1429 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tim Ruffing
515a5dbd02
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#991: Merge all "external" benchmarks into a single bench binary
af6abcb3d0097a7f7892fb8b54a4c6363e5c2c7f Make bench support selecting which benchmarks to run (Pieter Wuille)
9f56bdf5b9ba2e22e77c6adaaeb8302398732df3 Merge bench_schnorrsig into bench (Pieter Wuille)
3208557ae1062f7fcce25d5f2c5a29dc34a18895 Merge bench_recover into bench (Pieter Wuille)
855e18d8a809b98a622ab55765792aca132ea640 Merge bench_ecdh into bench (Pieter Wuille)
2a7be678a660d58742b1e767444c0fe75fa22592 Combine bench_sign and bench_verify into single bench (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  This combines `bench_verify`, `bench_sign`, `bench_ecdh`, `bench_recovery`, and `bench_schnorrsig` into a single `bench` binary.

  I don't think there is a good reason to have this many binaries, and it complicates build config and CI.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK af6abcb3d0097a7f7892fb8b54a4c6363e5c2c7f diff looks good, command line options work, valgrind is happy
  siv2r:
    tACK af6abcb, the command-line options work as expected on my ubuntu machine. The diff looks good.

Tree-SHA512: 39c099b508c70136eaac8a429591b4250a8c22e423fa922d83928ea9273d8f2c1136317427563b28f249c02cf83d1c73ea787c6d26aa88545236241641965705
2021-11-08 11:24:56 +01:00
Pieter Wuille
af6abcb3d0 Make bench support selecting which benchmarks to run 2021-11-05 17:48:18 -04:00
Pieter Wuille
9f56bdf5b9 Merge bench_schnorrsig into bench 2021-11-05 17:35:11 -04:00
Pieter Wuille
3208557ae1 Merge bench_recover into bench 2021-11-05 17:34:46 -04:00
Pieter Wuille
855e18d8a8 Merge bench_ecdh into bench 2021-11-05 17:34:25 -04:00
Pieter Wuille
2a7be678a6 Combine bench_sign and bench_verify into single bench 2021-11-05 17:30:56 -04:00
Tim Ruffing
8fa41201bd
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1002: Make aux_rnd32==NULL behave identical to 0x0000..00.
5324f8942dd322448fae6c9b225ecac2854fa7e2 Make aux_rnd32==NULL behave identical to 0x0000..00. (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  BIP340's default signing algorithm always requires an aux_rnd argument, but permits using an all-zero one when no randomness is available.

  Make secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign follow this even when aux_rnd32==NULL, by treating the same as if an all-zero byte array was provided as input.

ACKs for top commit:
  junderw:
    ACK 5324f89
  elichai:
    ACK 5324f8942dd322448fae6c9b225ecac2854fa7e2
  jonasnick:
    ACK 5324f8942dd322448fae6c9b225ecac2854fa7e2
  real-or-random:
    utACK 5324f8942dd322448fae6c9b225ecac2854fa7e2

Tree-SHA512: caa1d5a0eacea3239d8aaace5284eedcd850058bbe759768e626233a010199db6c637618aedccfb51fe94ec8d28f45bc0c441be77e2e12fa2a393b9cc3a5d3ae
2021-10-31 17:55:02 +01:00
Pieter Wuille
5324f8942d Make aux_rnd32==NULL behave identical to 0x0000..00.
BIP340's default signing algorithm always requires an aux_rnd argument,
but permits using an all-zero one when no randomness is available.

Make secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign follow this even when aux_rnd32==NULL,
by treating the same as if an all-zero byte array was provided as
input.
2021-10-30 13:03:55 -04:00
Tim Ruffing
21c188b3c5
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#943: VERIFY_CHECK precondition for secp256k1_fe_set_int.
2888640132eb64ed30a8a208931f27447c3e0366 VERIFY_CHECK precondition for secp256k1_fe_set_int. (Russell O'Connor)
d49011f54c2b31807158bdf06364f331558cccc7 Make _set_fe_int( . , 0 ) set magnitude to 0 (Tim Ruffing)

Pull request description:

  Also set the magnitude to 0 when setting the value to 0.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK 2888640132eb64ed30a8a208931f27447c3e0366
  jonasnick:
    ACK 2888640132eb64ed30a8a208931f27447c3e0366

