Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Draft EIP for ENS support for contract ABIs
* Fix signature for resolver function
* Rename abi to ABI to avoid name clashes
* Update and rename eip-ens-abi-lookup.md to eip-634.md
* Update eip-634.md
* Update eip-634.md
* Update and rename eip-634.md to eip-205.md
* Delete eip-634.md
* Draft EIP for ENS support for contract ABIs
* Fix signature for resolver function
* Rename abi to ABI to avoid name clashes
* Update and rename eip-ens-abi-lookup.md to eip-634.md
* Update eip-634.md
* Update eip-634.md
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Moving EIP-1167 to Last Call status
* included code-golf gas improvements, eliminated extraneous tooling (factory, probe, deployment bytecode), added vanity address optimization
* adding last call comment period end date
* adding last call comment period end date
* moved status to Final
* removed Last Call period end date
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Net gas metering for SSTORE without dirty maps
* typo: opcode
* typo: changed
* Self-assign the PR number 1283
* Add a dummy discussion url
* Fix R_sclear loopholes
* Properly handle refund for 0 value issue
* fix: refund should only be added again if new value is 0
* clarify if statement
* Clearly state what () means
* typo fix: unnecessary wording "additional"
* fix: should have parent clause if original value is not zero
* Remove 15k gas from refund counter instead of deduct it as gas cost
* Be more clear on EIP-658 enabled only-commit-storage-changes-at-end-of-block optimizations
* Move some discussion comments to motivations section
* typo: commons -> common
* Be more specific when gas reduction won't happen compared with EIP-1087
* typo: duplicate description
* Add explanation section
* becomes -> become
* typo: covers -> cover
* Add state transition diagrams
* Fix table formatting
* typo: 0 -> `current`
* typo: missing -
* Change state transition table to use `(current, original)` vs `new`
* fix: vertical <-> horizontal
* Be more specific on usages benefited by this EIP
* Typo fix
* Changes EIP-1 wording to focus on technicals not community sentiment.
All of the recent changes to the EIP process have been made to ensure that the EIP process is a technical one, and not one of sentiment analysis. There is a lot of discussion going on with regards to how we can improve the process and get valid community sentiment analysis pre-fork, but there doesn't exist a complete solution yet at this time (just proposals).
It appears that the Last Call PR introduced sentiment analysis into the process, which I do not believe was intended. From my recollection of the discussions around the Last Call stuff, the goal wasn't to fundamentally change how governance works, but rather to ensure that EIPs don't get stuck indefinitely in limbo.
This change simply removes the sentiment analysis wording from the process and makes it more clear that the EIP process is about gauging technical feasibility, not making judgement calls as to whether or not a thing is a good idea or not.
* Adds Active state
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Add notion that Github PR can't be discussion-to
* Update eip-1.md
* Update <url> it is interpret as HTML tag
* Update eip-1.md
* Update eip-1.md
* Update eip-1.md
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* added Standard Bounties EIP
* updated date and EIP number
* updated EIP number
* Updated to follow the prescribed EIP-X format
* renamed file
* Updated based on suggestions
* updated to lowercase eip
* Update eip-1081.md
* Updated EIP verbiage.
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Creates Remove Difficulty Bomb EIP
The difficulty bomb operates under the assumption that miners decide what code economic participants are running, rather than economic participants deciding for themselves. In reality, miners will mine whatever chain is most profitable and the most profitable chain is the one that economic participants use. If 99% of miners mine a chain that no economic participants use then that chain will have no value and the miners will cease mining of it in favor of some other chain that does have economic participants. Another way to put this is that miners will follow economic participants, not the other way around.
With the difficulty bomb removed, when Casper is released it will be up to economic participants to decide whether they want the features that Casper enables or not. If they do not want Casper, they are free to continue running unpatched clients and participating in the Ethereum network as it exists today. This freedom of choice is the cornerstone of DLTs and making it hard for people to make that choice (by creating an artificial pressure) does not work towards that goal of freedom of choice. If the development team is not confident that economic participants will want Casper, then they should re-evaluate their priorities rather than trying to force Casper onto users.
Personal Note: I think we will see almost all economic participants in Ethereum switch to PoS/Sharding without any extra pressure beyond client defaults.
