78 KiB
Ethereum 2.0 Phase 0 -- The Beacon Chain
NOTICE: This document is a work-in-progress for researchers and implementers. It reflects recent spec changes and takes precedence over the Python proof-of-concept implementation [python-poc].
Table of contents
- Ethereum 2.0 Phase 0 -- The Beacon Chain
- Table of contents
- Introduction
- Notation
- Terminology
- Constants
- Data structures
- Ethereum 1.0 deposit contract
- Beacon chain processing
- Beacon chain state transition function
- Helper functions
hash
hash_tree_root
is_active_validator
get_active_validator_indices
shuffle
split
get_shuffling
get_shard_committees_at_slot
get_block_root
get_beacon_proposer_index
merkle_root
get_attestation_participants
bytes1
,bytes2
, ...get_effective_balance
get_fork_version
get_domain
verify_slashable_vote_data
is_double_vote
is_surround_vote
integer_squareroot
bls_verify
bls_verify_multiple
bls_aggregate_pubkeys
- On startup
- Routine for processing deposits
- Routines for updating validator status
- Helper functions
- Per-slot processing
- Per-block processing
- Per-epoch processing
- State root processing
- References
- Copyright
Introduction
This document represents the specification for Phase 0 of Ethereum 2.0 -- The Beacon Chain.
At the core of Ethereum 2.0 is a system chain called the "beacon chain". The beacon chain stores and manages the registry of validators. In the initial deployment phases of Ethereum 2.0 the only mechanism to become a validator is to make a one-way ETH transaction to a deposit contract on Ethereum 1.0. Activation as a validator happens when Ethereum 1.0 deposit receipts are processed by the beacon chain, the activation balance is reached, and after a queuing process. Exit is either voluntary or done forcibly as a penalty for misbehavior.
The primary source of load on the beacon chain is "attestations". Attestations are availability votes for a shard block, and simultaneously proof of stake votes for a beacon chain block. A sufficient number of attestations for the same shard block create a "crosslink", confirming the shard segment up to that shard block into the beacon chain. Crosslinks also serve as infrastructure for asynchronous cross-shard communication.
Notation
Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in this style
is to be interpreted as an algorithm defined in Python. Implementations may implement such algorithms using any code and programming language desired as long as the behavior is identical to that of the algorithm provided.
Terminology
- Validator - a participant in the Casper/sharding consensus system. You can become one by depositing 32 ETH into the Casper mechanism.
- Active validator - a validator currently participating in the protocol which the Casper mechanism looks to produce and attest to blocks, crosslinks and other consensus objects.
- Committee - a (pseudo-) randomly sampled subset of active validators. When a committee is referred to collectively, as in "this committee attests to X", this is assumed to mean "some subset of that committee that contains enough validators that the protocol recognizes it as representing the committee".
- Proposer - the validator that creates a beacon chain block
- Attester - a validator that is part of a committee that needs to sign off on a beacon chain block while simultaneously creating a link (crosslink) to a recent shard block on a particular shard chain.
- Beacon chain - the central PoS chain that is the base of the sharding system.
- Shard chain - one of the chains on which user transactions take place and account data is stored.
- Block root - a 32-byte Merkle root of a beacon chain block or shard chain block. Previously called "block hash".
- Crosslink - a set of signatures from a committee attesting to a block in a shard chain, which can be included into the beacon chain. Crosslinks are the main means by which the beacon chain "learns about" the updated state of shard chains.
- Slot - a period of
SLOT_DURATION
seconds, during which one proposer has the ability to create a beacon chain block and some attesters have the ability to make attestations - Epoch - an aligned span of slots during which all validators get exactly one chance to make an attestation
- Finalized, justified - see Casper FFG finalization [casper-ffg]
- Withdrawal period - the number of slots between a validator exit and the validator balance being withdrawable
- Genesis time - the Unix time of the genesis beacon chain block at slot 0
Constants
Misc
Name | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|
SHARD_COUNT |
2**10 (= 1,024) |
shards |
TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE |
2**7 (= 128) |
validators |
EJECTION_BALANCE |
2**4 (= 16) |
ETH |
MAX_BALANCE_CHURN_QUOTIENT |
2**5 (= 32) |
- |
GWEI_PER_ETH |
10**9 |
Gwei/ETH |
BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER |
2**64 - 1 |
- |
MAX_CASPER_VOTES |
2**10 (= 1,024) |
votes |
LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH |
2**13 (= 8,192) |
block roots |
LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH |
2**13 (= 8,192) |
randao mixes |
LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH |
2**13 (= 8,192) |
epochs |
- For the safety of crosslinks
TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE
exceeds the recommended minimum committee size of 111; with sufficient active validators (at leastEPOCH_LENGTH * TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE
), the shuffling algorithm ensures committee sizes at leastTARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE
. (Unbiasable randomness with a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) will improve committee robustness and lower the safe minimum committee size.)
Deposit contract
Name | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|
DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS |
TBD | |
DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH |
2**5 (= 32) |
- |
MIN_DEPOSIT |
2**0 (= 1) |
ETH |
MAX_DEPOSIT |
2**5 (= 32) |
ETH |
Initial values
Name | Value |
---|---|
GENESIS_FORK_VERSION |
0 |
GENESIS_SLOT |
0 |
GENESIS_START_SHARD |
0 |
FAR_FUTURE_SLOT |
2**64 - 1 |
ZERO_HASH |
bytes32(0) |
EMPTY_SIGNATURE |
[bytes48(0), bytes48(0)] |
BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX_BYTE |
bytes1(0) |
Time parameters
Name | Value | Unit | Duration |
---|---|---|---|
SLOT_DURATION |
6 |
seconds | 6 seconds |
MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY |
2**2 (= 4) |
slots | 24 seconds |
EPOCH_LENGTH |
2**6 (= 64) |
slots | 6.4 minutes |
SEED_LOOKAHEAD |
2**6 (= 64) |
slots | 6.4 minutes |
ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY |
2**8 (= 256) |
slots | 25.6 minutes |
DEPOSIT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD |
2**10 (= 1,024) |
slots | ~1.7 hours |
MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWAL_TIME |
2**14 (= 16,384) |
slots | ~27 hours |
Reward and penalty quotients
Name | Value |
---|---|
BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT |
2**10 (= 1,024) |
WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT |
2**9 (= 512) |
INCLUDER_REWARD_QUOTIENT |
2**3 (= 8) |
INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT |
2**24 (= 16,777,216) |
- The
BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT
parameter dictates the per-epoch reward. It corresponds to ~2.54% annual interest assuming 10 million participating ETH in every epoch. - The
INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT
equalsINVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME**2
whereINVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME := 2**12 epochs
(~18 days) is the time it takes the inactivity penalty to reduce the balance of non-participating validators to about1/sqrt(e) ~= 60.6%
. Indeed, the balance retained by offline validators aftern
epochs is about(1-1/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT)**(n**2/2)
so afterINVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME
epochs it is roughly(1-1/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT)**(INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT/2) ~= 1/sqrt(e)
.