Tree-SHA512: 6ec9b3485380503b11c00f30bfa79f92ba3facb93ee4f3df582b881c4e19fb8ae8b5acd5aeb6326497c290cd0904230d0356f33bd136ca577d2f25616279e090
2021-10-28 17:19:40 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
3e7b2ea194
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#999: bench_ecmult: improve clarity of output
23e2f66726f930ac01d5075106aa16a4073442b4 bench: don't return 1 in have_flag() if argc = 1 (Jonas Nick)
96b1ad2ea9f9d9419e566b95162487c48902c3eb bench_ecmult: improve clarity of output (Jonas Nick)

Pull request description:

  Previously "ecmult{,_multi} xg" meant multiplication with (x - 1) random points
  and base point G. Now
  - xP means multiplication with x random points and
  - xP & G means multiplication with x random points and G

ACKs for top commit:
  siv2r:
    tACK 23e2f66
  real-or-random:
    ACK 23e2f66726f930ac01d5075106aa16a4073442b4

Tree-SHA512: 0218aaa0baa4c2f92a7b98c97b8cc3b596e3da44d7f38ab4bdd707a4bdb96bb071b953fc6106cd34977a562278e4eaa860a3a7fa64c323c5117945e7a3107162
2021-10-25 12:06:24 +02:00
Jonas Nick
23e2f66726 bench: don't return 1 in have_flag() if argc = 1
This makes the semantic of have_flag more clear and fixes a bug
that was introduced in

2fe1b50df16c9f41ea77b151634d734b930eeddd
Add ecmult_gen, ecmult_const and ecmult to benchmark

where the behavior introduced by this commit was already assumed. If
bench_ecmult was called without arguments, have_flag("simple") returned 1 and no
scratch space was allocated which led to very wrong output.
2021-10-24 19:43:20 +00:00
Jonas Nick
96b1ad2ea9 bench_ecmult: improve clarity of output
Previously "ecmult{,_multi} xg" meant multiplication with (x - 1) random points
and base point G. Now
- ecmult_{,multi_}xp means multiplication with x random points and
- ecmult_{,multi_}xp_g means multiplication with x random points and G
2021-10-24 18:47:24 +00:00
Jonas Nick
20d791edfb
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#989: Shared benchmark format for command line and CSV outputs
b4b130678db31a7cabc2cde091bc4acbca92b7a3 create csv file from the benchmark output (siv2r)
26a255beb673217c839dcc51790d9a484f9a292d Shared benchmark format for command line and CSV outputs (siv2r)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK b4b130678db31a7cabc2cde091bc4acbca92b7a3
  jonasnick:
    ACK b4b130678db31a7cabc2cde091bc4acbca92b7a3

Tree-SHA512: 1eebbdd7701ad21d9647434ff05f23827be217d47870bb05a2fdb12447abc365fc6e56306f344e05d8d2ec1ff5532562131b3876261733e4412117357c5c65f8
2021-10-22 12:30:36 +00:00
Tim Ruffing
aa1b889b61
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#996: Fix G.y parity in sage code
044d95630556dda5492a70af056bc277f0b79ebc Fix G.y parity in sage code (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  I'm not sure if `EllipticCurve.lift_x` has well-defined Y coordinate or not, but at least my current version of Sage computes the wrong G. Fix this.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK 044d95630556dda5492a70af056bc277f0b79ebc

Tree-SHA512: afb919af29027da2bb3c58628924f9740672d3c347ad39cc663c9c399b1aa8536256fd3fd4e1e54457e38344704d47f281d82488da413f4e6e67e191decc960f
2021-10-20 16:40:55 +02:00
Pieter Wuille
044d956305 Fix G.y parity in sage code 2021-10-20 10:14:13 -04:00
siv2r
b4b130678d create csv file from the benchmark output 2021-10-19 21:30:23 +05:30
siv2r
26a255beb6 Shared benchmark format for command line and CSV outputs
1. add `print_output_table_header_row` func to print the table header for benchmark output
2. modify the following benchmarks to include the table header
    - bench_ecdh.c
    - bench_ecmult.c
    - bench_internal.c
    - bench_recover.c
    - bench_schnorrsig.c
    - bench_sign.c
    - bench_verify.c
2021-10-19 21:25:37 +05:30
Tim Ruffing
9526874d14
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#810: Avoid overly-wide multiplications in 5x52 field mul/sqr
b53e0cd61fce0bcef178f317537c91efc9afd04d Avoid overly-wide multiplications (Peter Dettman)

Pull request description:

