Summary:
@public
Non-null owner pointer in Yoga node indicates that this node is already being used by some other subtree, so it must be cloned in case of possible (re)layout.
Theoretically, this node must/can be cloned by Yoga right before applying a new layout to this node, but Yoga has a special optimization that uses that fact that Yoga always cloning *all* children of a particular node altogether. This is not true for React; to meet React and Yoga worlds we double check the owner pointer in `addChild` and clone node preliminary if needed.
See also the previous diff for more context.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8709952
fbshipit-source-id: 84ef0faa0f1d9cc9a8136b550cf325bc20508d53
Summary:
It's wasteful to do it by value. I'm fairly sure this is
safe, especially because
fbd332dee8 (diff-ade2a4bbd6582e2898cbd9e0fa142ab5R215)
shows that we did access by reference before.
Reviewed By: priteshrnandgaonkar, davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D8822697
fbshipit-source-id: 791bcf0fa37453f67795af727c85c8adce3b0f69
Summary:
@public
Most of them are legit issues which should not be compilable anyways (but Clang tolerates thems).
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8655539
fbshipit-source-id: 645729fb9d6a120ce1ab2b07542abcdacd72320d
Summary:
@public
This is follow up for D8601600 and D8247652 (the last one has detailed explanation of the problem).
From this commit I propose that we have to follow simple rule:
If some prop has a default value which differs from the default value of its type, we have to specify it as {<value>} in .h file and explicitly in .m file, for all other props the default value must not be specified explicitly (in .h files it must be specified as {}).
The reason is that we have to embrase those cases and establish behaviour: if we change the default value in .h file, it always means that we have to change the value in .cpp file too.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8601776
fbshipit-source-id: 3379aace4e2d72febb2b942a3da1cb24decf54be
Summary:
@public
It fixes a problem when some Views got disaper after they have non-zero opacity.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8601600
fbshipit-source-id: 3da3ee591d4a685a8d7a56b15519d4d5cae4a031
Summary:
@public
The current Fabric architecture, in general, does not support "subscribing" for events, so all kinds of events are always delivered no matter have JavaScript components `on`-handlers for them or not.
At this point, we are not sure should it be this way or not. But we are sure that for some extremely noisy events (like onLayout) we have to make an exception right now (otherwise overall performance will suffer).
So, this diff implements that for `onLayout`.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8597408
fbshipit-source-id: 6933b7cb96e24f0660bd7850b625ff27e3146a2b
Summary:
@public
Another small but important piece of Accessibility Support.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8528921
fbshipit-source-id: d4ba87bab702d76a90e9ddb751999193243cdc74
Summary:
@public
After reading about move-semantic and rvalue refs I realized that we (I) definitely overuse `auto &&` (aka universal reference) construction. Even if this is harmless, does not look good and idiomatic.
Whenever I used that from a semantical point of view I always meant "I need an alias for this" which is actually "read-only reference" which is `const auto &`.
This is also fit good to our policy where "everything is const (immutable) by default".
Hence I change that to how it should be.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8475637
fbshipit-source-id: 0a691ededa0e798db8ffa053bff0f400913ab7b8
Summary:
@public
This diff changes how we store and manage Yoga Config in layoutable shadow nodes.
Previously we have `shared_ptr` to single shared yoga config (one to many relationships); now we initiate and store yoga config with yoga node (one to one relationship).
Cons:
- Less memory efficient.
Pros:
- Much more flexible model. Configuration can be tweaked on a per-node basis.
- More performant. Dealing with `shared_ptr` is expensive because of atomic ref-counter. (This is not really applicable for the previous approach but would be applicable for any alternate approach where we want to have more granular control of the configuration.) Data locality is also great in the new model which should positively impact performance.
- Simplicity. Any alternate approach where we manage sets of nodes which share the same configuration is going to be quite complex.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8475638
fbshipit-source-id: 5d73116718ced8e4b2d31d857bb9aac69eb69f2b
Summary:
@public
... and we initalize this in Surface.
We need this for requesting images with proper size/pixel-density, setup proper parameters for rasterizing CALayer's and rounding layout metric values.
