35 KiB
Ethereum 2.0 Phase 0 -- Honest Validator
Notice: This document is a work-in-progress for researchers and implementers. This is an accompanying document to Ethereum 2.0 Phase 0 -- The Beacon Chain, which describes the expected actions of a "validator" participating in the Ethereum 2.0 protocol.
Table of contents
- Introduction
- Prerequisites
- Constants
- Becoming a validator
- Validator assignments
- Beacon chain responsibilities
- Phase 0 attestation subnet stability
- How to avoid slashing
Introduction
This document represents the expected behavior of an "honest validator" with respect to Phase 0 of the Ethereum 2.0 protocol. This document does not distinguish between a "node" (i.e. the functionality of following and reading the beacon chain) and a "validator client" (i.e. the functionality of actively participating in consensus). The separation of concerns between these (potentially) two pieces of software is left as a design decision that is out of scope.
A validator is an entity that participates in the consensus of the Ethereum 2.0 protocol. This is an optional role for users in which they can post ETH as collateral and verify and attest to the validity of blocks to seek financial returns in exchange for building and securing the protocol. This is similar to proof-of-work networks in which miners provide collateral in the form of hardware/hash-power to seek returns in exchange for building and securing the protocol.
Prerequisites
All terminology, constants, functions, and protocol mechanics defined in the Phase 0 -- The Beacon Chain and Phase 0 -- Deposit Contract doc are requisite for this document and used throughout. Please see the Phase 0 doc before continuing and use as a reference throughout.
Constants
Misc
Name | Value | Unit | Duration |
---|---|---|---|
TARGET_AGGREGATORS_PER_COMMITTEE |
2**4 (= 16) |
validators | |
RANDOM_SUBNETS_PER_VALIDATOR |
2**0 (= 1) |
subnets | |
EPOCHS_PER_RANDOM_SUBNET_SUBSCRIPTION |
2**8 (= 256) |
epochs | ~27 hours |
ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT |
64 |
The number of attestation subnets used in the gossipsub protocol. |
Becoming a validator
Initialization
A validator must initialize many parameters locally before submitting a deposit and joining the validator registry.
BLS public key
Validator public keys are G1 points on the BLS12-381 curve. A private key, privkey
, must be securely generated along with the resultant pubkey
. This privkey
must be "hot", that is, constantly available to sign data throughout the lifetime of the validator.
BLS withdrawal key
A secondary withdrawal private key, withdrawal_privkey
, must also be securely generated along with the resultant withdrawal_pubkey
. This withdrawal_privkey
does not have to be available for signing during the normal lifetime of a validator and can live in "cold storage".
The validator constructs their withdrawal_credentials
via the following:
- Set
withdrawal_credentials[:1] == BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX
. - Set
withdrawal_credentials[1:] == hash(withdrawal_pubkey)[1:]
.
Submit deposit
In Phase 0, all incoming validator deposits originate from the Ethereum 1.0 chain defined by DEPOSIT_CHAIN_ID
and DEPOSIT_NETWORK_ID
. Deposits are made to the deposit contract located at DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS
.
To submit a deposit:
- Pack the validator's initialization parameters into
deposit_data
, aDepositData
SSZ object. - Let
amount
be the amount in Gwei to be deposited by the validator whereamount >= MIN_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT
. - Set
deposit_data.pubkey
to validator'spubkey
. - Set
deposit_data.withdrawal_credentials
towithdrawal_credentials
. - Set
deposit_data.amount
toamount
. - Let
deposit_message
be aDepositMessage
with all theDepositData
contents except thesignature
. - Let
signature
be the result ofbls.Sign
of thecompute_signing_root(deposit_message, domain)
withdomain=compute_domain(DOMAIN_DEPOSIT)
. (Warning: Deposits must be signed withGENESIS_FORK_VERSION
, callingcompute_domain
without a second argument defaults to the correct version). - Let
deposit_data_root
behash_tree_root(deposit_data)
. - Send a transaction on the Ethereum 1.0 chain to
DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS
executingdef deposit(pubkey: bytes[48], withdrawal_credentials: bytes[32], signature: bytes[96], deposit_data_root: bytes32)
along with a deposit ofamount
Gwei.
