Summary:
Related to: #15454
Motivation: Improve tvOS feeling for TouchableHighlight
![changewithaniamtion](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7658664/29193477-b99b4a10-7e25-11e7-8b31-e0e4ca9d7720.gif)
- When you select the button he is focus and the underlay is show
- When you press the button, there is an animation, but after the animation, the focus is on the button and the underlay is show
Play with tvParallaxProperties on tvOS, test with and without patch just to see the actual behaviour
```
<TouchableHighlight
tvParallaxProperties={{
enabled: true,
shiftDistanceX: 0,
shiftDistanceY: 0,
tiltAngle: 0,
magnification: 1.1,
pressMagnification: 1.0,
pressDuration: 0.3,
}}
underlayColor="black"
onShowUnderlay={() => (console.log("onShowUnderlay")}
onHideUnderlay={() => (console.log("onHideUnderlay")}
onPress={() => (console.log("onPress")}
>
<Image
style={styles.image}
source={ uri: 'https://www.facebook.com/images/fb_icon_325x325.png' }
/>
</TouchableHighlight>
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15455
Differential Revision: D6887437
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: e18b695068bc99643ba4006fb3f39215b38a74c1
Summary:
<!--
Thank you for sending the PR! We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes.
Help us understand your motivation by explaining why you decided to make this change.
You can learn more about contributing to React Native here: http://facebook.github.io/react-native/docs/contributing.html
Happy contributing!
-->
The scrollToOffset method of RCTScrollView for iOS does not include bound check for the scroll offset provided to the method. This can cause the whole view to scroll out of screen if the offset provided is greater than the bounds of the View.
The same does not happen on Android, where the scroll halts once the last item of the scrollView is in the viewport.
I have added bounds check so the offset resets to the MaxOffset which makes sure the view does not scroll out of the viewport.
The issue can be observed in the following snack:
https://snack.expo.io/H1363Uo8f
![ezgif com-optimize 1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16662518/36068270-2437ae88-0ef7-11e8-96dd-819b4ae0fd67.gif)
To test my changes I ran the code provided in the snack above with the react-native dependency pointing to my branch. As can be see in the video attached below, the scroll halts once it hits the end of the ScrollView even if the scroll offset provided is higher than the bounds of the ScrollView. It also does not scroll up for negative scroll offset.
![ezgif com-optimize](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16662518/36068130-9ae4f918-0ef3-11e8-8728-af7b2888bdb8.gif)
[IOS] [BUGFIX] [ScrollView] - Added bounds check to prevent ScrollView from scrolling to an offset which is out of bounds of the ScrollView for iOS.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17927
Differential Revision: D7014466
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: a817738d08e1057a4c70f43373132f88fa1461c4
Summary:
So, all initial operations can now be done synchronously (and on the main thread).
To do so, instancitate `RCTSurface` object and call `synchronouslyWaitForStage:timeout:` method like that:
RCTSurface *surface = [[RCTSurface alloc] initWithBridge:... moduleName:... initialProperties:...];
BOOL success = [surface synchronouslyWaitForStage:RCTSurfaceStageSurfaceDidInitialMounting timeout:timeout];
or
RCTSurfaceHostingView *surfaceHostingView = [[RCTSurfaceHostingView alloc] initWithBridge:... moduleName:... initialProperties:...];
BOOL success = [surfaceHostingView.surface synchronouslyWaitForStage:RCTSurfaceStageSurfaceDidInitialMounting timeout:timeout];
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7014178
fbshipit-source-id: c3c13904a3587ff2a222fa71623c40c8f30bc8af
Summary: In some embedding/interop cases (RN inside, something else outside), the interop layer has to have the ability to control (intercept, delay, perform synchronously with another stuff) mounting process. This API allows doing that.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7014179
fbshipit-source-id: 04036095f7e60a5ff7e69025ff6066fea92eb361
Summary:
See the comment in code.
