status-react/doc/new-guidelines.md
Icaro Motta 6e897f0ea6
Migrate away from rf/defn and rf/merge (first step) (#17451)
This commit shows how to move away from rf/defn
f12c7401d1/src/utils/re_frame.clj (L1-L90)
& rf/merge
f12c7401d1/src/utils/re_frame.cljs (L39-L85)
and why we should do it.

## Problems

Before jumping to solutions, let's understand the problems first, in no order of
importance.

### Problem 1: Cyclic dependencies

If you ever tried to move event handlers or the functions used inside them to
different files in status-mobile, you probably stumbled in cyclic dependency
errors.

When an event is registered in re-frame, it is globally available for any other
place to dispatch. The dispatch mechanism relies on globally unique keywords,
the so called event IDs, e.g. :chat/mute-successfully. This means that event
namespaces don't need to require other event namespaces, just like you don't
need to require subscription namespaces in views.

rf/merge increases the likelihood of cyclic dependencies because they force
event namespaces to require each other. Although not as common, this happened a
few times with devs in the team and it can be a big hassle to fix if you are
unlucky. It is a problem we should not have in the first place (at least not as
easily).

### Problem 2: We are not linting thousands of lines of code

The linter (clj-kondo) is incapable of understanding the rf/defn macro. In
theory, we could teach clj-kondo what the macro produces. I tried this, but gave
up after a few tries.

This is a big deal, clj-kondo can catch many issues and will continue to catch
more as it continue to evolve. It's hard to precisely count how many lines are
affected, but `find src/ -type f -name 'events.cljs' -exec wc -l {} +` gives us
more than 4k LOC.

### Problem 3: Blocking RN's UI thread for too long

Re-frame has a routing mechanism to manage events. When an event is dispatched,
it is enqueued and scheduled to run some time later (very soon). This process is
asynchronous and is optimized in such a way as to balance responsiveness vs the
time to empty the queue.

>[...] when processing events, one after the other, do ALL the currently queued
>events. Don't stop. Don't yield to the browser. Hog that CPU.
>
>[...] but if any new events are dispatched during this cycle of processing,
>don't do them immediately. Leave them queued.
>
>-- https://github.com/day8/re-frame/blob/master/src/re_frame/router.cljc#L8-L60

Decisions were made (way back in 2017) to reduce the number of registered
re-frame events and, more importantly, to coalesce events into bigger ones with
the rf/merge pattern. I tried to find evidence of real problems that were trying
to be solved, but my understanding is that decisions were largely based on
personal architectural preferences.

Fast-forward to 2023, and we are in a situation where we have many heavy events
that process a LOT of stuff in one go using rf/merge, thus blocking the UI
thread longer than we should. See, for example,
[status-im2.contexts.profile.login.events/login-existing-profile](3082605d1e/src/status_im2/contexts/profile/login/events.cljs (L69)),
[status-im2.contexts.profile.login.events/get-chats-callback](3082605d1e/src/status_im2/contexts/profile/login/events.cljs (L98)),
and many others.

The following excerpt was generally used to justify the idea that coalescing
events would make the app perform better.

> We will reduce the the amount of subscription re-computations, as for each
> distinct action, :db effect will be produced and swapped into app-db only once
>
> -- https://github.com/status-im/swarms/issues/31#issuecomment-346345981

This is in fact incorrect. Re-frame, ever since 2015 (so before the original
discussions in 2017) uses a concept of batching to process events, which means
subscriptions won't re-run after every dispatched event, and thus components
won't re-render either. Re-frame is smarter than that.

> groups of events queued up will be handled in a batch, one after the other,
> without yielding to the browser (previously re-frame yielded to the browser
> before every single event).
>
> -- 39adca9367/docs/releases/2015.md (050--2015-11-5)

Here's a practical example you can try in a shadow-cljs :mobile REPL to see the
batching behavior in practice.

```clojure
;; A dummy event that toggles between DEBUG and INFO levels.
(re-frame/reg-event-fx :dummy-event
  (fn [{:keys [db]}]
    {:db (update-in db
                    [:profile/profile :log-level]
                    (fn [level]
                      (if (= "DEBUG" level)
                        "INFO"
                        "DEBUG")))}))

(def timer
  (js/setInterval #(re-frame/dispatch [:dummy-event])
                  50))

;; 1. In component status-im.ui.screens.advanced-settings.views/advanced-settings,
;; add a print call to see when it's re-rendered by Reagent because the
;; subscription :log-level/current-log-level will be affected by our dummy event.
;;
;; 2. Also add a print call to the subscription :log-level/current-log-level to
;; see that the subscription does NOT re-run on every dispatch.

;; Remember to eval this expression to cancel the timer.
(js/clearInterval timer)
```

If you run the above timer with 50ms interval, you'll see a fair amount of
batching happening. You can infer that's the case because you'll see way less
than 20 print statements per second (so way less than 20 recomputations of the
subscription, which is the max theoretical limit).