Note: Deposits made for the same pubkey
are treated as for the same validator. A singular Validator
will be added to state.validators
with each additional deposit amount added to the validator's balance. A validator can only be activated when total deposits for the validator pubkey meet or exceed MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
.
Process deposit
Deposits cannot be processed into the beacon chain until the Eth1 block in which they were deposited or any of its descendants is added to the beacon chain state.eth1_data
. This takes a minimum of ETH1_FOLLOW_DISTANCE
Eth1 blocks (~8 hours) plus EPOCHS_PER_ETH1_VOTING_PERIOD
epochs (~6.8 hours). Once the requisite Eth1 data is added, the deposit will normally be added to a beacon chain block and processed into the state.validators
within an epoch or two. The validator is then in a queue to be activated.
Validator index
Once a validator has been processed and added to the beacon state's validators
, the validator's validator_index
is defined by the index into the registry at which the ValidatorRecord
contains the pubkey
specified in the validator's deposit. A validator's validator_index
is guaranteed to not change from the time of initial deposit until the validator exits and fully withdraws. This validator_index
is used throughout the specification to dictate validator roles and responsibilities at any point and should be stored locally.
Activation
In normal operation, the validator is quickly activated, at which point the validator is added to the shuffling and begins validation after an additional MAX_SEED_LOOKAHEAD
epochs (25.6 minutes).
The function is_active_validator
can be used to check if a validator is active during a given epoch. Usage is as follows:
def check_if_validator_active(state: BeaconState, validator_index: ValidatorIndex) -> bool:
validator = state.validators[validator_index]
return is_active_validator(validator, get_current_epoch(state))
Once a validator is activated, the validator is assigned responsibilities until exited.
Note: There is a maximum validator churn per finalized epoch, so the delay until activation is variable depending upon finality, total active validator balance, and the number of validators in the queue to be activated.
Validator assignments
A validator can get committee assignments for a given epoch using the following helper via get_committee_assignment(state, epoch, validator_index)
where epoch <= next_epoch
.
def get_committee_assignment(state: BeaconState,
epoch: Epoch,
validator_index: ValidatorIndex
) -> Optional[Tuple[Sequence[ValidatorIndex], CommitteeIndex, Slot]]:
"""
Return the committee assignment in the ``epoch`` for ``validator_index``.
``assignment`` returned is a tuple of the following form:
* ``assignment[0]`` is the list of validators in the committee
* ``assignment[1]`` is the index to which the committee is assigned
* ``assignment[2]`` is the slot at which the committee is assigned
Return None if no assignment.
"""
next_epoch = Epoch(get_current_epoch(state) + 1)
assert epoch <= next_epoch
start_slot = compute_start_slot_at_epoch(epoch)
committee_count_per_slot = get_committee_count_per_slot(state, epoch)
for slot in range(start_slot, start_slot + SLOTS_PER_EPOCH):
for index in range(committee_count_per_slot):
committee = get_beacon_committee(state, Slot(slot), CommitteeIndex(index))
if validator_index in committee:
return committee, CommitteeIndex(index), Slot(slot)
return None
A validator can use the following function to see if they are supposed to propose during a slot. This function can only be run with a state
of the slot in question. Proposer selection is only stable within the context of the current epoch.
def is_proposer(state: BeaconState, validator_index: ValidatorIndex) -> bool:
return get_beacon_proposer_index(state) == validator_index
Note: To see if a validator is assigned to propose during the slot, the beacon state must be in the epoch in question. At the epoch boundaries, the validator must run an epoch transition into the epoch to successfully check the proposal assignment of the first slot.
Note: BeaconBlock
proposal is distinct from beacon committee assignment, and in a given epoch each responsibility might occur at a different slot.
Lookahead
The beacon chain shufflings are designed to provide a minimum of 1 epoch lookahead on the validator's upcoming committee assignments for attesting dictated by the shuffling and slot. Note that this lookahead does not apply to proposing, which must be checked during the epoch in question.
get_committee_assignment
should be called at the start of each epoch
to get the assignment for the next epoch (current_epoch + 1
).