If we on the main thread on registering time, we can/will break sequentiality of registering and mounting processes doing registration asynchronously.
We need this to make sync mouting eventually possible.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7014176
fbshipit-source-id: 110ad5e5d86e3422eac15c3b1bdb29ae04acd7e6
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
When running with the packager in the tvOS simulator, reloading from the packager hits an assert in `RCTEventEmitter`, causing a crash. The solution is for `RCTTVNavigationEventEmitter` to check for the existence of the bridge before attempting to send an event.
Manual testing.
[IOS] [BUGFIX] [RCTTVNavigationEventEmitter.m] - Fix crash when reloading in tvOS
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17797
Differential Revision: D7014975
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 0bf766e87267ca8592ff0cc0b3cb4621a8e8f9b5
Summary:
This is reimagining of interoperability layer between Yoga and ShadowViews (at least in Yoga -> RN part).
Goals:
* Make it clear and easy.
* Make clear separation between "what layout what", now parent always layout children, noone layout itself.
* Make possible to interleave Yoga layout with custom imperative layout (may be used in SafeAreaView, Text, Modal, InputAccessoryView and so on).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6863654
fbshipit-source-id: 5a6a933874f121d46f744aab99a31ae42ddd4a1b
Summary:
This change enables built-in Yoga mechanism which rounds producing layout metrics to closest "pixel" values.
See previous diff for more context.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D6889762
fbshipit-source-id: bc2eea44704db4b377e2e14fab9f67be8c935719
Summary:
> Okay, I don't remember where we first met
> But hey, admitting is the first step
This issue has a looong history.
The original algorithm was introduced by Nick Lockwood (nicklockwood Hey Nick! We miss you!) a while ago and from the very beginning this has one small error that basically makes it useless (try to find it yourself, it's fun!)
The problem was discovered and fixed twice (D4133643, D4983054), but every time we found that our <Text> infra was not ready for this, so we reverted and abandoned the change. As part of the last attempt to finally solve the issue, I ported the algorithm to Yoga where it lives today and works very well for Lytho and CK.
For now, the vision is clear:
* The basic algorithm should live in Yoga for unification and performance reasons.
* We still have to have `absolutePostion` as part of this API because it might be useful for some components which implement its own custom/non-Yoga-based layout.
* We have to enable it in RN eventually.
So, this is the first step: Removing old, broken code which we don't plan to fix and use.
Make React Native crisp again!
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D6888662
fbshipit-source-id: 2e5098d9935dcbe05d66c777dad3a9ec8ac87ec3
Summary:
It's unused.
Use `display` prop instead to control visiblity of the view.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D6888104
fbshipit-source-id: dd37a365033ec36bdfcfa305ec6a965a10dec2cd
Summary: Another juicy leftover from old Text implementation.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D6887942
fbshipit-source-id: d0363d06d566554c03d0ae3293597daf9c387028
Summary: This is leftovers from last <Text> reimplementation; nobody uses it and it does not hooked up with UIManager.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D6887795
fbshipit-source-id: 9e2e29af4ba959270096eeb494666d1cacaeba32
Summary:
I've talked to several major community users, and they're all ok with deleting this
code. There's several doc fixes which will make it easier for third
party developers which should land about the same time this will.
Also buried along with it is RCTJSCExecutor.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D6880781
fbshipit-source-id: b4cb1143def6fd23a96290e478fa728adbedacd3
Summary:
Trivial.
Special thanks to janicduplessis
Created from Diffusion's 'Open in Editor' feature.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D6863932
fbshipit-source-id: d40a30271adc5c8d47149ab920e2ac11158ab756
Summary:
This makes RCTTouchHandler follow the same logic when sending touch event
coordinates as `UIManager.measure`.
This is important as UIManager.measure is used in `Touchable.js` aka the mother
of all touch events in RN.
