Changes EIP-1 wording to focus on technicals not community sentiment. (#1224)

* Changes EIP-1 wording to focus on technicals not community sentiment.

All of the recent changes to the EIP process have been made to ensure that the EIP process is a technical one, and not one of sentiment analysis.  There is a lot of discussion going on with regards to how we can improve the process and get valid community sentiment analysis pre-fork, but there doesn't exist a complete solution yet at this time (just proposals).

It appears that the Last Call PR introduced sentiment analysis into the process, which I do not believe was intended.  From my recollection of the discussions around the Last Call stuff, the goal wasn't to fundamentally change how governance works, but rather to ensure that EIPs don't get stuck indefinitely in limbo.

This change simply removes the sentiment analysis wording from the process and makes it more clear that the EIP process is about gauging technical feasibility, not making judgement calls as to whether or not a thing is a good idea or not.

* Adds Active state
This commit is contained in:
Micah Zoltu 2018-08-07 17:31:44 +08:00 committed by Nick Johnson
parent 1b8ebf86fd
commit 4f8f1cbd1d
2 changed files with 14 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ EIP stands for Ethereum Improvement Proposal. An EIP is a design document provid
## EIP Rationale
We intend EIPs to be the primary mechanisms for proposing new features, for collecting community input on an issue, and for documenting the design decisions that have gone into Ethereum. Because the EIPs are maintained as text files in a versioned repository, their revision history is the historical record of the feature proposal.
We intend EIPs to be the primary mechanisms for proposing new features, for collecting community technical input on an issue, and for documenting the design decisions that have gone into Ethereum. Because the EIPs are maintained as text files in a versioned repository, their revision history is the historical record of the feature proposal.
For Ethereum implementers, EIPs are a convenient way to track the progress of their implementation. Ideally each implementation maintainer would list the EIPs that they have implemented. This will give end users a convenient way to know the current status of a given implementation or library.
@ -48,24 +48,25 @@ Your role as the champion is to write the EIP using the style and format describ
Each status change is requested by the EIP author and reviewed by the EIP editors. Use a pull request to update the status. Please include a link to where people should continue discussing your EIP. The EIP editors will process these requests as per the conditions below.
* **Active** -- Some Informational and Process EIPs may also have a status of “Active” if they are never meant to be completed. E.g. EIP 1 (this EIP).
* **Work in progress (WIP)** -- Once the champion has asked the Ethereum community whether an idea has any chance of support, they will write a draft EIP as a [pull request]. Consider including an implementation if this will aid people in studying the EIP.
* :arrow_right: Draft -- If agreeable, EIP editor will assign the EIP a number (generally the issue or PR number related to the EIP) and merge your pull request. The EIP editor will not unreasonably deny an EIP.
* :x: Draft -- Reasons for denying draft status include being too unfocused, too broad, duplication of effort, being technically unsound, not providing proper motivation or addressing backwards compatibility, or not in keeping with the [Ethereum philosophy](https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper#philosophy).
* **Draft** -- Once the first draft has been merged, you may submit follow-up pull requests with further changes to your draft until such point as you believe the EIP to be mature and ready to proceed to the next status. An EIP in draft status must be implemented to be considered for promotion to the next status (ignore this requirement for core EIPs).
* :arrow_right: Last Call -- If agreeable, the EIP editor will assign Last Call status and set a review end date, normally 14 days later.
* :x: Last Call -- A request for Last Call status will be denied if material changes are still expected to be made to the draft. We hope that EIPs only enter Last Call once, so as to avoid unnecessary noise on the RSS feed. Last Call will be denied if the implementation is not complete and supported by the community.
* :x: Last Call -- A request for Last Call status will be denied if material changes are still expected to be made to the draft. We hope that EIPs only enter Last Call once, so as to avoid unnecessary noise on the RSS feed.
* **Last Call** -- This EIP will listed prominently on the http://eips.ethereum.org/ website (subscribe via RSS at [last-call.xml](/last-call.xml)).
* :x: -- A Last Call which results in material changes or substantial unaddressed complaints will cause the EIP to revert to Draft.
* :arrow_right: Accepted (Core EIPs only) -- After the review end date, the Ethereum Core Developers will vote on whether to accept this change. If yes, the status will upgrade to Accepted.
* :arrow_right: Final (Not core EIPs) -- A successful Last Call without material changes or unaddressed complaints will become Final.
* **Accepted (Core EIPs only)** -- This is being implemented by Ethereum Core Developers.
* :arrow_right: Final -- Standards Track Core EIPs must be implemented in at least three viable Ethereum clients before it can be considered Final. When the implementation is complete and supported by the community, the status will be changed to “Final”.
* :x: -- A Last Call which results in material changes or substantial unaddressed technical complaints will cause the EIP to revert to Draft.
* :arrow_right: Accepted (Core EIPs only) -- A successful Last Call without material changes or unaddressed technical complaints will become Accepted.
* :arrow_right: Final (Not core EIPs) -- A successful Last Call without material changes or unaddressed technical complaints will become Final.
* **Accepted (Core EIPs only)** -- This EIP is in the hands of the Ethereum client developers. Their process for deciding whether to encode it into their clients as part of a hard fork is not part of the EIP process.
* :arrow_right: Final -- Standards Track Core EIPs must be implemented in at least three viable Ethereum clients before it can be considered Final. When the implementation is complete and adopted by the community, the status will be changed to “Final”.
* **Final** -- This EIP represents the current state-of-the-art. A Final EIP should only be updated to correct errata.
Other exceptional statuses include:
* Deferred -- This is for core EIPs that have been put off for a future hard fork.
* Rejected -- An EIP that is fundamentally broken and will not be implemented.
* Rejected -- An EIP that is fundamentally broken or a Core EIP that was rejected by the Core Devs and will not be implemented.
* Active -- This is similar to Final, but denotes an EIP which which may be updated without changing its EIP number.
* Superseded -- An EIP which was previously final but is no longer considered state-of-the-art. Another EIP will be in Final status and reference the Superseded EIP.

View File

@ -22,9 +22,11 @@ When you believe your EIP is mature and ready to progress past the draft phase,
- **For all other EIPs**, open a PR changing the state of your EIP to 'Final'. An editor will review your draft and ask if anyone objects to its being finalised. If the editor decides there is no rough consensus - for instance, because contributors point out significant issues with the EIP - they may close the PR and request that you fix the issues in the draft before trying again.
# EIP Status Terms
* **Draft** - an EIP that is open for consideration.
* **Accepted** - an EIP that is planned for immediate adoption, i.e. expected to be included in the next hard fork (for Core/Consensus layer EIPs).
* **Final** - an EIP that has been adopted in a previous hard fork (for Core/Consensus layer EIPs).
* **Draft** - an EIP that is undergoing rapid iteration and changes
* **Last Call** - an EIP that is done with its initial iteration and ready for review by a wide audience
* **Accepted** - a core EIP that has been in Last Call for at least 2 weeks and any technical changes that were requested have been addressed by the author
* **Final (non-Core)** - an EIP that has been in Last Call for at least 2 weeks and any technical changes that were requested have been addressed by the author.
* **Final (Core)** - an EIP that the Core Devs have decide to implement and release in a future hard fork or has already been released in a hard fork
* **Deferred** - an EIP that is not being considered for immediate adoption. May be reconsidered in the future for a subsequent hard fork.
# Preferred Citation Format