A validator should plan for future assignments by noting their assigned attestation
slot and joining the committee index attestation subnet related to their committee assignment.
Specifically a validator should:
- Call
get_committee_assignment(state, next_epoch, validator_index)
when checking for next epoch assignments. - Calculate the committees per slot for the next epoch:
committees_per_slot = get_committee_count_per_slot(state, next_epoch)
- Calculate the subnet index:
subnet_id = compute_subnet_for_attestation(committees_per_slot, slot, committee_index)
- Find peers of the pubsub topic
beacon_attestation_{subnet_id}
.- If an insufficient number of current peers are subscribed to the topic, the validator must discover new peers on this topic. Via the discovery protocol, find peers with an ENR containing the
attnets
entry such thatENR["attnets"][subnet_id] == True
. Then validate that the peers are still persisted on the desired topic by requestingGetMetaData
and checking the resultingattnets
field. - If the validator is assigned to be an aggregator for the slot (see
is_aggregator()
), then subscribe to the topic.
- If an insufficient number of current peers are subscribed to the topic, the validator must discover new peers on this topic. Via the discovery protocol, find peers with an ENR containing the
Note: If the validator is not assigned to be an aggregator, the validator only needs sufficient number of peers on the topic to be able to publish messages. The validator does not need to subscribe and listen to all messages on the topic.
Beacon chain responsibilities
A validator has two primary responsibilities to the beacon chain: proposing blocks and creating attestations. Proposals happen infrequently, whereas attestations should be created once per epoch.
Block proposal
A validator is expected to propose a SignedBeaconBlock
at
the beginning of any slot during which is_proposer(state, validator_index)
returns True
.
To propose, the validator selects the BeaconBlock
, parent
,
that in their view of the fork choice is the head of the chain during slot - 1
.
The validator creates, signs, and broadcasts a block
that is a child of parent
that satisfies a valid beacon chain state transition.
There is one proposer per slot, so if there are N active validators any individual validator will on average be assigned to propose once per N slots (e.g. at 312,500 validators = 10 million ETH, that's once per ~6 weeks).
Note: In this section, state
is the state of the slot for the block proposal without the block yet applied.
That is, state
is the previous_state
processed through any empty slots up to the assigned slot using process_slots(previous_state, slot)
.
Preparing for a BeaconBlock
To construct a BeaconBlockBody
, a block
(BeaconBlock
) is defined with the necessary context for a block proposal:
Slot
Set block.slot = slot
where slot
is the current slot at which the validator has been selected to propose. The parent
selected must satisfy that parent.slot < block.slot
.
Note: There might be "skipped" slots between the parent
and block
. These skipped slots are processed in the state transition function without per-block processing.
Proposer index
Set block.proposer_index = validator_index
where validator_index
is the validator chosen to propose at this slot. The private key mapping to state.validators[validator_index].pubkey
is used to sign the block.
Parent root
Set block.parent_root = hash_tree_root(parent)
.
Constructing the BeaconBlockBody
Randao reveal
Set block.body.randao_reveal = epoch_signature
where epoch_signature
is obtained from:
def get_epoch_signature(state: BeaconState, block: BeaconBlock, privkey: int) -> BLSSignature:
domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_RANDAO, compute_epoch_at_slot(block.slot))
signing_root = compute_signing_root(compute_epoch_at_slot(block.slot), domain)
return bls.Sign(privkey, signing_root)
Eth1 Data
The block.body.eth1_data
field is for block proposers to vote on recent Eth1 data.
This recent data contains an Eth1 block hash as well as the associated deposit root
(as calculated by the get_deposit_root()
method of the deposit contract) and
deposit count after execution of the corresponding Eth1 block.
If over half of the block proposers in the current Eth1 voting period vote for the same
eth1_data
then state.eth1_data
updates immediately allowing new deposits to be processed.
Each deposit in block.body.deposits
must verify against state.eth1_data.eth1_deposit_root
.
