eth2.0-specs/specs/core/0_beacon-chain.md

1632 lines
69 KiB
Markdown

# Ethereum 2.0 Phase 0 -- The Beacon Chain
**NOTICE**: This document is a work-in-progress for researchers and implementers. It reflects recent spec changes and takes precedence over the Python proof-of-concept implementation [[python-poc]](#ref-python-poc).
## Table of contents
<!-- TOC -->
- [Ethereum 2.0 Phase 0 -- The Beacon Chain](#ethereum-20-phase-0----the-beacon-chain)
- [Table of contents](#table-of-contents)
- [Introduction](#introduction)
- [Notation](#notation)
- [Terminology](#terminology)
- [Constants](#constants)
- [Misc](#misc)
- [Deposit contract](#deposit-contract)
- [Initial values](#initial-values)
- [Time parameters](#time-parameters)
- [Reward and penalty quotients](#reward-and-penalty-quotients)
- [Status codes](#status-codes)
- [Special record types](#special-record-types)
- [Validator registry delta flags](#validator-registry-delta-flags)
- [Signature domains](#signature-domains)
- [Data structures](#data-structures)
- [Deposits](#deposits)
- [`DepositParametersRecord`](#depositparametersrecord)
- [Beacon chain blocks](#beacon-chain-blocks)
- [`BeaconBlock`](#beaconblock)
- [`AttestationRecord`](#attestationrecord)
- [`AttestationData`](#attestationdata)
- [`ProposalSignedData`](#proposalsigneddata)
- [`SpecialRecord`](#specialrecord)
- [Beacon chain state](#beacon-chain-state)
- [`BeaconState`](#beaconstate)
- [`ValidatorRecord`](#validatorrecord)
- [`CrosslinkRecord`](#crosslinkrecord)
- [`ShardCommittee`](#shardcommittee)
- [`ShardReassignmentRecord`](#shardreassignmentrecord)
- [`CandidatePoWReceiptRootRecord`](#candidatepowreceiptrootrecord)
- [`PendingAttestationRecord`](#pendingattestationrecord)
- [`ForkData`](#forkdata)
- [Specials](#specials)
- [`VoluntaryExitSpecial`](#voluntaryexitspecial)
- [`CasperSlashingSpecial`](#casperslashingspecial)
- [`SpecialAttestationData`](#specialattestationdata)
- [`ProposerSlashingSpecial`](#proposerslashingspecial)
- [`DepositProofSpecial`](#depositproofspecial)
- [Ethereum 1.0 deposit contract](#ethereum-10-deposit-contract)
- [Deposit arguments](#deposit-arguments)
- [`Deposit` logs](#deposit-logs)
- [`ChainStart` log](#chainstart-log)
- [Vyper code](#vyper-code)
- [Beacon chain processing](#beacon-chain-processing)
- [Beacon chain fork choice rule](#beacon-chain-fork-choice-rule)
- [Beacon chain state transition function](#beacon-chain-state-transition-function)
- [Helper functions](#helper-functions)
- [`get_active_validator_indices`](#get_active_validator_indices)
- [`shuffle`](#shuffle)
- [`split`](#split)
- [`clamp`](#clamp)
- [`get_new_shuffling`](#get_new_shuffling)
- [`get_shard_committees_at_slot`](#get_shard_committees_at_slot)
- [`get_block_hash`](#get_block_hash)
- [`get_beacon_proposer_index`](#get_beacon_proposer_index)
- [`get_attestation_participants`](#get_attestation_participants)
- [`bytes1`, `bytes2`, ...](#bytes1-bytes2-)
- [`get_effective_balance`](#get_effective_balance)
- [`get_new_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip`](#get_new_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip)
- [`integer_squareroot`](#integer_squareroot)
- [On startup](#on-startup)
- [Routine for activating a validator](#routine-for-activating-a-validator)
- [Routine for exiting a validator](#routine-for-exiting-a-validator)
- [Per-slot processing](#per-slot-processing)
- [Proposer signature](#proposer-signature)
- [Attestations](#attestations)
- [RANDAO](#randao)
- [PoW receipt root](#pow-receipt-root)
- [Special objects](#special-objects)
- [`VOLUNTARY_EXIT`](#voluntary_exit)
- [`CASPER_SLASHING`](#casper_slashing)
- [`PROPOSER_SLASHING`](#proposer_slashing)
- [`DEPOSIT_PROOF`](#deposit_proof)
- [Per-epoch processing](#per-epoch-processing)
- [Helpers](#helpers)
- [Receipt roots](#receipt-roots)
- [Justification](#justification)
- [Finalization](#finalization)
- [Crosslinks](#crosslinks)
- [Justification and finalization rewards and penalties](#justification-and-finalization-rewards-and-penalties)
- [Crosslink rewards and penalties](#crosslink-rewards-and-penalties)
- [Validator registry](#validator-registry)
- [Proposer reshuffling](#proposer-reshuffling)
- [Final updates](#final-updates)
- [State root processing](#state-root-processing)
- [Appendix](#appendix)
- [Appendix A - Hash function](#appendix-a---hash-function)
- [References](#references)
- [Normative](#normative)
- [Informative](#informative)
- [Copyright](#copyright)
<!-- /TOC -->
## Introduction
This document represents the specification for Phase 0 of Ethereum 2.0 -- The Beacon Chain.
At the core of Ethereum 2.0 is a system chain called the "beacon chain". The beacon chain stores and manages the registry of [validators](#dfn-validator). In the initial deployment phases of Ethereum 2.0 the only mechanism to become a [validator](#dfn-validator) is to make a one-way ETH transaction to a deposit contract on Ethereum 1.0. Activation as a [validator](#dfn-validator) happens when deposit transaction receipts are processed by the beacon chain, the activation balance is reached, and after a queuing process. Exit is either voluntary or done forcibly as a penalty for misbehavior.
The primary source of load on the beacon chain is "attestations". Attestations are availability votes for a shard block, and simultaneously proof of stake votes for a beacon chain block. A sufficient number of attestations for the same shard block create a "crosslink", confirming the shard segment up to that shard block into the beacon chain. Crosslinks also serve as infrastructure for asynchronous cross-shard communication.
## Notation
Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted as an algorithm defined in Python. Implementations may implement such algorithms using any code and programming language desired as long as the behavior is identical to that of the algorithm provided.
## Terminology
* **Validator** <a id="dfn-validator"></a> - a participant in the Casper/sharding consensus system. You can become one by depositing 32 ETH into the Casper mechanism.
* **Active validator** <a id="dfn-active-validator"></a> - a [validator](#dfn-validator) currently participating in the protocol which the Casper mechanism looks to produce and attest to blocks, crosslinks and other consensus objects.
* **Committee** - a (pseudo-) randomly sampled subset of [active validators](#dfn-active-validator). When a committee is referred to collectively, as in "this committee attests to X", this is assumed to mean "some subset of that committee that contains enough [validators](#dfn-validator) that the protocol recognizes it as representing the committee".
* **Proposer** - the [validator](#dfn-validator) that creates a beacon chain block
* **Attester** - a [validator](#dfn-validator) that is part of a committee that needs to sign off on a beacon chain block while simultaneously creating a link (crosslink) to a recent shard block on a particular shard chain.
* **Beacon chain** - the central PoS chain that is the base of the sharding system.
* **Shard chain** - one of the chains on which user transactions take place and account data is stored.
* **Crosslink** - a set of signatures from a committee attesting to a block in a shard chain, which can be included into the beacon chain. Crosslinks are the main means by which the beacon chain "learns about" the updated state of shard chains.
