34 KiB

Raw Blame History

Ethereum 2.0 spec—Casper and sharding

tags: `spec`, `eth2.0`, `casper`, `sharding`

spec version: 2.2 (October 2018)

NOTICE: This document is a work-in-progress for researchers and implementers. It reflects recent spec changes and takes precedence over the Python proof-of-concept implementation.

Introduction

At the center of Ethereum 2.0 is a system chain called the "beacon chain". The beacon chain stores and manages the set of active proof-of-stake validators. In the initial deployment phases of Ethereum 2.0 the only mechanism to become a validator is to make a fixed-size one-way ETH deposit to a registration contract on the Ethereum 1.0 PoW chain. Induction as a validator happens after registration transaction receipts are processed by the beacon chain and after a queuing process. Deregistration is either voluntary or done forcibly as a penalty for misbehavior.

The primary source of load on the beacon chain are "attestations". Attestations simultaneously attest to a shard block and a corresponding beacon chain block. A sufficient number of attestations for the same shard block create a "crosslink", confirming the shard segment up to that shard block into the beacon chain. Crosslinks also serve as infrastructure for asynchronous cross-shard communication.

Terminology

Validator - a participant in the Casper/sharding consensus system. You can become one by depositing 32 ETH into the Casper mechanism.
Active validator set - those validators who are currently participating, and which the Casper mechanism looks to produce and attest to blocks, crosslinks and other consensus objects.
Committee - a (pseudo-) randomly sampled subset of the active validator set. When a committee is referred to collectively, as in "this committee attests to X", this is assumed to mean "some subset of that committee that contains enough validators that the protocol recognizes it as representing the committee".
Proposer - the validator that creates a block
Attester - a validator that is part of a committee that needs to sign off on a block.
Beacon chain - the central PoS chain that is the base of the sharding system.
Shard chain - one of the chains on which user transactions take place and account data is stored.
Crosslink - a set of signatures from a committee attesting to a block in a shard chain, which can be included into the beacon chain. Crosslinks are the main means by which the beacon chain "learns about" the updated state of shard chains.
Slot - a period of SLOT_DURATION seconds, during which one proposer has the ability to create a block and some attesters have the ability to make attestations
Dynasty transition - a change of the validator set
Dynasty - the number of dynasty transitions that have happened in a given chain since genesis
Cycle - a span of blocks during which all validators get exactly one chance to make an attestation (unless a dynasty transition happens inside of one)
Finalized, justified - see Casper FFG finalization here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437
Withdrawal period - number of slots between a validator exit and the validator balance being withdrawable
Genesis time - the Unix time of the genesis beacon chain block at slot 0

Constants

Constant	Value	Unit	Approximation
`SHARD_COUNT`	2**10 (= 1,024)	shards
`DEPOSIT_SIZE`	2**5 (= 32)	ETH
`MIN_COMMITTEE_SIZE`	2**7 (= 128)	validators
`GENESIS_TIME`	TBD	seconds
`SLOT_DURATION`	2**4 (= 16)	seconds
`CYCLE_LENGTH`	2**6 (= 64)	slots	~17 minutes
`MIN_DYNASTY_LENGTH`	2**8 (= 256)	slots	~1.1 hours
`SQRT_E_DROP_TIME`	2**16 (= 65,536)	slots	~12 days
`WITHDRAWAL_PERIOD`	2**19 (= 524,288)	slots	~97 days
`BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT`	2**15 (= 32,768)	—
`MAX_VALIDATOR_CHURN_QUOTIENT`	2**5 (= 32)	—

Notes

The SQRT_E_DROP_TIME constant is the amount of time it takes for the quadratic leak to cut deposits of non-participating validators by ~39.4%.
The BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT constant is the per-slot interest rate assuming all validators are participating, assuming total deposits of 1 ETH. It corresponds to ~3.88% annual interest assuming 10 million participating ETH.
At most 1/MAX_VALIDATOR_CHURN_QUOTIENT of the validators can change during each dynasty.

