EIP 1010: Uniformity Between Two Addresses (#1010)

* Create eip-draft_uniformity_between_0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B_and_0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c.md

* Fix typo

* Use pull request ID as tentative EIP

I think this might fix the Travis CI build errors

* Update and rename eip-draft_uniformity_between_0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B_and_0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c.md to eip-1010.md

EIPS/eip-1010.md

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+---
+eip: 1010
+title: Uniformity Between 0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B and 0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c
+author: Anderson Wesley (@andywesley)
+discussions-to: https://github.com/andywesley/EIPs/issues/1
+status: Draft
+type: Standards Track
+category: Core
+created: 2018-04-18
+---
+
+## Simple Summary
+
+This document proposes to improve the uniformity of ether distribution
+between wallet address `0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B` and
+wallet address `0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c` which are
+currently experiencing a significant non-uniformity.
+
+## Abstract
+
+As of the date of this EIP, the difference in balance between
+address `0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B` and address
+`0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c` is far from equitable
+or uniform, with the former having more than 365,000 ether
+more than the latter. The distribution of ether between these two
+addresses must be improved in order to protect the Ethereum economy
+from centralized control. This will be accomplished by transferring
+100,000 ether from the former address to the latter. This is a properly
+motivated improvement in keeping with the core Ethereum philosophy of
+decentralization.
+
+## Motivation
+
+This proposal is necessary because the Ethereum protocol does not allow
+the owner of an address which does not own an equitable amount of ether
+to claim their share of ether from an address which owns a dangerously
+centralized quantity. Rather than proposing an overly complicated generic
+mechanism for any user to claim ether to which they believe they are
+equitably entitled, this proposal will take the simple route of a one-time
+transfer of 100,000 ether from `0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B`
+to `0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c`. This avoids duplicating
+the effort of other proposals and provides a net improvement to the
+Ethereum project and community.
+
+## Specification
+
+The balance of `0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B` will be decreased
+by 100,000 ether. The balance of `0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c`
+will be increased by 100,000 ether. No net change in the amount of extant
+ether will occur unless at the time of implementation the former address does not
+contain sufficient ether for such a deduction.
+
+## Rationale
+
+The value 100,000 was chosen after careful technically sound analysis of various economic theories
+developed over the past century. In spite of the fact that it is a convenient round
+number, it is actually the exact output of a complex statistical process iterated to
+determine the optimal distribution of ether between these addresses.
+
+## Backwards Compatibility
+
+Clients that fail to implement this change will not be aware of the correct balances
+for these addresses. This will create a hard fork. The implementation of this change
+consistently among all clients as intended by the proposal process will be sufficient
+to ensure that backwards compatibility is not a concern.
+
+## Copyright
+Copyright and related rights waived via
+[CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).