* **Slot** - a period of `SLOT_DURATION` seconds, during which one proposer has the ability to create a beacon chain block and some attesters have the ability to make attestations
* **Epoch** - an aligned span of slots during which all [validators](#dfn-validator) get exactly one chance to make an attestation
* **Finalized**, **justified** - see Casper FFG finalization here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437
* **Withdrawal period** - the number of slots between a [validator](#dfn-validator) exit and the [validator](#dfn-validator) balance being withdrawable
* **Genesis time** - the Unix time of the genesis beacon chain block at slot 0
## Constants
### Misc
| Name | Value | Unit |
| - | - | :-: |
| `SHARD_COUNT` | `2**10` (= 1,024) | shards |
| `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE` | `2**8` (= 256) | [validators](#dfn-validator) |
| `MAX_ATTESTATIONS_PER_BLOCK` | `2**7` (= 128) | attestations |
| `MIN_BALANCE` | `2**4` (= 16) | ETH |
| `MAX_BALANCE_CHURN_QUOTIENT` | `2**5` (= 32) | - |
| `GWEI_PER_ETH` | `10**9` | Gwei/ETH |
| `BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER` | `2**64 - 1` | - |
| `BLS_WITHDRAWAL_CREDENTIALS` | `0x00` | - |
* For the safety of crosslinks a minimum committee size of 111 is [recommended](https://vitalik.ca/files/Ithaca201807_Sharding.pdf). (Unbiasable randomness with a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) will improve committee robustness and lower the safe minimum committee size.) The shuffling algorithm generally ensures (assuming sufficient validators) committee sizes at least `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE // 2`.
### Deposit contract
| Name | Value | Unit |
| - | - | :-: |
| `DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS` | **TBD** |
| `DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH` | `2**5` (= 32) | - |
| `MIN_DEPOSIT` | `2**0` (= 1) | ETH |
| `MAX_DEPOSIT` | `2**5` (= 32) | ETH |
### Initial values
| Name | Value |
| - | - |
| `INITIAL_FORK_VERSION` | `0` |
| `INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER` | `0` |
| `ZERO_HASH` | `bytes([0] * 32)` |
### Time parameters
| Name | Value | Unit | Duration |
| - | - | :-: | :-: |
| `SLOT_DURATION` | `6` | seconds | 6 seconds |
| `MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY` | `2**2` (= 4) | slots | 24 seconds |
| `EPOCH_LENGTH` | `2**6` (= 64) | slots | 6.4 minutes |
| `MIN_VALIDATOR_REGISTRY_CHANGE_INTERVAL` | `2**8` (= 256) | slots | 25.6 minutes |
| `POW_RECEIPT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD` | `2**10` (= 1,024) | slots | ~1.7 hours |
| `SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD` | `2**17` (= 131,072) | slots | ~9 days |
| `COLLECTIVE_PENALTY_CALCULATION_PERIOD` | `2**20` (= 1,048,576) | slots | ~73 days |
| `ZERO_BALANCE_VALIDATOR_TTL` | `2**22` (= 16,777,216) | slots | ~290 days |
### Reward and penalty quotients
| Name | Value |
| - | - |
| `BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT` | `2**11` (= 2,048) |
| `WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT` | `2**9` (= 512) |
| `INCLUDER_REWARD_QUOTIENT` | `2**3` (= 8) |
| `INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` | `2**34` (= 131,072) |
* The `BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT` constant dictates the per-epoch reward. It corresponds to ~2.54% annual interest assuming 10 million participating ETH in every epoch.
* The `INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` equals `SQRT_E_DROP_TIME**2` where `SQRT_E_DROP_TIME := 2**17 slots` (~9 days) is the amount of time it takes for the inactivity penalty to cut deposits of non-participating [validators](#dfn-validator) by ~39.4%. The portion lost by offline [validators](#dfn-validator) after `D` epochs is about `D*D/2/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT`.
### Status codes
| Name | Value |
| - | - |
| `PENDING_ACTIVATION` | `0` |
| `ACTIVE` | `1` |
| `ACTIVE_PENDING_EXIT` | `2` |
| `EXITED_WITHOUT_PENALTY` | `3` |
| `EXITED_WITH_PENALTY` | `4` |
### Special record types
| Name | Value | Maximum count |
| - | - | :-: |
| `VOLUNTARY_EXIT` | `0` | `16` |
| `CASPER_SLASHING` | `1` | `16` |
| `PROPOSER_SLASHING` | `2` | `16` |
| `DEPOSIT_PROOF` | `3` | `16` |
### Validator registry delta flags
| Name | Value |
| - | - |
| `ACTIVATION` | `0` |
| `EXIT` | `1` |
### Signature domains
| Name | Value |
| - | - |
| `DOMAIN_DEPOSIT` | `0` |
| `DOMAIN_ATTESTATION` | `1` |
| `DOMAIN_PROPOSAL` | `2` |
| `DOMAIN_EXIT` | `3` |
## Data structures
### Deposits
#### `DepositParametersRecord`
```python
{
# BLS pubkey
'pubkey': 'uint384',
# BLS proof of possession (a BLS signature)
'proof_of_possession': ['uint384'],
# Withdrawal credentials
'withdrawal_credentials': 'hash32',
# Initial RANDAO commitment
'randao_commitment': 'hash32',
}
```
### Beacon chain blocks
#### `BeaconBlock`
```python
{
# Slot number
'slot': 'uint64',
# Proposer RANDAO reveal
'randao_reveal': 'hash32',
# Candidate PoW receipt root
'candidate_pow_receipt_root': 'hash32',
# Skip list of ancestor beacon block hashes
# i'th item is the most recent ancestor whose slot is a multiple of 2**i for i = 0, ..., 31
'ancestor_hashes': ['hash32'],
# State root
'state_root': 'hash32',
# Attestations
'attestations': [AttestationRecord],
# Specials (e.g. exits, penalties)
'specials': [SpecialRecord],
# Proposer signature
'proposer_signature': ['uint384'],
}
```
#### `AttestationRecord`
```python
{
# Attestation data
'data': AttestationData,
# Attester participation bitfield
'participation_bitfield': 'bytes',
# Proof of custody bitfield
'custody_bitfield': 'bytes',
# BLS aggregate signature
'aggregate_signature': ['uint384'],
}
```
#### `AttestationData`
```python
{
# Slot number
'slot': 'uint64',
# Shard number
'shard': 'uint64',
# Hash of the signed beacon block
'beacon_block_hash': 'hash32',
# Hash of the ancestor at the epoch boundary
'epoch_boundary_hash': 'hash32',
# Shard block hash being attested to
'shard_block_hash': 'hash32',
# Last crosslink hash
'latest_crosslink_hash': 'hash32',
# Slot of the last justified beacon block
'justified_slot': 'uint64',
# Hash of the last justified beacon block
'justified_block_hash': 'hash32',
}
```
#### `ProposalSignedData`
```python
{
# Slot number
'slot': 'uint64',
# Shard number (`BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER` for beacon chain)
'shard': 'uint64',
# Block hash
'block_hash': 'hash32',
}
```
#### `SpecialRecord`
```python
{
# Kind
'kind': 'uint64',
# Data
'data': 'bytes',
}
```
### Beacon chain state
#### `BeaconState`
```python
{
# Misc
'slot': 'uint64',
'genesis_time': 'uint64',
'fork_data': ForkData, # For versioning hard forks
# Validator registry
'validator_registry': [ValidatorRecord],
'validator_registry_latest_change_slot': 'uint64',
'validator_registry_exit_count': 'uint64',
'validator_registry_delta_chain_tip': 'hash32', # For light clients to track deltas
# Randomness and committees
'randao_mix': 'hash32',
'next_seed': 'hash32',
'shard_committees_at_slots': [[ShardCommittee]],
'persistent_committees': [['uint24']],
'persistent_committee_reassignments': [ShardReassignmentRecord],
# Finality
'previous_justified_slot': 'uint64',
'justified_slot': 'uint64',
'justification_bitfield': 'uint64',
'finalized_slot': 'uint64',
# Recent state
'latest_crosslinks': [CrosslinkRecord],
'latest_block_hashes': ['hash32'], # Needed to process attestations, older to newer
'latest_penalized_exit_balances': ['uint64'], # Balances penalized at every withdrawal period
'latest_attestations': [PendingAttestationRecord],
# PoW receipt root
'processed_pow_receipt_root': 'hash32',
'candidate_pow_receipt_roots': [CandidatePoWReceiptRootRecord],
}
```
#### `ValidatorRecord`
```python
{