Status codes

Status code	Value
`PENDING_LOG_IN`	`0`
`LOGGED_IN`	`1`
`PENDING_EXIT`	`2`
`PENDING_WITHDRAW`	`3`
`WITHDRAWN`	`4`
`PENALIZED`	`128`
`ENTRY`	`1`
`EXIT`	`2`

PoW chain registration contract

The initial deployment phases of Ethereum 2.0 are implemented without consensus changes to the PoW chain. A registration contract is added to the PoW chain to deposit ETH. This contract has a registration function which takes as arguments pubkey, withdrawal_shard, withdrawal_address, randao_commitment as defined in a ValidatorRecord below. A BLS proof_of_possession of types bytes is given as a final argument.

The registration contract emits a log with the various arguments for consumption by the beacon chain. It does not do validation, pushing the registration logic to the beacon chain. In particular, the proof of possession (based on the BLS12-381 curve) is not verified by the registration contract.

Data structures

Beacon chain blocks

A BeaconChainBlock has the following fields:

{
    # Slot number
    'slot': 'int64',
    # Proposer RANDAO reveal
    'randao_reveal': 'hash32',
    # Recent PoW chain reference (block hash)
    'pow_chain_reference': 'hash32',
    # Skip list of ancestor block hashes (i'th item is 2**i'th ancestor (or zero) for i = 0, ..., 31)
    'ancestor_hashes': ['hash32'],
    # Active state root
    'active_state_root': 'hash32',
    # Crystallized state root
    'crystallized_state_root': 'hash32',
    # Attestations
    'attestations': [AttestationRecord],
    # Specials (e.g. logouts, penalties)
    'specials': [SpecialRecord]
}

An AttestationRecord has the following fields:

{
    # Slot number
    'slot': 'int64',
    # Shard number
    'shard': 'int16',
    # Block hashes not part of the current chain, oldest to newest
    'oblique_parent_hashes': ['hash32'],
    # Shard block hash being attested to
    'shard_block_hash': 'hash32',
    # Attester participation bitfield (1 bit per attester)
    'attester_bitfield': 'bytes',
    # Slot of last justified block
    'justified_slot': 'int64',
    # Hash of last justified block
    'justified_block_hash': 'hash32',
    # BLS aggregate signature
    'aggregate_sig': ['int256']
}

A SpecialRecord has the following fields:

fields = {
    # Type
    'type': 'int8',
    # Data
    'data': ['bytes']
}

Beacon chain state

For convenience we define the beacon chain state in two parts: "active state" and "crystallized state".

The ActiveState has the following fields:

{
    # Most recent 2 * CYCLE_LENGTH block hashes, oldest to newest
    'recent_block_hashes': ['hash32'],
    # Attestations not yet processed
    'pending_attestations': [AttestationRecord],
    # Specials not yet been processed
    'pending_specials': [SpecialRecord]
}

The CrystallizedState has the following fields:

{
    # Dynasty number
    'dynasty': 'int64',
    # Dynasty seed (from randomness beacon)
    'dynasty_seed': 'hash32',
    # Dynasty start
    'dynasty_start_slot': 'int64',
    # List of validators
    'validators': [ValidatorRecord],
    # Most recent crosslink for each shard
    'crosslinks': [CrosslinkRecord],
    # Last crystallized state recalculation
    'last_state_recalculation_slot': 'int64',
    # Last finalized slot
    'last_finalized_slot': 'int64',
    # Last justified slot
    'last_justified_slot': 'int64',
    # Number of consecutive justified slots
    'justified_streak': 'int64',
    # Committee members and their assigned shard, per slot
    'shard_and_committee_for_slots': [[ShardAndCommittee]],
    # Total deposits penalized in the given withdrawal period
    'deposits_penalized_in_period': ['int32'],
    # Hash chain of validator set changes (for light clients to easily track deltas)
    'validator_set_delta_hash_chain': 'hash32'
}

A ValidatorRecord has the following fields:

