status-im/re-frame
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/re-frame.git synced 2025-02-23 07:18:22 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Experiment with line width for easy reading.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mike Thompson 2016-08-30 00:00:15 +10:00
parent 6db396381f
commit 11821950b5
1 changed files with 20 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

40
docs/The-ref-frame-logo.md
View File

@ -7,40 +7,40 @@
Created by the mysterious, deep thinker, known only as @martinklepsch.
Some say he appears on high value stamps in Germany and that he once <br>
punched a horse to the ground. Others say he loves recursion so much <br>
that, in his wallet, he carries a photograph of his wallet.
punched a horse to the ground. Others say he loves recursion so much that, <br>
in his wallet, he carries a photograph of his wallet.
All we know for sure is that he wields [Sketch.app](https://www.sketchapp.com/)<br>
like Bruce Lee wielded nunchucks.
All we know for sure is that he wields [Sketch.app](https://www.sketchapp.com/) like Bruce Lee <br>
wielded nunchucks.
### Genesis Theories
Great, unexplained works encourage fan theories, and <br>
the re-frame logo is no exception.
Great, unexplained works encourage fan theories, and the re-frame <br>
logo is no exception.
One noisy group think @martinklepsch simply wanted to <br>
`Put the 'f' back into infinity`. They have t-shirts.
`Put the 'f' back into infinity`. They have t-shirts.
Another group speculates that he created the logo as a <br>
bifarious rainbow homage to Frank Lloyd Wright's masterpiece, <br>
the Guggenheim Museum. A classic case of premature abstraction <br>
and over engineering if you ask me. Their theory, not the Guggenheim.
Another group speculates that he created the logo as a bifarious <br>
rainbow homage to Frank Lloyd Wright's masterpiece, the Guggenheim <br>
Museum. A classic case of premature abstraction and over engineering <br>
if you ask me. Their theory, not the Guggenheim.
![](/images/logo/Guggenheim.jpg)
The infamous "Bad Touch" faction look at the logo and see the <br>
cljs logo mating noisily with re-frame's official architecture <br>
diagram. Attend one of their parties and you have a 50% chance of arrest.
The infamous "Bad Touch" faction look at the logo and see the cljs <br>
logo mating noisily with re-frame's official architecture diagram. <br>
Attend one of their parties and you have a 50% chance of arrest.
![](/images/logo/Genesis.png)
The Functional Fundamentalists, a stern bunch, see the logo as <br>
a flowing poststructuralist rebuttal of OO's vowel duplication <br>
and horizontal adjacency. Their approach, FF, is apparently fine <br>
because "everyone loves a fricative".
The Functional Fundamentalists, a stern bunch, see the logo as a <br>
flowing poststructuralist rebuttal of OO's vowel duplication and <br>
horizontal adjacency. Their alternative pproach, FF, is apparently <br>
fine because "everyone loves a fricative".
For his part, @martinklepsch has never confirmed any theory, <br>
teasing us instead with coded clues like "Will you please stop emailing me"<br>
For his part, @martinklepsch has never confirmed any theory, teasing <br>
us instead with coded clues like "Will you please stop emailing me" <br>
and "Why did you say I hit a horse?".
### Assets Where?