From 11821950b598eda3a45a1292d569dd0f7cfe420e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Thompson <mike.thompson@day8.com.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:15 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Experiment with line width for easy reading.

---
 docs/The-ref-frame-logo.md | 40 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/The-ref-frame-logo.md b/docs/The-ref-frame-logo.md
index f96b388..0b580af 100644
--- a/docs/The-ref-frame-logo.md
+++ b/docs/The-ref-frame-logo.md
@@ -7,40 +7,40 @@
 Created by the mysterious, deep thinker, known only as @martinklepsch.
 
 Some say he appears on high value stamps in Germany and that he once <br>
-punched a horse to the ground. Others say he loves recursion so much <br>
-that, in his wallet, he carries a photograph of his wallet.
+punched a horse to the ground. Others say he loves recursion so much that, <br>
+in his wallet, he carries a photograph of his wallet.
 
-All we know for sure is that he wields [Sketch.app](https://www.sketchapp.com/)<br>
-like Bruce Lee wielded nunchucks.
+All we know for sure is that he wields [Sketch.app](https://www.sketchapp.com/) like Bruce Lee <br>
+wielded nunchucks.
 
 ### Genesis Theories
 
-Great, unexplained works encourage fan theories, and <br>
-the re-frame logo is no exception.
+Great, unexplained works encourage fan theories, and the re-frame <br>
+logo is no exception.
 
 One noisy group think @martinklepsch simply wanted to <br>
-`Put the 'f' back into infinity`. They have t-shirts. 
+`Put the 'f' back into infinity`. They have t-shirts.
 
-Another group speculates that he created the logo as a <br>
-bifarious rainbow homage to Frank Lloyd Wright's masterpiece, <br>
-the Guggenheim Museum. A classic case of premature abstraction <br>
-and over engineering if you ask me. Their theory, not the Guggenheim.
+Another group speculates that he created the logo as a bifarious  <br>
+rainbow homage to Frank Lloyd Wright's masterpiece, the Guggenheim <br>
+Museum. A classic case of premature abstraction and over engineering <br>
+if you ask me. Their theory, not the Guggenheim.
 
 ![](/images/logo/Guggenheim.jpg)
 
-The infamous "Bad Touch" faction look at the logo and see the <br>
-cljs logo mating noisily with re-frame's official architecture <br>
-diagram. Attend one of their parties and you have a 50% chance of arrest. 
+The infamous "Bad Touch" faction look at the logo and see the cljs <br>
+logo mating noisily with re-frame's official architecture diagram. <br>
+Attend one of their parties and you have a 50% chance of arrest. 
 
 ![](/images/logo/Genesis.png)
 
-The Functional Fundamentalists, a stern bunch, see the logo as <br>
-a flowing poststructuralist rebuttal of OO's vowel duplication <br>
-and horizontal adjacency. Their approach, FF, is apparently fine <br>
-because "everyone loves a fricative".
+The Functional Fundamentalists, a stern bunch, see the logo as a <br>
+flowing poststructuralist rebuttal of OO's vowel duplication and <br>
+horizontal adjacency. Their alternative pproach, FF, is apparently <br>
+fine because "everyone loves a fricative".
 
-For his part, @martinklepsch has never confirmed any theory, <br>
-teasing us instead with coded clues like "Will you please stop emailing me"<br>
+For his part, @martinklepsch has never confirmed any theory, teasing <br>
+us instead with coded clues like "Will you please stop emailing me" <br>
 and "Why did you say I hit a horse?".
 
 ### Assets Where?