Summary:
Given async nature of RN, it is quite possible situation, hence it should not be a redbox.
And in Fabric it happends all the time which makes debugging painful.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8473511
fbshipit-source-id: cfe7a1d3d105fde3b23db4c4c07b99864215c94c
Summary:
See the comment in code.
This picture also illustrates the problem: https://cl.ly/250z0D1B0c17.
https://pxl.cl/ckBq
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7343566
fbshipit-source-id: e45a691add5e43434dea8708be4b76ff18e52131
Summary: In some embedding/interop cases (RN inside, something else outside), the interop layer has to have the ability to control (intercept, delay, perform synchronously with another stuff) mounting process. This API allows doing that.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7014179
fbshipit-source-id: 04036095f7e60a5ff7e69025ff6066fea92eb361
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
This is reimagining of interoperability layer between Yoga and ShadowViews (at least in Yoga -> RN part).
Goals:
* Make it clear and easy.
* Make clear separation between "what layout what", now parent always layout children, noone layout itself.
* Make possible to interleave Yoga layout with custom imperative layout (may be used in SafeAreaView, Text, Modal, InputAccessoryView and so on).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6863654
fbshipit-source-id: 5a6a933874f121d46f744aab99a31ae42ddd4a1b
Summary:
It's unused.
Use `display` prop instead to control visiblity of the view.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D6888104
fbshipit-source-id: dd37a365033ec36bdfcfa305ec6a965a10dec2cd
Summary:
This is a complete rewrite of RCTText, the part of React Native which manages Text and TextInput components.
Key points:
* It's understandable now. It follows a simple architectural pattern, and it's easy to debug and iterate. Text flow layout is a first-class citizen in React Native layout system now, not just a wired special case. It also brings entirely new possibilities such as nested interleaving <Text> and <View> components.
* All <Text>-specific APIs were removed from UIManager and co (it's about ~16 public methods which were used exclusively only by <Text>).
* It relies on new Yoga measurement/cloning API and on-dirty handler. So, it removes built-in dirty propagation subsystem from RN completely.
* It caches string fragments properly and granularly on a per-node basis which makes updating text-containing components more performant.
* It does not instantiate UIView for virtual components which reduces memory utilization.
* It drastically improves <TextInput> capabilities (e.g. rich text inside single line <TextInput> is now supported).
Screenshots:
https://cl.ly/2j3r1V0L0324https://cl.ly/3N2V3C3d3q3R
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6617326
fbshipit-source-id: 35d4d81b35c9870e9557d0211c0e934e6072a41e
Summary: Because setting `intrinsicContentSize` for `RCTSurfaceRootView` doesn't have much sense.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6701107
fbshipit-source-id: 259cdd27339bba3e8c9f98b6ca34affeb87f298c
Summary: Now we do not add newly created view to the registry at the preluminary step.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6641403
fbshipit-source-id: c69077aaba871f3cdb3500c75e1efe07546e1b7f
Summary: This is a leftover from recent changes in D6595780 where a prop application step was moved out to separare mount block.
Differential Revision: D6640736
fbshipit-source-id: 70de0f55f992a7912e222ec4bf9ade1c9bad99f2
Summary:
Nobody uses it.
If the reference to the bridge is available (which is should be case for testing purposes at least), it is easy to get same information.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6596376
fbshipit-source-id: 066eeb1e9465b4e0cc9d9b5b6bf41722450870e4
Summary: The `-[RCTShadowView viewName]` prop must exist, we don't need special handling for this case.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6596375
fbshipit-source-id: 3e99a62bd6296e0285156f03dc2ac93db7f630e5
Summary:
Motivation:
* Current implementation of `didUpdateReactSubviews` relies on `processUpdatedProperties:parentProperties:` method of RCTShadowView, which we plan to remove.
* The existing implementation does not call handlers on unmounted nodes (because they are not part of traversing tree), which is not correct.
* The current implementation is tight with RCTComponentData, which is conceptually wrong, it should be a UIManager thing.
* The new implementation must be much more performant because of simplicity. (We can measure it only after removing `processUpdatedProperties`.)
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6595780
fbshipit-source-id: a517207c17b5d5db839c9ce99a37136292acf78c
Summary: As it was mentioned in previous diffs, we are removing this because it overcomplicates rendering layer and provides (almost) no benefits (and cannot be implemented 100% accurate way).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6582560
fbshipit-source-id: 0778db96a45dd8e2520268d5d00792677cb01a20
Summary:
We are removing `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`.
Why?
* It is a performance drain. Supporting this requires dispatching main-thread block on every single transaction complete;
* It has "too broad" non-conceptual semantic which encouraged using this as a "band-aid solution" for poorly designed components;
* It is conceptually incompatible with new approaches that we are trying to implement to optimize the render layer;
* It was deprecated for very long time.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6549729
fbshipit-source-id: 58094aab982c67cec3d7fa3b616c637cb84d697f
Summary:
Because it is not simply flushing, it (in the future) is more complex process. And the names should represent logical meaning of the process, not particular implementation details.
It also nice to have unified terminology across our reactive UI frameworks.