{
    # BLS public key
    'pubkey': 'int256',
    # Withdrawal shard number
    'withdrawal_shard': 'int16',
    # Withdrawal address
    'withdrawal_address': 'address',
    # RANDAO commitment
    'randao_commitment': 'hash32',
    # Balance
    'balance': 'int128',
    # Status code
    'status': 'int8',
    # Slot when validator exited (or 0)
    'exit_slot': 'int64'
}

A ShardAndCommittee object has the following fields:

{
    # Shard number
    'shard': 'int16',
    # Validator indices
    'committee': ['int24']
}

A CrosslinkRecord has the following fields:

{
    # Dynasty number
    'dynasty': 'int64',
    # Slot number
    'slot': 'int64',
    # Beacon chain block hash
    'hash': 'hash32'
}

Beacon chain processing

The beacon chain is the "main chain" of the PoS system. The beacon chain's main responsibilities are:

Store and maintain the set of active, queued and exited validators
Process crosslinks (see above)
Process its own block-by-block consensus, as well as the finality gadget

Processing the beacon chain is fundamentally similar to processing a PoW chain in many respects. Clients download and process blocks, and maintain a view of what is the current "canonical chain", terminating at the current "head". However, because of the beacon chain's relationship with the existing PoW chain, and because it is a PoS chain, there are differences.

For a block on the beacon chain to be processed by a node, four conditions have to be met:

The parent pointed to by the ancestor_hashes[0] has already been processed and accepted
An attestation from the proposer of the block (see later for definition) is included along with the block in the network message object
The PoW chain block pointed to by the pow_chain_reference has already been processed and accepted
The node's local clock time is greater than or equal to the minimum timestamp as computed by GENESIS_TIME + block.slot * SLOT_DURATION

If these conditions are not met, the client should delay processing the block until the conditions are all satisfied.

Block production is significantly different because of the proof of stake mechanism. A client simply checks what it thinks is the canonical chain when it should create a block, and looks up what its slot number is; when the slot arrives, it either proposes or attests to a block as required. Note that this requires each node to have a clock that is roughly (ie. within SLOT_DURATION seconds) synchronized with the other nodes.

Beacon chain fork choice rule

The beacon chain uses the Casper FFG fork choice rule of "favor the chain containing the highest-slot-number justified block". To choose between chains that are all descended from the same justified block, the chain uses "immediate message driven GHOST" (IMD GHOST) to choose the head of the chain.

For a description see: https://ethresear.ch/t/beacon-chain-casper-ffg-rpj-mini-spec/2760

For an implementation with a network simulator see: https://github.com/ethereum/research/blob/master/clock_disparity/ghost_node.py

Here's an example of its working (green is finalized blocks, yellow is justified, grey is attestations):

Beacon chain state transition function

We now define the state transition function. At the high level, the state transition is made up of two parts:

The per-block processing, which happens every block, and affects the ActiveState only
The crystallized state recalculation, which happens only if block.slot >= last_state_recalculation_slot + CYCLE_LENGTH, and affects the CrystallizedState and ActiveState

The crystallized state recalculation generally focuses on changes to the validator set, including adjusting balances and adding and removing validators, as well as processing crosslinks and managing block justification, and the per-block processing generally focuses on verifying aggregate signatures and saving temporary records relating to the in-block activity in the ActiveState.

Helper functions

We start off by defining some helper algorithms. First, the function that selects the active validators:

def get_active_validator_indices(validators):
    return [i for i, v in enumerate(validators) if v.status == LOGGED_IN]

Now, a function that shuffles this list:

def shuffle(lst, seed):
    # entropy is consumed in 3 byte chunks
    # rand_max is defined to remove the modulo bias from this entropy source
    rand_max = 2**24
    assert len(lst) <= rand_max

    o = [x for x in lst]
    source = seed
    i = 0
    while i < len(lst):
        source = hash(source)
        for pos in range(0, 30, 3):
            m = int.from_bytes(source[pos:pos+3], 'big')
            remaining = len(lst) - i
            if remaining == 0:
                break
            rand_max = rand_max - rand_max % remaining
            if m < rand_max:
                replacement_pos = (m % remaining) + i
                o[i], o[replacement_pos] = o[replacement_pos], o[i]
                i += 1
    return o