# BLS public key
'pubkey': 'uint384',
# Withdrawal credentials
'withdrawal_credentials': 'hash32',
# RANDAO commitment
'randao_commitment': 'hash32',
# Slots the proposer has skipped (i.e. layers of RANDAO expected)
'randao_skips': 'uint64',
# Balance in Gwei
'balance': 'uint64',
# Status code
'status': 'uint64',
# Slot when validator last changed status (or 0)
'latest_status_change_slot': 'uint64',
# Exit counter when validator exited (or 0)
'exit_count': 'uint64',
}
```
#### `CrosslinkRecord`
```python
{
# Slot number
'slot': 'uint64',
# Shard block hash
'shard_block_hash': 'hash32',
}
```
#### `ShardCommittee`
```python
{
# Shard number
'shard': 'uint64',
# Validator indices
'committee': ['uint24'],
# Total validator count (for proofs of custody)
'total_validator_count': 'uint64',
}
```
#### `ShardReassignmentRecord`
```python
{
# Which validator to reassign
'validator_index': 'uint24',
# To which shard
'shard': 'uint64',
# When
'slot': 'uint64',
}
```
#### `CandidatePoWReceiptRootRecord`
```python
{
# Candidate PoW receipt root
'candidate_pow_receipt_root': 'hash32',
# Vote count
'votes': 'uint64',
}
```
#### `PendingAttestationRecord`
```python
{
# Signed data
'data': AttestationData,
# Attester participation bitfield
'participation_bitfield': 'bytes',
# Proof of custody bitfield
'custody_bitfield': 'bytes',
# Slot in which it was included
'slot_included': 'uint64',
}
```
#### `ForkData`
```python
{
# Previous fork version
'pre_fork_version': 'uint64',
# Post fork version
'post_fork_version': 'uint64',
# Fork slot number
'fork_slot': 'uint64',
}
```
### Specials
#### `VoluntaryExitSpecial`
```python
{
# Minimum slot for processing exit
'slot': 'unit64',
# Index of the exiting validator
'validator_index': 'uint64',
# Validator signature
'signature': '[uint384]',
}
```
#### `CasperSlashingSpecial`
```python
{
# First vote
vote_1: SpecialAttestationData,
# Second vote
vote_2: SpecialAttestationData,
}
```
#### `SpecialAttestationData`
```python
{
# Proof-of-custody indices (0 bits)
'aggregate_signature_poc_0_indices': '[uint24]',
# Proof-of-custody indices (1 bits)
'aggregate_signature_poc_1_indices': '[uint24]',
# Attestation data
'data': AttestationData,
# Aggregate signature
'aggregate_signature': '[uint384]',
}
```
#### `ProposerSlashingSpecial`
```python
{
# Proposer index
'proposer_index': 'uint24',
# First proposal data
'proposal_data_1': ProposalSignedData,
# First proposal signature
'proposal_signature_1': '[uint384]',
# Second proposal data
'proposal_data_2': ProposalSignedData,
# Second proposal signature
'proposal_signature_2': '[uint384]',
}
```
#### `DepositProofSpecial`
```python
{
# Receipt Merkle branch
'merkle_branch': '[hash32]',
# Merkle tree index
'merkle_tree_index': 'uint64',
# Deposit data
'deposit_data': {
# Deposit parameters
'deposit_parameters': DepositParametersRecord,
# Value in Gwei
'value': 'uint64',
# Timestamp from deposit contract
'timestamp': 'uint64',
},
}
```
## Ethereum 1.0 deposit contract
The initial deployment phases of Ethereum 2.0 are implemented without consensus changes to Ethereum 1.0. A deposit contract at address `DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS` is added to Ethereum 1.0 for deposits of ETH to the beacon chain. Validator balances will be withdrawable to the shards when the EVM2.0 is deployed and the shards have state.
### Deposit arguments
The deposit contract has a single `deposit` function which takes as argument a SimpleSerialize'd `DepositParametersRecord` object. One of the `DepositParametersRecord` fields is `withdrawal_credentials` which must satisfy:
* `withdrawal_credentials[:1] == BLS_WITHDRAWAL_CREDENTIALS`
* `withdrawal_credentials[1:] == hash(withdrawal_pubkey)[1:]` where `withdrawal_pubkey` is a BLS pubkey
We recommend the private key corresponding to `withdrawal_pubkey` be stored in cold storage until a withdrawal is required.
### `Deposit` logs
Every deposit, of size between `MIN_DEPOSIT` and `MAX_DEPOSIT`, emits a `Deposit` log for consumption by the beacon chain. The deposit contract does little validation, pushing most of the validator onboarding logic to the beacon chain. In particular, the proof of possession (a BLS12-381 signature) is not verified by the deposit contract.
### `ChainStart` log
When sufficiently many full deposits have been made the deposit contract emits the `ChainStart` log. The beacon chain may then be initialized by calling the `on_startup` function (defined below) where:
* `genesis_time` equals `time` in the `ChainStart` log
* `processed_pow_receipt_root` equals `receipt_root` in the `ChainStart` log
* `initial_validator_entries` is built according to the `Deposit` logs up to the deposit that triggered the `ChainStart` log, processed in the order in which they were emitted (oldest to newest)
### Vyper code
```python
MIN_DEPOSIT: constant(uint256) = 1 # ETH
MAX_DEPOSIT: constant(uint256) = 32 # ETH
GWEI_PER_ETH: constant(uint256) = 1000000000 # 10**9
CHAIN_START_FULL_DEPOSIT_THRESHOLD: constant(uint256) = 16384 # 2**14
DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH: constant(uint256) = 32
SECONDS_PER_DAY: constant(uint256) = 86400
Deposit: event({previous_receipt_root: bytes32, data: bytes[2064], deposit_count: uint256})
ChainStart: event({receipt_root: bytes32, time: bytes[8]})
receipt_tree: bytes32[uint256]
deposit_count: uint256
full_deposit_count: uint256
@payable
@public
def deposit(deposit_parameters: bytes[2048]):
assert msg.value >= as_wei_value(MIN_DEPOSIT, "ether")
assert msg.value <= as_wei_value(MAX_DEPOSIT, "ether")
index: uint256 = self.deposit_count + 2**DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH
msg_gwei_bytes8: bytes[8] = slice(concat("", convert(msg.value / GWEI_PER_ETH, bytes32)), start=24, len=8)
timestamp_bytes8: bytes[8] = slice(concat("", convert(block.timestamp, bytes32)), start=24, len=8)
deposit_data: bytes[2064] = concat(msg_gwei_bytes8, timestamp_bytes8, deposit_parameters)
log.Deposit(self.receipt_tree[1], deposit_data, self.deposit_count)
# add deposit to merkle tree
self.receipt_tree[index] = sha3(deposit_data)
for i in range(32): # DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH (range of constant var not yet supported)
index /= 2
self.receipt_tree[index] = sha3(concat(self.receipt_tree[index * 2], self.receipt_tree[index * 2 + 1]))
self.deposit_count += 1
if msg.value == as_wei_value(MAX_DEPOSIT, "ether"):
self.full_deposit_count += 1
if self.full_deposit_count == CHAIN_START_FULL_DEPOSIT_THRESHOLD:
timestamp_day_boundary: uint256 = as_unitless_number(block.timestamp) - as_unitless_number(block.timestamp) % SECONDS_PER_DAY + SECONDS_PER_DAY
timestamp_day_boundary_bytes8: bytes[8] = slice(concat("", convert(timestamp_day_boundary, bytes32)), start=24, len=8)
log.ChainStart(self.receipt_tree[1], timestamp_day_boundary_bytes8)
@public
@constant
def get_receipt_root() -> bytes32:
return self.receipt_tree[1]
```
## Beacon chain processing
The beacon chain is the system chain for Ethereum 2.0. The main responsibilities of the beacon chain are:
* Store and maintain the registry of [validators](#dfn-validator)
* Process crosslinks (see above)
* Process its per-slot consensus, as well as the finality gadget
Processing the beacon chain is similar to processing the Ethereum 1.0 chain. Clients download and process blocks, and maintain a view of what is the current "canonical chain", terminating at the current "head". However, because of the beacon chain's relationship with Ethereum 1.0, and because it is a proof-of-stake chain, there are differences.
For a beacon chain block, `block`, to be processed by a node, the following conditions must be met:
* The parent block (possibly a skip block) with hash `block.ancestor_hashes[0]` has been processed and accepted.
