2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
A More In-Depth Look at Some of SpiffWorkflow's Features
|
|
|
|
========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filtering Tasks
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
---------------
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In our earlier example, all we did was check the lane a task was in and display
|
|
|
|
it along with the task name and state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lets take a look at a sample workflow with lanes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: figures/lanes.png
|
|
|
|
:scale: 30%
|
|
|
|
:align: center
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workflow with lanes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To get all of the tasks that are ready for the 'Customer' workflow, we could
|
|
|
|
specify the lane when retrieving ready user tasks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ready_tasks = workflow.get_ready_user_tasks(lane='Customer')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If there were no tasks ready for the 'Customer' lane, you would get an empty list,
|
|
|
|
and of course if you had no lane that was labeled 'Customer' you would *always* get an
|
|
|
|
empty list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can also get a list of tasks by state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need to import the :code:`Task` object (unless you want to memorize which numbers
|
|
|
|
correspond to which states).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
from SpiffWorkflow.task import TaskState
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To get a list of completed tasks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
tasks = workflow.get_tasks(TaskState.COMPLETED)
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tasks themselves are not particularly intuitive to work with. So SpiffWorkflow
|
|
|
|
provides some facilities for obtaining a more user-friendly version of upcoming tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Logging
|
|
|
|
-------
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Spiff provides several loggers:
|
|
|
|
- the :code:`spiff` logger, which emits messages when a workflow is initialized and when tasks change state
|
|
|
|
- the :code:`spiff.metrics` logger, which emits messages containing the elapsed duration of tasks
|
|
|
|
- the :code:`spiff.data` logger, which emits message when task or workflow data is updated.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Log level :code:`INFO` will provide reasonably detailed information about state changes.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
As usual, log level :code:`DEBUG` will probably provide more logs than you really want
|
|
|
|
to see, but the logs will contain the task and task internal data.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Data can be included at any level less than :code:`INFO`. In our exmple application,
|
|
|
|
we define a custom log level
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
logging.addLevelName(15, 'DATA_LOG')
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
so that we can see the task data in the logs without fully enabling debugging.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
The workflow runners take an `-l` argument that can be used to specify the logging level used
|
|
|
|
when running the example workflows.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serialization
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
Serialization Changed in Version 1.1.7.
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Support for pre-1.1.7 serialization will be dropped in a future release.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
The old serialization method still works but it is deprecated.
|
|
|
|
To migrate your system to the new version, see "Migrating between
|
|
|
|
serialization versions" below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So far, we've only considered the context where we will run the workflow from beginning to end in one
|
|
|
|
setting. This may not always be the case, we may be executing the workflow in the context of a web server where we
|
|
|
|
may have a user request a web page where we open a specific workflow that we may be in the middle of, do one step of
|
|
|
|
that workflow and then the user may be back in a few minutes, or maybe a few hours depending on the application.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
The :code:`BpmnWorkflowSerializer` class contains a serializer for a workflow containing only standard BPMN Tasks.
|
|
|
|
Since we are using custom task classes (the Camunda :code:`UserTask` and the DMN :code:`BusinessRuleTask`),
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
we'll need to supply serializers for those task specs as well.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strictly speaking, these are not serializers per se: they actually convert the tasks into dictionaries of
|
|
|
|
JSON-serializable objects. Conversion to JSON is done only as the last step and could easily be replaced with some
|
|
|
|
other output format.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
We'll need to configure a Workflow Spec Converter with our custom classes, as well as an optional
|
|
|
|
custom data converter.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
def create_serializer(task_types, data_converter=None):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wf_spec_converter = BpmnWorkflowSerializer.configure_workflow_spec_converter(task_types)
|
|
|
|
return BpmnWorkflowSerializer(wf_spec_converter, data_converter)
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
We'll call this from our main script:
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
serializer = create_serializer([ UserTaskConverter, BusinessRuleTaskConverter ], custom_data_converter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We first configure a workflow spec converter that uses our custom task converters, and then we create
|
|
|
|
a :code:`BpmnWorkflowSerializer` from our workflow spec and data converters.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We'll give the user the option of dumping the workflow at any time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
