mirror of
https://github.com/status-im/eth2.0-specs.git
synced 2025-02-22 15:28:11 +00:00
* Introduce consensus code for Whisk * polish, simplify, clean up (~100 fewer lines) @asn-d6: As discussed, I fixed a few bugs along the way but likely also introduced some bugs :) * minor cleanups and fixes * simplify is_k_commitment_unique * Update beacon-chain.md * Update beacon-chain.md * Initialize `k` in `get_validator_from_deposit()` * minor cleanups * Update beacon-chain.md * Create beacon-chain.md This PR changes the Whisk tracker format to be of the form `(r * pubkey, r * BLS_GT_GENERATOR)` instead of `(r * k * BLS_G1_GENERATOR, r * BLS_G1_GENERATOR)`. This allows for non-interactive tracker registrations from validator pubkeys, removing ~50 lines the code. It also significantly reduces the amount of state overhead. This PR also removes permutation commitments, though those can be easily readded if deemed necessary. * A couple of fixes to the no-registration simplification @asn-d6: Readded a consistency check for `IsValidWhiskOpeningProof` (involving `pubkey` instead of `k_commitment`). * remove unused helpers * use Mary's suggested tracker * Update beacon-chain.md * Revert G_t element optimization This needs its own ethresearch post, and some additional analysis to see if we can do the shuffle ZKP in the allowed timeframe. This reverts commit 8517acabfc1dbb1a35789e6170b5db0bb2c19c9a. * Implement new shuffling strategy Ditch the Feistel logic and instead have each shuffler pick the row they shuffle using their RANDAO reveal. * Curdleproofs edits * working whisk eth2spec * working whisk dummy test * add more boilerplate set up code * rebase constants * Implement even newer and simplified shuffling strategy This commit further simplifies 0faef30fc131d1b471b63a7f16772eeeef548ef8 by removing the entire squareshuffle. The latest version of https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/560 proposes that each shuffler picks random indices from the entire candidate set instead of organizing validators into a square. * Move to _features * remove dummy test * Run doctoc * Change Whisk's previous fork to Capella instead of Bellatrix. Make linter happier. * Fix lint * Fix pylint * Fix mypy issues * Clean-up get_beacon_proposer_index * Fix doc headers * Fix capella link * Update apply_deposit * Rename process_shuffled_trackers --------- Co-authored-by: George Kadianakis <desnacked@riseup.net> Co-authored-by: Justin <drakefjustin@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nalin Bhardwaj <nalinbhardwaj@nibnalin.me> Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
139 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown
139 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown
# Whisk -- Fork Logic
|
|
|
|
**Notice**: This document is a work-in-progress for researchers and implementers.
|
|
|
|
## Table of contents
|
|
|
|
<!-- TOC -->
|
|
<!-- START doctoc generated TOC please keep comment here to allow auto update -->
|
|
<!-- DON'T EDIT THIS SECTION, INSTEAD RE-RUN doctoc TO UPDATE -->
|
|
|
|
- [Introduction](#introduction)
|
|
- [Configuration](#configuration)
|
|
- [Fork to Whisk](#fork-to-whisk)
|
|
|
|
<!-- END doctoc generated TOC please keep comment here to allow auto update -->
|
|
<!-- /TOC -->
|
|
|
|
## Introduction
|
|
|
|
This document describes the process of Whisk upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
"""
|
|
WHISK_FORK_EPOCH
|
|
| cooldown
|
|
| | ||
|
|
v vsvv
|
|
--+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----+-
|
|
shuffling ^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proposer selection
|
|
candidate selection
|
|
"""
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Configuration
|
|
|
|
Warning: this configuration is not definitive.
|
|
|
|
| Name | Value |
|
|
| -------------------- | ----------------------- |
|
|
| `WHISK_FORK_VERSION` | `Version('0x05000000')` |
|
|
| `WHISK_FORK_EPOCH` | `Epoch(18446744073709551615)` **TBD** |
|
|
|
|
## Fork to Whisk
|
|
|
|
If `state.slot % SLOTS_PER_EPOCH == 0` and `compute_epoch_at_slot(state.slot) == WHISK_FORK_EPOCH`, an irregular state change is made to upgrade to Whisk. `WHISK_FORK_EPOCH` must be a multiple of `WHISK_RUN_DURATION_IN_EPOCHS`.