* Added more clarity on how to fix the difficulty.
* Adds Yellow Paper implementation.
* Sets EIP number.
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Started writing proposal
* Added more commentary and removed comments
* Update and rename eip-oracle_interface.md to eip-1154.md
* Add discussions-to URL
* Corrected discussions-to link
* Expand on use cases and types of oracles supported
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* First version of EIP-SDA.
* Added public discussion link.
* Update and rename eip-SDA.md to eip-1129.md
* Renamed eip-SDA.md to eip-1129.md
* Removed eip-SDA.md.
* Update eip-1129.md
* Fixed some typos in EIP 1129.
* Add eip-signTypedData
* Change namespace from personal to eth
* Change a way schema hash is combined together with data as proposed by @MicahZoltu
* Add a note about it being implemented in MetaMask as an experimental feature
* Add signerAddress as a parameter
* Add test vectors
* Fix an example
* Missing commas, periods
* Address the feedback
* Add a missing signerAddress parameter in the example
* Change the order of parameters to have an address as a second arg
* Wrote motivation
* WIP
* First draft of specification
* Fixes
* Update to new EIP format
* Assign EIP number
* Clarify encoding of short static byte arrays
* Removed Solidity changes
* Fixup
* Fix typos
* WIP EIP191
* WIP TODO
* WIP Replay attacks
* Fixes the sorted by name example encoding
* Remove Solidity hash
* Added note on replay protection
* Redesign domain separator
* Include images and simple motivation
* Fix up EIP metadata formatting
* Add domain separator
* Remove replay attacks from todo list
* Add Jacob Evans to authors
* Clarify encodeData
* Rename Message example to Mail
* Update mock signing screen
* Rework EIP712Domain
* Update Solidity example
* Update Javascript example
* Relocate files
* Rename DomainSeparator to EIP712Domain (fix)
* Move examples to separate files
* Remove httpOrigin domain parameter
* Update JSON-Schema
* Add registery of version bytes
* Add eip712 to eip191 registery
* Add requires header
* Set correct language on all snipets
* GitHub highlighting for Solidity files
* Update Web3 API specification
* Use abi.encode where possible
* Update JSON-RPC specification
* Asset path repo is ethereums
* Correctly spelling of registry
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Because Yellow Paper only describes the latest mainnet hard fork, there is not official source of information were the gas costs before the changes of EIP-150 are provided.
* Add draft of elliptic-curve gas cost reduction EIP
* Add status and EIP dependencies
* Lowercase preamble per observed practice
* Tweak EIP title to reflect core cause for cost reduction
The EIP listed out the precompiles, but really this is about reducing all
alt_bn128-related gas costs.
* Reduce constant factor in line with original EIP issue
For some reason this got missed when turning into PR form.
* Fix footnote formatting
* Drop extraneous code fence
* GitHub username only for EIP author line
* Label alt_bn128 gas cost EIP as EIP 1108
* Add new two-week review process to EIPs
* Add ACCEPTED status, thanks @arachnid
* Use last call, thanks @arachnid
* Add other authors
* Re-add "request to merge"
* Add accepted as draft
* Match statuses to words used in text
* Match whitespace
* Add last call RSS
* add RSS link to EIP1
* Update deferred wording
* Provide
* "EIP authors can request"
* Correct HTML error
* review-period last date only
* Briefer review end date name
* alse
* Fully document statuses and transitions
* One implementation for draft
* Focus on the goal
* Use prior definition of final
* Use Accepted
* Use Accepted
* PR is the preferred mechanism to request status changes
* hide markdown formatting
* Initial draft
* Strengthen constraint language and add noop logic path
* Add identifier property to web3 request payload
* Update example to remove error case
* Add identifier to web3 response payload for filtering
* Concretely detail DOM-specific APIs
* Update and rename eip-web3-access.md to eip-1102.md
* Remove unnecessary constraint link
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Remove call costs for precompiled contracts
* EIP number added and file name changed
* Fixed discussion-to field
* Fixed type and category fields
* discussion-to field changed to ethereum-magicians
* Change a bad change
* Changed the discussion link
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Updates the error response for not found block.