Status flags
Name | Value |
---|---|
INITIATED_EXIT |
2**0 (= 1) |
WITHDRAWABLE |
2**1 (= 2) |
Max operations per block
Name | Value |
---|---|
MAX_PROPOSER_SLASHINGS |
2**4 (= 16) |
MAX_CASPER_SLASHINGS |
2**4 (= 16) |
MAX_ATTESTATIONS |
2**7 (= 128) |
MAX_DEPOSITS |
2**4 (= 16) |
MAX_EXITS |
2**4 (= 16) |
Validator registry delta flags
Name | Value |
---|---|
ACTIVATION |
0 |
EXIT |
1 |
Signature domains
Name | Value |
---|---|
DOMAIN_DEPOSIT |
0 |
DOMAIN_ATTESTATION |
1 |
DOMAIN_PROPOSAL |
2 |
DOMAIN_EXIT |
3 |
Data structures
Beacon chain operations
Proposer slashings
ProposerSlashing
{
# Proposer index
'proposer_index': 'uint24',
# First proposal data
'proposal_data_1': ProposalSignedData,
# First proposal signature
'proposal_signature_1': '[uint384]',
# Second proposal data
'proposal_data_2': ProposalSignedData,
# Second proposal signature
'proposal_signature_2': '[uint384]',
}
Casper slashings
CasperSlashing
{
# First batch of votes
'slashable_vote_data_1': SlashableVoteData,
# Second batch of votes
'slashable_vote_data_2': SlashableVoteData,
}
SlashableVoteData
{
# Validator indices with custody bit equal to 0
'custody_bit_0_indices': ['uint24'],
# Validator indices with custody bit equal to 1
'custody_bit_1_indices': ['uint24'],
# Attestation data
'data': AttestationData,
# Aggregate signature
'aggregate_signature': ['uint384'],
}
Attestations
Attestation
{
# Attestation data
'data': AttestationData,
# Attester participation bitfield
'participation_bitfield': 'bytes',
# Custody bitfield
'custody_bitfield': 'bytes',
# BLS aggregate signature
'aggregate_signature': ['uint384'],
}
AttestationData
{
# Slot number
'slot': 'uint64',
# Shard number
'shard': 'uint64',
# Hash of root of the signed beacon block
'beacon_block_root': 'hash32',
# Hash of root of the ancestor at the epoch boundary
'epoch_boundary_root': 'hash32',
# Shard block's hash of root
'shard_block_root': 'hash32',
# Last crosslink's hash of root
'latest_crosslink_root': 'hash32',
# Slot of the last justified beacon block
'justified_slot': 'uint64',
# Hash of the last justified beacon block
'justified_block_root': 'hash32',
}
AttestationDataAndCustodyBit
{
# Attestation data
data: AttestationData,
# Custody bit
custody_bit: bool,
}
Deposits
Deposit
{
# Branch in the deposit tree
'branch': '[hash32]',
# Index in the deposit tree
'index': 'uint64',
# Data
'deposit_data': DepositData,
}
DepositData
{
# Amount in Gwei
'amount': 'uint64',
# Timestamp from deposit contract
'timestamp': 'uint64',
# Deposit input
'deposit_input': DepositInput,
}
DepositInput
{
# BLS pubkey
'pubkey': 'uint384',
# Withdrawal credentials
'withdrawal_credentials': 'hash32',
# Initial RANDAO commitment
'randao_commitment': 'hash32',
# Initial custody commitment
'custody_commitment': 'hash32',
# A BLS signature of this `DepositInput`
'proof_of_possession': ['uint384'],
}
Exits
Exit
{
# Minimum slot for processing exit
'slot': 'uint64',
# Index of the exiting validator
'validator_index': 'uint24',
# Validator signature
'signature': '[uint384]',
}
Beacon chain blocks
BeaconBlock
{
## Header ##
'slot': 'uint64',
'parent_root': 'hash32',
'state_root': 'hash32',
'randao_reveal': 'hash32',
'deposit_root': 'hash32',
'signature': ['uint384'],
## Body ##
'body': BeaconBlockBody,
}
BeaconBlockBody
{
'proposer_slashings': [ProposerSlashing],
'casper_slashings': [CasperSlashing],
'attestations': [Attestation],
'custody_reseeds': [CustodyReseed],
'custody_challenges': [CustodyChallenge],
'custody_responses': [CustodyResponse],
'deposits': [Deposit],
'exits': [Exit],
}
CustodyReseed
, CustodyChallenge
, and CustodyResponse
will be defined in phase 1; for now, put dummy classes as these lists will remain empty throughout phase 0.
ProposalSignedData
{
# Slot number
'slot': 'uint64',
# Shard number (`BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER` for beacon chain)
'shard': 'uint64',
# Block's hash of root
'block_root': 'hash32',
}
Beacon chain state
BeaconState
{
# Misc
'slot': 'uint64',
'genesis_time': 'uint64',
'fork_data': ForkData, # For versioning hard forks
# Validator registry
'validator_registry': [ValidatorRecord],
'validator_balances': ['uint64'],
'validator_registry_latest_change_slot': 'uint64',
'validator_registry_exit_count': 'uint64',
'validator_registry_delta_chain_tip': 'hash32', # For light clients to track deltas
# Randomness and committees
'latest_randao_mixes': ['hash32'],
'latest_vdf_outputs': ['hash32'],
'shard_committees_at_slots': [[ShardCommittee]],
# Custody challenges
'custody_challenges': [CustodyChallenge],
# Finality
'previous_justified_slot': 'uint64',
'justified_slot': 'uint64',
'justification_bitfield': 'uint64',
'finalized_slot': 'uint64',
# Recent state
'latest_crosslinks': [CrosslinkRecord],
'latest_block_roots': ['hash32'], # Needed to process attestations, older to newer
'latest_penalized_exit_balances': ['uint64'], # Balances penalized at every withdrawal period
'latest_attestations': [PendingAttestationRecord],
'batched_block_roots': ['hash32'],
# Ethereum 1.0 deposit root
'latest_deposit_root': 'hash32',
'deposit_root_votes': [DepositRootVote],
}
ValidatorRecord
{
# BLS public key
'pubkey': 'uint384',
# Withdrawal credentials
'withdrawal_credentials': 'hash32',
# RANDAO commitment
'randao_commitment': 'hash32',
# Slots the proposer has skipped (i.e. layers of RANDAO expected)
'randao_layers': 'uint64',
# Slot when validator activated
'activation_slot': 'uint64',
# Slot when validator exited
'exit_slot': 'uint64',
# Slot when validator withdrew
'withdrawal_slot': 'uint64',
# Slot when validator was penalized
'penalized_slot': 'uint64',
# Exit counter when validator exited
'exit_count': 'uint64',
# Status flags
'status_flags': 'uint64',
# Custody commitment
'custody_commitment': 'hash32',
# Slot of latest custody reseed
'latest_custody_reseed_slot': 'uint64',
# Slot of second-latest custody reseed
'penultimate_custody_reseed_slot': 'uint64',
}
CrosslinkRecord
{
# Slot number
'slot': 'uint64',
# Shard block root
'shard_block_root': 'hash32',
}
ShardCommittee
{
# Shard number
'shard': 'uint64',
# Validator indices
'committee': ['uint24'],
# Total validator count (for custody challenges)
'total_validator_count': 'uint64',
}
DepositRootVote
{
# Deposit root
'deposit_root': 'hash32',
# Vote count
'vote_count': 'uint64',
}
PendingAttestationRecord
{
# Signed data
'data': AttestationData,
# Attester participation bitfield
'participation_bitfield': 'bytes',
# Custody bitfield
'custody_bitfield': 'bytes',
# Slot the attestation was included
'slot_included': 'uint64',
}
ForkData
{
# Previous fork version
'pre_fork_version': 'uint64',
# Post fork version
'post_fork_version': 'uint64',
# Fork slot number
'fork_slot': 'uint64',
}
ValidatorRegistryDeltaBlock
{
latest_registry_delta_root: 'hash32',
validator_index: 'uint24',
pubkey: 'uint384',
slot: 'uint64',
flag: 'uint64',
}
Ethereum 1.0 deposit contract
The initial deployment phases of Ethereum 2.0 are implemented without consensus changes to Ethereum 1.0. A deposit contract at address DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS
is added to Ethereum 1.0 for deposits of ETH to the beacon chain. Validator balances will be withdrawable to the shards in phase 2, i.e. when the EVM2.0 is deployed and the shards have state.
