Adding docker container recipe and instructions in README for running sourcecred
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat <vsochat@stanford.edu>
Test plan: @decentralion verified that the commands work on a fresh setup prior to merging.
#1167 added some info to the README about how the user needs to have ssh keys setup. This was true at the time, but changed as a result of #1210. This commit fixes that up by removing the now-outdated information.
* Quicker failure and description when invalid token supplied
Fixes#1156
When users export a GitHub API token that has insufficient privleges
or has been revoked, we have been using a catch all error with retry
to handle it. This change adds a new error type for bad credentials
and does not retry.
Test plan:
There are no unit tests that cover this, however, you can test the
change by supplying a revoked token and attempting to load a GitHub
repo.
* Minor: reunite comment with relevant code block
* Update Changelog: Fail quicker and with information when using invalid GH token (#1161)
* Documentation updates
Added note on Changelog update format, SSH key requirements, and formatted the console (CLI) blocks a little better.
* Minor formatting fixes
* Revert a line wrap commit as it is not appropriate on README.md
* Removed prompt tokens and changed non-visible formatting
This commit changes CI to test against node 12 and 10 instead of node 8.
I test against node 12 by default (it will be LTS soon, and it has a
number of nice improvements compared to 10). We test node10 on the
nightly and post-merge, that way we will still discover quickly if we
have a problem with node 10, but it won't slow down CI for merges.
I'm just dropping explicit support for node 8 entirely, since node 8 is
end-of-life soon (Dec 19).
Test plan: I've locally verified that `yarn test --full` passes for both
node 10 and node 12.
This commit enables Greenkeeper, along with an initial upgrade push for our dependencies.
I've reverted a number of upgrades, and also added them to the
greenkeeper ignore list. They mostly relate to babel/webpack stuff,
which I'm reluctant to dive into now (there have been major upgrades for
both babel and webpack) but we should address eventually. There are also
a few oddballs like whatwg-fetch and history.
Test plan: `yarn test --full` passes.
This commit fixes three broken links (two in the README, one in the prototype app) that were still pointing to https://discuss.sourcecred.io/.
Test plan:
Verify that there are no other bad links to the old Discourse location, by running `git grep "discuss.sourcecred.io"`.
There's a bug in #1076 where the Node link at
the bottom of the Readme catches the Node
link reference created earlier in the Readme and
links to 'https://nodejs.org/en/' instead of
'https://github.com/nodejs/node`.
Used @wpank's solution to add the Node link
using a reference text, so we could keep
the word "Node" linked, instead of using "Node.js",
which would suggest the organization instead of
the GitHub project.
Test Plan:
Testing that these links work in the live ReadMe on my
fork, instead of copy/pasting the changed bits into
a Markdown parser.
In response to SourceCred/Mission#15, we switched the default new contributor label from "Contributions Welcome" to "good first issue". This updates the README to reflect that change.
Test Plan: make sure the link redirects to our Issues page filtered for "good first issue" labels.
Adds a badge, adds a link, slight rewrite of the contributing section.
Test plan: Check the links and badge works.
(The badge topic count is off, we'll see if it is at least directionally
correct over time.)
Summary:
As a first pass toward support for analyzing whole organizations, we
allow loading multiple repositories with `sourcecred load`, combining
them into a single relational view and a single Git graph at load time.
Test Plan:
Run
```
node bin/sourcecred.js \
load \
sourcecred/example-git \
sourcecred/example-github \
sourcecred/sourcecred \
--output sourcecred/examples \
;
```
and select `sourcecred/examples` from the web view. Filter “Repository”
nodes, and note that there are three.
Note that loading a single repository without `--output` still works,
that loading a single repository with `--output` still works (respecting
the alias name), and loading not exactly one repository without
`--output` yields an appropriate error message.
Note that `yarn sharness-full` still works.
wchargin-branch: load-combined
Summary:
The information currently in the README is helpful but incomplete. We
now have a `CONTRIBUTING.md` guide, so we can simply link to that.
Test Plan:
None.
wchargin-branch: contributing-md-readme
Summary:
Running `yarn test` (equiv. `npm test` or `npm run test`) now runs all
checks. It takes the place of the former `yarn travis`. This is more in
line with the expectation of a top-level `test` command: if it passes,
your code is good.
The `unit` command now runs Jest once, not in watch mode. It takes the
place of the former `ci-test`. To run tests in watch mode, run any of
the following:
- `yarn unit --watch`, or
- `npm run unit -- --watch`, or
- `npm unit -- --watch`.
This behavior is more consistent with the standard behavior of commands
like `make test`. It is also empirically what @wchargin and
@decentralion want most of the time.
Test Plan:
Verify that each of the scripts `test`, `unit`, and `coverage` passes.
Verify that each of the aforementioned `--watch` invocations works.
Verify that `.travis.yml` has the correct `script:` command.
wchargin-branch: reorganize-test-command
Summary:
Using the environment variable is the preferred way to interact with the
CLI, simply because it’s easier for users. We should demonstrate this
interface instead of the legacy flag-only version.
Paired with @decentralion.
wchargin-branch: readme-env-var
Rewrites the README to be a lot more concrete about what SourceCred is
doing, and to give more up-to-date information overall.
Test plan: The README includes a small code block with instructions for
turning on a local copy of the Cred Explorer. I ran this on my machine
(inside /tmp) and it worked locally.
This reflects our current vision that SourceCred is aimed at valuing open-source contributions via a credit graph, not on directly creating cryptotokens
Vanessasaurus
Tyler Mace
Dandelion Mané
greenkeeper[bot]
Seth Benton
Brian Litwin
Aseem Sood
William Chargin
Claire L
Dandelion Mané