Summary:
ExtraBold is a fairly common suffix in font naming. A good example is "Circe-ExtraBold". It's usually synonymous with Heavy or Black at font weight 800, as described here: https://www.webtype.com/info/articles/fonts-weights/
This fixes a regression with ExtraBold fonts introduced in d3007b0 where simply having an extrabold font will cause `weightOfFont` to choose this weight aggressively, resulting in all bold text erroneously interpreted as extrabold/heavy. This fix ensures that extrabold is detected before bold, and correctly attributed to `UIFontWeightHeavy`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16323
Differential Revision: D6119059
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 56a5c30584f220974308a7d6068c8d952aa20fb8
Summary:
This usage of `...` currently causes BackHandler to silently become non-functional when a `Symbol` polyfill is used.
Why?
- The `[...obj]` operator implicitly calls the object's iterator to fill the array
- react-native's internal `Set` polyfill has a load order issue that breaks it whenever a project uses a `Symbol` polyfill
- This means that when `BackHandler` tries to `[...set]` a `Set` of subscriptions the result is always an empty array instead of an array of subscriptions
Additionally it's worth noting that the current code is also wastefully inefficient as in order to reverse iterate over subscriptions it:
- Clones the `Set` (which fills it by implicitly running the set's iterator)
- Uses `[...set]` to convert the cloned set into an array (which also implicitly runs the iterator on the clone)
- Finally reverses the order of the array
----
This code fixes this problem by replacing the use of multiple Set instance iterators with a simple `.forEach` loop that unshifts directly into the final array.
I've tested this by opening the repo's RNTester app on Android and tvOS ensuring that the back handler works before changes, the application crashes when I introduce an error (to verify my code changes are being applied to the app), the back handler works and after changes.
Fixes#11968
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15182
Differential Revision: D6114696
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 2eae127558124a394bb3572a6381a5985ebf9d64
Summary:
The relevant changes in the PR are to Libraries/StyleSheet/EdgeInsetsPropType.js; the rest are just removals of FlowIgnores.
The definition of the relevant types is [here](https://github.com/facebook/flow/blob/master/lib/react.js#L262-L271).
The long and short of it is that for whatever reason, Flow is unable to realize that `ReactPropsChainableTypeChecker` is a subtype of `ReactPropsCheckType` unless we assert it. Once we explicitly hint this to the typechecker, it realizes that `EdgeInsetsPropType` is indeed a valid React PropType, and stops complaining that it isn't.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16437
Differential Revision: D6109742
Pulled By: sahrens
fbshipit-source-id: e4e10720b68c912d0372d810409f389b65d7f4b1
Summary:
Touch cancel events are currently being ignored by the ScrollView component. Currently scrollview responds both to scroll events and touchStart/touchMove/touchEnd events.
The reason why ScrollView listens to touchStart/touchEnd is so that it can update its `state.isTouching` param. This parameter then is used in `scrollResponderHandleScrollShouldSetResponder` to make the decision if scrollview should set the responder or not. So if `isTouching` is true (we've received touchStart) then ScrollView want to became a JS responder. This in turn is important for the case where we receive scroll events that does not necessarily need to trigger responder change, e.g. we don't want Scrollview to become JS responder if scroll events have been triggered by `scrollTo` in which case setting responder would put the whole responder system in a bogus state (note that responder can be released only by touchEnd or touchCancel, so if there is no touchEnd that follows scroll event then ScrollView will remain the responder and this would break next touch interaction).
It is therefore crucial for the ScrollView to reset `isTouching` state when touchCancel arrives, as otherwise the next scroll event would incorrectly trigger responder change.
On top of that ScrollView seems to be the only component in RN's core that registers to handle touchEnd but ignores touchCancel, which stands agains the comment added to `RCTRootView.cancelTouches` [here](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/c14cc123d#diff-9cd70243bd2af75c613e29972bb1b41cR127).