Deposit arguments
The deposit contract has a single deposit
function which takes as argument a SimpleSerialize'd DepositInput
.
Withdrawal credentials
One of the DepositInput
fields is withdrawal_credentials
. It is a commitment to credentials for withdrawals to shards. The first byte of withdrawal_credentials
is a version number. As of now the only expected format is as follows:
withdrawal_credentials[:1] == BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX_BYTE
withdrawal_credentials[1:] == hash(withdrawal_pubkey)[1:]
wherewithdrawal_pubkey
is a BLS pubkey
The private key corresponding to withdrawal_pubkey
will be required to initiate a withdrawal. It can be stored separately until a withdrawal is required, e.g. in cold storage.
Deposit
logs
Every Ethereum 1.0 deposit, of size between MIN_DEPOSIT
and MAX_DEPOSIT
, emits a Deposit
log for consumption by the beacon chain. The deposit contract does little validation, pushing most of the validator onboarding logic to the beacon chain. In particular, the proof of possession (a BLS12-381 signature) is not verified by the deposit contract.
ChainStart
log
When sufficiently many full deposits have been made the deposit contract emits the ChainStart
log. The beacon chain state may then be initialized by calling the get_initial_beacon_state
function (defined below) where:
genesis_time
equalstime
in theChainStart
loglatest_deposit_root
equalsdeposit_root
in theChainStart
loginitial_validator_deposits
is a list ofDeposit
objects built according to theDeposit
logs up to the deposit that triggered theChainStart
log, processed in the order in which they were emitted (oldest to newest)
Vyper code
## compiled with v0.1.0-beta.6 ##
MIN_DEPOSIT: constant(uint256) = 1 # ETH
MAX_DEPOSIT: constant(uint256) = 32 # ETH
GWEI_PER_ETH: constant(uint256) = 1000000000 # 10**9
CHAIN_START_FULL_DEPOSIT_THRESHOLD: constant(uint256) = 16384 # 2**14
DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH: constant(uint256) = 32
TWO_TO_POWER_OF_TREE_DEPTH: constant(uint256) = 4294967296 # 2**32
SECONDS_PER_DAY: constant(uint256) = 86400
Deposit: event({previous_deposit_root: bytes32, data: bytes[2064], deposit_count: uint256})
ChainStart: event({deposit_root: bytes32, time: bytes[8]})
deposit_tree: map(uint256, bytes32)
deposit_count: uint256
full_deposit_count: uint256
@payable
@public
def deposit(deposit_input: bytes[2048]):
assert msg.value >= as_wei_value(MIN_DEPOSIT, "ether")
assert msg.value <= as_wei_value(MAX_DEPOSIT, "ether")
index: uint256 = self.deposit_count + TWO_TO_POWER_OF_TREE_DEPTH
msg_gwei_bytes8: bytes[8] = slice(concat("", convert(msg.value / GWEI_PER_ETH, bytes32)), start=24, len=8)
timestamp_bytes8: bytes[8] = slice(concat("", convert(block.timestamp, bytes32)), start=24, len=8)
deposit_data: bytes[2064] = concat(msg_gwei_bytes8, timestamp_bytes8, deposit_input)
log.Deposit(self.deposit_tree[1], deposit_data, self.deposit_count)
# add deposit to merkle tree
self.deposit_tree[index] = sha3(deposit_data)
for i in range(DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH):
index /= 2
self.deposit_tree[index] = sha3(concat(self.deposit_tree[index * 2], self.deposit_tree[index * 2 + 1]))
self.deposit_count += 1
if msg.value == as_wei_value(MAX_DEPOSIT, "ether"):
self.full_deposit_count += 1
if self.full_deposit_count == CHAIN_START_FULL_DEPOSIT_THRESHOLD:
timestamp_day_boundary: uint256 = as_unitless_number(block.timestamp) - as_unitless_number(block.timestamp) % SECONDS_PER_DAY + SECONDS_PER_DAY
timestamp_day_boundary_bytes8: bytes[8] = slice(concat("", convert(timestamp_day_boundary, bytes32)), start=24, len=8)
log.ChainStart(self.deposit_tree[1], timestamp_day_boundary_bytes8)
@public
@constant
def get_deposit_root() -> bytes32:
return self.deposit_tree[1]
Beacon chain processing
The beacon chain is the system chain for Ethereum 2.0. The main responsibilities of the beacon chain are:
- Store and maintain the registry of validators
- Process crosslinks (see above)
- Process its per-slot consensus, as well as the finality gadget
Processing the beacon chain is similar to processing the Ethereum 1.0 chain. Clients download and process blocks, and maintain a view of what is the current "canonical chain", terminating at the current "head". However, because of the beacon chain's relationship with Ethereum 1.0, and because it is a proof-of-stake chain, there are differences.
For a beacon chain block, block
, to be processed by a node, the following conditions must be met:
- The parent block with root
block.parent_root
has been processed and accepted. - The node has processed its
state
up to slot,block.slot - 1
. - An Ethereum 1.0 block pointed to by the
state.latest_deposit_root
has been processed and accepted. - The node's local clock time is greater than or equal to
state.genesis_time + block.slot * SLOT_DURATION
.
If these conditions are not met, the client should delay processing the beacon block until the conditions are all satisfied.
Beacon block production is significantly different because of the proof of stake mechanism. A client simply checks what it thinks is the canonical chain when it should create a block, and looks up what its slot number is; when the slot arrives, it either proposes or attests to a block as required. Note that this requires each node to have a clock that is roughly (i.e. within SLOT_DURATION
seconds) synchronized with the other nodes.
Beacon chain fork choice rule
The beacon chain fork choice rule is a hybrid that combines justification and finality with Latest Message Driven (LMD) Greediest Heaviest Observed SubTree (GHOST). At any point in time a validator v
subjectively calculates the beacon chain head as follows.
- Let
store
be the set of attestations and blocks that the validatorv
has observed and verified (in particular, block ancestors must be recursively verified). Attestations not part of any chain are still included instore
. - Let
finalized_head
be the finalized block with the highest slot number. (A blockB
is finalized if there is a descendant ofB
instore
the processing of which setsB
as finalized.) - Let
justified_head
be the descendant offinalized_head
with the highest slot number that has been justified for at leastEPOCH_LENGTH
slots. (A blockB
is justified if there is a descendant ofB
instore
the processing of which setsB
as justified.) If no such descendant exists setjustified_head
tofinalized_head
. - Let
get_ancestor(store, block, slot)
be the ancestor ofblock
with slot numberslot
. Theget_ancestor
function can be defined recursively asdef get_ancestor(store, block, slot): return block if block.slot == slot else get_ancestor(store, store.get_parent(block), slot)
. - Let
get_latest_attestation(store, validator)
be the attestation with the highest slot number instore
fromvalidator
. If several such attestations exist, use the one the validatorv
observed first. - Let
get_latest_attestation_target(store, validator)
be the target block in the attestationget_latest_attestation(store, validator)
. - The head is
lmd_ghost(store, justified_head)
where the functionlmd_ghost
is defined below. Note that the implementation below is suboptimal; there are implementations that compute the head in time logarithmic in slot count.
def lmd_ghost(store, start):
validators = start.state.validator_registry
active_validators = [validators[i] for i in
get_active_validator_indices(validators, start.state.slot)]
attestation_targets = [get_latest_attestation_target(store, validator)
for validator in active_validators]
def get_vote_count(block):
return len([target for target in attestation_targets if
get_ancestor(store, target, block.slot) == block])
head = start
while 1:
children = get_children(head)
if len(children) == 0:
return head
head = max(children, key=get_vote_count)
Beacon chain state transition function
We now define the state transition function. At a high level the state transition is made up of two parts:
- The per-slot transitions, which happens every slot, and only affects a parts of the
state
. - The per-epoch transitions, which happens at every epoch boundary (i.e.
state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH == 0
), and affects the entirestate
.