When the interval is reduced even more, to say 10ms (to simulate lots of
dispatches in a row), sometimes you don't see a single recomputation in a 5s
window because re-frame is too busy processing events.

This shows just how critical it is to have event handlers finishing as soon as
possible to relinquish control back to the UI thread, otherwise responsiveness
is affected. It also shows that too many dispatches in a row can be bad, just as
big event handlers would block the batch for too long. You see here that
dispatching events in succession does NOT cause needless re-computations.

Of course there's an overhead of using re-frame.core/dispatch instead of calling
a Clojure function, but the trade-off is clearly documented: the more we
process in a single event, the less responsive the app may be because re-frame
won't be able to relinquish control back to the UI thread. The total time to
process the batch increases, but re-frame can't stop in the middle compared to
when different dispatches are used.

Thus, I believe this rf/merge pattern is harmful as a default practice in an
environment such as ours, where it's desirable end-users feel a snappy RN app. I
actually firmly believe we can improve the app's responsiveness by not
coalescing events by default. We're also preventing status-mobile from taking
the most advantage from future improvements in re-frame's scheduler. I can
totally see us experimenting with other algorithms in the scheduler to best fit
our needs. We should not blindly reduce the number of events as stated here
https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/2634#discussion_r155243127.

Solution: only coalesce events into one pile when it's strictly desirable to
atomically update the app db to avoid inconsistencies, otherwise, let the
re-frame scheduler do its job by using fx, not rf/merge. When needed, embrace
*eventual app db consistency* as a way to achieve lower UI latency, i.e. write
fast and short events, intentionally use :dispatch-later or other timing effects
to bend the re-frame's scheduler to your will.

There's another argument in favor of using something like rf/merge which I would
like to deconstruct. rf/merge gives us a way to reuse computations from
different events, which is nice. The thing here is that we don't need rf/merge
or re-frame to reuse functions across namespaces. rf/merge complects re-frame
with the need to reuse transformations.

Instead, the solution is as trivial as it gets, reuse app db "transformers"
across events by extracting the logic to data store namespaces
(src/status_im/data_store). This solution has the added benefit of not causing
cyclic dependency errors.

### Problem 4: Clojure's language server doesn't understand code under rf/defn

Nowadays, many (if not most) Clojure devs rely on the Clojure Language Server
https://github.com/clojure-lsp/clojure-lsp to be more effective. It is an
invaluable tool, but it doesn't work well with the macro rf/defn, and it's a
constant source of frustration when working in event namespaces. Renaming
symbols inside the macro don't work, finding references, jumping to local
bindings, etc.

Solution: don't use rf/defn, instead use re-frame's reg-event-fx function and
clojure-lsp will understand all the code inside event handlers.

### Problem 5: Unit tests for events need to "test the world"

Re-frame's author strongly recommends testing events that contain non-trivial
data transformations, and we do have many in status-mobile (note: let's not
confuse with integration tests in status_im/integration_test.cljs). That, and
non-trivial layer-3 subscriptions should be covered too. The reasoning is that
if we have a well developed and tested state layer, many UI bugs can be
prevented as the software evolves, since the UI is partially or greatly derived
from the global state. See re-frame: What to Test?
39adca9367/docs/Testing.md (what-to-test).
See PR Introduce subscription tests
https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/14472, where I share more
details about re-frame's testing practices.

When we use rf/merge, we make unit testing events a perennial source of
frustration because too many responsibilities are aggregated in a single event.
Unfortunately, we don't have many devs in the team that attempted to write unit
tests for events to confirm my claim, but no worries, let's dive into a real
example.

In a unit test for an event, we want to test that, given a cofx and args, the
event handler returns the expected map of effects with the correct values
(usually db transformations).