filename = input('Enter filename: ')
|
|
|
|
state = serializer.serialize_json(workflow)
|
|
|
|
with open(filename, 'w') as dump:
|
|
|
|
dump.write(state)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We'll ask them for a filename and use the serializer to dump the state to that file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To restore the workflow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if args.restore is not None:
|
|
|
|
with open(args.restore) as state:
|
|
|
|
wf = serializer.deserialize_json(state.read())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The workflow serializer is designed to be flexible and modular and as such is a little complicated. It has
|
|
|
|
two components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- a workflow spec converter (which handles workflow and task specs)
|
|
|
|
- a data converter (which handles workflow and task data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The default workflow spec converter likely to meet your needs, either on its own, or with the inclusion of
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
:code:`UserTask` and :code:`BusinessRuleTask` in the :code:`camnuda` or :code:`spiff` and :code:`dmn` subpackages
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
of this library, and all you'll need to do is add them to the list of task converters, as we did above.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, he default data converter is very simple, adding only JSON-serializable conversions of :code:`datetime`
|
|
|
|
and :code:`timedelta` objects (we make these available in our default script engine) and UUIDs. If your
|
|
|
|
workflow or task data contains objects that are not JSON-serializable, you'll need to extend ours, or extend
|
|
|
|
its base class to create one of your own.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
To extend ours:
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Subclass the base data converter
|
|
|
|
2. Register classes along with functions for converting them to and from dictionaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from SpiffWorkflow.bpmn.serializer.dictionary import DictionaryConverter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class MyDataConverter(DictionaryConverter):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
|
|
|
super().__init__()
|
|
|
|
self.register(MyClass, self.my_class_to_dict, self.my_class_from_dict)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def my_class_to_dict(self, obj):
|
|
|
|
return obj.__dict__
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def my_class_from_dict(self, dct):
|
|
|
|
return MyClass(**dct)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More information can be found in the class documentation for the
|
|
|
|
`default converter <https://github.com/sartography/SpiffWorkflow/blob/main/SpiffWorkflow/bpmn/serializer/bpmn_converters.py>`_
|
|
|
|
and its `base class <https://github.com/sartography/SpiffWorkflow/blob/main/SpiffWorkflow/bpmn/serializer/dictionary.py>`_
|
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can also replace ours entirely with one of your own. If you do so, you'll need to implement `convert` and
|
|
|
|
`restore` methods. The former should return a JSON-serializable representation of your workflow data; the
|
|
|
|
latter should recreate your data from the serialization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have written any custom task specs, you'll need to implement task spec converters for those as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Spec converters are also based on the :code:`DictionaryConverter`. You should be able to use the
|
|
|
|
`BpmnTaskSpecConverter <https://github.com/sartography/SpiffWorkflow/blob/main/SpiffWorkflow/bpmn/serializer/bpmn_converters.py>`_
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
as a basis for your custom specs. It provides some methods for extracting attributes from Spiff base classes as well as
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
standard BPNN attributes from tasks that inherit from :code:`BMPNSpecMixin`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `Camunda User Task Converter <https://github.com/sartography/SpiffWorkflow/blob/main/SpiffWorkflow/camunda/serializer/task_spec_converters.py>`_
|
|
|
|
should provide a simple example of how you might create such a converter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Migrating Between Serialization Versions
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old (Non-Versioned) Serializer
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Spiff 1.1.7, the serialized output did not contain a version number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
old_serializer = BpmnSerializer() # the deprecated serializer.
|
|
|
|
# new serializer, which can be customized as described above.
|
|
|
|
serializer = BpmnWorkflowSerializer(version="MY_APP_V_1.0")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new serializer has a :code:`get_version` method that will read the version
|
|
|
|
back out of the serialized json. If the version isn't found, it will return
|
|
|
|
:code:`None`, and you can then assume it is using the old style serializer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
version = serializer.get_version(some_json)
|
|
|
|
if version == "MY_APP_V_1.0":
|
|
|
|
workflow = serializer.deserialize_json(some_json)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
workflow = old_serializer.deserialize_workflow(some_json, workflow_spec=spec)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not using any custom tasks and do not require custom serialization, then you'll be able to
|
|
|
|
serialize the workflow in the new format:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new_json = serializer.serialize_json(workflow)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, if you use custom tasks or data serialization, you'll also need to specify workflow spec or data
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
serializers, as in the examples in the previous section, before you'll be able to serialize with the new serializer.
