mirror of
https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile.git
synced 2025-01-27 08:55:39 +00:00
6e897f0ea6
This commit shows how to move away from rf/defnf12c7401d1/src/utils/re_frame.clj (L1-L90)
& rf/mergef12c7401d1/src/utils/re_frame.cljs (L39-L85)
and why we should do it. ## Problems Before jumping to solutions, let's understand the problems first, in no order of importance. ### Problem 1: Cyclic dependencies If you ever tried to move event handlers or the functions used inside them to different files in status-mobile, you probably stumbled in cyclic dependency errors. When an event is registered in re-frame, it is globally available for any other place to dispatch. The dispatch mechanism relies on globally unique keywords, the so called event IDs, e.g. :chat/mute-successfully. This means that event namespaces don't need to require other event namespaces, just like you don't need to require subscription namespaces in views. rf/merge increases the likelihood of cyclic dependencies because they force event namespaces to require each other. Although not as common, this happened a few times with devs in the team and it can be a big hassle to fix if you are unlucky. It is a problem we should not have in the first place (at least not as easily). ### Problem 2: We are not linting thousands of lines of code The linter (clj-kondo) is incapable of understanding the rf/defn macro. In theory, we could teach clj-kondo what the macro produces. I tried this, but gave up after a few tries. This is a big deal, clj-kondo can catch many issues and will continue to catch more as it continue to evolve. It's hard to precisely count how many lines are affected, but `find src/ -type f -name 'events.cljs' -exec wc -l {} +` gives us more than 4k LOC. ### Problem 3: Blocking RN's UI thread for too long Re-frame has a routing mechanism to manage events. When an event is dispatched, it is enqueued and scheduled to run some time later (very soon). This process is asynchronous and is optimized in such a way as to balance responsiveness vs the time to empty the queue. >[...] when processing events, one after the other, do ALL the currently queued >events. Don't stop. Don't yield to the browser. Hog that CPU. > >[...] but if any new events are dispatched during this cycle of processing, >don't do them immediately. Leave them queued. > >-- https://github.com/day8/re-frame/blob/master/src/re_frame/router.cljc#L8-L60 Decisions were made (way back in 2017) to reduce the number of registered re-frame events and, more importantly, to coalesce events into bigger ones with the rf/merge pattern. I tried to find evidence of real problems that were trying to be solved, but my understanding is that decisions were largely based on personal architectural preferences. Fast-forward to 2023, and we are in a situation where we have many heavy events that process a LOT of stuff in one go using rf/merge, thus blocking the UI thread longer than we should. See, for example, [status-im2.contexts.profile.login.events/login-existing-profile](3082605d1e/src/status_im2/contexts/profile/login/events.cljs (L69)
), [status-im2.contexts.profile.login.events/get-chats-callback](3082605d1e/src/status_im2/contexts/profile/login/events.cljs (L98)
), and many others. The following excerpt was generally used to justify the idea that coalescing events would make the app perform better. > We will reduce the the amount of subscription re-computations, as for each > distinct action, :db effect will be produced and swapped into app-db only once > > -- https://github.com/status-im/swarms/issues/31#issuecomment-346345981 This is in fact incorrect. Re-frame, ever since 2015 (so before the original discussions in 2017) uses a concept of batching to process events, which means subscriptions won't re-run after every dispatched event, and thus components won't re-render either. Re-frame is smarter than that. > groups of events queued up will be handled in a batch, one after the other, > without yielding to the browser (previously re-frame yielded to the browser > before every single event). > > --39adca9367/docs/releases/2015.md (050--2015-11-5)
Here's a practical example you can try in a shadow-cljs :mobile REPL to see the batching behavior in practice. ```clojure ;; A dummy event that toggles between DEBUG and INFO levels. (re-frame/reg-event-fx :dummy-event (fn [{:keys [db]}] {:db (update-in db [:profile/profile :log-level] (fn [level] (if (= "DEBUG" level) "INFO" "DEBUG")))})) (def timer (js/setInterval #(re-frame/dispatch [:dummy-event]) 50)) ;; 1. In component status-im.ui.screens.advanced-settings.views/advanced-settings, ;; add a print call to see when it's re-rendered by Reagent because the ;; subscription :log-level/current-log-level will be affected by our dummy event. ;; ;; 2. Also add a print call to the subscription :log-level/current-log-level to ;; see that the subscription does NOT re-run on every dispatch. ;; Remember to eval this expression to cancel the timer. (js/clearInterval timer) ``` If you run the above timer with 50ms interval, you'll see a fair amount of batching happening. You can infer that's the case because you'll see way less than 20 print statements per second (so way less than 20 recomputations of the subscription, which is the max theoretical limit). When the interval is reduced even more, to say 10ms (to simulate lots of dispatches in a row), sometimes you don't see a single recomputation in a 5s window because re-frame is too busy processing events. This shows just how critical it is to have event handlers finishing as soon as possible to relinquish control back to the UI thread, otherwise responsiveness is affected. It also shows that too many dispatches in a row can be bad, just as big event handlers would block the batch for too long. You see here that dispatching events in succession does NOT cause needless re-computations. Of course there's an overhead of using re-frame.core/dispatch instead of calling a Clojure function, but the trade-off is clearly