The per-slot transitions generally focus on verifying aggregate signatures and saving temporary records relating to the per-slot activity in the BeaconState
. The per-epoch transitions focus on the validator registry, including adjusting balances and activating and exiting validators, as well as processing crosslinks and managing block justification/finalization.
Helper functions
Note: The definitions below are for specification purposes and are not necessarily optimal implementations.
hash
The hash function is denoted by hash
. In Phase 0 the beacon chain is deployed with the same hash function as Ethereum 1.0, i.e. Keccak-256 (also incorrectly known as SHA3).
Note: We aim to migrate to a S[T/N]ARK-friendly hash function in a future Ethereum 2.0 deployment phase.
hash_tree_root
hash_tree_root
is a function for hashing objects into a single root utilizing a hash tree structure. hash_tree_root
is defined in the SimpleSerialize spec.
is_active_validator
def is_active_validator(validator: ValidatorRecord, slot: int) -> bool:
"""
Checks if ``validator`` is active.
"""
return validator.activation_slot <= slot < validator.exit_slot
get_active_validator_indices
def get_active_validator_indices(validators: [ValidatorRecord], slot: int) -> List[int]:
"""
Gets indices of active validators from ``validators``.
"""
return [i for i, v in enumerate(validators) if is_active_validator(v, slot)]
shuffle
def shuffle(values: List[Any], seed: Hash32) -> List[Any]:
"""
Returns the shuffled ``values`` with ``seed`` as entropy.
"""
values_count = len(values)
# Entropy is consumed from the seed in 3-byte (24 bit) chunks.
rand_bytes = 3
# The highest possible result of the RNG.
rand_max = 2 ** (rand_bytes * 8) - 1
# The range of the RNG places an upper-bound on the size of the list that
# may be shuffled. It is a logic error to supply an oversized list.
assert values_count < rand_max
output = [x for x in values]
source = seed
index = 0
while index < values_count - 1:
# Re-hash the `source` to obtain a new pattern of bytes.
source = hash(source)
# Iterate through the `source` bytes in 3-byte chunks.
for position in range(0, 32 - (32 % rand_bytes), rand_bytes):
# Determine the number of indices remaining in `values` and exit
# once the last index is reached.
remaining = values_count - index
if remaining == 1:
break
# Read 3-bytes of `source` as a 24-bit big-endian integer.
sample_from_source = int.from_bytes(source[position:position + rand_bytes], 'big')
# Sample values greater than or equal to `sample_max` will cause
# modulo bias when mapped into the `remaining` range.
sample_max = rand_max - rand_max % remaining
# Perform a swap if the consumed entropy will not cause modulo bias.
if sample_from_source < sample_max:
# Select a replacement index for the current index.
replacement_position = (sample_from_source % remaining) + index
# Swap the current index with the replacement index.
output[index], output[replacement_position] = output[replacement_position], output[index]
index += 1
else:
# The sample causes modulo bias. A new sample should be read.
pass
return output
split
def split(values: List[Any], split_count: int) -> List[Any]:
"""
Splits ``values`` into ``split_count`` pieces.
"""
list_length = len(values)
return [
values[(list_length * i // split_count): (list_length * (i + 1) // split_count)]
for i in range(split_count)
]
get_shuffling
def get_shuffling(seed: Hash32,
validators: List[ValidatorRecord],
crosslinking_start_shard: int,
slot: int) -> List[List[ShardCommittee]]:
"""
Shuffles ``validators`` into shard committees seeded by ``randao_mix`` and ``slot``.
"""
# Normalizes slot to start of epoch boundary
slot -= slot % EPOCH_LENGTH
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(validators, slot)
committees_per_slot = max(
1,
min(
SHARD_COUNT // EPOCH_LENGTH,
len(active_validator_indices) // EPOCH_LENGTH // TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE,
)
)
# Shuffle
seed = xor(randao_mix, bytes32(slot))
shuffled_active_validator_indices = shuffle(active_validator_indices, seed)
# Split the shuffled list into epoch_length pieces
validators_per_slot = split(shuffled_active_validator_indices, EPOCH_LENGTH)
output = []
for slot_position, slot_indices in enumerate(validators_per_slot):
# Split the shuffled list into committees_per_slot pieces
shard_indices = split(slot_indices, committees_per_slot)
shard_id_start = crosslinking_start_shard + slot_position * committees_per_slot
shard_committees = [
ShardCommittee(
shard=(shard_id_start + shard_position) % SHARD_COUNT,
committee=indices,
total_validator_count=len(active_validator_indices),
)
for shard_position, indices in enumerate(shard_indices)
]
output.append(shard_committees)
return output
Invariant: if get_shuffling(seed, validators, shard, slot)
returns some value x
, it should return the same value x
for the same seed
and shard
and possible future modifications of validators
forever in phase 0, and until the ~1 year deletion delay in phase 2 and in the future.
Here's a diagram of what is going on:
get_shard_committees_at_slot
def get_shard_committees_at_slot(state: BeaconState,
slot: int) -> List[ShardCommittee]:
"""
Returns the ``ShardCommittee`` for the ``slot``.
"""
earliest_slot_in_array = state.slot - (state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH) - EPOCH_LENGTH
assert earliest_slot_in_array <= slot < earliest_slot_in_array + EPOCH_LENGTH * 2
return state.shard_committees_at_slots[slot - earliest_slot_in_array]
get_block_root
def get_block_root(state: BeaconState,
slot: int) -> Hash32:
"""
Returns the block root at a recent ``slot``.
"""
assert state.slot <= slot + LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH
assert slot < state.slot
return state.latest_block_roots[slot % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH]
get_block_root(_, s)
should always return hash_tree_root
of the block in the beacon chain at slot s
, and get_shard_committees_at_slot(_, s)
should not change unless the validator registry changes.
get_beacon_proposer_index
def get_beacon_proposer_index(state: BeaconState,
slot: int) -> int:
"""
Returns the beacon proposer index for the ``slot``.
"""
first_committee = get_shard_committees_at_slot(state, slot)[0].committee
return first_committee[slot % len(first_committee)]
merkle_root
def merkle_root(values):
"""
Merkleize ``values`` (where ``len(values)`` is a power of two) and return the Merkle root.
"""
o = [0] * len(values) + values
for i in range(len(values) - 1, 0, -1):
o[i] = hash(o[i * 2] + o[i * 2 + 1])
return o[1]
get_attestation_participants
def get_attestation_participants(state: BeaconState,
attestation_data: AttestationData,
participation_bitfield: bytes) -> List[int]:
"""
Returns the participant indices at for the ``attestation_data`` and ``participation_bitfield``.
"""
# Find the relevant committee
shard_committees = get_shard_committees_at_slot(state, attestation_data.slot)
shard_committee = [x for x in shard_committees if x.shard == attestation_data.shard][0]
assert len(participation_bitfield) == ceil_div8(len(shard_committee.committee))
# Find the participating attesters in the committee
participants = []
for i, validator_index in enumerate(shard_committee.committee):
participation_bit = (participation_bitfield[i//8] >> (7 - (i % 8))) % 2
if participation_bit == 1:
participants.append(validator_index)
return participants
bytes1
, bytes2
, ...
bytes1(x): return x.to_bytes(1, 'big')
, bytes2(x): return x.to_bytes(2, 'big')
, and so on for all integers, particularly 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 32.
get_effective_balance
def get_effective_balance(state: State, index: int) -> int:
"""
Returns the effective balance (also known as "balance at stake") for a ``validator`` with the given ``index``.