|
|
|
|
The upgrade occurs after the completion of the inner loop of `process_slots` that sets `state.slot` equal to `WHISK_FORK_EPOCH * SLOTS_PER_EPOCH`.
|
|
|
|
This ensures that we drop right into the beginning of the shuffling phase but without `process_whisk_epoch()` triggering for this Whisk run. Hence we handle all the setup ourselves in `upgrade_to_whisk()` below.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
def whisk_candidate_selection(state: BeaconState, epoch: Epoch) -> None:
|
|
# TODO
|
|
# pylint: disable=unused-argument
|
|
pass
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
def whisk_proposer_selection(state: BeaconState, epoch: Epoch) -> None:
|
|
# TODO
|
|
# pylint: disable=unused-argument
|
|
pass
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
def upgrade_to_whisk(pre: bellatrix.BeaconState) -> BeaconState:
|
|
epoch = bellatrix.get_current_epoch(pre)
|
|
post = BeaconState(
|
|
# Versioning
|
|
genesis_time=pre.genesis_time,
|
|
genesis_validators_root=pre.genesis_validators_root,
|
|
slot=pre.slot,
|
|
fork=Fork(
|
|
previous_version=pre.fork.current_version,
|
|
current_version=WHISK_FORK_VERSION,
|
|
epoch=epoch,
|
|
),
|
|
# History
|
|
latest_block_header=pre.latest_block_header,
|
|
block_roots=pre.block_roots,
|
|
state_roots=pre.state_roots,
|
|
historical_roots=pre.historical_roots,
|
|
# Eth1
|
|
eth1_data=pre.eth1_data,
|
|
eth1_data_votes=pre.eth1_data_votes,
|
|
eth1_deposit_index=pre.eth1_deposit_index,
|
|
# Registry
|
|
validators=[],
|
|
balances=pre.balances,
|
|
# Randomness
|
|
randao_mixes=pre.randao_mixes,
|
|
# Slashings
|
|
slashings=pre.slashings,
|
|
# Participation
|
|
previous_epoch_participation=pre.previous_epoch_participation,
|
|
current_epoch_participation=pre.current_epoch_participation,
|
|
# Finality
|
|
justification_bits=pre.justification_bits,
|
|
previous_justified_checkpoint=pre.previous_justified_checkpoint,
|
|
current_justified_checkpoint=pre.current_justified_checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint=pre.finalized_checkpoint,
|
|
# Inactivity
|
|
inactivity_scores=pre.inactivity_Scores,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Initialize all validators with predictable commitments
|
|
for val_index, pre_validator in enumerate(pre.validators):
|
|
whisk_commitment, whisk_tracker = get_initial_commitments(get_unique_whisk_k(post, ValidatorIndex(val_index)))
|
|
|
|
post_validator = Validator(
|
|
pubkey=pre_validator.pubkey,
|
|
withdrawal_credentials=pre_validator.withdrawal_credentials,
|
|
effective_balance=pre_validator.effective_balance,
|
|
slashed=pre_validator.slashed,
|
|
activation_eligibility_epoch=pre_validator.activation_eligibility_epoch,
|
|
activation_epoch=pre_validator.activation_epoch,
|
|
exit_epoch=pre_validator.exit_epoch,
|
|
withdrawable_epoch=pre_validator.withdrawable_epoch,
|
|
whisk_commitment=whisk_commitment,
|
|
whisk_tracker=whisk_tracker,
|
|
)
|
|
post.validators.append(post_validator)
|
|
|
|
# Do a candidate selection followed by a proposer selection so that we have proposers for the upcoming day
|
|
# Use an old epoch when selecting candidates so that we don't get the same seed as in the next candidate selection
|
|
whisk_candidate_selection(post, epoch - WHISK_PROPOSER_SELECTION_GAP - 1)
|
|
whisk_proposer_selection(post, epoch)
|
|
|
|
# Do a final round of candidate selection.
|
|
# We need it so that we have something to shuffle over the upcoming shuffling phase.
|
|
whisk_candidate_selection(post, epoch)
|
|
|
|
return post
|
|
```
|