Eth1Block
Let Eth1Block
be an abstract object representing Eth1 blocks with the timestamp
and depost contract data available.
class Eth1Block(Container):
timestamp: uint64
deposit_root: Root
deposit_count: uint64
# All other eth1 block fields
get_eth1_data
Let get_eth1_data(block: Eth1Block) -> Eth1Data
be the function that returns the Eth1 data for a given Eth1 block.
An honest block proposer sets block.body.eth1_data = get_eth1_vote(state)
where:
def compute_time_at_slot(state: BeaconState, slot: Slot) -> uint64:
return uint64(state.genesis_time + slot * SECONDS_PER_SLOT)
def voting_period_start_time(state: BeaconState) -> uint64:
eth1_voting_period_start_slot = Slot(state.slot - state.slot % (EPOCHS_PER_ETH1_VOTING_PERIOD * SLOTS_PER_EPOCH))
return compute_time_at_slot(state, eth1_voting_period_start_slot)
def is_candidate_block(block: Eth1Block, period_start: uint64) -> bool:
return (
block.timestamp + SECONDS_PER_ETH1_BLOCK * ETH1_FOLLOW_DISTANCE <= period_start
and block.timestamp + SECONDS_PER_ETH1_BLOCK * ETH1_FOLLOW_DISTANCE * 2 >= period_start
)
def get_eth1_vote(state: BeaconState, eth1_chain: Sequence[Eth1Block]) -> Eth1Data:
period_start = voting_period_start_time(state)
# `eth1_chain` abstractly represents all blocks in the eth1 chain sorted by ascending block height
votes_to_consider = [
get_eth1_data(block) for block in eth1_chain
if (
is_candidate_block(block, period_start)
# Ensure cannot move back to earlier deposit contract states
and get_eth1_data(block).deposit_count >= state.eth1_data.deposit_count
)
]
# Valid votes already cast during this period
valid_votes = [vote for vote in state.eth1_data_votes if vote in votes_to_consider]
# Default vote on latest eth1 block data in the period range unless eth1 chain is not live
default_vote = votes_to_consider[len(votes_to_consider) - 1] if any(votes_to_consider) else state.eth1_data
return max(
valid_votes,
key=lambda v: (valid_votes.count(v), -valid_votes.index(v)), # Tiebreak by smallest distance
default=default_vote
)
Proposer slashings
Up to MAX_PROPOSER_SLASHINGS
, ProposerSlashing
objects can be included in the block
. The proposer slashings must satisfy the verification conditions found in proposer slashings processing. The validator receives a small "whistleblower" reward for each proposer slashing found and included.
Attester slashings
Up to MAX_ATTESTER_SLASHINGS
, AttesterSlashing
objects can be included in the block
. The attester slashings must satisfy the verification conditions found in attester slashings processing. The validator receives a small "whistleblower" reward for each attester slashing found and included.
Attestations
Up to MAX_ATTESTATIONS
, aggregate attestations can be included in the block
. The attestations added must satisfy the verification conditions found in attestation processing. To maximize profit, the validator should attempt to gather aggregate attestations that include singular attestations from the largest number of validators whose signatures from the same epoch have not previously been added on chain.
Deposits
If there are any unprocessed deposits for the existing state.eth1_data
(i.e. state.eth1_data.deposit_count > state.eth1_deposit_index
), then pending deposits must be added to the block. The expected number of deposits is exactly min(MAX_DEPOSITS, eth1_data.deposit_count - state.eth1_deposit_index)
. These deposits
are constructed from the Deposit
logs from the Eth1 deposit contract and must be processed in sequential order. The deposits included in the block
must satisfy the verification conditions found in deposits processing.
The proof
for each deposit must be constructed against the deposit root contained in state.eth1_data
rather than the deposit root at the time the deposit was initially logged from the 1.0 chain. This entails storing a full deposit merkle tree locally and computing updated proofs against the eth1_data.deposit_root
as needed. See minimal_merkle.py
for a sample implementation.