* The Ethereum 1.0 block pointed to by the `state.processed_pow_receipt_root` has been processed and accepted.
* The node's local clock time is greater than or equal to `state.genesis_time + block.slot * SLOT_DURATION`.
If these conditions are not met, the client should delay processing the beacon block until the conditions are all satisfied.
Beacon block production is significantly different because of the proof of stake mechanism. A client simply checks what it thinks is the canonical chain when it should create a block, and looks up what its slot number is; when the slot arrives, it either proposes or attests to a block as required. Note that this requires each node to have a clock that is roughly (i.e. within `SLOT_DURATION` seconds) synchronized with the other nodes.
### Beacon chain fork choice rule
The beacon chain fork choice rule is a hybrid that combines justification and finality with Latest Message Driven (LMD) Greediest Heaviest Observed SubTree (GHOST). At any point in time a [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` subjectively calculates the beacon chain head as follows.
* Let `store` be the set of attestations and blocks that the [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` has observed and verified (in particular, block ancestors must be recursively verified). Attestations not part of any chain are still included in `store`.
* Let `finalized_head` be the finalized block with the highest slot number. (A block `B` is finalized if there is a descendant of `B` in `store` the processing of which sets `B` as finalized.)
* Let `justified_head` be the descendant of `finalized_head` with the highest slot number that has been justified for at least `EPOCH_LENGTH` slots. (A block `B` is justified if there is a descendant of `B` in `store` the processing of which sets `B` as justified.) If no such descendant exists set `justified_head` to `finalized_head`.
* Let `get_ancestor(store, block, slot)` be the ancestor of `block` with slot number `slot`. The `get_ancestor` function can be defined recursively as `def get_ancestor(store, block, slot): return block if block.slot == slot else get_ancestor(store, store.get_parent(block), slot)`.
* Let `get_latest_attestation(store, validator)` be the attestation with the highest slot number in `store` from `validator`. If several such attestations exist, use the one the [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` observed first.
* Let `get_latest_attestation_target(store, validator)` be the target block in the attestation `get_latest_attestation(store, validator)`.
* The head is `lmd_ghost(store, justified_head)` where the function `lmd_ghost` is defined below. Note that the implementation below is suboptimal; there are implementations that compute the head in time logarithmic in slot count.
```python
def lmd_ghost(store, start):
validators = start.state.validator_registry
active_validators = [validators[i] for i in
get_active_validator_indices(validators, start.slot)]
attestation_targets = [get_latest_attestation_target(store, validator)
for validator in active_validators]
def get_vote_count(block):
return len([target for target in attestation_targets if
get_ancestor(store, target, block.slot) == block])
head = start
while 1:
children = get_children(head)
if len(children) == 0:
return head
head = max(children, key=get_vote_count)
```
## Beacon chain state transition function
We now define the state transition function. At a high level the state transition is made up of two parts:
1. The per-slot transitions, which happens every slot, and only affects a parts of the `state`.
2. The per-epoch transitions, which happens at every epoch boundary (i.e. `state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH == 0`), and affects the entire `state`.
The per-slot transitions generally focus on verifying aggregate signatures and saving temporary records relating to the per-slot activity in the `BeaconState`. The per-epoch transitions focus on the [validator](#dfn-validator) registry, including adjusting balances and activating and exiting [validators](#dfn-validator), as well as processing crosslinks and managing block justification/finalization.
### Helper functions
Note: The definitions below are for specification purposes and are not necessarily optimal implementations.
#### `get_active_validator_indices`
```python
def get_active_validator_indices(validators: [ValidatorRecord]) -> List[int]:
"""
Gets indices of active validators from ``validators``.
"""
return [i for i, v in enumerate(validators) if v.status in [ACTIVE, ACTIVE_PENDING_EXIT]]
```
#### `shuffle`
```python
def shuffle(values: List[Any], seed: Hash32) -> List[Any]:
"""
Returns the shuffled ``values`` with ``seed`` as entropy.
"""
values_count = len(values)
# Entropy is consumed from the seed in 3-byte (24 bit) chunks.
rand_bytes = 3
# The highest possible result of the RNG.
rand_max = 2 ** (rand_bytes * 8) - 1
# The range of the RNG places an upper-bound on the size of the list that
# may be shuffled. It is a logic error to supply an oversized list.
assert values_count < rand_max
output = [x for x in values]
source = seed
index = 0
while index < values_count - 1:
# Re-hash the `source` to obtain a new pattern of bytes.
source = hash(source)
# Iterate through the `source` bytes in 3-byte chunks.
for position in range(0, 32 - (32 % rand_bytes), rand_bytes):
# Determine the number of indices remaining in `values` and exit
# once the last index is reached.
remaining = values_count - index
if remaining == 1:
break
# Read 3-bytes of `source` as a 24-bit big-endian integer.
sample_from_source = int.from_bytes(source[position:position + rand_bytes], 'big')
# Sample values greater than or equal to `sample_max` will cause
# modulo bias when mapped into the `remaining` range.
sample_max = rand_max - rand_max % remaining
# Perform a swap if the consumed entropy will not cause modulo bias.
if sample_from_source < sample_max:
# Select a replacement index for the current index.
replacement_position = (sample_from_source % remaining) + index
# Swap the current index with the replacement index.
output[index], output[replacement_position] = output[replacement_position], output[index]
index += 1
else:
# The sample causes modulo bias. A new sample should be read.
pass
return output
```
#### `split`
```python
def split(values: List[Any], split_count: int) -> List[Any]:
"""
Splits ``values`` into ``split_count`` pieces.
"""
list_length = len(values)
return [
values[(list_length * i // split_count): (list_length * (i + 1) // split_count)]
for i in range(split_count)
]
```
#### `clamp`
```python
def clamp(minval: int, maxval: int, x: int) -> int:
"""
Clamps ``x`` between ``minval`` and ``maxval``.
"""
if x <= minval:
return minval
elif x >= maxval:
return maxval
else:
return x
```
#### `get_new_shuffling`
```python
def get_new_shuffling(seed: Hash32,
validators: List[ValidatorRecord],
crosslinking_start_shard: int) -> List[List[ShardCommittee]]:
"""
Shuffles ``validators`` into shard committees using ``seed`` as entropy.
"""
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(validators)
committees_per_slot = clamp(
1,
SHARD_COUNT // EPOCH_LENGTH,
len(active_validator_indices) // EPOCH_LENGTH // TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE,
)
# Shuffle with seed
shuffled_active_validator_indices = shuffle(active_validator_indices, seed)
# Split the shuffled list into epoch_length pieces
validators_per_slot = split(shuffled_active_validator_indices, EPOCH_LENGTH)
output = []
for slot, slot_indices in enumerate(validators_per_slot):
# Split the shuffled list into committees_per_slot pieces
shard_indices = split(slot_indices, committees_per_slot)
shard_id_start = crosslinking_start_shard + slot * committees_per_slot
shard_committees = [
ShardCommittee(
shard=(shard_id_start + shard_position) % SHARD_COUNT,
committee=indices,
total_validator_count=len(active_validator_indices),
)
for shard_position, indices in enumerate(shard_indices)
]
output.append(shards_and_committees_for_slot)
return output
```
Here's a diagram of what is going on:
![](http://vitalik.ca/files/ShuffleAndAssign.png?1)
#### `get_shard_committees_at_slot`
```python
def get_shard_committees_at_slot(state: BeaconState,
slot: int) -> List[ShardCommittee]:
"""
Returns the ``ShardCommittee`` for the ``slot``.
"""
earliest_slot_in_array = state.slot - (state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH) - EPOCH_LENGTH
assert earliest_slot_in_array <= slot < earliest_slot_in_array + EPOCH_LENGTH * 2
return state.shard_committees_at_slots[slot - earliest_slot_in_array]
```
#### `get_block_hash`
```python
def get_block_hash(state: BeaconState,
slot: int) -> Hash32:
"""
Returns the block hash at a recent ``slot``.
"""
earliest_slot_in_array = state.slot - len(state.latest_block_hashes)
assert earliest_slot_in_array <= slot < state.slot
return state.latest_block_hashes[slot - earliest_slot_in_array]
```
`get_block_hash(_, s)` should always return the block hash in the beacon chain at slot `s`, and `get_shard_committees_at_slot(_, s)` should not change unless the [validator](#dfn-validator) registry changes.