documented: the more we process in a single event, the less responsive the app may be because re-frame won't be able to relinquish control back to the UI thread. The total time to process the batch increases, but re-frame can't stop in the middle compared to when different dispatches are used. Thus, I believe this rf/merge pattern is harmful as a default practice in an environment such as ours, where it's desirable end-users feel a snappy RN app. I actually firmly believe we can improve the app's responsiveness by not coalescing events by default. We're also preventing status-mobile from taking the most advantage from future improvements in re-frame's scheduler. I can totally see us experimenting with other algorithms in the scheduler to best fit our needs. We should not blindly reduce the number of events as stated here https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/2634#discussion_r155243127. Solution: only coalesce events into one pile when it's strictly desirable to atomically update the app db to avoid inconsistencies, otherwise, let the re-frame scheduler do its job by using fx, not rf/merge. When needed, embrace *eventual app db consistency* as a way to achieve lower UI latency, i.e. write fast and short events, intentionally use :dispatch-later or other timing effects to bend the re-frame's scheduler to your will. There's another argument in favor of using something like rf/merge which I would like to deconstruct. rf/merge gives us a way to reuse computations from different events, which is nice. The thing here is that we don't need rf/merge or re-frame to reuse functions across namespaces. rf/merge complects re-frame with the need to reuse transformations. Instead, the solution is as trivial as it gets, reuse app db "transformers" across events by extracting the logic to data store namespaces (src/status_im/data_store). This solution has the added benefit of not causing cyclic dependency errors. ### Problem 4: Clojure's language server doesn't understand code under rf/defn Nowadays, many (if not most) Clojure devs rely on the Clojure Language Server https://github.com/clojure-lsp/clojure-lsp to be more effective. It is an invaluable tool, but it doesn't work well with the macro rf/defn, and it's a constant source of frustration when working in event namespaces. Renaming symbols inside the macro don't work, finding references, jumping to local bindings, etc. Solution: don't use rf/defn, instead use re-frame's reg-event-fx function and clojure-lsp will understand all the code inside event handlers. ### Problem 5: Unit tests for events need to "test the world" Re-frame's author strongly recommends testing events that contain non-trivial data transformations, and we do have many in status-mobile (note: let's not confuse with integration tests in status_im/integration_test.cljs). That, and non-trivial layer-3 subscriptions should be covered too. The reasoning is that if we have a well developed and tested state layer, many UI bugs can be prevented as the software evolves, since the UI is partially or greatly derived from the global state. See re-frame: What to Test?39adca9367/docs/Testing.md (what-to-test)
. See PR Introduce subscription tests https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/14472, where I share more details about re-frame's testing practices. When we use rf/merge, we make unit testing events a perennial source of frustration because too many responsibilities are aggregated in a single event. Unfortunately, we don't have many devs in the team that attempted to write unit tests for events to confirm my claim, but no worries, let's dive into a real example. In a unit test for an event, we want to test that, given a cofx and args, the event handler returns the expected map of effects with the correct values (usually db transformations). Let's assume we need to test the following event. The code is still using the combo rf/defn & rf/merge. ```clojure (rf/defn accept-notification-success {:events [:activity-center.notifications/accept-success]} [{:keys [db] :as cofx} notification-id {:keys [chats]}] (when-let [notification (get-notification db notification-id)] (rf/merge cofx (chat.events/ensure-chats (map data-store.chats/<-rpc chats)) (notifications-reconcile [(assoc notification :read true :accepted true)])))) ``` As you can see, we're "rf/merging" two other functions, namely ensure-chats and notifications-reconcile. In fact, ensure-chats is not registered in re-frame, but it's 99% defined as if it's one because it needs to be "mergeable" according to the rules of rf/merge. Both of these "events" are quite complicated under the hood and should be unit tested on their own. Now here goes the unit test. Don't worry about the details, except for the expected output. ```clojure (deftest accept-notification-success-test (testing "marks notification as accepted and read, then reconciles" (let [notif-1 {:id "0x1" :type types/private-group-chat} notif-2 {:id "0x2" :type types/private-group-chat} notif-2-accepted (assoc notif-2 :accepted true :read true) cofx {:db {:activity-center {:filter {:type types/no-type :status :all} :notifications [notif-2 notif-1]}}} expected {:db {:activity-center {:filter {:type 0 :status :all} :notifications [notif-2-accepted notif-1]} :chats {} :chats-home-list nil} ;; *** HERE *** :dispatch-n [[:activity-center.notifications/fetch-unread-count] [:activity-center.notifications/fetch-pending-contact-requests]]} actual (events/accept-notification-success cofx (:id notif-2) nil)] (is (= expected actual))))) ``` Notice the map has a :dispatch-n effect and other stuff inside of it that are not the responsibility of the event under test to care about. This happens because rf/merge forces the event handler to compute/call everything in one go. And things get MUCH worse when you want to test an event A that uses rf/merge, but A calls other events B and C that also use rf/merge (e.g. event :profile.login/get-chats-callback). At that point you flip the table in horror 😱, but