"""
return min(state.validator_balances[index], MAX_DEPOSIT * GWEI_PER_ETH)
get_fork_version
def get_fork_version(fork_data: ForkData,
slot: int) -> int:
if slot < fork_data.fork_slot:
return fork_data.pre_fork_version
else:
return fork_data.post_fork_version
get_domain
def get_domain(fork_data: ForkData,
slot: int,
domain_type: int) -> int:
return get_fork_version(
fork_data,
slot
) * 2**32 + domain_type
verify_slashable_vote_data
def verify_slashable_vote_data(state: BeaconState, vote_data: SlashableVoteData) -> bool:
if len(vote_data.custody_bit_0_indices) + len(vote_data.custody_bit_1_indices) > MAX_CASPER_VOTES:
return False
return bls_verify_multiple(
pubkeys=[
aggregate_pubkey([state.validators[i].pubkey for i in vote_data.custody_bit_0_indices]),
aggregate_pubkey([state.validators[i].pubkey for i in vote_data.custody_bit_1_indices]),
],
messages=[
hash_tree_root(AttestationDataAndCustodyBit(vote_data.data, False)),
hash_tree_root(AttestationDataAndCustodyBit(vote_data.data, True)),
],
signature=vote_data.aggregate_signature,
domain=get_domain(
state.fork_data,
state.slot,
DOMAIN_ATTESTATION,
),
)
is_double_vote
def is_double_vote(attestation_data_1: AttestationData,
attestation_data_2: AttestationData) -> bool
"""
Assumes ``attestation_data_1`` is distinct from ``attestation_data_2``.
Returns True if the provided ``AttestationData`` are slashable
due to a 'double vote'.
"""
target_epoch_1 = attestation_data_1.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH
target_epoch_2 = attestation_data_2.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH
return target_epoch_1 == target_epoch_2
is_surround_vote
def is_surround_vote(attestation_data_1: AttestationData,
attestation_data_2: AttestationData) -> bool:
"""
Assumes ``attestation_data_1`` is distinct from ``attestation_data_2``.
Returns True if the provided ``AttestationData`` are slashable
due to a 'surround vote'.
Note: parameter order matters as this function only checks
that ``attestation_data_1`` surrounds ``attestation_data_2``.
"""
source_epoch_1 = attestation_data_1.justified_slot // EPOCH_LENGTH
source_epoch_2 = attestation_data_2.justified_slot // EPOCH_LENGTH
target_epoch_1 = attestation_data_1.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH
target_epoch_2 = attestation_data_2.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH
return (
(source_epoch_1 < source_epoch_2) and
(source_epoch_2 + 1 == target_epoch_2) and
(target_epoch_2 < target_epoch_1)
)
integer_squareroot
def integer_squareroot(n: int) -> int:
"""
The largest integer ``x`` such that ``x**2`` is less than ``n``.
"""
x = n
y = (x + 1) // 2
while y < x:
x = y
y = (x + n // x) // 2
return x
bls_verify
bls_verify
is a function for verifying a BLS12-381 signature, defined in the BLS Signature spec.
bls_verify_multiple
bls_verify_multiple
is a function for verifying a BLS12-381 signature constructed from multiple messages, defined in the BLS Signature spec.
bls_aggregate_pubkeys
bls_aggregate_pubkeys
is a function for aggregating a BLS12-381 public keys into a single aggregate key, defined in the BLS Signature spec.
On startup
A valid block with slot GENESIS_SLOT
(a "genesis block") has the following values. Other validity rules (e.g. requiring a signature) do not apply.
{
slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
parent_root=ZERO_HASH,
state_root=STARTUP_STATE_ROOT,
randao_reveal=ZERO_HASH,
deposit_root=ZERO_HASH,
signature=EMPTY_SIGNATURE,
body=BeaconBlockBody(
proposer_slashings=[],
casper_slashings=[],
attestations=[],
custody_reseeds=[],
custody_challenges=[],
custody_responses=[],
deposits=[],
exits=[],
),
}
STARTUP_STATE_ROOT
(in the above "genesis block") is generated from the get_initial_beacon_state
function below. When enough full deposits have been made to the deposit contract and the ChainStart
log has been emitted, get_initial_beacon_state
will execute to compute the hash_tree_root
of BeaconState
.
def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
genesis_time: int,
latest_deposit_root: Hash32) -> BeaconState:
state = BeaconState(
# Misc
slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
genesis_time=genesis_time,
fork_data=ForkData(
pre_fork_version=GENESIS_FORK_VERSION,
post_fork_version=GENESIS_FORK_VERSION,
fork_slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
),
# Validator registry
validator_registry=[],
validator_balances=[],
validator_registry_latest_change_slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
validator_registry_exit_count=0,
validator_registry_delta_chain_tip=ZERO_HASH,
# Randomness and committees
latest_randao_mixes=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH)],
latest_vdf_outputs=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH // EPOCH_LENGTH)],
shard_committees_at_slots=[],
# Custody challenges
custody_challenges=[],
# Finality
previous_justified_slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
justified_slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
justification_bitfield=0,
finalized_slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
# Recent state
latest_crosslinks=[CrosslinkRecord(slot=GENESIS_SLOT, shard_block_root=ZERO_HASH) for _ in range(SHARD_COUNT)],
latest_block_roots=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH)],
latest_penalized_exit_balances=[0 for _ in LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH],
latest_attestations=[],
batched_block_roots=[],
# Deposit root
latest_deposit_root=latest_deposit_root,
deposit_root_votes=[],
)
# Process initial deposits
for deposit in initial_validator_deposits:
process_deposit(
state=state,
pubkey=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.pubkey,
amount=deposit.deposit_data.amount,
proof_of_possession=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.proof_of_possession,
withdrawal_credentials=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.randao_commitment,
custody_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.custody_commitment,
)
# Process initial activations
for validator_index, _ in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
if get_effective_balance(state, validator_index) >= MAX_DEPOSIT * GWEI_PER_ETH:
activate_validator(state, validator_index, True)
# Set initial committee shuffling
initial_shuffling = get_shuffling(ZERO_HASH, state.validator_registry, GENESIS_START_SHARD, GENESIS_SLOT)
state.shard_committees_at_slots = initial_shuffling + initial_shuffling
return state
Routine for processing deposits
First, a helper function:
def validate_proof_of_possession(state: BeaconState,
pubkey: int,
proof_of_possession: bytes,
withdrawal_credentials: Hash32,
randao_commitment: Hash32,
custody_commitment: Hash32) -> bool:
proof_of_possession_data = DepositInput(
pubkey=pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials=withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment=randao_commitment,
custody_commitment=custody_commitment,
proof_of_possession=EMPTY_SIGNATURE,
)
return bls_verify(
pubkey=pubkey,
message=hash_tree_root(proof_of_possession_data),
signature=proof_of_possession,
domain=get_domain(
state.fork_data,
state.slot,
DOMAIN_DEPOSIT,
)
)
Now, to add a validator or top up an existing validator's balance by some deposit
amount:
def process_deposit(state: BeaconState,
pubkey: int,
amount: int,
proof_of_possession: bytes,
withdrawal_credentials: Hash32,
randao_commitment: Hash32,
custody_commitment: Hash32) -> None:
"""
Process a deposit from Ethereum 1.0.
Note that this function mutates ``state``.