Invalid parameters isn't quite right, since the parameter in this case was valid, but the resource doesn't exist or isn't available. Also changes `data` to just contain the block hash so that clients have an easier time parsing out the not-found block (no need to use a regex to pull out the block hash).
* Adds author GitHub name to PR
* ERC: log in / signup using ENS subdomains
This presents a method to replace the usual signup/login design pattern with a minimal ethereum native scheme, that doesn’t require passwords, backing up private keys nor typing seed phrases. From the user point of view it will be very similar to patterns they’re already used to with second factor authentication (without relying in a central server), but for dapp developers it requires a new way to think about ethereum transactions.
* Update eip-1078.md
* Update eip-1078.md
* changed dependencies
* change title to force travis rebuild
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* ERC: Executable Signed Messages refunded by the contract
Allowing users to sign messages to show intent of execution, but allowing a third party relayer to execute them is an emerging pattern being used in many projects. Standardizing a common format for them, as well as a way in which the user allows the transaction to be paid in tokens, gives app developers a lot of flexibility and can become the main way in which app users interact with the Blockchain.
* Update eip-1077.md
* Update eip-1077.md
* Added uPort and Gnosis examples
* Swarm city
* change dependencies
* moves reference to 877
* work on setting up the eip-governable-token
* some notes
* Update and rename eip-governable-token.md to eip-recoverable-token.md
added the three levels of token recovery. considering adding separate process for loss because of theft
* Update and rename eip-recoverable-token.md to eip-1080.md
* added colon and discussion to link
* epi drafted
* minor changes made
* minor changes made
* changes to sender interface and added diagrams
* added diagrams in the markdown
* updated the diagrams
* update the headers
* made changes suggested by @arachnid
* added png to assets folder
* Formalize IPFS hash into ENS(Ethereum Name Service) resolver
* Update and rename eip-X.md to eip-1062.md
* Remove superfluous space after 'category'
* Update the URL for discussion
* Fix typos
* Fix typo
* Update Specification, Rationale and Test Cases
* Store multihash value in bytes
* Add initial EIP skeleton
* Initial take through "Rationale"
* First very rough draft of ERC20 Metadata Extension
Nearly ready for comments by Matt, Matt, and John
* Initial "Token Metadata Standard" Proposal + small change to ERC721
- Added initial “Token Metadata JSON Schema”
- Re-named “ERC721 Metadata JSON Schema” to “Token Metadata JSON
Schema” in the ERC721 EIP
* ERC20 Metadata Extension ready to read
* Update Title of ERC Metadata Extension
* Fixing Matt's Github handle
Apparently Github handles for authors are meant to be “accurate” - who
knew?
* update grammatical errors; properly format JSON to remove excess commas
* update JSON descriptions & make grammatical changes to EIP
* Changed language in Token Metadata JSON Schema to reflect use by tokens which are not NFT's. Added clarification for backwards compatibility
* update authors and contact email
* Author Fix
* Removing ERC20 Metadata Extension
This branch is going to be just the Token Metadata Standard
* Removing change to 721 and renaming to 1047
* Full ERC721 revert
No changes to ERC721 in this PR
* Add initial EIP skeleton
* Initial take through "Rationale"
* First very rough draft of ERC20 Metadata Extension
Nearly ready for comments by Matt, Matt, and John
* Initial "Token Metadata Standard" Proposal + small change to ERC721
- Added initial “Token Metadata JSON Schema”
- Re-named “ERC721 Metadata JSON Schema” to “Token Metadata JSON
Schema” in the ERC721 EIP
* ERC20 Metadata Extension ready to read
* Update Title of ERC Metadata Extension
* Fixing Matt's Github handle
Apparently Github handles for authors are meant to be “accurate” - who
knew?
* update grammatical errors; properly format JSON to remove excess commas
* update JSON descriptions & make grammatical changes to EIP
* Changed language in Token Metadata JSON Schema to reflect use by tokens which are not NFT's. Added clarification for backwards compatibility
* update authors and contact email
* Author Fix
* Removing Token Metadata Standard
This Branch will be just the ERC20 Token Metadata Extension
* Updates from reviewer comments
- Some grammar fixes
- Removed mentions of ERC721 standard code
- Added EIP # and discussion forum
* Fixing discussion-to
discussion-to instead of discussion-forum
* Should remove the change to 721
* 100% revert on ERC721
No changes to ERC721 in this PR now
* Discussions-to
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Update and rename EIP-X-authorisations-nickjohnson.md to eip-927.md
* Update and rename EIP-X-metadata-nickjohnson.md to eip-926.md
* Update eip-927.md
This change makes information in ENR compatible with the existing
discovery protocol:
- The default identity scheme is now called "v4" to make the name shorter.
