27 KiB

Raw Blame History

Ethereum 2.0 Phase 1 -- Custody Game

Notice: This document is a work-in-progress for researchers and implementers.

Ethereum 2.0 Phase 1 -- Custody Game

Introduction

This document details the beacon chain additions and changes in Phase 1 of Ethereum 2.0 to support the shard data custody game, building upon the Phase 0 specification.

Terminology

Custody game—
Custody period—
Custody chunk—
Custody chunk bit—
Custody chunk challenge—
Custody bit—
Custody bit challenge—
Custody key—
Custody key reveal—
Custody key mask—
Custody response—
Custody response deadline—

Constants

Misc

Name	Value
`BYTES_PER_SHARD_BLOCK`	`2**14` (= 16,384)
`BYTES_PER_CUSTODY_CHUNK`	`2**9` (= 512)
`MINOR_REWARD_QUOTIENT`	`2**8` (= 256)

Time parameters

Name	Value	Unit	Duration
`MAX_CHUNK_CHALLENGE_DELAY`	`2**11` (= 2,048)	epochs	~9 days
`CUSTODY_RESPONSE_DEADLINE`	`2**14` (= 16,384)	epochs	~73 days
`RANDAO_PENALTY_EPOCHS`	`2**1` (= 2)	epochs	12.8 minutes
`EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS`	`2**14`	epochs	~73 days
`EPOCHS_PER_CUSTODY_PERIOD`	`2**11` (= 2,048)	epochs	~9 days
`CUSTODY_PERIOD_TO_RANDAO_PADDING`	`2**11` (= 2,048)	epochs	~9 days
`MAX_REVEAL_LATENESS_DECREMENT`	`2**7` (= 128)	epochs	~14 hours

Max operations per block

Name	Value
`MAX_CUSTODY_KEY_REVEALS`	`2**4` (= 16)
`MAX_EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_REVEALS`	`1`
`MAX_CUSTODY_CHUNK_CHALLENGES`	`2**2` (= 4)
`MAX_CUSTODY_BIT_CHALLENGES`	`2**2` (= 4)
`MAX_CUSTODY_RESPONSES`	`2**5` (= 32)

Reward and penalty quotients

| EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_REVEAL_SLOT_REWARD_MULTIPLE | 2**1 (= 2) |

Signature domains

Name	Value
`DOMAIN_CUSTODY_BIT_CHALLENGE`	`6`

Data structures

Custody objects

`CustodyChunkChallenge`

{
    'responder_index': ValidatorIndex,
    'attestation': Attestation,
    'chunk_index': 'uint64',
}

`CustodyBitChallenge`

{
    'responder_index': ValidatorIndex,
    'attestation': Attestation,
    'challenger_index': ValidatorIndex,
    'responder_key': BLSSignature,
    'chunk_bits': Bitfield,
    'signature': BLSSignature,
}

`CustodyChunkChallengeRecord`

{
    'challenge_index': 'uint64',
    'challenger_index': ValidatorIndex,
    'responder_index': ValidatorIndex,
    'deadline': Epoch,
    'crosslink_data_root': Hash,
    'depth': 'uint64',
    'chunk_index': 'uint64',
}

`CustodyBitChallengeRecord`

{
    'challenge_index': 'uint64',
    'challenger_index': ValidatorIndex,
    'responder_index': ValidatorIndex,
    'deadline': Epoch,
    'crosslink_data_root': Hash,
    'chunk_count': 'uint64',
    'chunk_bits_merkle_root': Hash,
    'responder_key': BLSSignature,
}

`CustodyResponse`

{
    'challenge_index': 'uint64',
    'chunk_index': 'uint64',
    'chunk': ['byte', BYTES_PER_CUSTODY_CHUNK],
    'data_branch': [Hash],
    'chunk_bits_branch': [Hash],
    'chunk_bits_leaf': Hash,
}

New beacon operations

`CustodyKeyReveal`

{
    # Index of the validator whose key is being revealed
    'revealer_index': 'uint64',
    # Reveal (masked signature)
    'reveal': 'bytes96',
}

`EarlyDerivedSecretReveal`

Represents an early (punishable) reveal of one of the derived secrets, where derived secrets are RANDAO reveals and custody reveals (both are part of the same domain).