testing events and maintaining them should be trivial. Solution: Use re-frame's `fx` effect. Here's the improved implementation and its accompanying test. ```clojure (defn accept-notification-success [{:keys [db]} [notification-id {:keys [chats]}]] (when-let [notification (get-notification db notification-id)] (let [new-notifications [(assoc notification :read true :accepted true)]] {:fx [[:dispatch [:chat/ensure-chats (map data-store.chats/<-rpc chats)]] [:dispatch [:activity-center.notifications/reconcile new-notifications]]]}))) (re-frame/reg-event-fx :activity-center.notifications/accept-success accept-notification-success) (deftest accept-notification-success-test (testing "marks notification as accepted and read, then reconciles" (let [notif-1 {:id "0x1" :type types/private-group-chat} notif-2 {:id "0x2" :type types/private-group-chat} notif-2-accepted (assoc notif-2 :accepted true :read true) cofx {:db {:activity-center {:filter {:type types/no-type :status :all} :notifications [notif-2 notif-1]}}} ;; *** HERE *** expected {:fx [[:dispatch [:chat/ensure-chats []]] [:dispatch [:activity-center.notifications/reconcile [notif-2-accepted]]]]} actual (events/accept-notification-success cofx [(:id notif-2) nil])] (is (= expected actual))))) ``` Notice how the test expectation is NOT verifying what other events do (it's actually "impossible" now). Using fx completely decouples events and makes testing them a joy again. ### Problem 6: Unordered effects status-mobile still uses the legacy way to describe the effects map, which has the problem that their order is unpredictable. > Prior to v1.1.0, the answer is: no guarantees were provided about ordering. > Actual order is an implementation detail upon which you should not rely. > > --39adca9367/docs/Effects.md (order-of-effects)
> In fact, with v1.1.0 best practice changed to event handlers should only > return two effects :db and :fx, in which case :db was always done first and > then :fx, and within :fx the ordering is sequential. This new approach is more > about making it easier to compose event handlers from many smaller functions, > but more specificity around ordering was a consequence. > > --39adca9367/docs/Effects.md (order-of-effects)
### Problem 7: Usage of deprecated effect dispatch-n We have 35 usages, the majority in new code using dispatch-n, which has been officially deprecated in favor of multiple dispatch tuples in fx. See39adca9367/docs/api-builtin-effects.md (L114)
### Problem 8: Complexity 🧙♂️ Have you ever tried to understand and/or explain how rf/merge and rf/defn work? They have their fare share of complexity and have tripped up many contributors. This is not ideal if we want to create a project where contributors can learn re-frame as quickly as possible. Re-frame is already complicated enough to grasp for many, the added abstractions should be valuable enough to justify. Interestingly, rf/merge is a stateful function, and although this is not a problem in practice, it is partially violating re-frame's spirit of only using pure functions inside event handlers. ### Problem 9: Using a wrapping macro rf/defn instead of global interceptors When rf/defn was created inside status-mobile, re-frame didn't have global interceptors yet (which were introduced 3+ years ago). We no longer have this limitation after we upgraded our old re-frame version in PR https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/15997. Global interceptors are a simple and functional abstraction to specify functions that should run on every event, for example, for debugging during development, logging, etc. This PR already shows this is possible by removing the wrapping function utils.re-frame/register-handler-fx without causing any breakage. ## Conclusion By embracing re-frame's best practices for describing effects39adca9367/docs/FAQs/BestPractice.md (use-the-fx-effect)
, we can solve long standing issues that affect every contributor at different levels and bring the following benefits: - Simplify the codebase. - Bring back the DX we all deserve, i.e. Clojure Language Server and clj-kondo fully working in event namespaces. - Greatly facilitate the testability of events. - Give devs more flexibility to make the app more responsive, because the new default would not coalesce events, which in turn, would block the UI thread for shorter periods of time. At least that's the theory, but exceptions will be found. The actions to achieve those benefits are: - Don't use the macro approach, replace rf/defn with re-frame.core/reg-event-fx. - Don't use rf/merge, simply use re-frame's built-in effect :fx. - Don't call event handlers as normal functions, just as we don't directly call subscription handlers. Use re-frame's built-in effect :fx. ## How do we refactor the remainder of the code? Some numbers first: - There are 228 events defined with rf/defn in src/status-im2/. - There are 34 usages of rf/merge in src/status_im2/. ## Resources - Release notes where fx was introduced in re-frame:39adca9367/docs/releases/2020.md (110-2020-08-24)
870 lines
24 KiB
Markdown
870 lines
24 KiB
Markdown
# Code Style Guidelines
|
|
|
|
> [!IMPORTANT]
|
|
> The goal of this document is to help all contributors (core and external) to
|
|
> write code in _unison_ and help establish good practices that serve the Status
|
|
> Mobile contributors well.
|
|
|
|
We don't want to turn this document into an exhaustive list of rules to be
|
|
followed that nobody will read. As much as possible, we'll try to document only
|
|
what we consider important for Status Mobile. In other words, we don't want to
|
|
maintain a general Clojure convention/style guide, nor do we want to turn this
|
|
document into a long tutorial.
|
|
|
|
> [!WARNING]
|
|
> This is a **work in progress**, and not all conventions are properly
|
|
> implemented in the codebase yet. The project structure is also undergoing
|
|
> major changes, and it will take a considerable amount of time until we migrate
|
|
> the existing code to the new structure.