In particular, this will make touch events correctly handled for places where RN is embedded into other screens.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D6838102
fbshipit-source-id: 70cad52606ea931cb637d8aa2d4845818eea0647
Summary:
So in v0.52.0 space-evenly is introduced but not yet implemented (1050e0b by woehrl01). This pull request implements the space-evenly.
Manual Testing.
![notes marker](https://i.imgur.com/IXmezVY.png)
[IOS] [FEATURE] [Yoga] Adding space-evenly on justify-content in iOS
[ANDROID] [FEATURE] [Yoga] - Adding space-evenly on justify-content in Android
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17805
Differential Revision: D6858294
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 7a705ca05f58603ef4588e1bfd16c16a78f8a390
Summary:
Fix issues with the react-native CLI when linking iOS and tvOS libraries to a project created with `react-native init`. (#13783)
Verified the changes against test project at https://github.com/dlowder-salesforce/react-native-link-test. Both `react-native link react-native-svg` and `react-native unlink react-native-svg` work correctly on this project. Added new unit test for the new file added to `local-cli/link/ios`.
[CLI] [BUGFIX] `react-native link` has been fixed to correctly link iOS and tvOS targets.
[IOS] [BUGFIX] `react-native link` has been fixed to correctly link iOS and tvOS targets.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17231
Differential Revision: D6837567
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 234d3d3966ae1b89cd16a37c95d303553f7ba5f5
Summary: It's been more than two years; I think everyone already migrated and learned the new behavior.
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D6829885
fbshipit-source-id: a86d56fb7235a137e9ce6e360d7ae2224b047313
Summary:
[this commit](2e1707d0e6) which was just a small refactor broke refreshControl behavior - if we render FlatList with refreshing=true, the refreshControl won't be visible on initial render.
The problem is, the [previous beginRefreshing method](2e1707d0e6 (diff-cfafa8d7e42ab87ab863f917e187a4aeL51)) was renamed to `beginRefreshingProgramatically` and the old call was left in one place [here](2e1707d0e6 (diff-cfafa8d7e42ab87ab863f917e187a4aeR47)).
Now, I am not sure what kind of jumping the mentioned commit was fixing, but since this fix only concerns the initial render, I believe it will not influence the jumping fix.
I have tested this locally in my app, can provide a video if needed.
none
[IOS] [BUGFIX] [RefreshControl] - Make sure refreshControl shows up on initial render if specified
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17727
Differential Revision: D6827402
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 25849244e87af54f25d636b6ade7adcf88958980
Summary:
This is a complete rewrite of RCTText, the part of React Native which manages Text and TextInput components.
Key points:
* It's understandable now. It follows a simple architectural pattern, and it's easy to debug and iterate. Text flow layout is a first-class citizen in React Native layout system now, not just a wired special case. It also brings entirely new possibilities such as nested interleaving <Text> and <View> components.
* All <Text>-specific APIs were removed from UIManager and co (it's about ~16 public methods which were used exclusively only by <Text>).
* It relies on new Yoga measurement/cloning API and on-dirty handler. So, it removes built-in dirty propagation subsystem from RN completely.
* It caches string fragments properly and granularly on a per-node basis which makes updating text-containing components more performant.
* It does not instantiate UIView for virtual components which reduces memory utilization.
* It drastically improves <TextInput> capabilities (e.g. rich text inside single line <TextInput> is now supported).
Screenshots:
https://cl.ly/2j3r1V0L0324https://cl.ly/3N2V3C3d3q3R
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6617326
fbshipit-source-id: 35d4d81b35c9870e9557d0211c0e934e6072a41e
Summary:
Builds off of cae7179c94
- Make the prop a dictionary for more configuration options
- Rename `maintainPositionAtOrBeyondIndex` -> `maintainVisibleContentPosition` + `minIndexForVisible`
- Add autoscroll threshold feature
Given the async native of RN JS and background layout, there is no way to trigger the scrollTo from JS without risking a delay, so we add the feature in native code.