{
    # Index of the validator whose key is being revealed
    'revealed_index': 'uint64',
    # RANDAO epoch of the key that is being revealed
    'epoch': 'uint64',
    # Reveal (masked signature)
    'reveal': 'bytes96',
    # Index of the validator who revealed (whistleblower)
    'masker_index': 'uint64',
    # Mask used to hide the actual reveal signature (prevent reveal from being stolen)
    'mask': 'bytes32',
}

Phase 0 container updates

Add the following fields to the end of the specified container objects. Fields with underlying type uint64 are initialized to 0 and list fields are initialized to [].

`Validator`

    # next_custody_reveal_period is initialized to the custody period
    # (of the particular validator) in which the validator is activated
    # = get_validators_custody_reveal_period(...)
    'next_custody_reveal_period': 'uint64',
    'max_reveal_lateness': 'uint64',

`BeaconState`

    'custody_chunk_challenge_records': [CustodyChunkChallengeRecord],
    'custody_bit_challenge_records': [CustodyBitChallengeRecord],
    'custody_challenge_index': 'uint64',

    # Future derived secrets already exposed; contains the indices of the exposed validator
    # at RANDAO reveal period % EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS
    'exposed_derived_secrets': [['uint64'], EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS],

`BeaconBlockBody`

    'custody_chunk_challenges': [CustodyChunkChallenge],
    'custody_bit_challenges': [CustodyBitChallenge],
    'custody_responses': [CustodyResponse],
    'custody_key_reveals': [CustodyKeyReveal],
    'early_derived_secret_reveals': [EarlyDerivedSecretReveal],

Helpers

`typeof`

The typeof function accepts and SSZ object as a single input and returns the corresponding SSZ type.

`empty`

The empty function accepts and SSZ type as input and returns an object of that type with all fields initialized to default values.

`get_crosslink_chunk_count`

def get_custody_chunk_count(attestation: Attestation) -> int:
    crosslink_start_epoch = attestation.data.latest_crosslink.epoch
    crosslink_end_epoch = slot_to_epoch(attestation.data.slot)
    crosslink_crosslink_length = min(MAX_CROSSLINK_EPOCHS, end_epoch - start_epoch)
    chunks_per_epoch = 2 * BYTES_PER_SHARD_BLOCK * SLOTS_PER_EPOCH // BYTES_PER_CUSTODY_CHUNK
    return crosslink_crosslink_length * chunks_per_epoch

`get_custody_chunk_bit`

def get_custody_chunk_bit(key: BLSSignature, chunk: bytes) -> bool:
    # TODO: Replace with something MPC-friendly, e.g. the Legendre symbol
    return get_bitfield_bit(hash(challenge.responder_key + chunk), 0)

`get_chunk_bits_root`

def get_chunk_bits_root(chunk_bitfield: Bitfield) -> Bytes32:
    aggregated_bits = bytearray([0] * 32)
    for i in range(0, len(chunk_bitfield), 32):
        for j in range(32):
            aggregated_bits[j] ^= chunk_bitfield[i+j]
    return hash(aggregated_bits)

`get_randao_epoch_for_custody_period`

def get_randao_epoch_for_custody_period(period: int, validator_index: ValidatorIndex) -> Epoch:
    next_period_start = (period + 1) * EPOCHS_PER_CUSTODY_PERIOD - validator_index % EPOCHS_PER_CUSTODY_PERIOD
    return next_period_start + CUSTODY_PERIOD_TO_RANDAO_PADDING

`get_validators_custody_reveal_period`

def get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state: BeaconState,
                                        validator_index: ValidatorIndex,
                                        epoch: Epoch=None) -> int:
   '''
   This function returns the reveal period for a given validator.
   If no epoch is supplied, the current epoch is assumed.
   Note: This function implicitly requires that validators are not removed from the
   validator set in fewer than EPOCHS_PER_CUSTODY_PERIOD epochs
   '''
   epoch = get_current_epoch(state) if epoch is None else epoch
   return (epoch + validator_index % EPOCHS_PER_CUSTODY_PERIOD) // EPOCHS_PER_CUSTODY_PERIOD

`replace_empty_or_append`

def replace_empty_or_append(list: List[Any], new_element: Any) -> int:
    for i in range(len(list)):
        if list[i] == empty(typeof(new_element)):
            list[i] = new_element
            return i
    list.append(new_element)
    return len(list) - 1

Per-block processing

Operations

Add the following operations to the per-block processing, in the order given below and after all other operations in Phase 0.