|
|
|
|
If you find out anything is outdated or missing, please, share with us or even
|
|
better, create a pull-request! 🤸
|
|
|
|
## Style guide
|
|
|
|
We follow the [Clojure Style
|
|
Guide](https://github.com/bbatsov/clojure-style-guide) and we use
|
|
[zprint](https://github.com/kkinnear/zprint) to format Clojure code. Running
|
|
`make lint-fix` should fix most formatting issues, but not all of them.
|
|
|
|
## Dos and don'ts
|
|
|
|
### Hiccup
|
|
|
|
Never use anonymous inline function in hiccup, this will lead to
|
|
reinitialization of component on each render of parent component.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(defn checkbox-view
|
|
[{:keys [size]}]
|
|
[rn/view
|
|
[(fn [] [rn/view])]])
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(defn comp []
|
|
[rn/view])
|
|
|
|
(defn checkbox-view
|
|
[{:keys [size]}]
|
|
[rn/view
|
|
[comp]])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This mistake mostly happens with functional components.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(fn []
|
|
(let [atom (rf/sub [:sub])]
|
|
(fn []
|
|
[:f>
|
|
(fn []
|
|
[rn/text atom]
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(defn f-comp [atom]
|
|
[rn/text atom])
|
|
|
|
(fn []
|
|
(let [atom (rf/sub [:sub])]
|
|
(fn []
|
|
[:f> f-comp atom])))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
It's important to name functional components with `f-` prefix.
|
|
|
|
### Component props and API scheme to match Figma as closely as possible
|
|
|
|
Ideally, the prop names for components (particularly in quo2 Design System)
|
|
should match the Figma properties as best as possible. This makes it easier for
|
|
the developer using that component to configure it correctly for the screen it
|
|
is being used on and avoids unnecessary overwrites and adjustments being made.
|
|
|
|
#### Avoid unnecessarily grouping categories to reduce the number of props
|
|
|
|
For example in Figma if there is a component and it has the following variants:
|
|
|
|
|theme: "light" blur: "False"|theme: "dark" blur: "False"|theme: "light" blur: "True"|theme: "dark" blur: "True"|
|
|
|----------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|
|
| type :neutral label "ABC" | type :neutral label "ABC" | | |
|
|
| type :active label "ABC" | type :active label "ABC" | | |
|
|
| type :danger label "ABC" | type :danger label "ABC" | type :danger label "ABC" | type :danger label "ABC" |
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
"theme - :light or :dark
|
|
type - can be :neutral :active :danger :danger-blur"
|
|
(defn my-component [{:keys [theme type]} label])
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
"theme - :light or :dark
|
|
type - can be :neutral :active :danger
|
|
blur? - boolean
|
|
"
|
|
(defn my-component [{:keys [theme blur? type]} label])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Please note this is only for the external API of the component and there should
|
|
be no restriction of how the component manages its internal API as that will not
|
|
affect the developer using the component with the issues described above.
|
|
|
|
In some cases this is not always possible or does not make sense. However the
|
|
thought process should be how easy will it be for another developer to use this
|
|
component with the correct configuration given the screen designs for Figma.
|
|
|
|
#### Avoid unnecessarily renaming props
|
|
|
|
In general it can be helpful to avoid renaming props from their counterpart in
|
|
Figma.
|
|
|
|
For example if Figma has sizes `:small`, `:medium` and `:large`
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
":size - :little, :default or :big"
|
|
(defn my-component [{:keys [size]}])
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
":size - :small, :medium or :large"
|
|
(defn my-component [{:keys [size]}])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Component styles
|
|
|
|
Prefer to define styles in a separate file named `style.cljs`, colocated with
|
|
the source file. For a real example, see
|
|
[src/quo2/components/record_audio/record_audio/style.cljs](../src/quo2/components/record_audio/record_audio/style.cljs).
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(defn checkbox-view
|
|
[{:keys [size]}]
|
|
[rn/view
|
|
{:style {:width size
|
|
:height size
|
|
:border-radius 4
|
|
:justify-content :center
|
|
:align-items :center}}
|
|
[rn/view (do-something)]])
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(defn checkbox-view
|
|
[{:keys [size]}]
|
|
[rn/view {:style (style/checkbox size)}
|
|
[rn/view (do-something)]])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Always add styles inside the `:style` key
|
|
|
|
Although when compiling ReactNative for mobile some components are able work with
|
|
their styles in the top-level of the properties map, prefer to add them inside the
|
|
`:style` key in order to separate styles from properties:
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
[rn/button {:flex 1
|
|
:padding-vertical 10
|
|
:padding-horizontal 20
|
|
:on-press #(js/alert "Hi!")
|
|
:title "Button"}]
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
[rn/button {:style {:flex 1
|
|
:padding-vertical 10
|
|
:padding-horizontal 20}
|
|
:on-press #(js/alert "Hi!")
|
|
:title "Button"}]
|
|
|
|
;; better
|
|
;; (define them in a style ns & place them inside `:style` key)
|
|
[rn/button {:style (style/button)
|
|
:on-press #(js/alert "Hi!")