Here's a function that splits a list into N pieces:

def split(lst, N):
    return [lst[len(lst)*i//N: len(lst)*(i+1)//N] for i in range(N)]

Now, our combined helper method:

def get_new_shuffling(seed, validators, crosslinking_start_shard):
    active_validators = get_active_validator_indices(validators)
    if len(active_validators) >= CYCLE_LENGTH * MIN_COMMITTEE_SIZE:
        committees_per_slot = min(len(active_validators) // CYCLE_LENGTH // (MIN_COMMITTEE_SIZE * 2) + 1, SHARD_COUNT // CYCLE_LENGTH)
        slots_per_committee = 1
    else:
        committees_per_slot = 1
        slots_per_committee = 1
        while len(active_validators) * slots_per_committee < CYCLE_LENGTH * MIN_COMMITTEE_SIZE \
                and slots_per_committee < CYCLE_LENGTH:
            slots_per_committee *= 2
    o = []
    for i, slot_indices in enumerate(split(shuffle(active_validators, seed), CYCLE_LENGTH)):
        shard_indices = split(slot_indices, committees_per_slot)
        shard_start = crosslinking_start_shard + \
            i * committees_per_slot // slots_per_committee
        o.append([ShardAndCommittee(
            shard = (shard_start + j) % SHARD_COUNT,
            committee = indices
        ) for j, indices in enumerate(shard_indices)])
    return o

Here's a diagram of what's going on:

We also define two functions for retrieving data from the state:

def get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(crystallized_state, slot):
    earliest_slot_in_array = crystallized_state.last_state_recalculation_slot - CYCLE_LENGTH
    assert earliest_slot_in_array <= slot < earliest_slot_in_array + CYCLE_LENGTH * 2
    return crystallized_state.shard_and_committee_for_slots[slot - earliest_slot_in_array]

def get_block_hash(active_state, curblock, slot):
    earliest_slot_in_array = curblock.slot - CYCLE_LENGTH * 2
    assert earliest_slot_in_array <= slot < earliest_slot_in_array + CYCLE_LENGTH * 2
    return active_state.recent_block_hashes[slot - earliest_slot_in_array]

get_block_hash(_, _, s) should always return the block in the chain at slot s, and get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(_, s) should not change unless the dynasty changes.

We define a function to "add a link" to the validator hash chain, used when a validator is added or removed:

def add_validator_set_change_record(crystallized_state, index, pubkey, flag):
    crystallized_state.validator_set_delta_hash_chain = \
        hash(crystallized_state.validator_set_delta_hash_chain +
             bytes1(flag) + bytes3(index) + bytes32(pubkey))

Finally, we abstractly define int_sqrt(n) for use in reward/penalty calculations as the largest integer k such that k**2 <= n. Here is one possible implementation, though clients are free to use their own including standard libraries for integer square root if available and meet the specification.

def int_sqrt(n):
    x = n
    y = (x + 1) // 2
    while y < x:
        x = y
        y = (x + n // x) // 2
    return x

On startup

Run the following code:

def on_startup(initial_validator_entries):
    # Induct validators
    validators = []
    for pubkey, proof_of_possession, withdrawal_shard, withdrawal_address, \
            randao_commitment in initial_validator_entries:
        add_validator(validators, pubkey, proof_of_possession,
                      withdrawal_shard, withdrawal_address, randao_commitment)
    # Setup crystallized state
    cs = CrystallizedState()
    x = get_new_shuffling(bytes([0] * 32), validators, 0)
    cs.shard_and_committee_for_slots = x + x
    cs.dynasty = 1
    cs.crosslinks = [CrosslinkRecord(dynasty=0, slot=0, hash=bytes([0] * 32))
                            for i in range(SHARD_COUNT)]
    # Setup active state
    as = ActiveState()
    as.recent_block_hashes = [bytes([0] * 32) for _ in range(CYCLE_LENGTH * 2)]

The CrystallizedState() and ActiveState() constructors should initialize all values to zero bytes, an empty value or an empty array depending on context. The add_validator routine is defined below.