- Node addresses are derived as the hash of the uncompressed public key.
- The "ip4" and "ip6" keys are merged into a single "ip" key which
can hold a IPv4 or IPv6 address.
- The "discv5" key is now called "udp".
- The new "tcp" key holds the TCP port.
* epi drafted
* minor changes made
* minor changes made
* changes to sender interface and added diagrams
* added diagrams in the markdown
* updated the diagrams
* update the headers
* made changes suggested by @arachnid
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Create EIP-X-on-chain-issuance-control.md
* Update and rename EIP-X-on-chain-issuance-control.md to EIP-1000-on-chain-issuance-control.md
* Update and rename EIP-1000-on-chain-issuance-control.md to EIP-1015-on-chain-issuance-control.md
* Rename EIP-1015-on-chain-issuance-control.md to EIP-1015.md
* Rename EIP-1015.md to eip-1015.md
* Create eip-541.md
* Added proofOfWork and getDifficultyAdjustmentPeriod
* Updated EIP number
Updated EIP number to reflect PR
* Several functional updates
Upon review from a wider audience, this commit includes an interface definition of minimum functionality for mined tokens, a more comprehensive abstract contract that defines required behavior for 4 separate internal phases of solution verification, difficulty modification, epoch period updates, and token reward. Additionally added an example mining program and several simple and complex examples are referenced. Included main net deployed implementation contract addresses 0xbitcoin and PoWAdv. Updated new header format per EIP standardization.
* Attempt at format fix
trying to address :
Incremental build: disabled. Enable with --incremental
Generating...
Liquid Exception: Liquid error (/home/travis/build/ethereum/EIPs/_includes/eiptable.html line 11): comparison of Array with Array failed included in all.html
jekyll 3.6.2 | Error: Liquid error (/home/travis/build/ethereum/EIPs/_includes/eiptable.html line 11): comparison of Array with Array failed included
The command "bash -ex .travis-ci.sh" exited with 1.
* Abstract contract update
Added full Mineable Abstract contract code to illustrate a more behaviourally specific implementation to the relatively general EIP918 interface.
* init
* permissions init
* start of permissions service
* Token Validator (#6)
* File naming convention
* Remove previous versions
* remove reference to the old variable
* Update frontmatter as per @Arachnid
* Switch to byte
* EIP-1 minors edits: clarify some sections on EIP collaborators and editors, cross-links, links, grammar, etc.
* Add a link for [Ethereum philosophy](https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper#philosophy) to the section in the white paper that was originally removed and which I re-added recently.
* Revise the format for the author header (names can be optional for anonymity).
* History edits (link to revision history + a minor edit).
* Add cross-links to other sections for better readability and clarity.
* Add clarifications on approval before merging from both editors and authors.
* Add more links for discussion channels
* Link to other clients and eips.ethereum.org.
* Reorder EIP editors roughly based on recent contributions.
* Other minor edits: grammar, etc.
* Add a link to core dev meetings
* discussion*s*
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* correct precompile address; expand on motivation; add links to implementation PRs
* return length is 4 octets, not 1; more text polish
* typo
* expand implementation section; add link to cpp-ethereum PR
* Create blockhash_refactoring.md
Stores blockhashes in the state, reducing the protocol complexity and the need for client implementation complexity in order to process the BLOCKHASH opcode. Also extends the range of how far back blockhash checking can go, with the side effect of creating direct links between blocks with very distant block numbers, facilitating much more efficient initial light client syncing.
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Update blockhash_refactoring.md
* Rename blockhash_refactoring.md to eip-210.md
* Create eip-draft_uniformity_between_0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B_and_0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c.md
* Fix typo
* Use pull request ID as tentative EIP
I think this might fix the Travis CI build errors
* Update and rename eip-draft_uniformity_between_0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B_and_0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c.md to eip-1010.md
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Claim a random number
* Add specification
* Add rationale
* Improve wording
* Improve formatting
* Improve wording
* Specify the account values for balance, nonce, code, and storage
* Be more specific about a hard-fork
* Add poc implementation for Parity
* Improve formatting
* Improve formatting
* Make sure the total supply will be unchanged.