|
|
:title "Button"}]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Also its fine to keep one liner styles in view
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; ok
|
|
[rn/view {:style {:flex 1 :padding-top 5}}]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Don't define properties in styles ns
|
|
|
|
Properties must be set on view level
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
{:style {:position :absolute
|
|
:left 0
|
|
:right 0
|
|
:bottom 0}
|
|
:blur-amount 30
|
|
:blur-radius 25
|
|
:blur-type :transparent
|
|
:overlay-color :transparent}
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
{:position :absolute
|
|
:left 0
|
|
:right 0
|
|
:bottom 0}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Apply animated styles in the style file
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(defn circle
|
|
[]
|
|
(let [opacity (reanimated/use-shared-value 1)]
|
|
[reanimated/view {:style (reanimated/apply-animations-to-style
|
|
{:opacity opacity}
|
|
style/circle-container)}]))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(defn circle
|
|
[]
|
|
(let [opacity (reanimated/use-shared-value 1)]
|
|
[reanimated/view {:style (style/circle-container opacity)}]))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Don't use percents to define width/height
|
|
|
|
In ReactNative, all layouts use the [flexbox
|
|
model](https://reactnative.dev/docs/flexbox), so percentages are unnecessary the
|
|
vast majority of the time, don't use them. Check out this great [interactive
|
|
flexbox guide](https://www.joshwcomeau.com/css/interactive-guide-to-flexbox/) by
|
|
Joshua Comeau.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
[rn/view {:style {:width "80%"}}]
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
[rn/view {:style {:padding-horizontal 20}}]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Use a question mark to convey the value is a boolean
|
|
|
|
The Clojure Style Guide suggests using a question mark only in [predicate
|
|
functions](https://guide.clojure.style/#naming-predicates), but nothing is
|
|
mentioned about other symbols and keywords. We prefer to extend the convention
|
|
to all boolean references.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(let [is-open? true] ...)
|
|
(def flag-is-enabled false)
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(let [open? true] ...)
|
|
(def flag-enabled? false)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
And for keywords too:
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
[some-component {:logged-in true}]
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
[some-component {:logged-in? true}]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Styles def vs defn
|
|
|
|
Always use `def` over `defn` if there are no dynamic values. This helps cut the
|
|
cost of function calls.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(defn title-column []
|
|
{:height 56})
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(def title-column
|
|
{:height 56})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(def community-card
|
|
{:background-color (colors/theme-colors colors/white colors/neutral-90)})
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(defn community-card []
|
|
{:background-color (colors/theme-colors colors/white colors/neutral-90)})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Custom Colors
|
|
|
|
The Status designs have a lot of customization of user and group colors. For
|
|
consistency it is best to use `customization-color` as the prop key on pages and
|
|
components. This will help easily identify what pages and components in the
|
|
application are using customized colors.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(defn community-card [{keys [custom-color]}]
|
|
...)
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(defn community-card [{keys [customization-color]}]
|
|
...)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Using TODOs comments
|
|
|
|
_TODO_ comments are used extensively in the codebase, but prefer to use them
|
|
only when strictly necessary and when an issue is not enough to track the work
|
|
left to be done.
|
|
|
|
These are all good examples:
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; TODO(@username): <message>
|
|
;; TODO(@username): <message>, <issue URL>
|
|
;; TODO(YYYY-MM-DD): <message>
|
|
;; TODO(@username,YYYY-MM-DD): <message>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Subscription names and event names
|
|
|
|
Always register events and subscriptions using a meaningful namespace, but don't
|
|
namespace them with `::`. We understand it's a controversial decision because
|
|
there are both pros and cons to such practice.
|
|
|
|
Whenever appropriate, it's also recommended to use _fake_ namespaces to convey
|
|
more knowledge in the keyword about which bounded context (domain) it refers to.
|
|
You may also use dots to convey hierarchical structures.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
;; Don't use real namespaced keywords.
|
|
(re-frame/reg-sub
|
|
::profile-pictures-visibility
|
|
:<- [:multiaccount]
|
|
(fn [multiaccount]
|
|
(:profile-pictures-visibility multiaccount)))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
;; Uses a fake namespaced keyword.
|
|
(re-frame/reg-sub
|
|
:profile/pictures-visibility
|
|
:<- [:multiaccount]
|
|
(fn [multiaccount]
|
|
(:profile-pictures-visibility multiaccount)))
|
|
|
|
;; better
|
|
;; Uses a fake namespaced keyword with a parent namespace (multiaccount).
|
|
(re-frame/reg-sub
|
|
:multiaccount.profile/pictures-visibility
|
|
:<- [:multiaccount]
|
|
(fn [multiaccount]
|
|
(:profile-pictures-visibility multiaccount)))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Declaring view components
|
|
|
|
Use the simple `defn` to declare components. Don't use `utils.views/defview` and
|
|
`utils.views/letsubs`.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(utils.views/defview browser []
|
|
(utils.views/letsubs [window-width [:dimensions/window-width]]
|
|
(do-something window-width)))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(defn browser []
|
|
(let [window-width (rf/sub [:dimensions/window-width])]
|
|
(do-something window-width)))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Use `[]` instead of `()` in Reagent components
|
|
|
|
- The `()` version [does NOT work with Form-2 and
|
|
Form-3](https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent/blob/master/doc/UsingSquareBracketsInsteadOfParens.md#a-further-significant-why)
|
|
components.