Let's assume we need to test the following event. The code is still using the
combo rf/defn & rf/merge.

```clojure
(rf/defn accept-notification-success
  {:events [:activity-center.notifications/accept-success]}
  [{:keys [db] :as cofx} notification-id {:keys [chats]}]
  (when-let [notification (get-notification db notification-id)]
    (rf/merge cofx
              (chat.events/ensure-chats (map data-store.chats/<-rpc chats))
              (notifications-reconcile [(assoc notification :read true :accepted true)]))))
```

As you can see, we're "rf/merging" two other functions, namely ensure-chats and
notifications-reconcile. In fact, ensure-chats is not registered in re-frame,
but it's 99% defined as if it's one because it needs to be "mergeable" according
to the rules of rf/merge. Both of these "events" are quite complicated under the
hood and should be unit tested on their own.

Now here goes the unit test. Don't worry about the details, except for the expected output.

```clojure
(deftest accept-notification-success-test
  (testing "marks notification as accepted and read, then reconciles"
    (let [notif-1          {:id "0x1" :type types/private-group-chat}
          notif-2          {:id "0x2" :type types/private-group-chat}
          notif-2-accepted (assoc notif-2 :accepted true :read true)
          cofx             {:db {:activity-center {:filter        {:type types/no-type :status :all}
                                                   :notifications [notif-2 notif-1]}}}

          expected {:db         {:activity-center {:filter        {:type 0 :status :all}
                                                   :notifications [notif-2-accepted notif-1]}
                                 :chats           {}
                                 :chats-home-list nil}
                    ;; *** HERE ***
                    :dispatch-n [[:activity-center.notifications/fetch-unread-count]
                                 [:activity-center.notifications/fetch-pending-contact-requests]]}
          actual   (events/accept-notification-success cofx (:id notif-2) nil)]
      (is (= expected actual)))))
```

Notice the map has a :dispatch-n effect and other stuff inside of it that are
not the responsibility of the event under test to care about. This happens
because rf/merge forces the event handler to compute/call everything in one go.
And things get MUCH worse when you want to test an event A that uses rf/merge,
but A calls other events B and C that also use rf/merge (e.g. event
:profile.login/get-chats-callback). At that point you flip the table in horror
😱, but testing events and maintaining them should be trivial.

Solution: Use re-frame's `fx` effect.

Here's the improved implementation and its accompanying test.

```clojure
(defn accept-notification-success
  [{:keys [db]} [notification-id {:keys [chats]}]]
  (when-let [notification (get-notification db notification-id)]
    (let [new-notifications [(assoc notification :read true :accepted true)]]
      {:fx [[:dispatch [:chat/ensure-chats (map data-store.chats/<-rpc chats)]]
            [:dispatch [:activity-center.notifications/reconcile new-notifications]]]})))

(re-frame/reg-event-fx :activity-center.notifications/accept-success accept-notification-success)

(deftest accept-notification-success-test
  (testing "marks notification as accepted and read, then reconciles"
    (let [notif-1          {:id "0x1" :type types/private-group-chat}
          notif-2          {:id "0x2" :type types/private-group-chat}
          notif-2-accepted (assoc notif-2 :accepted true :read true)
          cofx             {:db {:activity-center {:filter        {:type types/no-type :status :all}
                                                   :notifications [notif-2 notif-1]}}}

          ;; *** HERE ***
          expected {:fx [[:dispatch [:chat/ensure-chats []]]
                         [:dispatch [:activity-center.notifications/reconcile [notif-2-accepted]]]]}
          actual   (events/accept-notification-success cofx [(:id notif-2) nil])]
      (is (= expected actual)))))
```

Notice how the test expectation is NOT verifying what other events do (it's
actually "impossible" now). Using fx completely decouples events and makes
testing them a joy again.

### Problem 6: Unordered effects

status-mobile still uses the legacy way to describe the effects map, which has
the problem that their order is unpredictable.

> Prior to v1.1.0, the answer is: no guarantees were provided about ordering.
> Actual order is an implementation detail upon which you should not rely.
>
> -- 39adca9367/docs/Effects.md (order-of-effects)

> In fact, with v1.1.0 best practice changed to event handlers should only
> return two effects :db and :fx, in which case :db was always done first and
> then :fx, and within :fx the ordering is sequential. This new approach is more
> about making it easier to compose event handlers from many smaller functions,
> but more specificity around ordering was a consequence.
>
> -- 39adca9367/docs/Effects.md (order-of-effects)

### Problem 7: Usage of deprecated effect dispatch-n

We have 35 usages, the majority in new code using dispatch-n, which has been
officially deprecated in favor of multiple dispatch tuples in fx. See
39adca9367/docs/api-builtin-effects.md (L114)

### Problem 8: Complexity 🧙‍♂️

Have you ever tried to understand and/or explain how rf/merge and rf/defn work?
They have their fare share of complexity and have tripped up many contributors.