* Point to relevant changes in chain spec.
* Remove contracts/#74 code from the proposal.
* Use the old but patched library
* Highlight differences to the initially deployed contract
* Add code and storage for the stateDiff
* Update resources
* Update resources
* Add correct discussion URL
* Standard Track -> Standards Track
* Link the PR for Parity
* Rationale on unchanged Ether supply
* Split specification alternatives via bytecode vs. codehash
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Add Github usernames
* Remove about.me link from triangular brackets
* Add @ before usernames, also note the previous commit was adding content from the original PR.
#908
* parentheses instead of triangular brackets: (@Githubusername)
* replace and with ,
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Create eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md
* Update and rename eip-Reward-full-nodes-validating-tx.md to eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md
* Quotes for Micah
* The amount of computation to validate a transaction will be the same as a miner...
* Add comments on Micah's suggestions and give further specification details
* Further commentary on transaction fee amount for full nodes vs miner tx fees
* Add "One problem with this is that a miner could run a full node validator using a different address with the same computer, and just cache the result of their execution and use it for the full node validator. I'm not sure how you would prevent this, but perhaps you could using IP address tracking (similarly asserting that the IP address of a full node validator isn't the same as the miner) which would add additional complexity to the protocol, but this could also be hacked with dynamic IPs and VPNs."
* he user agent would contain the information needed to send an amount of ETH to the full node and the client, which are the addresses of these parties and the amounts to add. I think full nodes would need to add to their set up to add the address to receive ETH after validating transactions. These fields could be read-only, or immutable, so that someone can't overwrite them with another address, thus preventing one possible attack.
* Add a missing T
* Update frontmatter
* Comment out implementation, add backwards incompatibility
* Update the specification, rewording and moving content
* Update the header, Test Cases and Implementation
* Update eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md
* Chamge the category to Core
* to be assigned => <to be assigned>
* discussions-to: https://gitter.im/ethereum/topics/topic/5ac8574227c509a774e7901a/eip-reward-full-nodes-and-clients
* Move around fields in the header
* Add an extra line to see if that will get the build to pass
* Assign eip number 908
* Rename eip-Reward-full-nodes-and-clients.md to eip-908.md
* ERC777 A New Advanced Token Standard
* ERC777: Add ERC777 Logo
* ERC777: Normalize EIP/ERC names
* ERC777: Spec for tokensToSend when burning tokens
* ERC777: Update official repository
* ERC777: Clarification and corrections
- Clarify unclear sections of the spec
- Fix typos and grammar mistakes
- Improve aesthetics of the text
* ERC777: Change terminology of the repo, small fix
- Don't refer to the repo as the official repo but the repo of the
reference implementation
- Fix a small typo in the AuthorizedOperator event
* ERC777: logo & release to public domain (CC0)
* ERC777: Use markdown not html & relative links
* ERC777: Adapt to new EIP template
* ERC777: Use solidity syntax and fix relative links
* ERC777: Add discussions-to link
* ERC777: Fix link in discussion-to
* ERC777: Fix image links
* ERC777: Fix eip type
* ERC777: Update header
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* ERC-820 Pseudo-introspection using a registry contract.
* Typos, links, and better explanation of Nicks deployment method
* Formating fix
* Email address
* solidity syntax highlight
* Adapt to new template for EIPs
* Discussions link added
* Fix link in discussion-to
* Type fixed
- Create `assets` folder
- Move existing EIPs (1, 107, 858) assets into the `assets` folder
- Update link to assets in EIPs 1, 107 and 858
- Describe the inclusion of assets for EIPs in `README.md`
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The creator of this PR is listed as an author on all modified EIP(s)
- The build is passing
* Added initial ASIC-resistant EIP details
* Format fixed
* Format fixed
* Format fixed
* Format fixed
* Format fixed
* Grammar fixes
* Added mention of more invasive hash algorithm replacements
* Added mention of the single duplicate in 0x010001cf
* Adjusted language to remove speculation and focus on the purpose and motivation of this pull request
* Assigned EIP number and discussion URL, altered language to be more descriptive about the intention and risk. Removed unneeded Concensus/Block field changes.