|
|
- Components defined with `[]` will be [more efficient at re-render
|
|
time](https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent/blob/master/doc/UsingSquareBracketsInsteadOfParens.md#which-and-why)
|
|
because they're interpreted by Reagent and transformed into distinct React
|
|
components, with their own lifecycle.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
[rn/view
|
|
(message-card message)]
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
[rn/view
|
|
[message-card message]]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Using re-frame subscriptions and dispatching events
|
|
|
|
Use the `utils.re-frame` namespace instead of `re-frame.core` to subscribe and
|
|
dispatch.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(ns my-namespace
|
|
(:require [re-frame.core :as rf]))
|
|
|
|
(let [username @(rf/subscribe [:username])]
|
|
[pressable/pressable {:on-press #(rf/dispatch [:do-something])}
|
|
[rn/view
|
|
(str "Hello " username)]])
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(ns my-namespace
|
|
(:require [utils.re-frame :as rf]))
|
|
|
|
(let [username (rf/sub [:username])]
|
|
[pressable/pressable {:on-press #(rf/dispatch [:do-something])}
|
|
[rn/view
|
|
(str "Hello " username)]])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Registering effects
|
|
|
|
When registering re-frame effects (`reg-fx`), prefer to expose a data-only
|
|
interface because that will allow event handlers to stay pure.
|
|
|
|
For instance, if an effect needs a `on-success` callback, allow it to receive a
|
|
*re-frame event vector*. This approach is used by us in the [json-rpc/call
|
|
effect](src/status_im2/common/json_rpc/events.cljs), but also by third-party
|
|
effects, such as https://github.com/Day8/re-frame-http-fx. For the complete
|
|
rationale, see [PR #15936](https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/15936).
|
|
|
|
### Using the effect `:json-rpc/call`
|
|
|
|
Prefer the pure version of `:json-rpc/call` (no callbacks).
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; not as good
|
|
(rf/defn accept-contact-request
|
|
{:events [:activity-center.contact-requests/accept]}
|
|
[_ contact-id]
|
|
{:json-rpc/call
|
|
[{:method "wakuext_acceptContactRequest"
|
|
:params [{:id contact-id}]
|
|
:on-success #(rf/dispatch [:sanitize-messages-and-process-response %])
|
|
:on-error #(rf/dispatch [:activity-center.contact-requests/accept-error contact-id %])}]})
|
|
|
|
;; better
|
|
(rf/defn accept-contact-request
|
|
{:events [:activity-center.contact-requests/accept]}
|
|
[_ contact-id]
|
|
{:json-rpc/call
|
|
[{:method "wakuext_acceptContactRequest"
|
|
:params [{:id contact-id}]
|
|
:on-success [:sanitize-messages-and-process-response]
|
|
:on-error [:activity-center.contact-requests/accept-error contact-id]}]})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Registering event handlers
|
|
|
|
Register events with `re-frame.core/reg-event-fx` and follow [re-frame's best
|
|
practice](https://github.com/day8/re-frame/blob/39adca93673f334dc751ee2d99d340b51a9cc6db/docs/FAQs/BestPractice.md#use-the-fx-effect)
|
|
so use only `:db` and `:fx` effects. `rf/merge` is deprecated and should not be
|
|
used in the new code in `src/status_im2/`. Don't use
|
|
`re-frame.core/reg-event-db`.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(rf/defn invite-people-pressed
|
|
{:events [:communities/invite-people-pressed]}
|
|
[cofx id]
|
|
(rf/merge cofx
|
|
(reset-community-id-input id)
|
|
(bottom-sheet/hide-bottom-sheet)
|
|
(navigation/open-modal :invite-people-community {:invite? true})))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(re-frame/reg-event-fx :communities/invite-people-pressed
|
|
(fn [{:keys [db]} [id]]
|
|
{:db (assoc db :communities/community-id-input id)
|
|
:fx [[:dispatch [:hide-bottom-sheet]]
|
|
[:dispatch [:open-modal :invite-people-community {:invite? true}]]]}))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Registering top-level re-frame subscriptions
|
|
|
|
Use `subs.root/reg-root-key-sub` to register top-level (root) subscriptions.