Then we have to figure out how to wire this up with YGConfig.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8475639
fbshipit-source-id: cec7af581b94efb4595dcf3f232252ce87a1fde3
Summary: This style/prop is called `position` (not `positionType`) in RN/JS API.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8473509
fbshipit-source-id: f381189e05e6b618f3c74f1bc4610e737981b388
Summary: The matrix magic and parsing approach are mixins between current iOS and Android implementation.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8344054
fbshipit-source-id: 524b48c5ab61959ce740373534d0d435eb37b647
Summary:
Just definition; we don't have an implementation on the native view layer yet.
And we don't have `transform` prop yet (because it's quite complex).
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8344058
fbshipit-source-id: 3b7b41480be8295cbc90b95ebe8562e52c6f81d7
Summary:
* numbers in JS are doubles in native land, since there's no notion of int or int64 in JS - so simply convert numbers to int instead of assuming it's int
* the parsing of Yoga props with `'...%'` string value has a bug: it should be copying the number instead of the `%`
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D8370873
fbshipit-source-id: 44e9e3f0530c000c963e8e9ca66e8b0a48d80bcd
Summary:
Using `EventHandlers` name was a bad idea, and I cannot tolerate it anymore.
The worst part of it is that when you have a collection of `EventHandlers` objects you cannot use plural word to describe it because `EventHandlers` is an already plural word.
And, this object is actually an event emitter, the thing on which we call events.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8247723
fbshipit-source-id: b3303a4b9529bd6d32bb8ca0378287ebefaedda8
Summary: The data model of Touch events and payload serialization. The implementation mimics W3C standard and current React Native implementation.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8246711
fbshipit-source-id: 955b2068674f290d8bdb82da1ebfb796dd32971b
Summary:
YogaLayoutableShadowNode::yogaNodeCloneCallbackConnector is a hot path.
Previous implementation did not use provided `childIndex` which is correct for most cases.
See comments in code for more details.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8070120
fbshipit-source-id: d1a6abe82688387752b66a57b13dc356abb22c96
Summary: This also illustrates how we should use EventHandlers objects.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8053357
fbshipit-source-id: cba084c8a871e40c7536720fce290c3467d33061
Summary:
Given that fact that life-time of YGNode and ShadowNode objects must be idential and that we always allocate ShadowNode on heap,
we can embed YGNode object right inside ShadowNode object and use pointer to it safely.
That allows us to save additional memory allocation for every single layoutable shadow node! Whoo-hoo!
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8070121
fbshipit-source-id: 6eefbca1b7ac0a8aad235513b4c4899d414835f2
Summary:
I recently realized (Thanks David!) that we should not use `shared_ptr` for storing YGNode*
because ShadowNode does not share ownership of the Yoga node with anybody.
So the lifecycle of shadow node and yoga node must be synchronized (this is already the case but changing to unique_ptr makes this explicit and a bit more performant).
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8030417
fbshipit-source-id: c7f85ea309598d2a5ebfed55b1d182d3fe1336ae
Summary:
Now ConcreteComponentDescriptor can infer `ComponentName` from `ShadowNodeT` automatically,
so in the most cases we even don't need to create a subclass of that.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8016965
fbshipit-source-id: d910597093c9f4c9f32ca06cb3ef1b12538b9543
Summary: We don't use them at all; moreover they complicate adding/changing signatures of those methods (because arguments with defaults must be grouped at the end and some arguments cannot have defaults).
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7981456
fbshipit-source-id: d7dd098e83630d1ab3342d2ca52ade9c4e27b2c3
Summary: Note: not all scrollview props and features (especially event listeners and imperative calls) are supported yet.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7961868
fbshipit-source-id: 5277674fe976e089fd963066f78e705ad846d78d
Summary:
A few fixes:
* missing include: folly/Optional.h
* switch folly::Optional's `has_value()` to `hasValue()` for now until folly is upgraded to newer version
* fix up import for RCTTextAttributes.h
* fix up includes for "conversions.h" to use namespaced includes
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D8021149
fbshipit-source-id: d3955986d3ab6b1d9b61ac1e385767893ce57e5e
Summary: Conceptually, it always must be node owner's responsibility, but for the root node, we have to make an exception because there is no another parent node and there is no another component which has access to YogaNode.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7958251
fbshipit-source-id: 0bdaea87adbd323c758bc3c28f325be615aa90f3
Summary:
Yoga represents concepts like `margin`, `padding` and `position` as `edges` (aka std::array<YGValue, YGEdgeCount>).