This is not ideal if we want to create a project where contributors can learn
re-frame as quickly as possible. Re-frame is already complicated enough to grasp
for many, the added abstractions should be valuable enough to justify.

Interestingly, rf/merge is a stateful function, and although this is not a
problem in practice, it is partially violating re-frame's spirit of only using
pure functions inside event handlers.

### Problem 9: Using a wrapping macro rf/defn instead of global interceptors

When rf/defn was created inside status-mobile, re-frame didn't have global
interceptors yet (which were introduced 3+ years ago). We no longer have this
limitation after we upgraded our old re-frame version in PR
https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/15997.

Global interceptors are a simple and functional abstraction to specify functions
that should run on every event, for example, for debugging during development,
logging, etc. This PR already shows this is possible by removing the wrapping
function utils.re-frame/register-handler-fx without causing any breakage.

## Conclusion

By embracing re-frame's best practices for describing effects
39adca9367/docs/FAQs/BestPractice.md (use-the-fx-effect),
we can solve long standing issues that affect every contributor at different
levels and bring the following benefits:

- Simplify the codebase.
- Bring back the DX we all deserve, i.e. Clojure Language Server and clj-kondo
  fully working in event namespaces.
- Greatly facilitate the testability of events.
- Give devs more flexibility to make the app more responsive, because the new
  default would not coalesce events, which in turn, would block the UI thread
  for shorter periods of time. At least that's the theory, but exceptions will
  be found.

The actions to achieve those benefits are:

- Don't use the macro approach, replace rf/defn with
  re-frame.core/reg-event-fx.
- Don't use rf/merge, simply use re-frame's built-in effect :fx.
- Don't call event handlers as normal functions, just as we don't directly call
  subscription handlers. Use re-frame's built-in effect :fx.

## How do we refactor the remainder of the code?

Some numbers first:

- There are 228 events defined with rf/defn in src/status-im2/.
- There are 34 usages of rf/merge in src/status_im2/.

## Resources

- Release notes where fx was introduced in re-frame:
  39adca9367/docs/releases/2020.md (110-2020-08-24)
2023-10-05 16:11:45 -03:00

24 KiB

Code Style Guidelines

Important

The goal of this document is to help all contributors (core and external) to write code in unison and help establish good practices that serve the Status Mobile contributors well.

We don't want to turn this document into an exhaustive list of rules to be followed that nobody will read. As much as possible, we'll try to document only what we consider important for Status Mobile. In other words, we don't want to maintain a general Clojure convention/style guide, nor do we want to turn this document into a long tutorial.

Warning

This is a work in progress, and not all conventions are properly implemented in the codebase yet. The project structure is also undergoing major changes, and it will take a considerable amount of time until we migrate the existing code to the new structure.

If you find out anything is outdated or missing, please, share with us or even better, create a pull-request! 🤸

Style guide

We follow the Clojure Style Guide and we use zprint to format Clojure code. Running make lint-fix should fix most formatting issues, but not all of them.

Dos and don'ts

Hiccup

Never use anonymous inline function in hiccup, this will lead to reinitialization of component on each render of parent component.

;; bad
(defn checkbox-view
  [{:keys [size]}]
  [rn/view
   [(fn [] [rn/view])]])

;; good
(defn comp []
  [rn/view])

(defn checkbox-view
  [{:keys [size]}]
  [rn/view
   [comp]])

This mistake mostly happens with functional components.

;; bad
(fn []
  (let [atom (rf/sub [:sub])]
    (fn []
      [:f>
       (fn []
         [rn/text atom]

;; good
(defn f-comp [atom]
 [rn/text atom])

(fn []
 (let [atom (rf/sub [:sub])]
   (fn []
     [:f> f-comp atom])))

It's important to name functional components with f- prefix.

Component props and API scheme to match Figma as closely as possible

Ideally, the prop names for components (particularly in quo2 Design System) should match the Figma properties as best as possible. This makes it easier for the developer using that component to configure it correctly for the screen it is being used on and avoids unnecessary overwrites and adjustments being made.