|
|
Additionally, register root subscriptions in the `subs.root` namespace.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(re-frame/reg-sub
|
|
:view-id
|
|
(fn [db]
|
|
(:view-id db)))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(reg-root-key-sub :view-id :view-id)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Registering layer-3 subscriptions
|
|
|
|
The majority of the subscriptions should be defined as [layer-3
|
|
subscriptions](https://day8.github.io/re-frame/subscriptions/#the-four-layer)
|
|
due to performance constraints.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(re-frame/reg-sub
|
|
:ens/preferred-name
|
|
(fn [db]
|
|
(get-in db [:multiaccount :preferred-name])))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(re-frame/reg-sub
|
|
:ens/preferred-name
|
|
:<- [:multiaccount]
|
|
(fn [multiaccount]
|
|
(:preferred-name multiaccount)))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Requiring quo2 components
|
|
|
|
Consume `quo2` components from `quo2.core`, unless the namespace is also inside
|
|
the `quo2/` directory.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(ns my-namespace
|
|
(:require [quo2.components.icon :as icon]))
|
|
|
|
(icon/icon :i/verified)
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(ns my-namespace
|
|
(:require [quo2.core :as quo]))
|
|
|
|
(quo/icon :i/verified)
|
|
|
|
;; also good because both namespaces are inside quo2/
|
|
(ns quo2.components.tabs.account-selector
|
|
(:require [quo2.components.markdown.text :as text]))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Require/import
|
|
|
|
Prefer `:as` instead of `:refer`. There are exceptions to this rule, e.g. the
|
|
test macros `deftest` and `is`, which are ubiquitous in the Clojure community.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(ns status-im.utils.datetime
|
|
(:require [cljs-time.coerce :refer [from-long]]))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(ns status-im.utils.datetime
|
|
(:require [cljs-time.coerce :as time.coerce]))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Javascript interop
|
|
|
|
Use [binaryage/oops](https://github.com/binaryage/cljs-oops) macros instead of
|
|
core interop macros.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(fn [^js event]
|
|
(.-width (.-nativeEvent event)))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(require '[oops.core :as oops])
|
|
(fn [event]
|
|
(oops/oget event "nativeEvent.width"))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Accessibility labels
|
|
|
|
Accessibility labels are currently used only for end-to-end tests. Use keywords
|
|
instead of strings (remember keywords are cached).
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
[text/text {:accessibility-label "profile-nickname"}
|
|
"Markov"]
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
[text/text {:accessibility-label :profile-nickname}
|
|
"Markov"]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Avoid dynamic labels, for example to specify an element's index because
|
|
[Appium](https://appium.io/) already supports element selection based on
|
|
indices.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
[button {:accessibility-label (str "do-something" index)}]
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
[button {:accessibility-label :do-something}]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Icons
|
|
|
|
Use the appropriate keyword qualification/namespace.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(require '[quo2.components.icon :as icons])
|
|
(icons/icon :main-icons2/verified)
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(require '[quo2.core :as quo2])
|
|
(quo2/icon :i/verified)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Translations
|
|
|
|
Prefer to use translation placeholders instead of creating multiple translation
|
|
keywords and concatenating them into a single string.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
;; Assume the translation key is:
|
|
;; "biometric-auth-error": "Unable perform biometric authentication"
|
|
(str (i18n/label :t/biometric-auth-error) "(" error-code ")")
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
;; Assume the translation key is:
|
|
;; "biometric-auth-error": "Unable perform biometric authentication ({{code}})"
|
|
(i18n/label :t/biometric-auth-error {:code error-code})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Tests
|
|
#### Subscription tests
|
|
|
|
Test [layer-3 subscriptions](https://day8.github.io/re-frame/subscriptions/) by
|
|
actually subscribing to them, so reframe's signal graph gets validated too.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; bad
|
|
(defn user-recipes
|
|
[[current-user all-recipes location]]
|
|
...)
|
|
|
|
(re-frame/reg-sub
|
|
:user/recipes
|
|
:<- [:current-user]
|
|
:<- [:all-recipes]
|
|
:<- [:location]
|
|
user-recipes)
|
|
|
|
(deftest user-recipes-test
|
|
(testing "builds list of recipes"
|
|
(let [current-user {...}
|
|
all-recipes {...}
|
|
location [...]]
|
|
(is (= expected (recipes [current-user all-recipes location]))))))
|
|
|
|
;; good
|
|
(require '[test-helpers.unit :as h])
|
|
|
|
(re-frame/reg-sub
|
|
:user/recipes
|
|
:<- [:current-user]
|
|
:<- [:all-recipes]
|
|
:<- [:location]
|
|
(fn [[current-user all-recipes location]]
|
|
...))
|
|
|
|
(h/deftest-sub :user/recipes
|
|
[sub-name]
|
|
(testing "builds list of recipes"
|
|
(swap! rf-db/app-db assoc
|
|
:current-user {...}
|
|
:all-recipes {...}
|
|
:location [...])
|
|
(is (= expected (rf/sub [sub-name])))))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Project Structure
|
|
|
|
First, the bird's-eye view with some example ClojureScript files:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
src
|
|
├── js/
|
|
├── mocks/
|
|
├── quo2
|
|
│ ├── components/
|
|
│ ├── foundations/
|
|
│ └── theme.cljs
|
|
├── react_native
|
|
│ ├── gesture.cljs
|
|
│ └── platform.cljs
|
|
├── status_im/
|
|
├── status_im2
|
|
│ ├── common
|
|
│ │ └── components
|
|
│ │ └── bottom_sheet.cljs
|
|
│ ├── contexts/
|
|
│ ├── setup/
|
|
│ └── subs/
|
|
├── test_helpers/
|
|
└── utils.cljs
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- `src/js`: Raw Javascript files, e.g. React Native Reanimated worklets.
|
|
- `src/mocks`: Plumbing configuration to be able to run tests.
|
|
- `src/quo2/`: The component library for Status Mobile.
|
|
- `src/react_native/`: Contains only low-level constructs to help React Native
|
|
work in tandem with Clojure(Script).
|
|
- `src/status_im2/`: Directory where we try to be as strict as possible about
|
|
our guidelines and where we prefer to write code for the new, redesigned
|
|
mobile app.