Voluntary exits
Up to MAX_VOLUNTARY_EXITS
, VoluntaryExit
objects can be included in the block
. The exits must satisfy the verification conditions found in exits processing.
Note: If a slashing for a validator is included in the same block as a voluntary exit, the voluntary exit will fail and cause the block to be invalid due to the slashing being processed first. Implementers must take heed of this operation interaction when packing blocks.
Packaging into a SignedBeaconBlock
State root
Set block.state_root = hash_tree_root(state)
of the resulting state
of the parent -> block
state transition.
Note: To calculate state_root
, the validator should first run the state transition function on an unsigned block
containing a stub for the state_root
.
It is useful to be able to run a state transition function (working on a copy of the state) that does not validate signatures or state root for this purpose:
def compute_new_state_root(state: BeaconState, block: BeaconBlock) -> Root:
temp_state: BeaconState = state.copy()
signed_block = SignedBeaconBlock(message=block)
state_transition(temp_state, signed_block, validate_result=False)
return hash_tree_root(temp_state)
Signature
signed_block = SignedBeaconBlock(message=block, signature=block_signature)
, where block_signature
is obtained from:
def get_block_signature(state: BeaconState, block: BeaconBlock, privkey: int) -> BLSSignature:
domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_BEACON_PROPOSER, compute_epoch_at_slot(block.slot))
signing_root = compute_signing_root(block, domain)
return bls.Sign(privkey, signing_root)
Attesting
A validator is expected to create, sign, and broadcast an attestation during each epoch. The committee
, assigned index
, and assigned slot
for which the validator performs this role during an epoch are defined by get_committee_assignment(state, epoch, validator_index)
.
A validator should create and broadcast the attestation
to the associated attestation subnet when either (a) the validator has received a valid block from the expected block proposer for the assigned slot
or (b) one-third of the slot
has transpired (SECONDS_PER_SLOT / 3
seconds after the start of slot
) -- whichever comes first.
Note: Although attestations during GENESIS_EPOCH
do not count toward FFG finality, these initial attestations do give weight to the fork choice, are rewarded, and should be made.
Attestation data
First, the validator should construct attestation_data
, an AttestationData
object based upon the state at the assigned slot.
- Let
head_block
be the result of running the fork choice during the assigned slot. - Let
head_state
be the state ofhead_block
processed through any empty slots up to the assigned slot usingprocess_slots(state, slot)
.
General
- Set
attestation_data.slot = slot
whereslot
is the assigned slot. - Set
attestation_data.index = index
whereindex
is the index associated with the validator's committee.
LMD GHOST vote
Set attestation_data.beacon_block_root = hash_tree_root(head_block)
.
FFG vote
- Set
attestation_data.source = head_state.current_justified_checkpoint
. - Set
attestation_data.target = Checkpoint(epoch=get_current_epoch(head_state), root=epoch_boundary_block_root)
whereepoch_boundary_block_root
is the root of block at the most recent epoch boundary.
Note: epoch_boundary_block_root
can be looked up in the state using:
- Let
start_slot = compute_start_slot_at_epoch(get_current_epoch(head_state))
. - Let
epoch_boundary_block_root = hash_tree_root(head_block) if start_slot == head_state.slot else get_block_root(state, get_current_epoch(head_state))
.
Construct attestation
Next, the validator creates attestation
, an Attestation
object.
Data
Set attestation.data = attestation_data
where attestation_data
is the AttestationData
object defined in the previous section, attestation data.
Aggregation bits
- Let
attestation.aggregation_bits
be aBitlist[MAX_VALIDATORS_PER_COMMITTEE]
of lengthlen(committee)
, where the bit of the index of the validator in thecommittee
is set to0b1
.
Note: Calling get_attesting_indices(state, attestation.data, attestation.aggregation_bits)
should return a list of length equal to 1, containing validator_index
.