This problem is difficult to test with a pure RN native app, as on Android it does not surface because of the `responderIgnoreScroll` flag that is being added to every scroll event, and it essentially makes the responder system ignore scroll events so they would never trigger responder change. On the other hand on iOS the cancel events are pretty rare. With pure RN app they can only be triggered by a "system" level interaction (e.g. when system alert dialog appears or when home button is clicked and there is a touch interaction happening). This issue becomes more prominent when RN app is embedded in a more sophisticated application that may use [`RCTRootView.cancelTouches`](1e8f3b1102/React/Base/RCTRootView.h (L130)) method to block RNs gesture recognizers in some cases or with third-party libraries that deals with touch events like [react-native-gesture-handler](https://github.com/kmagiera/react-native-gesture-handler) that also calls into the method when native touch interaction is detected.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16004
Differential Revision: D6003063
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: f6495ffc57a5f996117b5bd80478bb1a58d2d799
Summary:
Test suite for React Native version check relies on `ReactNativeVersion.js` file that is modified on a release branch (it contains values of a real version, not zeros).
That makes it impossible for the build to pass: https://circleci.com/gh/facebook/react-native/23494
This PR mocks it with zero values, just like we mock it in other suites. I am not sure if that is desired, but works for now.
CC ide
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16464
Differential Revision: D6100285
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 784f7e14f5283403f3fa518940565e1ef19dd398
Summary:
Update Integration with Existing Apps
Pod File missing link to podspecs that are not in the master CocoaPods spec repo
Be able to trust documentation when I come back to the page later.
[DOCS][ENHANCEMENT][docs/IntegrationWithExistingApps.md] Add private podspec path to iOS 'Integration with Existing Apps' example.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16461
Differential Revision: D6099907
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: f5ca94465355172e9d1df39469b66aa3b6a8624c
Summary:
Adds the dependency to the Babel preset's package.json and enables the plugin only when `**` exists in a source file.
This is https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12339 with merge conflicts resolved and putting the plugin behind a cheaper heuristic.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16191
Differential Revision: D6023857
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 16f4a5f14780c27d2ef95fa7e8d8b611fa992aa0
Summary:
**Motivation**
Give `TouchableOpacity` and `Button` the same TV focus support as is already present in `TouchableHighlight`.
**Test plan**
Manual testing on TV simulator and devices.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15561
Differential Revision: D5665976
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 0d5c588e1c82471f23617a3df1b77abc589a7c63
Summary:
Change the header description and example code.
Thanks for submitting a PR! Please read these instructions carefully:
- [x] Explain the **motivation** for making this change.
- [x] Provide a **test plan** demonstrating that the code is solid.
- [x] Match the **code formatting** of the rest of the codebase.
- [x] Target the `master` branch, NOT a "stable" branch.
What existing problem does the pull request solve?
Clarify extra requirements for a Component.
A good test plan has the exact commands you ran and their output, provides screenshots or videos if the pull request changes UI or updates the website. See [What is a Test Plan?][1] to learn more.
Go to documentation, see changes.
If you have added code that should be tested, add tests.
Sign the [CLA][2], if you haven't already.
Small pull requests are much easier to review and more likely to get merged. Make sure the PR does only one thing, otherwise please split it.
Make sure all **tests pass** on both [Travis][3] and [Circle CI][4]. PRs that break tests are unlikely to be merged.
For more info, see the ["Pull Requests"][5] section of our "Contributing" guidelines.
[1]: https://medium.com/martinkonicek/what-is-a-test-plan-8bfc840ec171#.y9lcuqqi9
[2]: https://code.facebook.com/cla
[3]: https://travis-ci.org/facebook/react-native
[4]: http://circleci.com/gh/facebook/react-native
[5]: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/13829
Differential Revision: D5661106
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 39736c05f8017009cdd637930c9f89ae6c2ee7c3
Summary:
The core React Native codebase already has full support for CocoaPods. However, `react-native link` doesn’t play nicely with CocoaPods, so installing third-party libs from the RN ecosystem is really hard.
This change will allow to link projects that contains its own `.podspec` file to CocoaPods-based projects. In case `link` detect `Podfile` in `iOS` directory, it will look for related `.podspec` file in linked project directory, and add it to `Podfile`. If `Podfile` and `.podspec` files are not present, it will fall back to previous implementation.