|
|
- `src/status_im/`: Directory containing what we call "old code", not yet
|
|
migrated to new guidelines for the new mobile app.
|
|
- `src/status_im2/common/`: Directories named `common` can appear at any level
|
|
of the directory tree. Just like directories named `utils`, their directory
|
|
nesting level communicates their applicable limits.
|
|
- `src/status_im2/common/components/`: Contains reusable components that are not
|
|
part of the design system (quo2).
|
|
- `src/status_im2/contexts/`: Contains [bounded contexts](#glossary), like
|
|
`browser/`, `messaging/`, etc. As much as possible, _bounded contexts_ should
|
|
not directly require each other's namespaces.
|
|
- `src/status_im2/setup/`: Contains namespaces that are mostly used to
|
|
initialize the application, configure test runners, etc. In general, such
|
|
namespaces should not be required from the outside.
|
|
- `src/test_helpers/`: Reusable utilities for writing all kinds of tests.
|
|
- `src/status_im/subs/`: All subscriptions should live inside it.
|
|
|
|
Directories named `utils/` can appear at any level of the directory tree. The
|
|
directory nesting level precisely indicates its boundaries. For example, a
|
|
`contexts/user_settings/utils/datetime.cljs` file communicates that it should
|
|
only be used in the `user_settings` context.
|
|
|
|
### src/quo2
|
|
|
|
The `src/quo2/` directory holds all components for the new design system. As
|
|
much as possible, its sub-directories and component names should reflect the
|
|
same language used by designers.
|
|
|
|
Even though the directory lives alongside the rest of the codebase, we should
|
|
think of it as an external entity that abstracts away particular Status domain
|
|
knowledge.
|
|
|
|
Components inside `src/quo2/` should not rely on re-frame, i.e. they should not
|
|
dispatch events or use subscriptions.
|
|
|
|
Example structure:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
src
|
|
└── quo2
|
|
├── components
|
|
│ └── dropdown
|
|
│ ├── style.cljs
|
|
│ ├── test.cljs
|
|
│ └── view.cljs
|
|
└── screens
|
|
└── dropdown
|
|
└── view.cljs
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Re-frame events
|
|
|
|
Event handlers should be defined in files named `events.cljs`, and they should
|
|
be _close_ to other _things_, like view files, components, etc.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
src
|
|
└── contexts
|
|
└── browser
|
|
├── bookmarks/
|
|
├── options/
|
|
├── permissions/
|
|
├── events.cljs
|
|
├── events_test.cljs
|
|
├── style.cljs
|
|
└── view.cljs
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Deprecation process
|
|
|
|
To deprecate a var, add the `:deprecated` metadata and, if necessary, suggest an
|
|
alternative.
|
|
|
|
```clojure
|
|
;; Good if there's no better alternative yet, but we want to deprecate it anyway.
|
|
(defn ^:deprecated foo
|
|
[]
|
|
(bar))
|
|
|
|
;; Good
|
|
(defn foo
|
|
{:deprecated "Use some.namespace/var-name instead."}
|
|
[]
|
|
(bar))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Please check the [Clojure Style](https://guide.clojure.style/#deprecated) documentation
|
|
|
|
To reduce visual clutter from deprecated methods in your text editor, consult this [example](https://rider-support.jetbrains.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/4419728641810-How-to-disable-the-the-strike-thru-for-deprecated-methods-in-Javascript-#:~:text=Try%20disabling%20%22Preferences%20%7C%20Editor%20%7C,It%20works%20for%20me). The approach can be adapted for settings in VSCode, Emacs, VIM, and others.
|
|
|
|
### Test structure
|
|
|
|
[Unit tests](#glossary) should be created alongside their respective source
|
|
implementation. We prefer them colocated with the source and not like most
|
|
Clojure (JVM) codebases which mirror the sources in a top-level test directory.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
├── models
|
|
│ ├── message.cljs
|
|
│ └── message_test.cljs
|
|
├── models.cljs
|
|
└── models_test.cljs
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Component tests should be created in the same directory as the source component,
|
|
and named as `component_spec.cljs`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
└── filter
|
|
├── component_spec.cljs
|
|
├── style.cljs
|
|
└── view.cljs
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
There's no hard rule on how integration test namespaces should be split, but
|
|
we're at least striving to define them under appropriate bounded contexts that
|
|
mirror the source code.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
test
|
|
├── appium/
|
|
└── integration
|
|
├── browser/
|
|
├── communities/
|
|
├── messaging/
|
|
├── user_settings/
|
|
└── wallet
|
|
└── payment_test.cljs
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Glossary
|
|
|
|
**Unit test**: The smallest atomic unit that's meaningful to test. For example,
|
|
tests for utility functions and event handlers are considered unit tests in the
|
|
mobile codebase. They should be completely deterministic, _fast_, and they
|
|
should work flawlessly in the REPL.
|
|
|
|
**Bounded context**: A logical separation between different domains. It's an
|
|
important concept in the [Domain-Driven
|
|
Design](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-driven_design) literature. See
|
|
[Bounded Context, by Martin
|
|
Fowler](https://martinfowler.com/bliki/BoundedContext.html) for an introduction
|
|
to the topic.
|