Aggregate signature
Set attestation.signature = attestation_signature
where attestation_signature
is obtained from:
def get_attestation_signature(state: BeaconState, attestation_data: AttestationData, privkey: int) -> BLSSignature:
domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_BEACON_ATTESTER, attestation_data.target.epoch)
signing_root = compute_signing_root(attestation_data, domain)
return bls.Sign(privkey, signing_root)
Broadcast attestation
Finally, the validator broadcasts attestation
to the associated attestation subnet, the beacon_attestation_{subnet_id}
pubsub topic.
The subnet_id
for the attestation
is calculated with:
- Let
committees_per_slot = get_committee_count_per_slot(state, attestation.data.target.epoch)
. - Let
subnet_id = compute_subnet_for_attestation(committees_per_slot, attestation.data.slot, attestation.data.committee_index)
.
def compute_subnet_for_attestation(committees_per_slot: uint64, slot: Slot, committee_index: CommitteeIndex) -> uint64:
"""
Compute the correct subnet for an attestation for Phase 0.
Note, this mimics expected Phase 1 behavior where attestations will be mapped to their shard subnet.
"""
slots_since_epoch_start = uint64(slot % SLOTS_PER_EPOCH)
committees_since_epoch_start = committees_per_slot * slots_since_epoch_start
return uint64((committees_since_epoch_start + committee_index) % ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT)
Attestation aggregation
Some validators are selected to locally aggregate attestations with a similar attestation_data
to their constructed attestation
for the assigned slot
.
Aggregation selection
A validator is selected to aggregate based upon the return value of is_aggregator()
.
def get_slot_signature(state: BeaconState, slot: Slot, privkey: int) -> BLSSignature:
domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_SELECTION_PROOF, compute_epoch_at_slot(slot))
signing_root = compute_signing_root(slot, domain)
return bls.Sign(privkey, signing_root)
def is_aggregator(state: BeaconState, slot: Slot, index: CommitteeIndex, slot_signature: BLSSignature) -> bool:
committee = get_beacon_committee(state, slot, index)
modulo = max(1, len(committee) // TARGET_AGGREGATORS_PER_COMMITTEE)
return bytes_to_uint64(hash(slot_signature)[0:8]) % modulo == 0
Construct aggregate
If the validator is selected to aggregate (is_aggregator()
), they construct an aggregate attestation via the following.
Collect attestations
seen via gossip during the slot
that have an equivalent attestation_data
to that constructed by the validator. If len(attestations) > 0
, create an aggregate_attestation: Attestation
with the following fields.
Data
Set aggregate_attestation.data = attestation_data
where attestation_data
is the AttestationData
object that is the same for each individual attestation being aggregated.
Aggregation bits
Let aggregate_attestation.aggregation_bits
be a Bitlist[MAX_VALIDATORS_PER_COMMITTEE]
of length len(committee)
, where each bit set from each individual attestation is set to 0b1
.
Aggregate signature
Set aggregate_attestation.signature = aggregate_signature
where aggregate_signature
is obtained from:
def get_aggregate_signature(attestations: Sequence[Attestation]) -> BLSSignature:
signatures = [attestation.signature for attestation in attestations]
return bls.Aggregate(signatures)
Broadcast aggregate
If the validator is selected to aggregate (is_aggregator
), then they broadcast their best aggregate as a SignedAggregateAndProof
to the global aggregate channel (beacon_aggregate_and_proof
) two-thirds of the way through the slot
-that is, SECONDS_PER_SLOT * 2 / 3
seconds after the start of slot
.
Selection proofs are provided in AggregateAndProof
to prove to the gossip channel that the validator has been selected as an aggregator.
AggregateAndProof
messages are signed by the aggregator and broadcast inside of SignedAggregateAndProof
objects to prevent a class of DoS attacks and message forgeries.