#### `get_beacon_proposer_index`
```python
def get_beacon_proposer_index(state: BeaconState,
slot: int) -> int:
"""
Returns the beacon proposer index for the ``slot``.
"""
first_committee = get_shard_committees_at_slot(state, slot)[0].committee
return first_committee[slot % len(first_committee)]
```
#### `get_attestation_participants`
```python
def get_attestation_participants(state: State,
attestation_data: AttestationData,
participation_bitfield: bytes) -> List[int]:
"""
Returns the participant indices at for the ``attestation_data`` and ``participation_bitfield``.
"""
# Find the relevant committee
shard_committees = get_shard_committees_at_slot(state, attestation_data.slot)
shard_committee = [x for x in shard_committees if x.shard == attestation_data.shard][0]
assert len(participation_bitfield) == ceil_div8(len(shard_committee.committee))
# Find the participating attesters in the committee
participants = []
for i, validator_index in enumerate(shard_committee.committee):
participation_bit = (participation_bitfield[i//8] >> (7 - (i % 8))) % 2
if participation_bit == 1:
participants.append(validator_index)
return participants
```
#### `bytes1`, `bytes2`, ...
`bytes1(x): return x.to_bytes(1, 'big')`, `bytes2(x): return x.to_bytes(2, 'big')`, and so on for all integers, particularly 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 32.
#### `get_effective_balance`
```python
def get_effective_balance(validator: ValidatorRecord) -> int:
"""
Returns the effective balance (also known as "balance at stake") for the ``validator``.
"""
return min(validator.balance, MAX_DEPOSIT)
```
#### `get_new_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip`
```python
def get_new_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip(current_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip: Hash32,
index: int,
pubkey: int,
flag: int) -> Hash32:
"""
Compute the next hash in the validator registry delta hash chain.
"""
return hash(
current_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip +
bytes1(flag) +
bytes3(index) +
bytes32(pubkey)
)
```
#### `integer_squareroot`
```python
def integer_squareroot(n: int) -> int:
"""
The largest integer ``x`` such that ``x**2`` is less than ``n``.
"""
x = n
y = (x + 1) // 2
while y < x:
x = y
y = (x + n // x) // 2
return x
```
### On startup
A valid block with slot `INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER` (a "genesis block") has the following values. Other validity rules (e.g. requiring a signature) do not apply.
```python
{
'slot': INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
'randao_reveal': ZERO_HASH,
'candidate_pow_receipt_roots': [],
'ancestor_hashes': [ZERO_HASH for i in range(32)],
'state_root': STARTUP_STATE_ROOT,
'attestations': [],
'specials': [],
'proposer_signature': [0, 0],
}
```
`STARTUP_STATE_ROOT` is the root of the initial state, computed by running the following code:
```python
def on_startup(initial_validator_entries: List[Any],
genesis_time: int,
processed_pow_receipt_root: Hash32) -> BeaconState:
# Activate validators
initial_validator_registry = []
for pubkey, deposit, proof_of_possession, withdrawal_credentials, randao_commitment in initial_validator_entries:
initial_validator_registry, _ = get_new_validators(
current_validators=initial_validator_registry,
fork_data=ForkData(
pre_fork_version=INITIAL_FORK_VERSION,
post_fork_version=INITIAL_FORK_VERSION,
fork_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
),
pubkey=pubkey,
deposit=deposit,
proof_of_possession=proof_of_possession,
withdrawal_credentials=withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment=randao_commitment,
current_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
status=ACTIVE,
)
# Setup state
initial_shuffling = get_new_shuffling(ZERO_HASH, initial_validator_registry, 0)
state = BeaconState(
# Misc
slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
genesis_time=genesis_time,
fork_data=ForkData(
pre_fork_version=INITIAL_FORK_VERSION,
post_fork_version=INITIAL_FORK_VERSION,
fork_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
),
# Validator registry
validator_registry=initial_validator_registry,
validator_registry_latest_change_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
validator_registry_exit_count=0,
validator_registry_delta_chain_tip=ZERO_HASH,
# Randomness and committees
randao_mix=ZERO_HASH,
next_seed=ZERO_HASH,
shard_committees_at_slots=initial_shuffling + initial_shuffling,
persistent_committees=split(shuffle(initial_validator_registry, ZERO_HASH), SHARD_COUNT),
persistent_committee_reassignments=[],
# Finality
previous_justified_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
justified_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
justification_bitfield=0,
finalized_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
# Recent state
latest_crosslinks=[CrosslinkRecord(slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER, shard_block_hash=ZERO_HASH) for _ in range(SHARD_COUNT)],
latest_block_hashes=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(EPOCH_LENGTH * 2)],
latest_penalized_exit_balances=[],
latest_attestations=[],
# PoW receipt root
processed_pow_receipt_root=processed_pow_receipt_root,
candidate_pow_receipt_roots=[],
)
return state
```
### Routine for activating a validator
This routine should be run for every [validator](#dfn-validator) that is activated as part of a log created on Ethereum 1.0 [TODO: explain where to check for these logs]. The status of the [validators](#dfn-validator) added after genesis is `PENDING_ACTIVATION`. These logs should be processed in the order in which they are emitted by Ethereum 1.0.
First, some helper functions:
```python
def min_empty_validator_index(validators: List[ValidatorRecord], current_slot: int) -> int:
for i, v in enumerate(validators):
if v.balance == 0 and v.latest_status_change_slot + ZERO_BALANCE_VALIDATOR_TTL <= current_slot:
return i
return None
def get_fork_version(fork_data: ForkData,
slot: int) -> int:
if slot < fork_data.fork_slot:
return fork_data.pre_fork_version
else:
return fork_data.post_fork_version
def get_domain(fork_data: ForkData,
slot: int,
domain_type: int) -> int:
return get_fork_version(
fork_data,
slot
) * 2**32 + domain_type
def get_new_validators(validators: List[ValidatorRecord],
fork_data: ForkData,
pubkey: int,
deposit: int,
proof_of_possession: bytes,
withdrawal_credentials: Hash32,
randao_commitment: Hash32,
status: int,
current_slot: int) -> Tuple[List[ValidatorRecord], int]:
assert BLSVerify(
pub=pubkey,
msg=hash(bytes32(pubkey) + withdrawal_credentials + randao_commitment),
sig=proof_of_possession,
domain=get_domain(
fork_data,
current_slot,
DOMAIN_DEPOSIT
)
)
validators_copy = copy.deepcopy(validators)
validator_pubkeys = [v.pubkey for v in validators_copy]
if pubkey not in validator_pubkeys:
# Add new validator
validator = ValidatorRecord(
pubkey=pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials=withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment=randao_commitment,
randao_skips=0,
balance=deposit,
status=status,
latest_status_change_slot=current_slot,
exit_count=0
)
index = min_empty_validator_index(validators_copy)
if index is None:
validators_copy.append(validator)
index = len(validators_copy) - 1
else:
validators_copy[index] = validator
else:
# Increase balance by deposit
index = validator_pubkeys.index(pubkey)
validator = validators_copy[index]
assert validator.withdrawal_credentials == withdrawal_credentials
validator.balance += deposit
return validators_copy, index
```
`BLSVerify` is a function for verifying a BLS12-381 signature, defined in the [BLS12-381 spec](https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/master/specs/bls_verify.md).
Now, to add a [validator](#dfn-validator) or top up an existing [validator](#dfn-validator)'s balance:
```python
def process_deposit(state: BeaconState,
pubkey: int,
deposit: int,
proof_of_possession: bytes,
withdrawal_credentials: Hash32,
randao_commitment: Hash32,
status: int,
current_slot: int) -> int:
"""
Process a deposit from Ethereum 1.0.
Note that this function mutates ``state``.
