status-im
/
specs
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/specs.git
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

payload fmt and add transit faq

This commit is contained in:
Oskar Thoren 2019-08-29 13:06:19 +02:00
parent dc6bfa85d2
commit 142bb8f852
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B2ECCFD3BC2EF77E
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
status-payloads-spec.md
View File

@ -33,11 +33,9 @@ as various clients created using different technologies.
In this document we describe the payload format and some special considerations. In this document we describe the payload format and some special considerations.
The payload must be flexible enough to support messaging but also cases described in [Status Whitepaper](https://status.im/whitepaper.pdf) as well as various clients created using vastly different technologies. ## Payload wrapper
## Wrapper All payloads are wrapped in a [protobuf record](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/)
Payloads are wrapped in a [protobuf record](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/)
record: record:
```protobuf ```protobuf
@ -139,3 +137,9 @@ The current protocol format is hardly upgradable without breaking backward compa
## Security Considerations ## Security Considerations
TBD. TBD.
## Design rationale
### Why are you using Transit and Protobuf?
Transit was initially chose for encoding, and Protobuf was added afterwards. This is partly due to the history of the protocol living inside of `status-react`, which is written in Clojurescript. In future versions of payload and data sync client specifications it is likely we'll move towards Protobuf only. See e.g. [Dasy](https://github.com/vacp2p/dasy) for a research proof of concept.