"""
# Validate the given `proof_of_possession`
assert validate_proof_of_possession(
state,
pubkey,
proof_of_possession,
withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment,
custody_commitment,
)
validator_pubkeys = [v.pubkey for v in state.validator_registry]
if pubkey not in validator_pubkeys:
# Add new validator
validator = ValidatorRecord(
pubkey=pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials=withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment=randao_commitment,
randao_layers=0,
activation_slot=FAR_FUTURE_SLOT,
exit_slot=FAR_FUTURE_SLOT,
withdrawal_slot=FAR_FUTURE_SLOT,
penalized_slot=FAR_FUTURE_SLOT,
exit_count=0,
status_flags=0,
custody_commitment=custody_commitment,
latest_custody_reseed_slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
penultimate_custody_reseed_slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
)
# Note: In phase 2 registry indices that has been withdrawn for a long time will be recycled.
index = len(state.validator_registry)
state.validator_registry.append(validator)
state.validator_balances.append(amount)
else:
# Increase balance by deposit amount
index = validator_pubkeys.index(pubkey)
assert state.validator_registry[index].withdrawal_credentials == withdrawal_credentials
state.validator_balances[index] += amount
Routines for updating validator status
Note: All functions in this section mutate state
.
def activate_validator(state: BeaconState, index: int, genesis: bool) -> None:
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
validator.activation_slot = GENESIS_SLOT if genesis else (state.slot + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY)
state.validator_registry_delta_chain_tip = hash_tree_root(
ValidatorRegistryDeltaBlock(
current_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip=state.validator_registry_delta_chain_tip,
validator_index=index,
pubkey=validator.pubkey,
slot=validator.activation_slot,
flag=ACTIVATION,
)
)
def initiate_validator_exit(state: BeaconState, index: int) -> None:
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
validator.status_flags |= INITIATED_EXIT
def exit_validator(state: BeaconState, index: int) -> None:
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
# The following updates only occur if not previous exited
if validator.exit_slot <= state.slot + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY:
return
validator.exit_slot = state.slot + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY
state.validator_registry_exit_count += 1
validator.exit_count = state.validator_registry_exit_count
state.validator_registry_delta_chain_tip = hash_tree_root(
ValidatorRegistryDeltaBlock(
current_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip=state.validator_registry_delta_chain_tip,
validator_index=index,
pubkey=validator.pubkey,
slot=validator.exit_slot,
flag=EXIT,
)
)
def penalize_validator(state: BeaconState, index: int) -> None:
exit_validator(state, index)
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
state.latest_penalized_exit_balances[(state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH] += get_effective_balance(state, index)
whistleblower_index = get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)
whistleblower_reward = get_effective_balance(state, index) // WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
state.validator_balances[whistleblower_index] += whistleblower_reward
state.validator_balances[index] -= whistleblower_reward
validator.penalized_slot = state.slot
def prepare_validator_for_withdrawal(state: BeaconState, index: int) -> None:
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
validator.status_flags |= WITHDRAWABLE
Per-slot processing
Below are the processing steps that happen at every slot.
Misc counters
- Set
state.slot += 1
. - Set
state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)].randao_layers += 1
. - Set
state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = state.latest_randao_mixes[(state.slot - 1) % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH]
Block roots
- Let
previous_block_root
be thetree_hash_root
of the previous beacon block processed in the chain. - Set
state.latest_block_roots[(state.slot - 1) % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH] = previous_block_root
. - If
state.slot % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH == 0
appendmerkle_root(state.latest_block_roots)
tostate.batched_block_roots
.
Per-block processing
Below are the processing steps that happen at every block
.
Slot
- Verify that
block.slot == state.slot
.
Proposer signature
- Let
block_without_signature_root
be thehash_tree_root
ofblock
whereblock.signature
is set toEMPTY_SIGNATURE
. - Let
proposal_root = hash_tree_root(ProposalSignedData(state.slot, BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER, block_without_signature_root))
. - Verify that
bls_verify(pubkey=state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)].pubkey, data=proposal_root, signature=block.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, state.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))
.
RANDAO
- Let
repeat_hash(x, n) = x if n == 0 else repeat_hash(hash(x), n-1)
. - Let
proposer = state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)]
. - Verify that
repeat_hash(block.randao_reveal, proposer.randao_layers) == proposer.randao_commitment
. - Set
state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = hash(xor(state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH], block.randao_reveal))
- Set
proposer.randao_commitment = block.randao_reveal
. - Set
proposer.randao_layers = 0
.
Deposit root
- If
block.deposit_root
isdeposit_root_vote.deposit_root
for somedeposit_root_vote
instate.deposit_root_votes
, setdeposit_root_vote.vote_count += 1
. - Otherwise, append to
state.deposit_root_votes
a newDepositRootVote(deposit_root=block.deposit_root, vote_count=1)
.
Operations
Proposer slashings
Verify that len(block.body.proposer_slashings) <= MAX_PROPOSER_SLASHINGS
.
For each proposer_slashing
in block.body.proposer_slashings
:
- Let
proposer = state.validator_registry[proposer_slashing.proposer_index]
. - Verify that
proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.slot == proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.slot
. - Verify that
proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.shard == proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.shard
. - Verify that
proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.block_root != proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.block_root
. - Verify that
validator.penalized_slot > state.slot
. - Verify that
bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message=hash_tree_root(proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1), signature=proposer_slashing.proposal_signature_1, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))
. - Verify that
bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message=hash_tree_root(proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2), signature=proposer_slashing.proposal_signature_2, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))
. - Run
penalize_validator(state, proposer_slashing.proposer_index)
.
Casper slashings
Verify that len(block.body.casper_slashings) <= MAX_CASPER_SLASHINGS
.
For each casper_slashing
in block.body.casper_slashings
:
- Let
slashable_vote_data_1 = casper_slashing.slashable_vote_data_1
. - Let
slashable_vote_data_2 = casper_slashing.slashable_vote_data_2
. - Let
indices(slashable_vote_data) = slashable_vote_data.custody_bit_0_indices + slashable_vote_data.custody_bit_1_indices
. - Let
intersection = [x for x in indices(slashable_vote_data_1) if x in indices(slashable_vote_data_2)]
. - Verify that
len(intersection) >= 1
. - Verify that
slashable_vote_data_1.data != slashable_vote_data_2.data
. - Verify that
is_double_vote(slashable_vote_data_1.data, slashable_vote_data_2.data)
oris_surround_vote(slashable_vote_data_1.data, slashable_vote_data_2.data)
. - Verify that
verify_slashable_vote_data(state, slashable_vote_data_1)
. - Verify that
verify_slashable_vote_data(state, slashable_vote_data_2)
. - For each validator index
i
inintersection
runpenalize_validator(state, i)
ifstate.validator_registry[i].penalized_slot > state.slot
.
Attestations
Verify that len(block.body.attestations) <= MAX_ATTESTATIONS
.
For each attestation
in block.body.attestations
:
- Verify that
attestation.data.slot + MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY <= state.slot
. - Verify that
attestation.data.slot + EPOCH_LENGTH >= state.slot
. - Verify that
attestation.data.justified_slot
is equal tostate.justified_slot if attestation.data.slot >= state.slot - (state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH) else state.previous_justified_slot
. - Verify that
attestation.data.justified_block_root
is equal toget_block_root(state, attestation.data.justified_slot)
. - Verify that either
attestation.data.latest_crosslink_root
orattestation.data.shard_block_root
equalsstate.latest_crosslinks[shard].shard_block_root
. aggregate_signature
verification:- Let
participants = get_attestation_participants(state, attestation.data, attestation.participation_bitfield)
. - Let
group_public_key = bls_aggregate_pubkeys([state.validator_registry[v].pubkey for v in participants])
. - Verify that
bls_verify(pubkey=group_public_key, message=hash_tree_root(AttestationDataAndCustodyBit(attestation.data, False)), signature=attestation.aggregate_signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, attestation.data.slot, DOMAIN_ATTESTATION))
.
- Let
- [TO BE REMOVED IN PHASE 1] Verify that
attestation.data.shard_block_root == ZERO_HASH
. - Append
PendingAttestationRecord(data=attestation.data, participation_bitfield=attestation.participation_bitfield, custody_bitfield=attestation.custody_bitfield, slot_included=state.slot)
tostate.latest_attestations
.