"""
state.validator_registry, index = get_new_validators(
current_validators=state.validator_registry,
fork_data=ForkData(
pre_fork_version=state.fork_data.pre_fork_version,
post_fork_version=state.fork_data.post_fork_version,
fork_slot=state.fork_data.fork_slot,
),
pubkey=pubkey,
deposit=deposit,
proof_of_possession=proof_of_possession,
withdrawal_credentials=withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment=randao_commitment,
status=status,
current_slot=current_slot,
)
return index
```
### Routine for exiting a validator
```python
def exit_validator(index: int,
state: BeaconState,
penalize: bool,
current_slot: int) -> None:
"""
Exit the validator with the given ``index``.
Note that this function mutates ``state``.
"""
state.validator_registry_exit_count += 1
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
validator.latest_status_change_slot = current_slot
validator.exit_count = state.validator_registry_exit_count
# Remove validator from persistent committees
for committee in state.persistent_committees:
for i, validator_index in committee:
if validator_index == index:
committee.pop(i)
break
if penalize:
validator.status = EXITED_WITH_PENALTY
state.latest_penalized_exit_balances[current_slot // COLLECTIVE_PENALTY_CALCULATION_PERIOD] += get_effective_balance(validator)
whistleblower = state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, current_slot)]
whistleblower_reward = validator.balance // WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
whistleblower.balance += whistleblower_reward
validator.balance -= whistleblower_reward
else:
validator.status = ACTIVE_PENDING_EXIT
state.validator_registry_delta_chain_tip = get_new_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip(
validator_registry_delta_chain_tip=state.validator_registry_delta_chain_tip,
index=index,
pubkey=validator.pubkey,
flag=EXIT,
)
```
## Per-slot processing
Below are the processing steps that happen at every slot.
First we define the following helpers.
```python
def get_updated_ancestor_hashes(parent: BeaconBlock,
parent_hash: Hash32) -> List[Hash32]:
new_ancestor_hashes = copy.copy(parent.ancestor_hashes)
for i in range(32):
if parent.slot % 2**i == 0:
new_ancestor_hashes[i] = parent_hash
return new_ancestor_hashes
def get_skip_block(slot: int,
parent: BeaconBlock,
parent_hash: Hash32) -> BeaconBlock:
return BeaconBlock(
slot=state.slot,
randao_reveal=ZERO_HASH,
candidate_pow_receipt_root=ZERO_HASH,
ancestor_hashes=get_updated_ancestor_hashes(parent, parent_hash),
state_root=ZERO_HASH, # filled in with post-state-transition root
attestations=[],
specials=[],
proposer_signature=[0, 0]
)
```
* Let `parent_hash` be the hash of the beacon block at the immediate previous slot.
* Let `parent` be the `BeaconBlock` with the hash `parent_hash`.
If there is a block from the proposer for `state.slot`, we process that incoming block:
* Let `block` be that associated incoming block.
If there is not a block from the proposer for `state.slot`, a "skip block" is inserted into the beacon chain:
* Let `block` be a skip block defined by `get_skip_block(state.slot, parent, parent_hash)`.
Verify that `block.ancestor_hashes` equals `get_updated_ancestor_hashes(parent, parent_hash)`.
Set `state.latest_block_hashes = state.latest_block_hashes + [parent_hash]`. (The output of `get_block_hash` should not change, except that it will no longer throw for `state.slot - 1`).
### Proposer signature
If `block` is not a skip block:
* Let `block_hash_without_sig` be the hash of `block` where `proposer_signature` is set to `[0, 0]`.
* Let `proposal_hash = hash(ProposalSignedData(state.slot, BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER, block_hash_without_sig))`.
* Verify that `BLSVerify(pubkey=state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)].pubkey, data=proposal_hash, sig=block.proposer_signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, state.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`.
### Attestations
* Verify that `len(block.attestations) <= MAX_ATTESTATIONS_PER_BLOCK`.
For each `attestation` in `block.attestations`:
* Verify that `attestation.data.slot <= state.slot - MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY`.
* Verify that `attestation.data.slot >= max(parent.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH + 1, 0)`.
* Verify that `attestation.data.justified_slot` is equal to `state.justified_slot if attestation.data.slot >= state.slot - (state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH) else state.previous_justified_slot`.
* Verify that `attestation.data.justified_block_hash` is equal to `get_block_hash(state, attestation.data.justified_slot)`.
* Verify that either `attestation.data.latest_crosslink_hash` or `attestation.data.shard_block_hash` equals `state.crosslinks[shard].shard_block_hash`.
* `aggregate_signature` verification:
* Let `participants = get_attestation_participants(state, attestation.data, attestation.participation_bitfield)`.
* Let `group_public_key = BLSAddPubkeys([state.validator_registry[v].pubkey for v in participants])`.
* Verify that `BLSVerify(pubkey=group_public_key, msg=SSZTreeHash(attestation.data) + bytes1(0), sig=aggregate_signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, slot, DOMAIN_ATTESTATION))`.
* [TO BE REMOVED IN PHASE 1] Verify that `shard_block_hash == ZERO_HASH`.
* Append `PendingAttestationRecord(data=attestation.data, participation_bitfield=attestation.participation_bitfield, custody_bitfield=attestation.custody_bitfield, slot_included=state.slot)` to `state.latest_attestations`.
### RANDAO
If `block` is a skip block:
* Let `state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)].randao_skips += 1`.
If `block` is not a skip block:
* Let `repeat_hash(x, n) = x if n == 0 else repeat_hash(hash(x), n-1)`.
* Let `proposer = state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)]`.
* Verify that `repeat_hash(block.randao_reveal, proposer.randao_skips + 1) == proposer.randao_commitment`.
* Set `state.randao_mix = xor(state.randao_mix, block.randao_reveal)`.
* Set `proposer.randao_commitment = block.randao_reveal`.
* Set `proposer.randao_skips = 0`.
### PoW receipt root
If `block` is not a skip block:
* If `block.candidate_pow_receipt_root` is `x.candidate_pow_receipt_root` for some `x` in `state.candidate_pow_receipt_roots`, set `x.votes += 1`.
* Otherwise, append to `state.candidate_pow_receipt_roots` a new `CandidatePoWReceiptRootRecord(candidate_pow_receipt_root=block.candidate_pow_receipt_root, votes=1)`.
### Special objects
* Verify that the quantity of each type of object in `block.specials` is less than or equal to its maximum (see table at the top).
* Verify that objects are sorted in order of `kind`. That is, `block.specials[i+1].kind >= block.specials[i].kind` for `0 <= i < len(block.specials-1)`.
For each `special` in `block.specials`:
* Verify that `special.kind` is a valid value.
* Verify that `special.data` deserializes according to the format for the given `kind` (see format definitions in "Data structures" above).
* Process `special.data` as specified below for each kind.
#### `VOLUNTARY_EXIT`
* Let `validator = state.validator_registry[validator_index]`.
* Verify that `BLSVerify(pubkey=validator.pubkey, msg=ZERO_HASH, sig=signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, slot, DOMAIN_EXIT))`.
* Verify that `validator.status == ACTIVE`.
* Verify that `state.slot >= slot`.
* Verify that `state.slot >= validator.latest_status_change_slot + SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD`.
* Run `exit_validator(validator_index, state, penalize=False, current_slot=state.slot)`.
#### `CASPER_SLASHING`
Let `verify_special_attestation_data` be the following helper:
```python
def verify_special_attestation_data(state: State, obj: SpecialAttestationData) -> bool:
pubs = [aggregate_pubkey([state.validators[i].pubkey for i in obj.aggregate_signature_poc_0_indices]),
aggregate_pubkey([state.validators[i].pubkey for i in obj.aggregate_signature_poc_1_indices])]
return BLSMultiVerify(pubkeys=pubs, msgs=[SSZTreeHash(obj)+bytes1(0), SSZTreeHash(obj)+bytes1(1), sig=aggregate_signature)
```
* Verify that `verify_special_attestation_data(vote_1)`.
* Verify that `verify_special_attestation_data(vote_2)`.
* Verify that `vote_1.data != vote_2.data`.
* Let `indices(vote) = vote.aggregate_signature_poc_0_indices + vote.aggregate_signature_poc_1_indices`.
* Let `intersection = [x for x in indices(vote_1) if x in indices(vote_2)]`.
* Verify that `len(intersection) >= 1`.