This diff improves conversion of this data structure to string (primarily for debugging purposes).
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7958241
fbshipit-source-id: 6931c7b5d2395c28821c8daef62f609b13f112c6
Summary:
Same as previous one.
Adopting template-generated `convertRawProp` and `debugStringConvertibleItem` functions in `view` module.
Note, to do so we have to change signatures of some conversions functions to make them more overloading-friendly.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7958242
fbshipit-source-id: 10199d1fbb43329de93604aa383c884f5cc64dc5
Summary:
Same as previous one.
Adopting template-generated `convertRawProp` and `debugStringConvertibleItem` functions in `graphics` module.
Note, to do so we have to change signatures of some conversions functions to make them more overloading-friendly.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7958252
fbshipit-source-id: 0f33a2e6aad60befacee31486acdb9b6114d3e07
Summary: This is continue of the work started in D7797561.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7901244
fbshipit-source-id: 2f7a5cd9fa8c0079787e26e19c7c6c4255e54b42
Summary:
This a natiral continue of previous/ongoing work towards modernizing props pipeline.
Less defines, less code, more obvious code.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7901246
fbshipit-source-id: 3387b6d13e21e6ec48a38c9e3708762dfe536105
Summary:
This diff contains several tight to each other changes (which can/should not be split into several diffs):
* The props parsing/conversion process was de-virtualized: we don't use virtual `apply` method to parse props anymore. Instead, we use old-fashioned constructors.
* All fields of Props classes which represent props values were marked as `const` which make impossible to modify them after the objects were created (even if we have non-const value-of/pointer-to the whole Props object). Those fields are also `public` now.
* All custom handwritten getters were removed (because we don't need them anymore).
So, now we don't need all those custom getters which makes code much more compact, performant and codegen-friendly.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7901245
fbshipit-source-id: 9f4b1fd2da64bf963b63215ed3bd74b9d3c58dd5
Summary: `RootShadowNode` is a dedicated class for managing the root node.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7857050
fbshipit-source-id: f15f4b177f03cea4c0fd5a60d761ee2745319d77
Summary:
Apparently, we don't need this functionality in Fabric because we compute mutation instactions during diffing anyways.
But we still need (will need) `LayoutContext` for sure.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7857045
fbshipit-source-id: 4be2744d9abea473ead847f35f698104f94af33d
Summary:
I was shamed by Sebastian's sebmarkbage concerns (totally unrelated to this topic) about introducing another level of indirection into the system and decided to change my original plan not to support text attributes for the <Paragraph> component.
So, now <Paragraph> shares <View>, <Text> and <Paragraph> itself capabilities. That reduces the minimum amount of required components for trivial text fragment from three (Paragraph, Text, RawText) to two (Paragraph and RawText).
Special thanks for C++ for supporting multiple inheritance.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7785889
fbshipit-source-id: dd9f2e2650bfbfd76d7d4b538adaf409f9429df3
Summary: Trivial. Those are artefacts from copy-pasting from `ViewShadowNode`.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7738576
fbshipit-source-id: 2d362cd0ff56420d54cdd0e339458ebe57049ddc
Summary:
YogaLayoutableShadowNode::enableMeasurement() connects Yoga's measuring API and Fabric measuring API.
`enableMeasurement` should be called for leaf Yoga nodes with custom content which should be measured manually during layout.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D7738574
fbshipit-source-id: ffe883905c4809290d4d973ad29dc5f0e1ec7573
Summary:
It's more useful and consistent now because:
- We print compound layout metrics from the correct storage (not from Yoga nodes);
- It works fro any kind of layout now (but we still have just one);
- It's much clear and straight-forward.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7607422
fbshipit-source-id: 4c3cd2848e785a7f77c7f591e376d00c7c09ade9
Summary:
The previous approach simply didn't work. :(
As you might notice, in previous implementation of ViewShadowNode::cloneAndReplaceChild we used `ViewShadowNode` class for cloning `childNode`, and this is incorrect becasue `childNode` might be instance of any class.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7595016
fbshipit-source-id: 2215414926f2f7a2e2fd05ca2d065f10d6d32b74
Valentin Shergin
Taras Tsugrii
Scott Wolchok
Kevin Gozali
Jonathan Kim