Avoid unnecessarily grouping categories to reduce the number of props

For example in Figma if there is a component and it has the following variants:

theme: "light" blur: "False" theme: "dark" blur: "False" theme: "light" blur: "True" theme: "dark" blur: "True"
type :neutral label "ABC" type :neutral label "ABC"
type :active label "ABC" type :active label "ABC"
type :danger label "ABC" type :danger label "ABC" type :danger label "ABC" type :danger label "ABC"
;; bad
"theme - :light or :dark
type - can be :neutral :active :danger :danger-blur"
(defn my-component [{:keys [theme type]} label])

;; good
"theme - :light or :dark
 type - can be :neutral :active :danger
 blur? - boolean
"
(defn my-component [{:keys [theme blur? type]} label])

Please note this is only for the external API of the component and there should be no restriction of how the component manages its internal API as that will not affect the developer using the component with the issues described above.

In some cases this is not always possible or does not make sense. However the thought process should be how easy will it be for another developer to use this component with the correct configuration given the screen designs for Figma.

Avoid unnecessarily renaming props

In general it can be helpful to avoid renaming props from their counterpart in Figma.

For example if Figma has sizes :small, :medium and :large

;; bad
":size - :little, :default or :big"
(defn my-component [{:keys [size]}])

;; good
":size - :small, :medium or :large"
(defn my-component [{:keys [size]}])

Component styles

Prefer to define styles in a separate file named style.cljs, colocated with the source file. For a real example, see src/quo2/components/record_audio/record_audio/style.cljs.

;; bad
(defn checkbox-view
  [{:keys [size]}]
  [rn/view
   {:style {:width           size
            :height          size
            :border-radius   4
            :justify-content :center
            :align-items     :center}}
   [rn/view (do-something)]])

;; good
(defn checkbox-view
  [{:keys [size]}]
  [rn/view {:style (style/checkbox size)}
   [rn/view (do-something)]])

Always add styles inside the :style key

Although when compiling ReactNative for mobile some components are able work with their styles in the top-level of the properties map, prefer to add them inside the :style key in order to separate styles from properties:

;; bad
[rn/button {:flex               1
            :padding-vertical   10
            :padding-horizontal 20
            :on-press           #(js/alert "Hi!")
            :title              "Button"}]

;; good
[rn/button {:style    {:flex               1
                       :padding-vertical   10
                       :padding-horizontal 20}
            :on-press #(js/alert "Hi!")
            :title    "Button"}]

;; better
;; (define them in a style ns & place them inside `:style` key)
[rn/button {:style    (style/button)
            :on-press #(js/alert "Hi!")
            :title    "Button"}]

Also its fine to keep one liner styles in view

;; ok
[rn/view {:style {:flex 1 :padding-top 5}}]

Don't define properties in styles ns

Properties must be set on view level

;; bad
{:style         {:position         :absolute
                 :left             0
                 :right            0
                 :bottom           0}
 :blur-amount   30
 :blur-radius   25
 :blur-type     :transparent
 :overlay-color :transparent}

;; good
{:position         :absolute
 :left             0
 :right            0
 :bottom           0}

Apply animated styles in the style file

;; bad
(defn circle
  []
  (let [opacity (reanimated/use-shared-value 1)]
    [reanimated/view {:style (reanimated/apply-animations-to-style
                              {:opacity opacity}
                              style/circle-container)}]))

;; good
(defn circle
  []
  (let [opacity (reanimated/use-shared-value 1)]
    [reanimated/view {:style (style/circle-container opacity)}]))

Don't use percents to define width/height

In ReactNative, all layouts use the flexbox model, so percentages are unnecessary the vast majority of the time, don't use them. Check out this great interactive flexbox guide by Joshua Comeau.

;; bad
[rn/view {:style {:width "80%"}}]

;; good
[rn/view {:style {:padding-horizontal 20}}]

Use a question mark to convey the value is a boolean

The Clojure Style Guide suggests using a question mark only in predicate functions, but nothing is mentioned about other symbols and keywords. We prefer to extend the convention to all boolean references.

;; bad
(let [is-open? true] ...)
(def flag-is-enabled false)

;; good
(let [open? true] ...)
(def flag-enabled? false)

And for keywords too:

;; bad
[some-component {:logged-in true}]

;; good
[some-component {:logged-in? true}]

Styles def vs defn

Always use def over defn if there are no dynamic values. This helps cut the cost of function calls.

;; bad
(defn title-column []
  {:height 56})

;; good
(def title-column
  {:height 56})
;; bad
(def community-card
  {:background-color (colors/theme-colors colors/white colors/neutral-90)})

;; good
(defn community-card []
  {:background-color (colors/theme-colors colors/white colors/neutral-90)})

Custom Colors

The Status designs have a lot of customization of user and group colors. For consistency it is best to use customization-color as the prop key on pages and components. This will help easily identify what pages and components in the application are using customized colors.

;; bad
(defn community-card [{keys [custom-color]}]
  ...)