**Test Plan**
1. Build a React Native project where the iOS part uses CocoaPods to manage its dependencies. The most common scenario here is to have React Native be a Pod dependency, among others.
2. Install a RN-related library, that contains `.podspec` file, with `react-native link` (as an example it could be: [react-native-maps](https://github.com/airbnb/react-native-maps)
3. Building the resulting iOS workspace should succeed (and there should be new entry in `Podfile`)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15460
Differential Revision: D6078649
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 9651085875892fd66299563ca0e42fb2bcc00825
Summary:
Small fix:
Fix typo in run-instrumentation-tests-via-adb-shell.sh. "reponse" is a misspelling of "response"
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16408
Differential Revision: D6080538
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 6fc4962fea3f52e1f384fcad3639626866fe131f
Summary:
This should have said React Native.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16418
Differential Revision: D6080529
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: df184c48daa71a3fa2045d2a7a75b86e3c2e6f09
Summary:
This provides a way to customize the return type of a sync exported method, instead of just using `id`.
```
RCT_EXPORT_SYNCHRONOUS_TYPED_METHOD(NSString *, sync1:(NSString *)x)
{
return @"hello";
}
```
The return type needs to be a sub type of `id` - so scalars like `double` won't work (the bridge will crash).
Differential Revision: D6068884
fbshipit-source-id: 43a98141f1d0aef335aa0b33a24219f8e574e58b
Summary:
This is meant to show a possible route format for a persistent form of Yoga. Where previous layouts can remain intact while still taking advantage of incremental layout by reusing previous subtrees.
```c
YGNodeRef YGNodeClone(const YGNodeRef node);
```
The core of this functionality is a new API to clone an existing node. This makes a new detached node with all the same values as the previous one. Conceptually this makes the original node "frozen" from that point on. It's now immutable. (This is not yet enforced at runtime in this PR but something we should add.)
Since the original is frozen, we reuse the children set from the original node. Their parent pointers still point back to the original tree though.
The cloned node is still mutable. It can have its styles updated, and nodes can be inserted or deleted. If an insertion/deletion happens on a cloned node whose children were reused, it'll first shallow clone its children automatically.
As a convenience I also added an API to clear all children:
```c
void YGNodeRemoveAllChildren(const YGNodeRef node);
```
During insert/delete, or as a result of layout a set of reused children may need to be first cloned. A kind of copy-on-write. When that happens, the host may want to respond. E.g. by updating the `context` such as by cloning any wrapper objects and attaching them to the new node.
```c
typedef void (*YGNodeClonedFunc)(YGNodeRef oldNode,
YGNodeRef newNode,
YGNodeRef parent,
int childIndex);
void YGConfigSetNodeClonedFunc(YGConfigRef config,
YGNodeClonedFunc callback);
```
This PR doesn't change any existing semantics for trees that are not first cloned.
It's possible for a single node to exist in two trees at once and be used by multiple threads. Therefore it's not safe to recursively free a whole tree when you use persistence. To solve this, any user of the library has to manually manage ref counting or tracing GC. E.g. by replicating the tree structure in a wrapper.
In a follow up we could consider moving ref counting into Yoga.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/636
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D5941921
Pulled By: sebmarkbage
fbshipit-source-id: c8e93421824c112d09c4773bed4e3141b6491ccf
Jonathan Keljo
Gustavo Gard
Sam Mueller
Alexey Lang
Daniel Friesen
Keyan Zhang
Miguel Jimenez Esun
ashoat
Tao Huang
Ramanpreet Nara
Krzysztof Magiera
Dan Caspi
Mike Grabowski
Vincent Bernier
Brian Vaughn
Dylan Vann
Jing Chen
dlowder-salesforce
Huyanh Hoang
Miron Pawlik
Brent Vatne
Andres Suarez
mori-dev
Héctor Ramos
Andrew Chen (Eng)
Kevin Gozali
Sebastian Markbage
Marc Horowitz
