Summary:
public
This diff introduces an internal transforms pipeline that integrates with the external one. This has been a feature we've been looking to implement for a long time to use babel instead of `replace` with regexps on many parts of the packager.
Also, to split the bundle we'll need to run one transform. Internally for Facebook we can run the system-import transform altogether withe the other ones. For OSS we offer `transformer.js` which people can use out of the box if they're writing ES6 code. For those people, `transformer.js` will also run the internal transforms`. However they might want to tune the transforms, or even write the code on another language that compiles to Javascript and use a complete different transformer. On those cases we'll need to run the external transforms first and pipe the output through the internal transforms. Note that the order it's important as the internal transforms assume the code is written in JS, though the original code could be on other scripting languages (CoffeeScript, TypeScript, etc).
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D2725109
fb-gh-sync-id: d764e209c78743419c4cb97068495c771372ab90
Summary: fixes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/3997
the root cause is in
Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:22:47 GMT ReactNativePackager:SocketServer uncaught error Error: listen EACCES C:\Users\donald\AppData\Local\Temp\react-packager-9248a9803ac72b509b389b456696850d
This means that the socket server cannot create the socket.
cfr https://gist.github.com/domenic/2790533 the socket name is not a valid windows socket name.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4071
Reviewed By: mkonicek
Differential Revision: D2699546
Pulled By: davidaurelio
fb-gh-sync-id: 6c6494c14c42bb17506b8559001419c9f85e91e3
Summary: This adds a build option for using Prepack (an experimental packager) to
build a bundle. It doesn't actually take on the npm package dependency
because it's not published/open source (yet).
This will be used while we experiment and should be maintained as the
build system changes so that we can continue getting fresh builds.
I found that saveBundleAndMap and processBundle were over abstracted and
got in my way so I inlined it and removed the unit tests because the unit
test was testing trivial code that is likely to change interface.
I went with a separate build phase and a separate Bundle class even though
there are a lot of commonalities. I imagine that the requirements for
Prepack will continue to diverge. Especially for source maps but a larger
refactor could try to unify these a bit more. The fact that modules are
wrapped before the write phase seems to be an unfortunate architecture
that makes this difficult.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4226
Reviewed By: amasad
Differential Revision: D2673760
Pulled By: sebmarkbage
fb-gh-sync-id: 299ccc42e4be1d9dee19ade443ea3388db2e39a8
Summary: @public
Since we added packager-managed assets -- internally we still think of asset dependency as a single "module". In reality there are multiple files that represent this module. This becomes important with the `getDependencies` API which is used by Buck to inform it on what to rebuild. Since `getDependencies` deals with modules, and is more of an internal API, I've introduced a new one and would go on to deprecate this.
Reviewed By: @frantic
Differential Revision: D2487207
Summary: @public
Have a top-level debug namespace: `ReactNativePackager`
And add a couple of debugs in the transformer. This is ground work for adding a verbose option.
Reviewed By: @DmitrySoshnikov
Differential Revision: D2489960
Summary: @public
We swallow errors like it's nobody's business :(
Having an error handler that `reject`s after the promise has been resolved is a no-op. In node, if there is no `error` event handler then the error would throw.
So after we start listening and we want to resolve the promise, we remove the error listener so that we make sure errors actually throw.
Finally, I made the `uncaughtError` handler log `error.stack` so we can get an idea of what's going on.
Reviewed By: @martinbigio
Differential Revision: D2468472
Summary: @public
The server dies after 30 seconds if it has no jobs on it's queue. The problem is that the jobs counter gets decreased before returning the bytes to the client. As a consequence, it's possible that the server dies while it's returning the bytes to the client, or just after it finished returning the bytes to the client.
To avoid both issues lets move the counter decrease a few lines below and bump the timer to make sure we have time to fully write the bytes on the socket and let the client close the connection before the server dies.
Reviewed By: @vjeux
Differential Revision: D2445264
Summary:
1. When the server starts up, it only gives itself 30 second to live before receiving any connections/jobs
2. There is a startup cost with starting the server and handshaking
3. The server dies before the client has a chance to connect to it
Solution:
1. While the server should die pretty fast after it's done it's work, we should have a longer timeout for starting it
2. I also added accompanying server logs with client connection errors
Summary:
Saw an issue with a build because of an ENONT error: https://fb.facebook.com/groups/716936458354972/permalink/923628747685741/
My hypothesis:
1. We issue a ping to the socket (in SocketInterface/index.js) a decides if the available socket is alive
2. We see that it's alive but by the time we actually connect to it the server would've died
Solution:
1. The server shouldn't die as long as there are clients connected to it (currently it only stay alive as long as there are jobs)
2. The "ping" should only disconnect once the client is connected
3. Finally, have a better error message than ENOENT
Summary:
Fix failing test that matches the exact error string to match using `contains`.
I was under the impression that jest tests were running in CI -- turns out not yet.
Summary:
A few potential races to fix:
1. Multiple clients maybe racing to delete a zombie socket
2. Servers who should die because other servers are already listening are taking the socket with them (move `process.on('exit'` code to after the server is listening
3. Servers which are redundant should immediatly die
Summary:
Buck (our build system) currently starts multiple packager instances for each target and may build multiple targets in parallel. This means we're paying startup costs and are duplicating the work. This enables us to start one instance of the packager and connect to it via socket to do all the work that needs to be done.
The way this is structured:
1. SocketServer: A server that listens on a socket path that is generated based on the server options
2. SocketClient: Interfaces with the server and exposes the operations that we support as methods
3. SocketInterface: Integration point and responsible for forking off the server