;; good
(defn community-card [{keys [customization-color]}]
  ...)

Using TODOs comments

TODO comments are used extensively in the codebase, but prefer to use them only when strictly necessary and when an issue is not enough to track the work left to be done.

These are all good examples:

;; TODO(@username): <message>
;; TODO(@username): <message>, <issue URL>
;; TODO(YYYY-MM-DD): <message>
;; TODO(@username,YYYY-MM-DD): <message>

Subscription names and event names

Always register events and subscriptions using a meaningful namespace, but don't namespace them with ::. We understand it's a controversial decision because there are both pros and cons to such practice.

Whenever appropriate, it's also recommended to use fake namespaces to convey more knowledge in the keyword about which bounded context (domain) it refers to. You may also use dots to convey hierarchical structures.

;; bad
;; Don't use real namespaced keywords.
(re-frame/reg-sub
 ::profile-pictures-visibility
 :<- [:multiaccount]
 (fn [multiaccount]
   (:profile-pictures-visibility multiaccount)))

;; good
;; Uses a fake namespaced keyword.
(re-frame/reg-sub
 :profile/pictures-visibility
 :<- [:multiaccount]
 (fn [multiaccount]
   (:profile-pictures-visibility multiaccount)))

;; better
;; Uses a fake namespaced keyword with a parent namespace (multiaccount).
(re-frame/reg-sub
 :multiaccount.profile/pictures-visibility
 :<- [:multiaccount]
 (fn [multiaccount]
   (:profile-pictures-visibility multiaccount)))

Declaring view components

Use the simple defn to declare components. Don't use utils.views/defview and utils.views/letsubs.

;; bad
(utils.views/defview browser []
  (utils.views/letsubs [window-width [:dimensions/window-width]]
    (do-something window-width)))

;; good
(defn browser []
  (let [window-width (rf/sub [:dimensions/window-width])]
    (do-something window-width)))

Use [] instead of () in Reagent components

;; bad
[rn/view
 (message-card message)]

;; good
[rn/view
 [message-card message]]

Using re-frame subscriptions and dispatching events

Use the utils.re-frame namespace instead of re-frame.core to subscribe and dispatch.

;; bad
(ns my-namespace
  (:require [re-frame.core :as rf]))

(let [username @(rf/subscribe [:username])]
  [pressable/pressable {:on-press #(rf/dispatch [:do-something])}
   [rn/view
    (str "Hello " username)]])

;; good
(ns my-namespace
  (:require [utils.re-frame :as rf]))

(let [username (rf/sub [:username])]
  [pressable/pressable {:on-press #(rf/dispatch [:do-something])}
   [rn/view
    (str "Hello " username)]])

Registering effects

When registering re-frame effects (reg-fx), prefer to expose a data-only interface because that will allow event handlers to stay pure.

For instance, if an effect needs a on-success callback, allow it to receive a re-frame event vector. This approach is used by us in the json-rpc/call effect, but also by third-party effects, such as https://github.com/Day8/re-frame-http-fx. For the complete rationale, see PR #15936.

Using the effect :json-rpc/call

Prefer the pure version of :json-rpc/call (no callbacks).

;; not as good
(rf/defn accept-contact-request
  {:events [:activity-center.contact-requests/accept]}
  [_ contact-id]
  {:json-rpc/call
   [{:method     "wakuext_acceptContactRequest"
     :params     [{:id contact-id}]
     :on-success #(rf/dispatch [:sanitize-messages-and-process-response %])
     :on-error   #(rf/dispatch [:activity-center.contact-requests/accept-error contact-id %])}]})

;; better
(rf/defn accept-contact-request
  {:events [:activity-center.contact-requests/accept]}
  [_ contact-id]
  {:json-rpc/call
   [{:method     "wakuext_acceptContactRequest"
     :params     [{:id contact-id}]
     :on-success [:sanitize-messages-and-process-response]
     :on-error   [:activity-center.contact-requests/accept-error contact-id]}]})

Registering event handlers

Register events with re-frame.core/reg-event-fx and follow re-frame's best practice so use only :db and :fx effects. rf/merge is deprecated and should not be used in the new code in src/status_im2/. Don't use re-frame.core/reg-event-db.