Routine for adding a validator

This routine should be run for every validator that is inducted as part of a log created on the PoW chain [TODO: explain where to check for these logs]. These logs should be processed in the order in which they are emitted by the PoW chain. Define min_empty_validator(validators) as a function that returns the lowest validator index i such that validators[i].status == WITHDRAWN, otherwise None.

def add_validator(validators, pubkey, proof_of_possession, withdrawal_shard,
                  withdrawal_address, randao_commitment):
    # if following assert fails, validator induction failed
    # move on to next validator registration log
    assert BLSVerify(pub=pubkey,
                     msg=hash(pubkey),
                     sig=proof_of_possession)
    rec = ValidatorRecord(
        pubkey=pubkey,
        withdrawal_shard=withdrawal_shard,
        withdrawal_address=withdrawal_address,
        randao_commitment=randao_commitment,
        balance=DEPOSIT_SIZE,  # in WEI
        status=PENDING_LOG_IN,
        exit_slot=0
    )
    index = min_empty_validator(validators)
    if index is None:
        validators.append(rec)
        return len(validators) - 1
    else:
        validators[index] = rec
        return index

Per-block processing

This procedure should be carried out every block.

First, set recent_block_hashes to the output of the following, where parent_hash is the hash of the immediate previous block (ie. must be equal to ancestor_hashes[0]):

def get_new_recent_block_hashes(old_block_hashes, parent_slot,
                                current_slot, parent_hash):
    d = current_slot - parent_slot
    return old_block_hashes[d:] + [parent_hash] * min(d, len(old_block_hashes))

The output of get_block_hash should not change, except that it will no longer throw for current_slot - 1, and will now throw for current_slot - CYCLE_LENGTH * 2 - 1. Also, check that the block's ancestor_hashes array was correctly updated, using the following algorithm:

def update_ancestor_hashes(parent_ancestor_hashes, parent_slot_number, parent_hash):
    new_ancestor_hashes = copy.copy(parent_ancestor_hashes)
    for i in range(32):
        if parent_slot_number % 2**i == 0:
            new_ancestor_hashes[i] = parent_hash
    return new_ancestor_hashes

A block can have 0 or more AttestationRecord objects

For each one of these attestations:

Verify that slot <= parent.slot and slot >= max(parent.slot - CYCLE_LENGTH + 1, 0)
Verify that the justified_slot and justified_block_hash given are in the chain and are equal to or earlier than the last_justified_slot in the crystallized state.
Compute parent_hashes = [get_block_hash(active_state, block, slot - CYCLE_LENGTH + i) for i in range(1, CYCLE_LENGTH - len(oblique_parent_hashes) + 1)] + oblique_parent_hashes (eg, if CYCLE_LENGTH = 4, slot = 5, the actual block hashes starting from slot 0 are Z A B C D E F G H I J, and oblique_parent_hashes = [D', E'] then parent_hashes = [B, C, D' E']). Note that when creating an attestation for a block, the hash of that block itself won't yet be in the active_state, so you would need to add it explicitly.
Let attestation_indices be get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(crystallized_state, slot)[x], choosing x so that attestation_indices.shard equals the shard value provided to find the set of validators that is creating this attestation record.
Verify that len(attester_bitfield) == ceil_div8(len(attestation_indices)), where ceil_div8 = (x + 7) // 8. Verify that bits len(attestation_indices).... and higher, if present (i.e. len(attestation_indices) is not a multiple of 8), are all zero
Derive a group public key by adding the public keys of all of the attesters in attestation_indices for whom the corresponding bit in attester_bitfield (the ith bit is (attester_bitfield[i // 8] >> (7 - (i %8))) % 2) equals 1
Verify that aggregate_sig verifies using the group pubkey generated and hash(slot.to_bytes(8, 'big') + parent_hashes + shard + shard_block_hash + justified_slot.to_bytes(8, 'big')) as the message.

