eth2.0-specs/specs/phase0/weak-subjectivity.md

Ethereum 2.0 Phase 0 -- Weak Subjectivity Guide

Notice: This document is a work-in-progress for researchers and implementers.

Table of contents

• Introduction
• Prerequisites
• Constants
• Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint
• Weak Subjectivity Period
  • Calculating the Weak Subjectivity Period
• Weak Subjectivity Sync
  • Weak Subjectivity Sync Procedure
  • Checking for Stale Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint
• Distributing Weak Subjectivity Checkpoints

Introduction

This document is a guide for implementing the Weak Subjectivity protections in Phase 0 of Ethereum 2.0. This document is still a work-in-progress, and is subject to large changes. For more information about weak subjectivity and why it is required, please refer to:

• Weak Subjectivity in Eth2.0
• Proof of Stake: How I Learned to Love Weak Subjectivity

Prerequisites

This document uses data structures, constants, functions, and terminology from Phase 0 -- The Beacon Chain and Phase 0 -- Beacon Chain Fork Choice.

Constants

Name	Value
SAFETY_DECAY	uint64(10)

Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint

Any Checkpoint can used be a Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint. These Weak Subjectivity Checkpoints are distributed by providers, downloaded by users and/or distributed as a part of clients, and used as input while syncing a client.

Weak Subjectivity Period

The Weak Subjectivity Period is the number of recent epochs within which there must be a Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint to ensure that an attacker who takes control of the validator set at the beginning of the period is slashed at least a minimum threshold in the event that a conflicting Checkpoint is finalized.

SAFETY_DECAY is defined as the maximum percentage tolerable loss in the one-third safety margin of FFG finality. Thus, any attack exploiting the Weak Subjectivity Period has a safety margin of at least 1/3 - SAFETY_DECAY/100.

Calculating the Weak Subjectivity Period

Note: compute_weak_subjectivity_period() is planned to be updated when a more accurate calculation is made.

def compute_weak_subjectivity_period(state: BeaconState) -> uint64:
    weak_subjectivity_period = MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWABILITY_DELAY
    validator_count = len(get_active_validator_indices(state, get_current_epoch(state)))
    if validator_count >= MIN_PER_EPOCH_CHURN_LIMIT * CHURN_LIMIT_QUOTIENT:
        weak_subjectivity_period += SAFETY_DECAY * CHURN_LIMIT_QUOTIENT // (2 * 100)
    else:
        weak_subjectivity_period += SAFETY_DECAY * validator_count // (2 * 100 * MIN_PER_EPOCH_CHURN_LIMIT)
    return weak_subjectivity_period

Details about the calculation:

• 100 appears in the denominator to get the actual percentage ratio from SAFETY_DECAY
• For more information about other terms in this equation, refer to Weak Subjectivity in Eth2.0

A brief reference for what these values look like in practice:

validator_count	weak_subjectivity_period
1024	268
2048	281
4096	307
8192	358
16384	460
32768	665
65536	1075
131072	1894
262144	3532
524288	3532

Weak Subjectivity Sync

Clients should allow users to input a Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint at startup, and guarantee that any successful sync leads to the given Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint along the canonical chain. If such a sync is not possible, the client should treat this as a critical and irrecoverable failure.

Weak Subjectivity Sync Procedure

1. Input a Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint as a CLI parameter in block_root:epoch_number format, where block_root (an "0x" prefixed 32-byte hex string) and epoch_number (an integer) represent a valid Checkpoint. Example of the format:

0x8584188b86a9296932785cc2827b925f9deebacce6d72ad8d53171fa046b43d9:9544

2. • IF epoch_number > store.finalized_checkpoint.epoch, then ASSERT during block sync that block with root block_root is in the sync path at epoch epoch_number. Emit descriptive critical error if this assert fails, then exit client process.
   • IF epoch_number <= store.finalized_checkpoint.epoch, then ASSERT that the block in the canonical chain at epoch epoch_number has root block_root. Emit descriptive critical error if this assert fails, then exit client process.

Checking for Stale Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint

Clients may choose to validate that the input Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint is not stale at the time of startup. To support this mechanism, the client needs to take the state at the Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint as a CLI parameter input (or fetch the state associated with the input Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint from some source). The check can be implemented in the following way:

def is_within_weak_subjectivity_period(store: Store, ws_state: BeaconState, ws_checkpoint: Checkpoint) -> bool:
    # Clients may choose to validate the input state against the input Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint
    assert ws_state.latest_block_header.state_root == ws_checkpoint.root
    assert compute_epoch_at_slot(ws_state.slot) == ws_checkpoint.epoch

    ws_period = compute_weak_subjectivity_period(ws_state)
    ws_state_epoch = compute_epoch_at_slot(ws_state.slot)
    current_epoch = compute_epoch_at_slot(get_current_slot(store))
    return current_epoch <= ws_state_epoch + ws_period

Distributing Weak Subjectivity Checkpoints

This section will be updated soon.