;; bad
(rf/defn invite-people-pressed
  {:events [:communities/invite-people-pressed]}
  [cofx id]
  (rf/merge cofx
            (reset-community-id-input id)
            (bottom-sheet/hide-bottom-sheet)
            (navigation/open-modal :invite-people-community {:invite? true})))

;; good
(re-frame/reg-event-fx :communities/invite-people-pressed
 (fn [{:keys [db]} [id]]
   {:db (assoc db :communities/community-id-input id)
    :fx [[:dispatch [:hide-bottom-sheet]]
         [:dispatch [:open-modal :invite-people-community {:invite? true}]]]}))

Registering top-level re-frame subscriptions

Use subs.root/reg-root-key-sub to register top-level (root) subscriptions. Additionally, register root subscriptions in the subs.root namespace.

;; bad
(re-frame/reg-sub
 :view-id
 (fn [db]
   (:view-id db)))

;; good
(reg-root-key-sub :view-id :view-id)

Registering layer-3 subscriptions

The majority of the subscriptions should be defined as layer-3 subscriptions due to performance constraints.

;; bad
(re-frame/reg-sub
 :ens/preferred-name
 (fn [db]
   (get-in db [:multiaccount :preferred-name])))

;; good
(re-frame/reg-sub
 :ens/preferred-name
 :<- [:multiaccount]
 (fn [multiaccount]
   (:preferred-name multiaccount)))

Requiring quo2 components

Consume quo2 components from quo2.core, unless the namespace is also inside the quo2/ directory.

;; bad
(ns my-namespace
  (:require [quo2.components.icon :as icon]))

(icon/icon :i/verified)

;; good
(ns my-namespace
  (:require [quo2.core :as quo]))

(quo/icon :i/verified)

;; also good because both namespaces are inside quo2/
(ns quo2.components.tabs.account-selector
  (:require [quo2.components.markdown.text :as text]))

Require/import

Prefer :as instead of :refer. There are exceptions to this rule, e.g. the test macros deftest and is, which are ubiquitous in the Clojure community.

;; bad
(ns status-im.utils.datetime
  (:require [cljs-time.coerce :refer [from-long]]))

;; good
(ns status-im.utils.datetime
  (:require [cljs-time.coerce :as time.coerce]))

Javascript interop

Use binaryage/oops macros instead of core interop macros.

;; bad
(fn [^js event]
  (.-width (.-nativeEvent event)))

;; good
(require '[oops.core :as  oops])
(fn [event]
  (oops/oget event "nativeEvent.width"))

Accessibility labels

Accessibility labels are currently used only for end-to-end tests. Use keywords instead of strings (remember keywords are cached).

;; bad
[text/text {:accessibility-label "profile-nickname"}
 "Markov"]

;; good
[text/text {:accessibility-label :profile-nickname}
 "Markov"]

Avoid dynamic labels, for example to specify an element's index because Appium already supports element selection based on indices.

;; bad
[button {:accessibility-label (str "do-something" index)}]

;; good
[button {:accessibility-label :do-something}]

Icons

Use the appropriate keyword qualification/namespace.

;; bad
(require '[quo2.components.icon :as icons])
(icons/icon :main-icons2/verified)

;; good
(require '[quo2.core :as quo2])
(quo2/icon :i/verified)

Translations

Prefer to use translation placeholders instead of creating multiple translation keywords and concatenating them into a single string.

;; bad
;; Assume the translation key is:
;;   "biometric-auth-error": "Unable perform biometric authentication"
(str (i18n/label :t/biometric-auth-error) "(" error-code ")")

;; good
;; Assume the translation key is:
;;   "biometric-auth-error": "Unable perform biometric authentication ({{code}})"
(i18n/label :t/biometric-auth-error {:code error-code})

Tests

Subscription tests

Test layer-3 subscriptions by actually subscribing to them, so reframe's signal graph gets validated too.

;; bad
(defn user-recipes
  [[current-user all-recipes location]]
  ...)

(re-frame/reg-sub
 :user/recipes
 :<- [:current-user]
 :<- [:all-recipes]
 :<- [:location]
 user-recipes)

(deftest user-recipes-test
  (testing "builds list of recipes"
    (let [current-user {...}
          all-recipes  {...}
          location     [...]]
      (is (= expected (recipes [current-user all-recipes location]))))))

;; good
(require '[test-helpers.unit :as h])

(re-frame/reg-sub
 :user/recipes
 :<- [:current-user]
 :<- [:all-recipes]
 :<- [:location]
 (fn [[current-user all-recipes location]]
   ...))