First, aggregate_and_proof = get_aggregate_and_proof(state, validator_index, aggregate_attestation, privkey)
is constructed.
def get_aggregate_and_proof(state: BeaconState,
aggregator_index: ValidatorIndex,
aggregate: Attestation,
privkey: int) -> AggregateAndProof:
return AggregateAndProof(
aggregator_index=aggregator_index,
aggregate=aggregate,
selection_proof=get_slot_signature(state, aggregate.data.slot, privkey),
)
Then signed_aggregate_and_proof = SignedAggregateAndProof(message=aggregate_and_proof, signature=signature)
is constructed and broadast. Where signature
is obtained from:
def get_aggregate_and_proof_signature(state: BeaconState,
aggregate_and_proof: AggregateAndProof,
privkey: int) -> BLSSignature:
aggregate = aggregate_and_proof.aggregate
domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_AGGREGATE_AND_PROOF, compute_epoch_at_slot(aggregate.data.slot))
signing_root = compute_signing_root(aggregate_and_proof, domain)
return bls.Sign(privkey, signing_root)
AggregateAndProof
class AggregateAndProof(Container):
aggregator_index: ValidatorIndex
aggregate: Attestation
selection_proof: BLSSignature
SignedAggregateAndProof
class SignedAggregateAndProof(Container):
message: AggregateAndProof
signature: BLSSignature
Phase 0 attestation subnet stability
Because Phase 0 does not have shards and thus does not have Shard Committees, there is no stable backbone to the attestation subnets (beacon_attestation_{subnet_id}
). To provide this stability, each validator must:
- Randomly select and remain subscribed to
RANDOM_SUBNETS_PER_VALIDATOR
attestation subnets - Maintain advertisement of the randomly selected subnets in their node's ENR
attnets
entry by setting the randomly selectedsubnet_id
bits toTrue
(e.g.ENR["attnets"][subnet_id] = True
) for all persistent attestation subnets - Set the lifetime of each random subscription to a random number of epochs between
EPOCHS_PER_RANDOM_SUBNET_SUBSCRIPTION
and2 * EPOCHS_PER_RANDOM_SUBNET_SUBSCRIPTION]
. At the end of life for a subscription, select a new random subnet, update subnet subscriptions, and publish an updated ENR
Note: Short lived beacon committee assignments should not be added in into the ENR attnets
entry.
Note: When preparing for a hard fork, a validator must select and subscribe to random subnets of the future fork versioning at least EPOCHS_PER_RANDOM_SUBNET_SUBSCRIPTION
epochs in advance of the fork. These new subnets for the fork are maintained in addition to those for the current fork until the fork occurs. After the fork occurs, let the subnets from the previous fork reach the end of life with no replacements.
How to avoid slashing
"Slashing" is the burning of some amount of validator funds and immediate ejection from the active validator set. In Phase 0, there are two ways in which funds can be slashed: proposer slashing and attester slashing. Although being slashed has serious repercussions, it is simple enough to avoid being slashed all together by remaining consistent with respect to the messages a validator has previously signed.
Note: Signed data must be within a sequential Fork
context to conflict. Messages cannot be slashed across diverging forks. If the previous fork version is 1 and the chain splits into fork 2 and 102, messages from 1 can slashable against messages in forks 1, 2, and 102. Messages in 2 cannot be slashable against messages in 102, and vice versa.
Proposer slashing
To avoid "proposer slashings", a validator must not sign two conflicting BeaconBlock
where conflicting is defined as two distinct blocks within the same slot.
In Phase 0, as long as the validator does not sign two different beacon blocks for the same slot, the validator is safe against proposer slashings.
Specifically, when signing a BeaconBlock
, a validator should perform the following steps in the following order:
- Save a record to hard disk that a beacon block has been signed for the
slot=block.slot
. - Generate and broadcast the block.
If the software crashes at some point within this routine, then when the validator comes back online, the hard disk has the record of the potentially signed/broadcast block and can effectively avoid slashing.
Attester slashing
To avoid "attester slashings", a validator must not sign two conflicting AttestationData
objects, i.e. two attestations that satisfy is_slashable_attestation_data
.
Specifically, when signing an Attestation
, a validator should perform the following steps in the following order:
- Save a record to hard disk that an attestation has been signed for source (i.e.
attestation_data.source.epoch
) and target (i.e.attestation_data.target.epoch
). - Generate and broadcast attestation.
If the software crashes at some point within this routine, then when the validator comes back online, the hard disk has the record of the potentially signed/broadcast attestation and can effectively avoid slashing.