  Speeds up bench_ecdh, bench_sign, bench_verify relative to master by 5+% at -O3, haswell.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    ACK b53e0cd61fce0bcef178f317537c91efc9afd04d
  real-or-random:
    ACK b53e0cd61fce0bcef178f317537c91efc9afd04d I've inspected the diff and run the tests without asm for a CPU day

Tree-SHA512: 4f79c98371a3dc9da013632210c8db979f910b222291999dfaa0c31849a77eb427361e4ab9206cbfee73c30a8933178784d6cb8e747e8dca6b227eb77fbea2a2
2021-10-17 18:44:54 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
920a0e5fa6
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#952: Avoid computing out-of-bounds pointer.
9be7b0f08340a063d961547b5d2663405f3fc162 Avoid computing out-of-bounds pointer. (Tim Ruffing)

Pull request description:

  This is a pedantic case of UB.

  Spotted in #879.

ACKs for top commit:
  elichai:
    ACK 9be7b0f08340a063d961547b5d2663405f3fc162
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK 9be7b0f08340a063d961547b5d2663405f3fc162
  sipa:
    ACK 9be7b0f08340a063d961547b5d2663405f3fc162

Tree-SHA512: a9d028c4cdb37ad0d5fcf0d2f678eef732a653d37155a69a20272c6b283c28e083172485d7a37dc4a7c6100b22a6f5b6a92e729239031be228cc511842ee35e8
2021-10-17 11:55:31 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
f34b5cae03
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#983: [RFC] Remove OpenSSL testing support
bc08599e776aff33c834ef829843ec5f629d1f39 Remove OpenSSL testing support (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  This removes the ability to test against OpenSSL, as well as the OpenSSL verification benchmark.

  The motivation is that OpenSSL 3 is deprecating part of the API used here (see #869), and I'm not sure it's worth maintaining. We do lose the fact that this is the only test that verifies randomly-generated cases against an independent implementation. On the other hand, there are tons of existing fixed tests now that test all kinds of edge cases already.

ACKs for top commit:
  elichai:
    tACK bc08599
  real-or-random:
    ACK bc08599e776aff33c834ef829843ec5f629d1f39
  jonasnick:
    ACK bc08599e776aff33c834ef829843ec5f629d1f39

Tree-SHA512: 632e6d3cf7bbc5828f5ca1f0f2a92c80bcb681bbcd4320c352b4a86fd521e410c852ccebcfc30fadc8fbf86649267a9e521f53e0f78072a8cd74d8726da28973
2021-10-17 00:36:32 +02:00
Jonas Nick
297ce82091
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#966: Make aux_rand32 arg to secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign const
db4667d5e0e13d1359991379df3400f64918b4e8 Make aux_rand32 arg to secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign const (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK db4667d5e0e13d1359991379df3400f64918b4e8 diff looks good
  jonasnick:
    ACK db4667d5e0e13d1359991379df3400f64918b4e8

Tree-SHA512: 6f003c856b0e11f3f41f6d8007470129f02f9075416c6a5d3904f8efb5fa461f38e600a6b31d326314b2961946c8c6b3bca1a8e9b333b52e099a6f023a04c698
2021-10-15 15:57:23 +00:00
Russell O'Connor
2888640132 VERIFY_CHECK precondition for secp256k1_fe_set_int. 2021-10-15 11:27:24 -04:00
Tim Ruffing
d49011f54c Make _set_fe_int( . , 0 ) set magnitude to 0 2021-10-15 11:20:27 -04:00
Pieter Wuille
bc08599e77 Remove OpenSSL testing support 2021-10-14 12:39:27 -04:00
Tim Ruffing
10f9bd84f4
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#987: Fix unused parameter warnings when building without VERIFY
189f6bcfef6578b89e21f937b24060f74bd18f00 Fix unused parameter warnings when building without VERIFY (Jonas Nick)

Pull request description:

  This commit makes `./configure --enable-coverage && make check` free of warnings.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK 189f6bcfef6578b89e21f937b24060f74bd18f00
  elichai:
    utACK 189f6bcfef6578b89e21f937b24060f74bd18f00
  siv2r:
    Tested ACK 189f6bc