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
The code would then look more like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from SpiffWorkflow.camunda.serializer import UserTaskConverter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
old_serializer = BpmnSerializer() # the deprecated serializer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# new serializer, with customizations
|
|
|
|
wf_spec_converter = BpmnWorkflowSerializer.configure_workflow_spec_converter([UserTaskConverter])
|
|
|
|
data_converter = MyDataConverter
|
|
|
|
serializer = BpmnWorkflowSerializer(wf_spec_converter, data_converter, version="MY_APP_V_1.0")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
version = serializer.get_version(some_json)
|
|
|
|
if version == "MY_APP_V_1.0":
|
|
|
|
workflow = serializer.deserialize_json(some_json)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
workflow = old_serializer.deserialize_workflow(some_json, workflow_spec=spec)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new_json = serializer.serialize_json(workflow)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because the serializer is highly customizable, we've made it possible for you to manage your own versions of the
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
serialization. You can do this by passing a version number into the serializer, which will be embedded in the
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
json of all workflows. This allow you to modify the serialization and customize it over time, and still manage
|
|
|
|
the different forms as you make adjustments without leaving people behind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Versioned Serializer
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As we make changes to Spiff, we may change the serialization format. For example, in 1.1.8, we changed
|
|
|
|
how subprocesses were handled interally in BPMN workflows and updated how they are serialized. If you have
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
not overridden our version number with one of your own, the serializer will transform the 1.0 format to the
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
new 1.1 format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you've overridden the serializer version, you may need to incorporate our serialization changes with
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
your own. You can find our conversions in
|
2022-10-12 14:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
`version_migrations.py <https://github.com/sartography/SpiffWorkflow/blob/main/SpiffWorkflow/bpmn/serializer/version_migration.py>`_
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Script Engines
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may need to modify the default script engine, whether because you need to make additional
|
|
|
|
functionality available to it, or because you might want to restrict its capabilities for
|
|
|
|
security reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The default script engine does little to no sanitization and uses :code:`eval`
|
|
|
|
and :code:`exec`! If you have security concerns, you should definitely investigate
|
|
|
|
replacing the default with your own implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We'll cover a simple extension of custom script engine here. There is also an examples of
|
|
|
|
a similar engine based on `RestrictedPython <https://restrictedpython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/>`_
|
|
|
|
included alongside this example.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
The default script engine does not import any objects.
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-02 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
You could add functions or classes from the standard python modules or any code you've
|
2022-10-14 00:45:00 +00:00
|
|
|
implemented yourself. Your global environment can be passed in using the `default_globals`
|
|
|
|
argument when initializing the script engine. In our RestrictedPython example, we use their
|
|
|
|
`safe_globals` which prevents users from executing some potentially unsafe operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In our example models so far, we've been using DMN tables to obtain product information. DMN
|
|
|
|
tables have a **lot** of uses so we wanted to feature them prominently, but in a simple way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a customer was selecting a product, we would surely have information about how the product
|
|
|
|
could be customized in a database somewhere. We would not hard code product information in
|
|
|
|
our diagram (although it is much easier to modify the BPMN diagram than to change the code
|
|
|
|
itself!). Our shipping costs would not be static, but would depend on the size of the order and
|
|
|
|
where it was being shipped -- maybe we'd query an API provided by our shipper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpiffWorkflow is obviously **not** going to know how to make a call to **your** database or
|
|
|
|
make API calls to **your** vendors. However, you can implement the calls yourself and make them
|
|
|
|
available as a method that can be used within a script task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are not going to actually include a database or API and write code for connecting to and querying
|
|
|
|
it, but we can model our database with a simple dictionary lookup since we only have 7 products
|
|
|
|
and just return the same static info for shipping for the purposes of the tutorial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from collections import namedtuple