Extend the list of AttestationRecord objects in the active_state with those included in the block, ordering the new additions in the same order as they came in the block. Similarly extend the list of SpecialRecord objects in the active_state with those included in the block.

Verify that the parent.slot % len(get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(crystallized_state, parent.slot)[0].committee)'th attester in get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(crystallized_state, parent.slot)[0] is part of the first (ie. item 0 in the array) AttestationRecord object; this attester can be considered to be the proposer of the parent block. In general, when a block is produced, it is broadcasted at the network layer along with the attestation from its proposer.

State recalculations (every `CYCLE_LENGTH` slots)

Repeat while slot - last_state_recalculation_slot >= CYCLE_LENGTH:

Adjust justified slots and crosslink status

For all slots s in last_state_recalculation_slot - CYCLE_LENGTH ... last_state_recalculation_slot - 1:

Determine the total set of validators that attested to that block at least once
Determine the total balance of these validators. If this value times three equals or exceeds the total balance of all active validators times two, set last_justified_slot = max(last_justified_slot, s) and justified_streak += 1. Otherwise, set justified_streak = 0
If justified_streak >= CYCLE_LENGTH + 1, set last_finalized_slot = max(last_finalized_slot, s - CYCLE_LENGTH - 1)

For all (shard, shard_block_hash) tuples, compute the total deposit size of validators that attested to that block hash for that shard. If this value times three equals or exceeds the total balance of all validators in the committee times two, and the current dynasty exceeds crosslinks[shard].dynasty, set crosslinks[shard] = CrosslinkRecord(dynasty=dynasty, slot=block.last_state_recalculation_slot + CYCLE_LENGTH, hash=shard_block_hash).

Let time_since_finality = block.slot - last_finalized_slot, and let B be the balance of any given validator whose balance we are adjusting, not including any balance changes from this round of state recalculation. Let:

total_deposits = sum([v.balance for i, v in enumerate(validators) if i in get_active_validator_indices(validators, dynasty)]) and total_deposits_in_ETH = total_deposits // 10**18
reward_quotient = BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT * int_sqrt(total_deposits_in_ETH) (1/reward_quotient is the per-slot max interest rate)
quadratic_penalty_quotient = SQRT_E_DROP_TIME**2 (after D slots about D*D/2/quadratic_penalty_quotient is the portion lost by offline validators)

For each slot S in the range last_state_recalculation_slot - CYCLE_LENGTH ... last_state_recalculation_slot - 1:

Let total_participated_deposits be the total balance of validators that voted for the correct hash in slot S (ie. the hash that actually is the hash of the block at that slot in the current chain); note that in the normal case, every validator will be in one of the CYCLE_LENGTH slots following the slot and so can vote for a hash in slot S. If time_since_finality <= 3 * CYCLE_LENGTH, then adjust participating and non-participating validators' balances as follows:
- Participating validators gain B // reward_quotient * (2 * total_participated_deposits - total_deposits) // total_deposits (note: this may be negative)
- Nonparticipating validators lose B // reward_quotient
Otherwise, adjust as follows:
- Participating validators' balances are unchanged
- Nonparticipating validators lose B // reward_quotient + B * time_since_finality // quadratic_penalty_quotient

Validators with status == PENALIZED also lose B // reward_quotient + B * time_since_finality // quadratic_penalty_quotient.