Custody key reveals

Verify that len(block.body.custody_key_reveals) <= MAX_CUSTODY_KEY_REVEALS.

For each reveal in block.body.custody_key_reveals, run the following function:

def process_custody_key_reveal(state: BeaconState,
                           reveal: CustodyKeyReveal) -> None:

    """
    Process ``CustodyKeyReveal`` operation.
    Note that this function mutates ``state``.
    """

    revealer = state.validator_registry[reveal.revealer_index]
    epoch_to_sign = get_randao_epoch_for_custody_period(revealer.next_custody_reveal_period, reveal.revealed_index)

    assert revealer.next_custody_reveal_period < get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, reveal.revealed_index)

    # Revealed validator is active or exited, but not withdrawn
    assert is_slashable_validator(revealer, get_current_epoch(state))

    # Verify signature
    assert bls_verify(
        pubkey=revealer.pubkey,
        message_hash=hash_tree_root(epoch_to_sign),
        signature=reveal.reveal,
        domain=get_domain(
            state=state,
            domain_type=DOMAIN_RANDAO,
            message_epoch=epoch_to_sign,
        ),
    )

    # Decrement max reveal lateness if response is timely
    if revealer.next_custody_reveal_period == get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, reveal.revealer_index) - 2:
            revealer.max_reveal_lateness -=  MAX_REVEAL_LATENESS_DECREMENT
    revealer.max_reveal_lateness = max(revealed_validator.max_reveal_lateness, get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, reveal.revealed_index) - revealer.next_custody_reveal_period)

    # Process reveal
    revealer.next_custody_reveal_period += 1

    # Reward Block Preposer
    proposer_index = get_beacon_proposer_index(state)
    increase_balance(state, proposer_index, base_reward(state, index) // MINOR_REWARD_QUOTIENT)

Early derived secret reveals

Verify that len(block.body.early_derived_secret_reveals) <= MAX_EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_REVEALS.

For each reveal in block.body.early_derived_secret_reveals, run the following function:

def process_early_derived_secret_reveal(state: BeaconState,
                              reveal: EarlyDerivedSecretReveal) -> None:
    """
    Process ``EarlyDerivedSecretReveal`` operation.
    Note that this function mutates ``state``.
    """

    revealed_validator = state.validator_registry[reveal.revealed_index]
    masker = state.validator_registry[reveal.masker_index]

    assert reveal.epoch >= get_current_epoch(state) + RANDAO_PENALTY_EPOCHS
    assert reveal.epoch < get_current_epoch(state) + EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS
    assert revealed_validator.slashed is False
    assert reveal.revealed_index not in state.exposed_derived_secrets[reveal.epoch % EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS]

    # Verify signature correctness
    masker = state.validator_registry[reveal.masker_index]
    pubkeys = [revealed_validator.pubkey, masker.pubkey]
    message_hashes = [
        hash_tree_root(reveal.epoch),
        reveal.mask,
    ]

    assert bls_verify_multiple(
        pubkeys=pubkeys,
        message_hashes=message_hashes,
        signature=reveal.reveal,
        domain=get_domain(
            state=state,
            domain_type=DOMAIN_RANDAO,
            message_epoch=reveal.epoch,
        ),
    )

    if reveal.epoch >= get_current_epoch(state) + CUSTODY_PERIOD_TO_RANDAO_PADDING:
        # Full slashing when the secret was revealed so early it may be a valid custody
        # round key
        slash_validator(state, reveal.revealed_index, reveal.masker_index)
    else:
        # Only a small penalty proportional to proposer slot reward for RANDAO reveal 
        # that does not interfere with the custody period
        # The penalty is proportional to the max proposer reward 
        