Deposits
Verify that len(block.body.deposits) <= MAX_DEPOSITS
.
[TODO: add logic to ensure that deposits from 1.0 chain are processed in order]
[TODO: update the call to verify_merkle_branch
below if it needs to change after we process deposits in order]
For each deposit
in block.body.deposits
:
- Let
serialized_deposit_data
be the serialized form ofdeposit.deposit_data
. It should be 8 bytes fordeposit_data.amount
followed by 8 bytes fordeposit_data.timestamp
and then theDepositInput
bytes. That is, it should matchdeposit_data
in the Ethereum 1.0 deposit contract of which the hash was placed into the Merkle tree. - Verify that
verify_merkle_branch(hash(serialized_deposit_data), deposit.branch, DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH, deposit.index, state.latest_deposit_root)
isTrue
.
def verify_merkle_branch(leaf: Hash32, branch: [Hash32], depth: int, index: int, root: Hash32) -> bool:
value = leaf
for i in range(depth):
if index // (2**i) % 2:
value = hash(branch[i] + value)
else:
value = hash(value + branch[i])
return value == root
- Run the following:
process_deposit(
state=state,
pubkey=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.pubkey,
amount=deposit.deposit_data.amount,
proof_of_possession=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.proof_of_possession,
withdrawal_credentials=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.randao_commitment,
custody_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.custody_commitment,
)
Exits
Verify that len(block.body.exits) <= MAX_EXITS
.
For each exit
in block.body.exits
:
- Let
validator = state.validator_registry[exit.validator_index]
. - Verify that
validator.exit_slot > state.slot + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY
. - Verify that
state.slot >= exit.slot
. - Verify that
bls_verify(pubkey=validator.pubkey, message=ZERO_HASH, signature=exit.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, exit.slot, DOMAIN_EXIT))
. - Run
initiate_validator_exit(state, exit.validator_index)
.
Custody
[TO BE REMOVED IN PHASE 1] Verify that len(block.body.custody_reseeds) == len(block.body.custody_challenges) == len(block.body.custody_responses) == 0
.
Per-epoch processing
The steps below happen when state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH == 0
.
Helpers
All validators:
- Let
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, state.slot)
. - Let
total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices])
.
Validators attesting during the current epoch:
- Let
current_epoch_attestations = [a for a in state.latest_attestations if state.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH <= a.data.slot < state.slot]
. (Note: this is the set of attestations of slots in the epochstate.slot-EPOCH_LENGTH...state.slot-1
, not attestations that got included in the chain during the epochstate.slot-EPOCH_LENGTH...state.slot-1
.) - Validators justifying the epoch boundary block at the start of the current epoch:
- Let
current_epoch_boundary_attestations = [a for a in current_epoch_attestations if a.data.epoch_boundary_root == get_block_root(state, state.slot-EPOCH_LENGTH) and a.justified_slot == state.justified_slot]
. - Let
current_epoch_boundary_attester_indices
be the union of the validator index sets given by[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in current_epoch_boundary_attestations]
. - Let
current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in current_epoch_boundary_attester_indices])
.
- Let
Validators attesting during the previous epoch:
- Validators that made an attestation during the previous epoch:
- Let
previous_epoch_attestations = [a for a in state.latest_attestations if state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH <= a.slot < state.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH]
. - Let
previous_epoch_attester_indices
be the union of the validator index sets given by[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_attestations]
.
- Let
- Validators targeting the previous justified slot:
- Let
previous_epoch_justified_attestations = [a for a in current_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.justified_slot == state.previous_justified_slot]
. - Let
previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices
be the union of the validator index sets given by[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_justified_attestations]
. - Let
previous_epoch_justified_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices])
.
- Let
- Validators justifying the epoch boundary block at the start of the previous epoch:
- Let
previous_epoch_boundary_attestations = [a for a in previous_epoch_justified_attestations if a.epoch_boundary_root == get_block_root(state, state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH)]
. - Let
previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices
be the union of the validator index sets given by[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_boundary_attestations]
. - Let
previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices])
.
- Let
- Validators attesting to the expected beacon chain head during the previous epoch:
- Let
previous_epoch_head_attestations = [a for a in previous_epoch_attestations if a.beacon_block_root == get_block_root(state, a.slot)]
. - Let
previous_epoch_head_attester_indices
be the union of the validator index sets given by[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_head_attestations]
. - Let
previous_epoch_head_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_head_attester_indices])
.
- Let
Note: previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance
balance might be marginally different than current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance
during the previous epoch transition. Due to the tight bound on validator churn each epoch and small per-epoch rewards/penalties, the potential balance difference is very low and only marginally affects consensus safety.
For every shard_committee_at_slot
in state.shard_committees_at_slots
and for every shard_committee
in shard_committee_at_slot
:
- Let
shard_block_root
bestate.latest_crosslinks[shard_committee.shard].shard_block_root
- Let
attesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, shard_block_root)
be the union of the validator index sets given by[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in current_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.shard == shard_committee.shard and a.shard_block_root == shard_block_root]
. - Let
winning_root(shard_committee)
be equal to the value ofshard_block_root
such thatsum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in attesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, shard_block_root)])
is maximized (ties broken by favoring lowershard_block_root
values). - Let
attesting_validators(shard_committee)
be equal toattesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, winning_root(shard_committee))
for convenience. - Let
total_attesting_balance(shard_committee) = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in attesting_validators(shard_committee)])
. - Let
total_balance(shard_committee) = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in shard_committee.committee])
.
Define the following helpers to process attestation inclusion rewards and inclusion distance reward/penalty. For every attestation a
in previous_epoch_attestations
:
- Let
inclusion_slot(state, index) = a.slot_included
for the attestationa
whereindex
is inget_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield)
. - Let
inclusion_distance(state, index) = a.slot_included - a.data.slot
wherea
is the above attestation.
Deposit roots
If state.slot % DEPOSIT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD == 0
:
- Set
state.latest_deposit_root = deposit_root_vote.deposit_root
ifdeposit_root_vote.vote_count * 2 > DEPOSIT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD
for somedeposit_root_vote
instate.deposit_root_votes
. - Set
state.deposit_root_votes = []
.
Justification
- Set
state.previous_justified_slot = state.justified_slot
. - Set
state.justification_bitfield = (state.justification_bitfield * 2) % 2**64
. - Set
state.justification_bitfield |= 2
andstate.justified_slot = state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH
if3 * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >= 2 * total_balance
. - Set
state.justification_bitfield |= 1
andstate.justified_slot = state.slot - 1 * EPOCH_LENGTH
if3 * current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >= 2 * total_balance
.
Set state.finalized_slot = state.previous_justified_slot
if any of the following are true:
state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 4 == 3
state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 3 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 8 == 7
state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 4 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 16 in (15, 14)
Crosslinks
For every shard_committee_at_slot
in state.shard_committees_at_slots
and for every shard_committee
in shard_committee_at_slot
:
- Set
state.latest_crosslinks[shard_committee.shard] = CrosslinkRecord(slot=state.slot, shard_block_root=winning_root(shard_committee))
if3 * total_attesting_balance(shard_committee) >= 2 * total_balance(shard_committee)
.
Rewards and penalties
First, we define some additional helpers:
- Let
base_reward_quotient = BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT * integer_squareroot(total_balance // GWEI_PER_ETH)
. - Let
base_reward(state, index) = get_effective_balance(state, index) // base_reward_quotient // 5
for any validator with the givenindex
. - Let
inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality) = base_reward(state, index) + get_effective_balance(state, index) * epochs_since_finality // INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT // 2
for any validator with the givenindex
.
Justification and finalization
Note: When applying penalties in the following balance recalculations implementers should make sure the uint64
does not underflow.