For each shard S for which a crosslink committee exists in the cycle prior to the most recent cycle (last_state_recalculation_slot - CYCLE_LENGTH ... last_state_recalculation_slot - 1), let V be the corresponding validator set. Let B be the balance of any given validator whose balance we are adjusting, not including any balance changes from this round of state recalculation. For each S, V:

Let total_v_deposits be the total balance of V
Let total_participated_v_deposits be the total balance of the subset of V that participated (note that total_participated_v_deposits <= total_v_deposits)
Let time_since_last_confirmation be block.slot - crosslinks[S].slot
Adjust balances as follows:
- If crosslinks[S].dynasty == dynasty, no reward adjustments
- Otherwise, participating validators' balances are increased by B // reward_quotient * (2 * total_participated_v_deposits - total_v_deposits) // total_v_deposits, and the balances of non-participating validators are decreased by B // reward_quotient + B * time_since_last_confirmation // quadratic_penalty_quotient

Let committees be the set of committees processed and time_since_last_confirmation(c) be the value of time_since_last_confirmation in that committee. Validators with status == PENALIZED lose B // reward_quotient + B * sum([time_since_last_confirmation(c) for c in committees]) // len(committees) // quadratic_penalty_quotient.

Process penalties, logouts and other special objects

For each SpecialRecord obj in active_state.pending_specials:

[covers logouts]: If obj.type == 0, interpret data[0] as a validator index as an int32 and data[1] as a signature. If BLSVerify(pubkey=validators[data[0]].pubkey, msg=hash("bye bye"), sig=data[1]), and validators[i].status == LOGGED_IN, set validators[i].status = PENDING_EXIT and validators[i].exit_slot = current_slot
[covers NO_DBL_VOTE, NO_SURROUND, NO_DBL_PROPOSE slashing conditions]: If obj.type == 1, interpret data[0] as a list of concatenated int32 values where each value represents an index into validators, data[1] as the data being signed and data[2] as an aggregate signature. Interpret data[3:6] similarly. Verify that both signatures are valid, that the two signatures are signing distinct data, and that they are either signing the same slot number, or that one surrounds the other (ie. source1 < source2 < target2 < target1). Let inds be the list of indices in both signatures; verify that its length is at least 1. For each validator index v in inds, set their end dynasty to equal the current dynasty plus 1, and if its status does not equal PENALIZED, then:

Set its exit_slot to equal the current slot
Set its status to PENALIZED
Set crystallized_state.deposits_penalized_in_period[slot // WITHDRAWAL_PERIOD] += validators[v].balance, extending the array if needed
Run add_validator_set_change_record(crystallized_state, v, validators[v].pubkey, EXIT)

Finally...

Set crystallized_state.last_state_recalculation_slot += CYCLE_LENGTH
Remove all attestation records older than slot crystallized_state.last_state_recalculation_slot
Empty the active_state.pending_specials list
Set shard_and_committee_for_slots[:CYCLE_LENGTH] = shard_and_committee_for_slots[CYCLE_LENGTH:]

Dynasty transition

A dynasty transition can happen after a state recalculation if all of the following criteria are satisfied:

block.slot - crystallized_state.dynasty_start_slot >= MIN_DYNASTY_LENGTH
last_finalized_slot > dynasty_start_slot
For every shard S in shard_and_committee_for_slots, crosslinks[S].slot > dynasty_start_slot

Then, run the following algorithm to update the validator set:

def change_validators(validators):
    # The active validator set
    active_validators = get_active_validator_indices(validators, dynasty)
    # The total size of active deposits
    total_deposits = sum([v.balance for i, v in enumerate(validators) if i in active_validators])
    # The maximum total wei that can deposit+withdraw
    max_allowable_change = max(
        DEPOSIT_SIZE * 2,
        total_deposits // MAX_VALIDATOR_CHURN_QUOTIENT
    )
    # Go through the list start to end depositing+withdrawing as many as possible
    total_changed = 0
    for i in range(len(validators)):
        if validators[i].status == PENDING_LOG_IN:
            validators[i].status = LOGGED_IN
            total_changed += DEPOSIT_SIZE
            add_validator_set_change_record(crystallized_state, i, validators[i].pubkey, ENTRY)
        if validators[i].status == PENDING_EXIT:
            validators[i].status = PENDING_WITHDRAW
            validators[i].exit_slot = current_slot
            total_changed += validators[i].balance
            add_validator_set_change_record(crystallized_state, i, validators[i].pubkey, EXIT)
        if total_changed >= max_allowable_change:
            break