== Test Plan ==
ScrollViewExample:
https://youtu.be/pmY8pxC9PRs
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D6729160
fbshipit-source-id: 70f9bae460ce84567857a4f696da78ce9b3b834c
Summary:
Another trivial sugar/helper to access computed by Yoga layout metrics.
We will use it soon in the new Text render/layout engine.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6671979
fbshipit-source-id: d36933415c2fa50bae5cc171434d8f0b281955b7
Summary: Waiting for layout is now available on main thread.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6719836
fbshipit-source-id: ef655095e999df5f77e69c5931459cce1aaeb1f0
Summary:
== Problem / Background ==
Most lists paginate in a single direction (standard infinite list), but some paginate in both directions. Most common example is a chat thread where new messages show up on the bottom, and old content can be loaded by scrolling up. Comment threads are another example.
Right now, adding content to the bottom of a scroll view is smooth - the content doesn't jump. But when adding to the top of the scrollview, the content gets pushed down, which is jarring (note this may appear reversed because of inverting the list which is common for chat applications).
== Approach ==
The basic idea is simple - we set a flag in JS, then for every uimanager transaction, we record which is the first eligible and visible view in the ScrollView, and compare it's new origin to the old one. If it has changed, we update the contentOffset of the ScrollView to compensate.
This is done by observing `willPerformMounting` directly (only from scrollviews that have this new property set), and then observing the prev state with prependUIBlock and making the update synchronously in addUIBlock to avoid any flicker.
There is also a way to skip views that we don't care about, like a spinner at the top of the view that we don't want to stay in place - we actually want it to get pushed up by the new content, replaced visually in the viewport.
== Notes ==
Most chat applications will probably want to do a scrollToTop when new content comes in and the user is already scrolled at or near the bottom.
This is glitchy if visible children are re-ordered, which could be fixed with additional logic, but it doesn't come up in the type of applications we're targetting here so punting on that.
== Test Plan ==
https://youtu.be/4GcqDGz9eOE
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D6696921
fbshipit-source-id: 822e7dfcb207006cd1ba098356324ea81f619428
Summary: Because setting `intrinsicContentSize` for `RCTSurfaceRootView` doesn't have much sense.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6701107
fbshipit-source-id: 259cdd27339bba3e8c9f98b6ca34affeb87f298c
Summary:
Fix issue #17027 (`RCTModalHostView` has a tvOS dependency that was not wrapped in `TARGET_OS_TV`)
Existing test automation should pass.
[GENERAL] [BUGFIX] [tvOS] Fix cocoapods compile issue in RCTModalHostView
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17502
Differential Revision: D6688166
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 38297f439f75a8303f59f83b92e004c6c73d9bf6
Summary:
Essentially, we had `dispatch_async` inside `delloc` method which tried to retain `self`, which is disallowed operation in ObjC runtime.
However, we don't need to notify anything `surface`-related in `_stop` because it always is called from `dealloc`.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6665631
fbshipit-source-id: ed0d192946f3323f4f54ecb99b30e56e0942f174
Summary: Now we do not add newly created view to the registry at the preluminary step.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6641403
fbshipit-source-id: c69077aaba871f3cdb3500c75e1efe07546e1b7f
Summary: Because we already support this for all kinds of shadow views!
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6665636
fbshipit-source-id: ceee7e4952ede4bbe54aedde5545587a1d13ea5a
Summary: See `RCTShadowView+Layout.m` for more info about differences between CGFLOAT_MAX and INFINITY in Yoga and UIKit.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6665635
fbshipit-source-id: 270ba5366c3dfe78e38474de5380d7d5d251e628
Summary:
That's now possible thanks to new Yoga's clonning API.
That will speed up RCTSurface measuring (see the next diff in stack) and should illuminate a class of problems in CK interop layer.
We also will use it in the new text layout engine (in React Native).