* Verify that `vote_1.data.justified_slot + 1 < vote_2.data.justified_slot + 1 == vote_2.data.slot < vote_1.data.slot` or `vote_1.data.slot == vote_2.data.slot`.
For each [validator](#dfn-validator) index `i` in `intersection`, if `state.validator_registry[i].status` does not equal `EXITED_WITH_PENALTY`, then run `exit_validator(i, state, penalize=True, current_slot=state.slot)`
#### `PROPOSER_SLASHING`
* Verify that `BLSVerify(pubkey=state.validator_registry[proposer_index].pubkey, msg=hash(proposal_data_1), sig=proposal_signature_1, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, proposal_data_1.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`.
* Verify that `BLSVerify(pubkey=state.validator_registry[proposer_index].pubkey, msg=hash(proposal_data_2), sig=proposal_signature_2, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, proposal_data_2.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`.
* Verify that `proposal_data_1 != proposal_data_2`.
* Verify that `proposal_data_1.slot == proposal_data_2.slot`.
* Verify that `state.validator_registry[proposer_index].status != EXITED_WITH_PENALTY`.
* Run `exit_validator(proposer_index, state, penalize=True, current_slot=state.slot)`.
#### `DEPOSIT_PROOF`
Let `serialized_deposit_data` be the serialized form of `deposit_data. It should be the `DepositParametersRecord` followed by 8 bytes for `deposit_data.value` and 8 bytes for `deposit_data.timestamp`. That is, it should match `deposit_data` in the [Ethereum 1.0 deposit contract](#ethereum-10-chain-deposit-contract) of which the hash was placed into the Merkle tree.
Use the following procedure to verify the `merkle_branch`, setting `leaf=serialized_deposit_data`, `depth=DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_TREE_DEPTH` and `root=state.processed_pow_receipt_root`:
```python
def verify_merkle_branch(leaf: Hash32, branch: [Hash32], depth: int, index: int, root: Hash32) -> bool:
value = leaf
for i in range(depth):
if index % 2:
value = hash(branch[i], value)
else:
value = hash(value, branch[i])
return value == root
```
* Verify that `state.slot - (deposit_data.timestamp - state.genesis_time) // SLOT_DURATION < ZERO_BALANCE_VALIDATOR_TTL`.
* Run the following:
```python
process_deposit(
state=state,
pubkey=deposit_data.deposit_parameters.pubkey,
deposit=deposit_data.value,
proof_of_possession=deposit_data.deposit_parameters.proof_of_possession,
withdrawal_credentials=deposit_data.deposit_parameters.withdrawal_credentials,
randao_commitment=deposit_data.deposit_parameters.randao_commitment,
status=PENDING_ACTIVATION,
current_slot=state.slot
)
```
## Per-epoch processing
The steps below happen when `state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH == 0`. For simplicity we denote `state.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH` by `s`.
### Helpers
All [validators](#dfn-validator):
* Let `active_validators = [state.validator_registry[i] for i in get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry)]`.
* Let `total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(v) for v in active_validators])`.
* Let `base_reward_quotient = BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT * integer_squareroot(total_balance // GWEI_PER_ETH)`.
* Let `base_reward(v) = get_effective_balance(v) // base_reward_quotient` for any validator `v`.
[Validators](#dfn-Validator) justifying the epoch boundary block at the start of the current epoch:
* Let `this_epoch_attestations = [a for a in state.latest_attestations if s <= a.data.slot < s + EPOCH_LENGTH]`. (Note: this is the set of attestations of slots in the epoch `s...s+EPOCH_LENGTH-1`, _not_ attestations that got included in the chain during the epoch `s...s+EPOCH_LENGTH-1`.)
* Let `this_epoch_boundary_attestations = [a for a in this_epoch_attestations if a.data.epoch_boundary_hash == get_block_hash(state, s) and a.justified_slot == state.justified_slot]`.
* Let `this_epoch_boundary_attesters` be the union of the [validator](#dfn-validator) index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in this_epoch_boundary_attestations]`.
* Let `this_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(v) for v in this_epoch_boundary_attesters])`.
[Validators](#dfn-Validator) justifying the epoch boundary block at the start of the previous epoch:
* Let `previous_epoch_attestations = [a for a in state.latest_attestations if s - EPOCH_LENGTH <= a.slot < s]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attestations = [a for a in this_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.epoch_boundary_hash == get_block_hash(state, s - EPOCH_LENGTH) and a.justified_slot == state.previous_justified_slot]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attesters` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_boundary_attestations]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(v) for v in previous_epoch_boundary_attesters])`.
For every `shard_committee` in `state.shard_committees_at_slots`:
* Let `attesting_validators(shard_committee, shard_block_hash)` be the union of the [validator](#dfn-validator) index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in this_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.shard == shard_committee.shard and a.shard_block_hash == shard_block_hash]`.
* Let `attesting_validators(shard_committee)` be equal to `attesting_validators(shard_committee, shard_block_hash)` for the value of `shard_block_hash` such that `sum([get_effective_balance(v) for v in attesting_validators(shard_committee, shard_block_hash)])` is maximized (ties broken by favoring lower `shard_block_hash` values).
* Let `total_attesting_balance(shard_committee)` be the sum of the balances-at-stake of `attesting_validators(shard_committee)`.
* Let `winning_hash(shard_committee)` be the winning `shard_block_hash` value.
* Let `total_balance(shard_committee) = sum([get_effective_balance(v) for v in shard_committee.committee])`.
* Let `inclusion_slot(v) = a.slot_included` for the attestation `a` where `v` is in `get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield)`.
* Let `inclusion_distance(v) = a.slot_included - a.data.slot` where `a` is the above attestation.
* Let `adjust_for_inclusion_distance(magnitude, distance)` be the function below.
```python
def adjust_for_inclusion_distance(magnitude: int, distance: int) -> int:
"""
Adjusts the reward of an attestation based on how long it took to get included (the longer, the lower the reward).
Returns a value between ``0`` and ``magnitude``.
""
return magnitude // 2 + (magnitude // 2) * MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY // distance
```
### Receipt roots
If `state.slot % POW_RECEIPT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD == 0`:
* Set `state.processed_pow_receipt_root = x.receipt_root` if `x.votes * 2 > POW_RECEIPT_ROOT_VOTING_PERIOD` for some `x` in `state.candidate_pow_receipt_root`.
* Set `state.candidate_pow_receipt_roots = []`.
### Justification
* Set `state.previous_justified_slot = state.justified_slot`.
* Set `state.justification_bitfield = (state.justification_bitfield * 2) % 2**64`.
* Set `state.justification_bitfield &= 2` and `state.justified_slot = s - EPOCH_LENGTH` if `3 * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >= 2 * total_balance`.
* Set `state.justification_bitfield &= 1` and `state.justified_slot = s` if `3 * this_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >= 2 * total_balance`.
### Finalization
* Set `state.finalized_slot = state.justified_slot` if `state.justified_slot == s - 1 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 4 == 3`.
* Set `state.finalized_slot = state.justified_slot` if `state.justified_slot == s - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 8 == 7`.
* Set `state.finalized_slot = state.justified_slot` If `state.justified_slot == s - 3 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 16 in (15, 14)`.
### Crosslinks
For every `shard_committee` in `state.shard_committees_at_slots`:
* Set `crosslinks[shard] = CrosslinkRecord(slot=state.slot, shard_block_hash=winning_hash(shard_committee))` if `3 * total_attesting_balance(shard_committee) >= 2 * total_balance(shard_committee)`.
### Justification and finalization rewards and penalties
Note: When applying penalties in the following balance recalculations implementers should make sure the `uint64` does not underflow.
* Let `slots_since_finality = state.slot - state.finalized_slot`.
Case 1: `slots_since_finality <= 4 * EPOCH_LENGTH`:
* Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` in `previous_epoch_boundary_attesters` gains `adjust_for_inclusion_distance(base_reward(v) * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance // total_balance, inclusion_distance(v))`.
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `v` not in `previous_epoch_boundary_attesters` loses `base_reward(v)`.
Case 2: `slots_since_finality > 4 * EPOCH_LENGTH`:
* Any [validator](#dfn-validator) in `previous_epoch_boundary_attesters` sees their balance unchanged.