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from SpiffWorkflow.bpmn.PythonScriptEngine import PythonScriptEngine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProductInfo = namedtuple('ProductInfo', ['color', 'size', 'style', 'price'])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVENTORY = {
|
|
|
|
'product_a': ProductInfo(False, False, False, 15.00),
|
|
|
|
'product_b': ProductInfo(False, False, False, 15.00),
|
|
|
|
'product_c': ProductInfo(True, False, False, 25.00),
|
|
|
|
'product_d': ProductInfo(True, True, False, 20.00),
|
|
|
|
'product_e': ProductInfo(True, True, True, 25.00),
|
|
|
|
'product_f': ProductInfo(True, True, True, 30.00),
|
|
|
|
'product_g': ProductInfo(False, False, True, 25.00),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def lookup_product_info(product_name):
|
|
|
|
return INVENTORY[product_name]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def lookup_shipping_cost(shipping_method):
|
|
|
|
return 25.00 if shipping_method == 'Overnight' else 5.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
additions = {
|
|
|
|
'lookup_product_info': lookup_product_info,
|
|
|
|
'lookup_shipping_cost': lookup_shipping_cost
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CustomScriptEngine = PythonScriptEngine(scripting_additions=additions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We pass the script engine we created to the workflow when we load it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return BpmnWorkflow(parser.get_spec(process), script_engine=CustomScriptEngine)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can use the custom functions in script tasks like any normal function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: figures/custom_script_usage.png
|
|
|
|
:scale: 30%
|
|
|
|
:align: center
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workflow with lanes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And we can simplify our 'Call Activity' flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: figures/call_activity_script_flow.png
|
|
|
|
:scale: 30%
|
|
|
|
:align: center
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workflow with lanes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To run this workflow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./run.py -p order_product -b bpmn/call_activity_script.bpmn bpmn/top_level_script.bpmn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is also possible to completely replace `exec` and `eval` with something else, or to
|
|
|
|
execute or evaluate statements in a completely separate environment by subclassing the
|
|
|
|
:code:`PythonScriptEngine` and overriding `_execute` and `_evaluate`. We have examples of
|
|
|
|
executing code inside a docker container or in a celery task i this repo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MultiInstance Notes
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**loopCardinality** - This variable can be a text representation of a
|
|
|
|
number - for example '2' or it can be the name of a variable in
|
|
|
|
task.data that resolves to a text representation of a number.
|
|
|
|
It can also be a collection such as a list or a dictionary. In the
|
|
|
|
case that it is a list, the loop cardinality is equal to the length of
|
|
|
|
the list and in the case of a dictionary, it is equal to the list of
|
|
|
|
the keys of the dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If loopCardinality is left blank and the Collection is defined, or if
|
|
|
|
loopCardinality and Collection are the same collection, then the
|
|
|
|
MultiInstance will loop over the collection and update each element of
|
|
|
|
that collection with the new information. In this case, it is assumed
|
|
|
|
that the incoming collection is a dictionary, currently behavior for
|
|
|
|
working with a list in this manner is not defined and will raise an error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Collection** This is the name of the collection that is created from
|
|
|
|
the data generated when the task is run. Examples of this would be
|
|
|
|
form data that is generated from a UserTask or data that is generated
|
|
|
|
from a script that is run. Currently the collection is built up to be
|
|
|
|
a dictionary with a numeric key that corresponds to the place in the
|
|
|
|
loopCardinality. For example, if we set the loopCardinality to be a
|
|
|
|
list such as ['a','b','c] the resulting collection would be {1:'result
|
|
|
|
from a',2:'result from b',3:'result from c'} - and this would be true
|
|
|
|
even if it is a parallel MultiInstance where it was filled out in a
|
|
|
|
different order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Element Variable** This is the variable name for the current
|
|
|
|
iteration of the MultiInstance. In the case of the loopCardinality
|
|
|
|
being just a number, this would be 1,2,3, . . . If the
|
|
|
|
loopCardinality variable is mapped to a collection it would be either
|
|
|
|
the list value from that position, or it would be the value from the
|
|
|
|
dictionary where the keys are in sorted order. It is the content of the
|
|
|
|
element variable that should be updated in the task.data. This content
|
|
|
|
will then be added to the collection each time the task is completed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
In a sequential MultiInstance, loop cardinality is ['a','b','c'] and elementVariable is 'myvar'
|
|
|
|
then in the case of a sequential multiinstance the first call would
|
|
|
|
have 'myvar':'a' in the first run of the task and 'myvar':'b' in the
|
|
|
|
second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
In a Parallel MultiInstance, Loop cardinality is a variable that contains
|
|
|
|
{'a':'A','b':'B','c':'C'} and elementVariable is 'myvar' - when the multiinstance is ready, there
|
|
|
|
will be 3 tasks. If we choose the second task, the task.data will
|
|
|
|
contain 'myvar':'B'.
|