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D6665632
fbshipit-source-id: e94909f0af89e9c7fc5e46b95090ecb3c52546a2
Summary:
Yoga and CoreGraphics have different opinions about how "infinity" value
should be represented.
Yoga uses `NAN` which requires additional effort to compare all those values,
whereas GoreGraphics uses `GFLOAT_MAX` which can be easyly compared with
standard `==` operator.
Messing with this can cause super weired bugs like 100% CPU load for couple of seconds somewhere in CoreGraphics.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6665633
fbshipit-source-id: b6236c6fa50d1f8fb0c9576203922f7b24b7301e
Summary:
Those are supposed to replace all `dirtyText`, `dirtyPropagation`, `isPropagationDirty`, `setTextComputed`, `isTextDirty` and so on.
We will use it widely soon (and remove all old ones).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6665634
fbshipit-source-id: 3c1db7154e90b71446756f2495627b163c779996
Summary:
The pull request adds the `--port` option to `run-ios` allowing a developer to build and launch a react-native app using a single command line like this:
```
react-native run-ios --port 8088
```
It defaults to the current port 8081.
This pull request fixes issue #9145 and issue #14113.
This patch also extends `run-android` to properly test and launch the packager with the specified port, extending the work done in PR: ##15316
1. Create a new react-native app, or simply clone this branch and then update your version of react-native using `yarn add file:./path/to/this/fork/of/react-native`
2. run `react-native run-ios --port 8088`
3. watch the packager start on the desired port (8088 in this case) and watch your app in your simulator connect to the packager and launch the app.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16172
Differential Revision: D6612534
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 50af449f5e4c32fb76ba95f4cb7bf179e35526d5
Summary:
Fix calculating layout in `RCTSurfaceRootShadowView` as the `minWidth` is set doubled in `calculateLayoutWithMinimumSize:maximumSize:`.
cc shergin
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17203
Differential Revision: D6642437
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 3483c952c9ecf0132182a156b7b916eb1e975424
Summary: This is a leftover from recent changes in D6595780 where a prop application step was moved out to separare mount block.
Differential Revision: D6640736
fbshipit-source-id: 70de0f55f992a7912e222ec4bf9ade1c9bad99f2
Summary:
It's always bothered that we have this protocol and I figured it could just be merged with RCTWrapperViewController.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17290
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6611544
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: a50b9d5adbeb2c48dbadbbfc1c77ccf6d1aae144
Summary:
Nobody uses it.
If the reference to the bridge is available (which is should be case for testing purposes at least), it is easy to get same information.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6596376
fbshipit-source-id: 066eeb1e9465b4e0cc9d9b5b6bf41722450870e4
Summary: The `-[RCTShadowView viewName]` prop must exist, we don't need special handling for this case.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6596375
fbshipit-source-id: 3e99a62bd6296e0285156f03dc2ac93db7f630e5
Summary:
Motivation:
* Current implementation of `didUpdateReactSubviews` relies on `processUpdatedProperties:parentProperties:` method of RCTShadowView, which we plan to remove.
* The existing implementation does not call handlers on unmounted nodes (because they are not part of traversing tree), which is not correct.
* The current implementation is tight with RCTComponentData, which is conceptually wrong, it should be a UIManager thing.
* The new implementation must be much more performant because of simplicity. (We can measure it only after removing `processUpdatedProperties`.)
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6595780
fbshipit-source-id: a517207c17b5d5db839c9ce99a37136292acf78c
Summary:
The previous file/class name convention seemed cool... but now it drives me BANANAS! It makes all this code really hard to maintain.
So, evething were renamed following common modern RN convention.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6605090
fbshipit-source-id: 88ca13d793a5d2adaac2b7922ec6bd4654aacec5
Summary: As it was mentioned in previous diffs, we are removing this because it overcomplicates rendering layer and provides (almost) no benefits (and cannot be implemented 100% accurate way).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6582560
fbshipit-source-id: 0778db96a45dd8e2520268d5d00792677cb01a20
Summary:
We are removing `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`.