(h/deftest-sub :user/recipes
  [sub-name]
  (testing "builds list of recipes"
    (swap! rf-db/app-db assoc
           :current-user {...}
           :all-recipes {...}
           :location [...])
    (is (= expected (rf/sub [sub-name])))))

Project Structure

First, the bird's-eye view with some example ClojureScript files:

src
├── js/
├── mocks/
├── quo2
│   ├── components/
│   ├── foundations/
│   └── theme.cljs
├── react_native
│   ├── gesture.cljs
│   └── platform.cljs
├── status_im/
├── status_im2
│   ├── common
│   │   └── components
│   │       └── bottom_sheet.cljs
│   ├── contexts/
│   ├── setup/
│   └── subs/
├── test_helpers/
└── utils.cljs
  • src/js: Raw Javascript files, e.g. React Native Reanimated worklets.
  • src/mocks: Plumbing configuration to be able to run tests.
  • src/quo2/: The component library for Status Mobile.
  • src/react_native/: Contains only low-level constructs to help React Native work in tandem with Clojure(Script).
  • src/status_im2/: Directory where we try to be as strict as possible about our guidelines and where we prefer to write code for the new, redesigned mobile app.
  • src/status_im/: Directory containing what we call "old code", not yet migrated to new guidelines for the new mobile app.
  • src/status_im2/common/: Directories named common can appear at any level of the directory tree. Just like directories named utils, their directory nesting level communicates their applicable limits.
  • src/status_im2/common/components/: Contains reusable components that are not part of the design system (quo2).
  • src/status_im2/contexts/: Contains bounded contexts, like browser/, messaging/, etc. As much as possible, bounded contexts should not directly require each other's namespaces.
  • src/status_im2/setup/: Contains namespaces that are mostly used to initialize the application, configure test runners, etc. In general, such namespaces should not be required from the outside.
  • src/test_helpers/: Reusable utilities for writing all kinds of tests.
  • src/status_im/subs/: All subscriptions should live inside it.

Directories named utils/ can appear at any level of the directory tree. The directory nesting level precisely indicates its boundaries. For example, a contexts/user_settings/utils/datetime.cljs file communicates that it should only be used in the user_settings context.

src/quo2

The src/quo2/ directory holds all components for the new design system. As much as possible, its sub-directories and component names should reflect the same language used by designers.

Even though the directory lives alongside the rest of the codebase, we should think of it as an external entity that abstracts away particular Status domain knowledge.

Components inside src/quo2/ should not rely on re-frame, i.e. they should not dispatch events or use subscriptions.

Example structure:

src
└── quo2
    ├── components
    │   └── dropdown
    │       ├── style.cljs
    │       ├── test.cljs
    │       └── view.cljs
    └── screens
        └── dropdown
            └── view.cljs

Re-frame events

Event handlers should be defined in files named events.cljs, and they should be close to other things, like view files, components, etc.

For example:

src
└── contexts
    └── browser
        ├── bookmarks/
        ├── options/
        ├── permissions/
        ├── events.cljs
        ├── events_test.cljs
        ├── style.cljs
        └── view.cljs

Deprecation process

To deprecate a var, add the :deprecated metadata and, if necessary, suggest an alternative.

;; Good if there's no better alternative yet, but we want to deprecate it anyway.
(defn ^:deprecated foo
  []
  (bar))

;; Good
(defn foo
  {:deprecated "Use some.namespace/var-name instead."}
  []
  (bar))

Please check the Clojure Style documentation

To reduce visual clutter from deprecated methods in your text editor, consult this example. The approach can be adapted for settings in VSCode, Emacs, VIM, and others.

Test structure

Unit tests should be created alongside their respective source implementation. We prefer them colocated with the source and not like most Clojure (JVM) codebases which mirror the sources in a top-level test directory.

├── models
│   ├── message.cljs
│   └── message_test.cljs
├── models.cljs
└── models_test.cljs

Component tests should be created in the same directory as the source component, and named as component_spec.cljs.

└── filter
    ├── component_spec.cljs
    ├── style.cljs
    └── view.cljs

There's no hard rule on how integration test namespaces should be split, but we're at least striving to define them under appropriate bounded contexts that mirror the source code.

test
├── appium/
└── integration
    ├── browser/
    ├── communities/
    ├── messaging/
    ├── user_settings/
    └── wallet
        └── payment_test.cljs

Glossary

Unit test: The smallest atomic unit that's meaningful to test. For example, tests for utility functions and event handlers are considered unit tests in the mobile codebase. They should be completely deterministic, fast, and they should work flawlessly in the REPL.

Bounded context: A logical separation between different domains. It's an important concept in the Domain-Driven Design literature. See Bounded Context, by Martin Fowler for an introduction to the topic.