- Let
epochs_since_finality = (state.slot - state.finalized_slot) // EPOCH_LENGTH
.
Case 1: epochs_since_finality <= 4
:
- Expected FFG source:
- Any validator
index
inprevious_epoch_justified_attester_indices
gainsbase_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_justified_attesting_balance // total_balance
. - Any active validator
v
not inprevious_epoch_justified_attester_indices
losesbase_reward(state, index)
.
- Any validator
- Expected FFG target:
- Any validator
index
inprevious_epoch_boundary_attester_indices
gainsbase_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance // total_balance
. - Any active validator
index
not inprevious_epoch_boundary_attester_indices
losesbase_reward(state, index)
.
- Any validator
- Expected beacon chain head:
- Any validator
index
inprevious_epoch_head_attester_indices
gainsbase_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_head_attesting_balance // total_balance)
. - Any active validator
index
not inprevious_epoch_head_attester_indices
losesbase_reward(state, index)
.
- Any validator
- Inclusion distance:
- Any validator
index
inprevious_epoch_attester_indices
gainsbase_reward(state, index) * MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY // inclusion_distance(state, index)
- Any validator
Case 2: epochs_since_finality > 4
:
- Any active validator
index
not inprevious_epoch_justified_attester_indices
, losesinactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality)
. - Any active validator
index
not inprevious_epoch_boundary_attester_indices
, losesinactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality)
. - Any active validator
index
not inprevious_epoch_head_attester_indices
, losesbase_reward(state, index)
. - Any active_validator
index
withvalidator.penalized_slot <= state.slot
, loses2 * inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality) + base_reward(state, index)
. - Any validator
index
inprevious_epoch_attester_indices
losesbase_reward(state, index) - base_reward(state, index) * MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY // inclusion_distance(state, index)
Attestation inclusion
For each index
in previous_epoch_attester_indices
, we determine the proposer proposer_index = get_beacon_proposer_index(state, inclusion_slot(state, index))
and set state.validator_balances[proposer_index] += base_reward(state, index) // INCLUDER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
.
Crosslinks
For every shard_committee_at_slot
in state.shard_committees_at_slots[:EPOCH_LENGTH]
(i.e. the objects corresponding to the epoch before the current one), for each shard_committee
in shard_committee_at_slot
, and for each index
in shard_committee.committee
, adjust balances as follows:
- If
index in attesting_validators(shard_committee)
,state.validator_balances[index] += base_reward(state, index) * total_attesting_balance(shard_committee) // total_balance(shard_committee))
. - If
index not in attesting_validators(shard_committee)
,state.validator_balances[index] -= base_reward(state, index)
.
Ejections
- Run
process_ejections(state)
.
def process_ejections(state: BeaconState) -> None:
"""
Iterate through the validator registry
and eject active validators with balance below ``EJECTION_BALANCE``.
"""
for index in active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry):
if state.validator_balances[index] < EJECTION_BALANCE * GWEI_PER_ETH:
exit_validator(state, index)
Validator registry
If the following are satisfied:
state.finalized_slot > state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot
state.latest_crosslinks[shard].slot > state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot
for every shard numbershard
inshard_committee
fromshard_committee_at_slot
instate.shard_committees_at_slots
update the validator registry and associated fields by running
def update_validator_registry(state: BeaconState) -> None:
"""
Update validator registry.
Note that this function mutates ``state``.
"""
# The active validators
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, state.slot)
# The total effective balance of active validators
total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices])
# The maximum balance churn in Gwei (for deposits and exits separately)
max_balance_churn = max(
MAX_DEPOSIT * GWEI_PER_ETH,
total_balance // (2 * MAX_BALANCE_CHURN_QUOTIENT)
)
# Activate validators within the allowable balance churn
balance_churn = 0
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
if validator.activation_slot > state.slot + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY and state.validator_balances[index] >= MAX_DEPOSIT * GWEI_PER_ETH:
# Check the balance churn would be within the allowance
balance_churn += get_effective_balance(state, index)
if balance_churn > max_balance_churn:
break
# Activate validator
activate_validator(state, index, False)
# Exit validators within the allowable balance churn
balance_churn = 0
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
if validator.exit_slot > state.slot + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY and validator.status_flags & INITIATED_EXIT:
# Check the balance churn would be within the allowance
balance_churn += get_effective_balance(state, index)
if balance_churn > max_balance_churn:
break
# Exit validator
exit_validator(state, index)
state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot = state.slot
Regardless of whether the above conditions are satisfied, run the following:
def process_penalties_and_exits(state: BeaconState) -> None:
# The active validators
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, state.slot)
# The total effective balance of active validators
total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices])
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
if (state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH) == (validator.penalized_slot // EPOCH_LENGTH) + LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH // 2:
e = (state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH
total_at_start = state.latest_penalized_exit_balances[(e + 1) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH]
total_at_end = state.latest_penalized_exit_balances[e]
total_penalties = total_at_end - total_at_start
penalty = get_effective_balance(state, index) * min(total_penalties * 3, total_balance) // total_balance
state.validator_balances[index] -= penalty
def eligible(index):
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
if validator.penalized_slot <= state.slot:
PENALIZED_WITHDRAWAL_TIME = LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH * EPOCH_LENGTH // 2
return state.slot >= validator.penalized_slot + PENALIZED_WITHDRAWAL_TIME
else:
return state.slot >= validator.exit_slot + MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWAL_TIME
all_indices = list(range(len(state.validator_registry)))
eligible_indices = filter(eligible, all_indices)
sorted_indices = sorted(eligible_indices, key=lambda index: state.validator_registry[index].exit_count)
withdrawn_so_far = 0
for index in sorted_indices:
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
prepare_validator_for_withdrawal(state, index)
withdrawn_so_far += 1
if withdrawn_so_far >= MAX_WITHDRAWALS_PER_EPOCH:
break
Also perform the following updates:
- Set
state.shard_committees_at_slots[:EPOCH_LENGTH] = state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:]
. - Set
state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:] = get_shuffling(state.latest_randao_mixes[(state.slot - SEED_LOOKAHEAD) % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH], state.validator_registry, next_start_shard, state.slot)
wherenext_start_shard = (state.shard_committees_at_slots[-1][-1].shard + 1) % SHARD_COUNT
.
If a validator registry update does not happen do the following:
- Set
state.shard_committees_at_slots[:EPOCH_LENGTH] = state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:]
. - Let
epochs_since_last_registry_change = (state.slot - state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot) // EPOCH_LENGTH
. - Let
start_shard = state.shard_committees_at_slots[0][0].shard
. - If
epochs_since_last_registry_change
is an exact power of 2, setstate.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:] = get_shuffling(state.latest_randao_mixes[(state.slot - SEED_LOOKAHEAD) % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH], state.validator_registry, start_shard, state.slot)
. Note thatstart_shard
is not changed from the last epoch.
Final updates
- Let
e = state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH
. Setstate.latest_penalized_exit_balances[(e+1) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH] = state.latest_penalized_exit_balances[e % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH]
- Remove any
attestation
instate.latest_attestations
such thatattestation.data.slot < state.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH
.
State root processing
Verify block.state_root == hash_tree_root(state)
if there exists a block
for the slot being processed.
References
This section is divided into Normative and Informative references. Normative references are those that must be read in order to implement this specification, while Informative references are merely that, information. An example of the former might be the details of a required consensus algorithm, and an example of the latter might be a pointer to research that demonstrates why a particular consensus algorithm might be better suited for inclusion in the standard than another.
Normative
Informative
casper-ffg
Casper the Friendly Finality Gadget. V. Buterin and V. Griffith. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437
python-poc
Python proof-of-concept implementation. Ethereum Foundation. URL: https://github.com/ethereum/beacon_chain
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.