* Clarified FNV rational, provided code for basic sanity FNV candidate analysis and FNV selection, grammar fixes
* initial submission of draft EIP for consideration
* EIP-884 correct spelling and add section on permissions management
* EIP-884 added oldHash
* EIP-884 changed getHash to hasHash and cleaned up grammar and spelling
* EIP-884 updates to wording
* EIR-884 added clarification on Delaware GCL vs Reg A+
* EIR-884 tweaks so the proposed code actually compiles
* EIP-884 simplified ownerAt and added requirement that a verified address that owns tokens can not be removed
* EIP-884 added link to reference implementation
* EIP-884 added notes on ERC721
* EIP-884 renamed document, removed references to Reg A+, and updated interface to include stock cancellation and reissuance.
* EIP-884 updated some documentation in the proposed interface
* EIP-884 added isHolder function to proposed interface
* EIP-884 moved to new frontmatter format
* EIP-884 removed 'requires' from metadata
* EIP-884 renamed file to match others
* Update social includes to link to repo, not org
* Add support for eip_validator by Makoto Inoue
* Fix external links in EIPs
* Change eip_validator to 0.3.0
* Fix dependency issues
* Update eip_validator to 0.3.4
* Add more condition on EIP input files
* Bump eip_validator to ignore invalid eip file format
* Fix EIP 86
- Fixed typo (operator to operators)
- Explicitly call out the implementation MUST support multiple operators per owner as implied by the comments
- Removed unnecessary throw from the dev instructions on setApprovalForAll
* Create abstraction.md
Implements a set of changes that serve the combined purpose of "abstracting out" signature verification and nonce checking, allowing users to create "account contracts" that perform any desired signature/nonce checks instead of using the mechanism that is currently hard-coded into transaction processing.
* Update abstraction.md
* Update abstraction.md
* Update abstraction.md
* Update abstraction.md
* Update abstraction.md
* Update abstraction.md
* Update abstraction.md
* Rename abstraction.md to eip-86.md, add copyright clause, fix header.
I'm adding myself as an co-author of this EIP. Nick and Maurelian can vouch that I wrote a large part of this text and helped design the initial mechanisms
Alex Beregszaszi
Jacques Dafflon
Ayrat Badykov
Paul Bouchon
Paweł Bylica
Nick Johnson
Nitika Goel
Ryan Ghods
Alan Lu
Noel Maersk
yarrumretep
Afri Schoedon
atlanticcrypto
Logan Saether
DB Hurley
Pedro Gomes
cslarson
Giuseppe Bertone
c-g-e-w-e-k-e-
Nick Mudge
Wei Tang
Jordi Baylina
Witek
Mark Beylin
benk10
Micah Zoltu
The Officious BokkyPooBah
benk10
Zainan Victor Zhou
Philippe Castonguay
Chaitanya Potti
EOS Classic
Jordan Schalm
SmeargleUsedFly
gary rong
jeffishjeff
Xiaoyu Wang
achon22
Brooklyn Zelenka
Pavel Motyrev
Juliano Rizzo
Domino Valdano
Nate Welch
Nitro888
Lev Dubinets
William Entriken
Maciej Górski
vbuterin
ThunderDeliverer
ledgerwatch
Leonid Logvinov
Nick Mudge
Leo Arias
g. nicholas d'andrea
Antonio Salazar Cardozo
knarfeh
Alex Van de Sande
Lanre Ige
James Ray
Jay Logelin
Andrew Parker
Danny Ryan
bradleat
Kashish Khullar
PhyrexTsai
Tommy Nicholas
Fabian Vogelsteller
Felix Lange
Nick Savers
juztin
Jorge Izquierdo
ligi
Tobias Oberstein
Anderson Wesley
HsiaChiHao
phiferd
Domino Valdano
bitspill
gluk256
Joe Jordan
David Stanfill
Yoichi Hirai
MattLongCT
Dave Sag
Greg Colvin
Dean Eigenmann
John Forrest
Felix Lange