Why?
* It is a performance drain. Supporting this requires dispatching main-thread block on every single transaction complete;
* It has "too broad" non-conceptual semantic which encouraged using this as a "band-aid solution" for poorly designed components;
* It is conceptually incompatible with new approaches that we are trying to implement to optimize the render layer;
* It was deprecated for very long time.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6549729
fbshipit-source-id: 58094aab982c67cec3d7fa3b616c637cb84d697f
Summary:
We are removing `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`.
Why?
* It is a performance drain. Supporting this requires dispatching main-thread block on every single transaction complete;
* It has "too broad" non-conceptual semantic which encouraged using this as a "band-aid solution" for poorly designed components;
* It is conceptually incompatible with new approaches that we are trying to implement to optimize the render layer;
* It was deprecated for very long time.
This diff replaces usage of `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction` with `uiManagerDidPerformMounting` which has very similar semantic except that fact that `uiManagerDidPerformMounting` is called asynchronously on the next run loop tick. And this should be okay because new React partial rendering does not guarantee synchronous execution anyways.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6549586
fbshipit-source-id: 589b814f83b91ed8fabf7e638e7554ab3c9d286e
Summary:
We are removing `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`.
Why?
* It is a performance drain. Supporting this requires dispatching main-thread block on every single transaction complete;
* It has "too broad" non-conceptual semantic which encouraged using this as a "band-aid solution" for poorly designed components;
* It is conceptually incompatible with new approaches that we are trying to implement to optimize the render layer;
* It was deprecated for very long time.
This diff replaces usage of `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction` with `uiManagerDidPerformMounting` which has very similar semantic except that fact that `uiManagerDidPerformMounting` is called asynchronously on the next run loop tick. And this should be okay because new React partial rendering does not guarantee synchronous execution anyways.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6549217
fbshipit-source-id: 2649e943e82e6fbe02c7678583a97db3f5800201
Summary:
Now setting explicit backgroundColor style is required for Views with background shadow,
otherwise the shadow will be generated based on content of the view (which is expected behaviour).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6582587
fbshipit-source-id: 0514cb3c57bad17d2af40810b0e0f7ddc96a2c31
Summary:
This was leftovers from old implementation of zIndex feature.
Janic janicduplessis refactored this and moved all logic to UIView layer, so we don't need this prop anymore in shadow realm.
More info: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14011
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6574414
fbshipit-source-id: 2cae19350765689784d7884ed875878d39b4e3f1
Summary: Following common ObjC pattern, we have to store delegates as weak pointers.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6558886
fbshipit-source-id: 11a710a7e9e17d7c6a78ae46b53b043f44ccf8e5
Summary:
We are removing `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`.
Why?
* It is a performance drain. Supporting this requires dispatching main-thread block on every single transaction complete;
* It has "too broad" non-conceptual semantic which encouraged using this as a "band-aid solution" for poorly designed components;
* It is conceptually incompatible with new approaches that we are trying to implement to optimize the render layer;
* It was deprecated for very long time.
This diff removes `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction` from RCTScrollView component. As I mentioned, because of the semantic of `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction` is extremely broad, it's hard to capture what exact case it should handle. Based on comments and existing logic, it seems it tight to `contentSize` property and the size of RCTScrollContentView.
Reviewed By: rsnara
Differential Revision: D6538419
fbshipit-source-id: ccc6f5fea327471f10f1738d3da5214c0d362953
Summary:
Because it is not simply flushing, it (in the future) is more complex process. And the names should represent logical meaning of the process, not particular implementation details.
It also nice to have unified terminology across our reactive UI frameworks.
See the next diffs.
Reviewed By: rsnara
Differential Revision: D6436770
fbshipit-source-id: 0a0b686e8ace89e30f6787a37c0a7965c5af757b