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `v` not in `previous_epoch_boundary_attesters`, and any [validator](#dfn-validator) with `status == EXITED_WITH_PENALTY`, loses `base_reward(v) + get_effective_balance(v) * slots_since_finality // INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT`.
For each `v` in `previous_epoch_boundary_attesters`, we determine the proposer `proposer_index = get_beacon_proposer_index(state, inclusion_slot(v))` and set `state.validator_registry[proposer_index].balance += base_reward(v) // INCLUDER_REWARD_QUOTIENT`.
### Crosslink rewards and penalties
For every `shard_committee` in `state.shard_committees_at_slots[:EPOCH_LENGTH]` (i.e. the objects corresponding to the epoch before the current one), for each `v` in `[state.validator_registry[index] for index in shard_committee.committee]`, adjust balances as follows:
* If `v in attesting_validators(shard_committee)`, `v.balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(base_reward(v) * total_attesting_balance(shard_committee) // total_balance(shard_committee)), inclusion_distance(v))`.
* If `v not in attesting_validators(shard_committee)`, `v.balance -= base_reward(v)`.
### Validator registry
If the following are satisfied:
* `state.finalized_slot > state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot`
* `crosslinks[shard].slot > state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot` for every shard number `shard` in `state.shard_committees_at_slots`
update the validator registry by running
```python
update_validator_registry(
copy.deepcopy(state.validator_registry),
copy.deepcopy(state.latest_penalized_exit_balances),
state.validator_registry_delta_chain_tip,
state.slot
)
```
where
```python
def update_validator_registry(validator_registry: List[ValidatorRecord],
latest_penalized_exit_balances: List[int],
validator_registry_delta_chain_tip: int,
current_slot: int) -> Tuple[List[ValidatorRecord], List[int], int]:
"""
Update the validator registry, as well as ``latest_penalized_exit_balances`` and ``validator_registry_delta_chain_tip``.
"""
# The active validators
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(validator_registry)
# The total effective balance of active validators
total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(v) for i, v in enumerate(validator_registry) if i in active_validator_indices])
# The maximum balance churn in Gwei (for deposits and exits separately)
max_balance_churn = max(
MAX_DEPOSIT * GWEI_PER_ETH,
total_balance // (2 * MAX_BALANCE_CHURN_QUOTIENT)
)
# Activate validators within the allowable balance churn
balance_churn = 0
for i in range(len(validator_registry)):
validator = validator_registry[i]
if validator.status == PENDING_ACTIVATION and validator.balance >= MAX_DEPOSIT:
# Check the balance churn would be within the allowance
balance_churn += get_effective_balance(validator)
if balance_churn > max_balance_churn:
break
# Activate validator
validator.status = ACTIVE
validator.latest_status_change_slot = current_slot
validator_registry_delta_chain_tip = get_new_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip(
validator_registry_delta_chain_tip=validator_registry_delta_chain_tip,
index=i,
pubkey=validator.pubkey,
flag=ACTIVATION,
)
# Exit validators within the allowable balance churn
balance_churn = 0
for i in range(len(validators)):
validator = validator_registry[i]
if validator.status == ACTIVE_PENDING_EXIT:
# Check the balance churn would be within the allowance
balance_churn += get_effective_balance(validator)
if balance_churn > max_balance_churn:
break
# Exit validator
validator.status = EXITED_WITHOUT_PENALTY
validator.latest_status_change_slot = current_slot
validator_registry_delta_chain_tip = get_new_validator_registry_delta_chain_tip(
validator_registry_delta_chain_tip=validator_registry_delta_chain_tip,
index=i,
pubkey=validator.pubkey,
flag=EXIT,
)
# Calculate the total ETH that has been penalized in the last ~2-3 withdrawal periods
period_index = current_slot // COLLECTIVE_PENALTY_CALCULATION_PERIOD
total_penalties = (
(latest_penalized_exit_balances[period_index]) +
(latest_penalized_exit_balances[period_index - 1] if period_index >= 1 else 0) +
(latest_penalized_exit_balances[period_index - 2] if period_index >= 2 else 0)
)
# Calculate penalties for slashed validators
def to_penalize(v):
return v.status == EXITED_WITH_PENALTY
validators_to_penalize = filter(to_penalize, validator_registry)
for v in validators_to_penalize:
v.balance -= get_effective_balance(v) * min(total_penalties * 3, total_balance) // total_balance
# Update the state
state.validator_registry = validator_registry
state.validator_registry_delta_chain_tip = validator_registry_delta_chain_tip
state.latest_penalized_exit_balances = latest_penalized_exit_balances
```
Also perform the following updates:
* Set `state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot = state.slot`.
* Set `state.shard_committees_at_slots[:EPOCH_LENGTH] = state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:]`.
* Set `state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:] = get_new_shuffling(state.next_seed, state.validator_registry, next_start_shard)` where next_start_shard = (state.shard_committees_at_slots[-1][-1].shard + 1) % SHARD_COUNT`.
* Set `state.next_seed = state.randao_mix`.
If a validator registry update does _not_ happen do the following:
* Set `state.shard_committees_at_slots[:EPOCH_LENGTH] = state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:]`.
* Let `slots_since_finality = state.slot - state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot`.
* Let `start_shard = state.shard_committees_at_slots[0][0].shard`.
* If `slots_since_finality * EPOCH_LENGTH <= MIN_VALIDATOR_REGISTRY_CHANGE_INTERVAL` or `slots_since_finality` is an exact power of 2, set `state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:] = get_new_shuffling(state.next_seed, state.validator_registry, start_shard)` and set `state.next_seed = state.randao_mix`. Note that `start_shard` is not changed from the last epoch.
### Proposer reshuffling
Run the following code to update the shard proposer set:
```python
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry)
num_validators_to_reshuffle = len(active_validator_indices) // SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD
for i in range(num_validators_to_reshuffle):
# Multiplying i to 2 to ensure we have different input to all the required hashes in the shuffling
# and none of the hashes used for entropy in this loop will be the same
validator_index = active_validator_indices[hash(state.randao_mix + bytes8(i * 2)) % len(active_validator_indices)]
new_shard = hash(state.randao_mix + bytes8(i * 2 + 1)) % SHARD_COUNT
shard_reassignment_record = ShardReassignmentRecord(
validator_index=validator_index,
shard=new_shard,
slot=s + SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD
)
state.persistent_committee_reassignments.append(shard_reassignment_record)
while len(state.persistent_committee_reassignments) > 0 and state.persistent_committee_reassignments[0].slot <= s:
reassignment = state.persistent_committee_reassignments.pop(0)
for committee in state.persistent_committees:
if reassignment.validator_index in committee:
committee.pop(committee.index(reassignment.validator_index))
state.persistent_committees[reassignment.shard].append(reassignment.validator_index)
```
### Final updates
* Remove any `attestation` in `state.latest_attestations` such that `attestation.data.slot < s`.
* Run `exit_validator(i, state, penalize=False, current_slot=state.slot)` for indices `i` such that `state.validator_registry[i].status = ACTIVE and state.validator_registry[i].balance < MIN_BALANCE`.
* Set `state.latest_block_hashes = state.latest_block_hashes[EPOCH_LENGTH:]`.
## State root processing
If `block` is not a skip block:
* Verify `block.state_root == hash(state)`
If `block` is a skip block:
* Set `block.state_root = hash(state)`
# Appendix
## Appendix A - Hash function
In Phase 0 the beacon chain is deployed with the same hash function as Ethereum 1.0, i.e. Keccak-256 (also incorrectly known as SHA3). We aim to migrate to a S[T/N]ARK-friendly hash function in a future Ethereum 2.0 deployment phase.
# References
This section is divided into Normative and Informative references. Normative references are those that must be read in order to implement this specification, while Informative references are merely that, information. An example of the former might be the details of a required consensus algorithm, and an example of the latter might be a pointer to research that demonstrates why a particular consensus algorithm might be better suited for inclusion in the standard than another.
## Normative
## Informative
<a id="ref-python-poc"></a> _**python-poc**_
&nbsp; _Python proof-of-concept implementation_. Ethereum Foundation. URL: https://github.com/ethereum/beacon_chain
# Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).