See the next diffs.
Reviewed By: rsnara
Differential Revision: D6436770
fbshipit-source-id: 0a0b686e8ace89e30f6787a37c0a7965c5af757b
Summary:
New super simple abstraction in RCTUIManager.
Nothing really changed and RCTUIManager became shorter.
Reviewed By: rsnara
Differential Revision: D5990342
fbshipit-source-id: b38397b789a999168ac14625585065eda73d328f
Summary:
RCTSurface instance represents React Native-powered piece of a user interface
which can be a full-screen app, separate modal view controller,
or even small widget. It is called "Surface".
The RCTSurface instance is completely thread-safe by design;
it can be created on any thread, and any its method can be called from
any thread (if the opposite is not mentioned explicitly).
The primary goals of the RCTSurface are:
- ability to measure and layout the surface in a thread-safe and synchronous manner;
- ability to create a UIView instance on demand (later);
- ability to communicate the current stage of the surface granularly.
Differential Revision: D6202576
fbshipit-source-id: 8e644c87fcaad2b6a9c9304b58384d7192747556
Summary:
This is pretty normal and harmless case, we should not crash here.
I plan to refactor similar places in this file soon.
Reviewed By: AaaChiuuu
Differential Revision: D5983443
fbshipit-source-id: 922fea8ed12ebef45d249f16739aa81fe3254f19
Summary:
Reasons:
* It is more clear and readable;
* It is more semantical;
* It allows us to add some magic (and complexity, to be fair) to the RCTExecuteOnUIManagerQueue. (See next diffs in the stack.)
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D5935466
fbshipit-source-id: aeb18d6e11c047eb19182a656da581b6ce073602
Summary:
This fixes [#15801](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/15801)
We ran into a strange crash on iOS (debug only). After removing the clutter I was able to reproduce it in a tiny app. You can check it out [here.](https://github.com/simonracz/textinput_stress)
The UI in JS and native are not always in sync (which is okay). Due to this, a native view might call back into JS, which is no longer present in the shadow view hierarchy there. I think this should be also okay.
TextInput in some cases calls into [setIntrinsicContentView](6d67e2dbbc/React/Modules/RCTUIManager.m (L382)), where it triggers an overly enthusiastic `NSAssert` and crashes the app.
Check out [textinput_stress](https://github.com/simonracz/textinput_stress)
Rotate the simulator a few times to see the crash or the lack of crash.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16170
Differential Revision: D5959776
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: f39f5a3f1d86b330ecf7cbccd90871bc01fd69d9
Summary:
This is required for D5874536, wherein I'll be introducing direction-aware props for borders.
When a view's border changes due to a direction update, only the frames of its children update. Therefore, only the children `UIView`s get a chance to be re-rendered. This is incorrect because the view that's had its borders changed also needs to re-render. So, I keep a track of the layout direction in a property on all shadow views. Then, when I update that prop within `applyLayoutNode`, I push shadow views into the `viewsWithNewFrames` set.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D5944488
fbshipit-source-id: 3f23e9973f3555612920703cdb6cec38e6360d2d
Summary: Because `RCTUIManager` is already overcomplicated and that stuff deserves separate file and header.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D5856653
fbshipit-source-id: 7001bb8ba611976bf3b82d6a25f5619810a35b34
Summary: As per the comment, <Modal> uses entering/leaving the view hierarchy as a cue to show/hide the modal. By re-adding it, we are causing a bunch of confusion.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D5893607
fbshipit-source-id: ecd05799751a9bba843998ae93f24fe35edca8b4
Summary:
In some cases we need a way to specify some environmental data to shadow view
to improve layout (or do something similar), so `localData` serves these needs.
For example, any stateful embedded native views may benefit from this.
Have in mind that this data is not supposed to interfere with the state of
the shadow view.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D5884711
fbshipit-source-id: f0bf66e4608894ec4479b8aca262afcfba6b9f4b
Summary:
This should be much more performant (and it better illustrates the intension of the code).
The fix was suggested by Adlai-Holler.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D5851595
fbshipit-source-id: 45d172a5fa796549c6dcea8f35c5cbb2a4c2d2e0
Summary:
We have to have a way to track ownership of shadow view.
Previous solution with traversing the hierarchy to figure out the root view does not actually work in some cases when the view is temporary detached from hierarchy.
This is also how it work on Andorid.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D5686112
fbshipit-source-id: a23a10e8c29c7572ac69403289db136c9d5176a9
Summary:
Here, `reactTag` is an `NSNumber *` which uses `%@` as the format specifier. Newer versions of clang can warn or error on this. This change prevents that from happening.
See also #15402
Local builds with clang 5.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15414
Differential Revision: D5583703
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: a6d0d2246725cd096b1f3cd062ab5924740ab76c
Valentin Shergin
Liamandrew
Sophie Alpert
Semen Zhydenko
Dmitry Zakharov
Ramanpreet Nara
Simon Racz
Jason Carreiro
Mehdi Mulani
Brian Vaughn
Dave Lee
Pieter De Baets
Pieter De Baets