        # Calculate penalty
        max_proposer_slot_reward = (
            get_base_reward(state, reveal.revealed_index) *
            SLOTS_PER_EPOCH //
            len(get_active_validator_indices(state, get_current_epoch(state))) //
            PROPOSER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
        )
        penalty = max_proposer_slot_reward * EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_REVEAL_SLOT_REWARD_MULTIPLE * (len(state.exposed_derived_secrets[reveal.epoch % EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS]) + 1)

        # Apply penalty
        proposer_index = get_beacon_proposer_index(state)
        whistleblower_index = reveal.masker_index
        whistleblowing_reward = penalty // WHISTLEBLOWING_REWARD_QUOTIENT
        proposer_reward = whistleblowing_reward // PROPOSER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
        increase_balance(state, proposer_index, proposer_reward)
        increase_balance(state, whistleblower_index, whistleblowing_reward - proposer_reward)
        decrease_balance(state, reveal.revealed_index, penalty)

        # Mark this derived secret as exposed so validator cannot be punished repeatedly 
        state.exposed_derived_secrets[reveal.epoch % EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS].append(reveal.revealed_index)

Chunk challenges

Verify that len(block.body.custody_chunk_challenges) <= MAX_CUSTODY_CHUNK_CHALLENGES.

For each challenge in block.body.custody_chunk_challenges, run the following function:

def process_chunk_challenge(state: BeaconState,
                            challenge: CustodyChunkChallenge) -> None:
    # Verify the attestation
    assert verify_indexed_attestation(state, convert_to_indexed(state, challenge.attestation))
    # Verify it is not too late to challenge
    assert slot_to_epoch(challenge.attestation.data.slot) >= get_current_epoch(state) - MAX_CHUNK_CHALLENGE_DELAY
    responder = state.validator_registry[challenge.responder_index]
    assert responder.exit_epoch >= get_current_epoch(state) - MAX_CHUNK_CHALLENGE_DELAY
    # Verify the responder participated in the attestation
    attesters = get_attesting_indices(state, attestation.data, attestation.aggregation_bitfield)
    assert challenge.responder_index in attesters
    # Verify the challenge is not a duplicate
    for record in state.custody_chunk_challenge_records:
        assert (
            record.crosslink_data_root != challenge.attestation.data.crosslink_data_root or
            record.chunk_index != challenge.chunk_index
        )
    # Verify depth
    depth = math.log2(next_power_of_two(get_custody_chunk_count(challenge.attestation)))
    assert challenge.chunk_index < 2**depth
    # Add new chunk challenge record
    new_record = CustodyChunkChallengeRecord(
        challenge_index=state.custody_challenge_index,
        challenger_index=get_beacon_proposer_index(state),
        responder_index=challenge.responder_index
        deadline=get_current_epoch(state) + CUSTODY_RESPONSE_DEADLINE,
        crosslink_data_root=challenge.attestation.data.crosslink_data_root,
        depth=depth,
        chunk_index=challenge.chunk_index,
    )
    replace_empty_or_append(state.custody_chunk_challenge_records, new_record)

    state.custody_challenge_index += 1
    # Postpone responder withdrawability
    responder.withdrawable_epoch = FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH

Bit challenges

Verify that len(block.body.custody_bit_challenges) <= MAX_CUSTODY_BIT_CHALLENGES.

For each challenge in block.body.custody_bit_challenges, run the following function:

def process_bit_challenge(state: BeaconState,
                          challenge: CustodyBitChallenge) -> None:

    # Verify challenge signature
    challenger = state.validator_registry[challenge.challenger_index]
    assert bls_verify(
        pubkey=challenger.pubkey,
        message_hash=signing_root(challenge),
        signature=challenge.signature,
        domain=get_domain(state, get_current_epoch(state), DOMAIN_CUSTODY_BIT_CHALLENGE),
    )
    assert is_slashable_validator(challenger, get_current_epoch(state))