    # Calculate the total ETH that has been penalized in the last ~2-3 withdrawal periods
    period_index = current_slot // WITHDRAWAL_PERIOD
    total_penalties = (
        (crystallized_state.deposits_penalized_in_period[period_index]) +
        (crystallized_state.deposits_penalized_in_period[period_index - 1] if period_index >= 1 else 0) +
        (crystallized_state.deposits_penalized_in_period[period_index - 2] if period_index >= 2 else 0)
    )
    # Separate loop to withdraw validators that have been logged out for long enough, and
    # calculate their penalties if they were slashed
    for i in range(len(validators)):
        if validators[i].status in (PENDING_WITHDRAW, PENALIZED) and current_slot >= validators[i].exit_slot + WITHDRAWAL_PERIOD:
            if validators[i].status == PENALIZED:
                validators[i].balance -= validators[i].balance * min(total_penalties * 3, total_deposits) // total_deposits
            validators[i].status = WITHDRAWN

            withdraw_amount = validators[i].balance
            ...
            # STUB: withdraw to shard chain

Finally:

Set last_dynasty_start_slot = crystallized_state.last_state_recalculation_slot
Set crystallized_state.dynasty += 1
Let next_start_shard = (shard_and_committee_for_slots[-1][-1].shard + 1) % SHARD_COUNT
Set shard_and_committee_for_slots[CYCLE_LENGTH:] = get_new_shuffling(block.ancestor_hashes[0], validators, next_start_shard)

TODO

Note: This spec is ~60% complete.

Missing

Specify how crystallized_state_root and active_state_root are constructed, including Merklelisation logic for light clients
Specify the rules around acceptable values for pow_chain_reference
Specify the shard chain blocks, blobs, proposers, etc.
Specify the rules for forced deregistrations
Specify the various assumptions (global clock, networking latency, validator honesty, validator liveness, etc.)
Specify (in a separate Vyper file) the registration contract on the PoW chain
Specify the bootstrapping logic for the beacon chain genesis (e.g. specify a minimum number validators before the genesis block)
Specify the logic for proofs of custody, including slashing conditions
Add an appendix about the BLS12-381 curve
Add an appendix on gossip networks and the offchain signature aggregation logic
Add a glossary (in a separate glossary.md) to comprehensively and precisely define all the terms
Undergo peer review, security audits and formal verification

Possible rework/additions

Replace the IMD fork choice rule with LMD
Merklelise crystallized_state_root and active_state_root into a single root
Replace Blake with a STARK-friendly hash function
Get rid of dynasties
Reduce the slot duration to 8 seconds
Allow for the delayed inclusion of aggregated signatures
Use a separate networking-optimised serialisation format for networking
Harden RANDAO against orphaned reveals
Introduce a RANDAO slashing condition for early leakage
Use a separate hash function for the proof of possession
Rework the ShardAndCommittee data structures
Add a double-batched Merkle accumulator for historical beacon chain blocks
Allow for deposits larger than 32 ETH, as well as deposit top-ups
Add penalties for a deposit below 32 ETH (or some other threshold)
Add a SpecialRecord to (re)register
Rework the document for readability
Clearly document the various edge cases, e.g. with committee sizing

Appendix

Appendix A - Hash function

We aim to have a STARK-friendly hash function hash(x) for the production launch of the beacon chain. While the standardisation process for a STARK-friendly hash function takes place—led by STARKware, who will produce a detailed report with recommendations—we use BLAKE2b-512 as a placeholder. Specifically, we set hash(x) := BLAKE2b-512(x)[0:32] where the BLAKE2b-512 algorithm is defined in RFC 7693 and the input x is of type bytes.

34 KiB Raw Blame History