    # Verify the attestation
    assert verify_indexed_attestation(state, convert_to_indexed(state, challenge.attestation))
    # Verify the attestation is eligible for challenging
    responder = state.validator_registry[challenge.responder_index]
    assert (slot_to_epoch(challenge.attestation.data.slot) + responder.max_reveal_lateness <=
            get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, challenge.responder_index))

    # Verify the responder participated in the attestation
    attesters = get_attesting_indices(state, attestation.data, attestation.aggregation_bitfield)
    assert challenge.responder_index in attesters

    # A validator can be the challenger or responder for at most one challenge at a time
    for record in state.custody_bit_challenge_records:
        assert record.challenger_index != challenge.challenger_index
        assert record.responder_index != challenge.responder_index

    # Verify the responder is a valid custody key
    epoch_to_sign = get_randao_epoch_for_custody_period(
        get_validators_custody_reveal_period(
            state=state,
            index=challenge.responder_index,
            epoch=slot_to_epoch(attestation.data.slot),
        challenge.responder_index
    )
    assert bls_verify(
        pubkey=responder.pubkey,
        message_hash=hash_tree_root(epoch_to_sign),
        signature=challenge.responder_key,
        domain=get_domain(
            state=state,
            domain_type=DOMAIN_RANDAO,
            message_epoch=epoch_to_sign,
        ),
    )

    # Verify the chunk count
    chunk_count = get_custody_chunk_count(challenge.attestation)
    assert verify_bitfield(challenge.chunk_bits, chunk_count)
    # Verify the first bit of the hash of the chunk bits does not equal the custody bit
    custody_bit = get_bitfield_bit(attestation.custody_bitfield, attesters.index(responder_index))
    assert custody_bit != get_bitfield_bit(get_chunk_bits_root(challenge.chunk_bits), 0)
    # Add new bit challenge record
    new_record = CustodyBitChallengeRecord(
        challenge_index=state.custody_challenge_index,
        challenger_index=challenge.challenger_index,
        responder_index=challenge.responder_index,
        deadline=get_current_epoch(state) + CUSTODY_RESPONSE_DEADLINE,
        crosslink_data_root=challenge.attestation.data.crosslink_data_root,
        chunk_count=chunk_count,
        chunk_bits_merkle_root=merkle_root(pad_to_power_of_2((challenge.chunk_bits))),
        responder_key=challenge.responder_key,
    )
    replace_empty_or_append(state.custody_bit_challenge_records, new_record)
    state.custody_challenge_index += 1

    # Postpone responder withdrawability
    responder.withdrawable_epoch = FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH

Custody responses

Verify that len(block.body.custody_responses) <= MAX_CUSTODY_RESPONSES.

For each response in block.body.custody_responses, run the following function:

def process_custody_response(state: BeaconState,
                             response: CustodyResponse) -> None:
    chunk_challenge = next(record for record in state.custody_chunk_challenge_records if record.challenge_index == response.challenge_index, None)
    if chunk_challenge is not None:
        return process_chunk_challenge_response(state, response, chunk_challenge)

    bit_challenge = next(record for record in state.custody_bit_challenge_records if record.challenge_index == response.challenge_index, None)
    if bit_challenge is not None:
        return process_bit_challenge_response(state, response, bit_challenge)

    assert False

def process_chunk_challenge_response(state: BeaconState,
                                     response: CustodyResponse,
                                     challenge: CustodyChunkChallengeRecord) -> None:
    # Verify chunk index
    assert response.chunk_index == challenge.chunk_index
    # Verify bit challenge data is null
    assert response.chunk_bits_branch == [] and response.chunk_bits_leaf == ZERO_HASH
    # Verify the chunk matches the crosslink data root
    assert verify_merkle_branch(
        leaf=hash_tree_root(response.chunk),
        branch=response.data_branch,
        depth=challenge.depth,
        index=response.chunk_index,
        root=challenge.crosslink_data_root,
    )
    # Clear the challenge
    records = state.custody_chunk_challenge_records
    records[records.index(challenge)] = CustodyChunkChallengeRecord()
    # Reward the proposer
    proposer_index = get_beacon_proposer_index(state)
    increase_balance(state, proposer_index, base_reward(state, index) // MINOR_REWARD_QUOTIENT)

def process_bit_challenge_response(state: BeaconState,
                                   response: CustodyResponse,
                                   challenge: CustodyBitChallengeRecord) -> None:
    # Verify chunk index
    assert response.chunk_index < challenge.chunk_count
    # Verify the chunk matches the crosslink data root
    assert verify_merkle_branch(
        leaf=hash_tree_root(response.chunk),
        branch=response.data_branch,
        depth=math.log2(next_power_of_two(challenge.chunk_count)),
        index=response.chunk_index,
        root=challenge.crosslink_data_root,
    )
    # Verify the chunk bit leaf matches the challenge data
    assert verify_merkle_branch(
        leaf=response.chunk_bits_leaf,
        branch=response.chunk_bits_branch,
        depth=math.log2(next_power_of_two(challenge.chunk_count) // 256),
        index=response.chunk_index // 256,
        root=challenge.chunk_bits_merkle_root
    )
    # Verify the chunk bit does not match the challenge chunk bit
    assert get_custody_chunk_bit(challenge.responder_key, response.chunk) != get_bitfield_bit(challenge.chunk_bits_leaf, response.chunk_index % 256)
    # Clear the challenge
    records = state.custody_bit_challenge_records
    records[records.index(challenge)] = CustodyBitChallengeRecord()
    # Slash challenger
    slash_validator(state, challenge.challenger_index, challenge.responder_index)

Per-epoch processing

Run process_reveal_deadlines(state) immediately after process_ejections(state):

def process_reveal_deadlines(state: BeaconState) -> None:
   for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
       if (validator.latest_custody_reveal_period +
           (CUSTODY_RESPONSE_DEADLINE // EPOCHS_PER_CUSTODY_PERIOD) <
           get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, index)):
               slash_validator(state, index)

Run process_challenge_deadlines(state) immediately after process_reveal_deadlines(state):

def process_challenge_deadlines(state: BeaconState) -> None:
    for challenge in state.custody_chunk_challenge_records:
        if get_current_epoch(state) > challenge.deadline:
            slash_validator(state, challenge.responder_index, challenge.challenger_index)
            records = state.custody_chunk_challenge_records
            records[records.index(challenge)] = CustodyChunkChallengeRecord()

    for challenge in state.custody_bit_challenge_records:
        if get_current_epoch(state) > challenge.deadline:
            slash_validator(state, challenge.responder_index, challenge.challenger_index)
            records = state.custody_bit_challenge_records
            records[records.index(challenge)] = CustodyBitChallengeRecord()

Append this to process_final_updates(state):

    # Clean up exposed RANDAO key reveals
    state.exposed_derived_secrets[current_epoch % EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS] = []

In process_penalties_and_exits, change the definition of eligible to the following (note that it is not a pure function because state is declared in the surrounding scope):

def eligible(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex) -> bool:
    validator = state.validator_registry[index]
    # Cannot exit if there are still open chunk challenges
    if len([record for record in state.custody_chunk_challenge_records if record.responder_index == index]) > 0:
        return False
    # Cannot exit if there are still open bit challenges
    if len([record for record in state.custody_bit_challenge_records if record.responder_index == index]) > 0:
        return False
    # Cannot exit if you have not revealed all of your custody keys
    elif validator.next_custody_reveal_period <= get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, index, validator.exit_epoch):
        return False
    # Cannot exit if you already have
    elif validator.withdrawable_epoch < FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH:
        return False
    # Return minimum time
    else:
        return current_epoch >= validator.exit_epoch + MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWAL_EPOCHS

27 KiB Raw Blame History

Ethereum 2.0 Phase 1 -- Custody Game

Table of contents

Introduction

Terminology

Constants

Misc

Time parameters

Max operations per block

Reward and penalty quotients

Signature domains

Data structures

Custody objects

CustodyChunkChallenge

CustodyBitChallenge

CustodyChunkChallengeRecord

CustodyBitChallengeRecord

CustodyResponse

New beacon operations

CustodyKeyReveal

EarlyDerivedSecretReveal