Tree-SHA512: 727fe0e40ff61f404780b32dfa4102a58bed9d922e61bd17ddaaf1243b0c06edd9697ff4763b5e92d033e7db3778193bee07d85cfa3b9c46d45e5fec3f568009
2021-10-12 16:31:38 +02:00
Jonas Nick
189f6bcfef Fix unused parameter warnings when building without VERIFY 2021-10-04 19:06:41 +00:00
Jonas Nick
da0092bccc
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#986: tests: remove secp256k1_fe_verify from tests.c and modify _fe_from_storage to call _fe_verify
d43993724deb5fdc1d2162f7423f8e8398103dd5 tests: remove `secp256k1_fe_verify` from tests.c and modify `secp256k1_fe_from_storage` to call `secp256k1_fe_verify` (siv2r)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  roconnor-blockstream:
    utACK d439937 diff looks correct, I also didn't run the tests locally.
  real-or-random:
    utACK d43993724deb5fdc1d2162f7423f8e8398103dd5 diff looks correct, I didn't run the tests locally
  jonasnick:
    ACK d43993724deb5fdc1d2162f7423f8e8398103dd5 ran tests with `--enable-coverage`

Tree-SHA512: c3c9ecf8e9b7dfdcd1144ddcf8bcc637996c699dbd0fc6223e6186d082908728468fa276b09c6f344e036ca05f54432dde6366a83eb39f915a334164faadd556
2021-10-04 18:54:24 +00:00
siv2r
d43993724d tests: remove secp256k1_fe_verify from tests.c and modify secp256k1_fe_from_storage to call secp256k1_fe_verify
1. secp256k1_fe_verify is removed from tests since, it throws an error if VERIFY is not defined during compilation.
   (Ex: ./configure --enable-coverage)
2. `secp256k1_fe_from_storage` calls `secp256k1_fe_verify` in the VERIFY build to check for invalid field element.
2021-10-02 15:52:05 +05:30
Tim Ruffing
2a3a97c665
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#976: secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign_internal should be static
72713872a8597884918bcf1edbc12f5c969ca680 Add missing static to secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign_internal (Elichai Turkel)

Pull request description:

  This function isn't used outside of this module so it should be declared static

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK 72713872a8597884918bcf1edbc12f5c969ca680
  jonasnick:
    ACK 72713872a8597884918bcf1edbc12f5c969ca680

Tree-SHA512: 6107a2c84c3e11ffd68de22a5288d989a3c71c2ec1ee4827c88f6165fc27ef8339d0f6740928540e8ccd03aff49a2a96149bf698ccebe6d6d8ad6e23e38e8838
2021-09-15 16:55:50 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
aa5d34a8fe
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#783: Make the public API docs more consistent and explicit
adec5a16383f1704d80d7c767b2a65d9221cee08 Add missing null check for ctx and input keys in the public API (Elichai Turkel)
f4edfc758142d6e100ca5d086126bf532b8a7020 Improve consistency for NULL arguments in the public interface (Elichai Turkel)

Pull request description:

  I went over the public API and added missing explanations on when a pointer can be null and when it cannot,
  and added some missing checks for null ctx and null pubkey pointers.

  Open questions IMHO:
  1. Can `secp256k1_context_create` return NULL? right now it could return null if you replaced the callbacks at compile time to ones that do return(unlike the default ones which never return).
  2. Related to the first, should we document that the callbacks should never return? (in the tests we use returning callbacks but we can violate our own API) right now we say the following:

  > After this callback returns, anything may happen, including crashing.

  Is this enough to document answer `no` for the first question and just saying that if the callback returned then you violated the API so `secp256k1_context_create` can return NULL even though it is promised not to?
  Right now we AFAICT we never check if it returns null

  Another nit I'm not sure about is wording `(does nothing if NULL)`/`(ignored if NULL)`/`(can be NULL)`

  More missing docs:
  1. Documenting the `data` argument to the default nonce functions

ACKs for top commit:
  ariard:
    ACK adec5a16
  jonasnick:
    ACK adec5a16383f1704d80d7c767b2a65d9221cee08

Tree-SHA512: 6fe785776b7e451e9e8cae944987f927b1eb2e2d404dfcb1b0ceb0a30bda4ce16469708920269417e5ada09739723a430e270dea1868fe7d12ccd5699dde5976
2021-09-15 16:36:11 +02:00
Elichai Turkel
72713872a8
Add missing static to secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign_internal 2021-09-15 12:46:13 +03:00
Pieter Wuille
db4667d5e0 Make aux_rand32 arg to secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign const 2021-09-11 10:05:14 -04:00
Tim Ruffing
9a5a87e0f1
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#956: Replace ecmult_context with a generated static array.
20abd52c2e107e79391a19d2d2f8845e83858dea Add tests for pre_g tables. (Russell O'Connor)
6815761cf5500f1a619965c5b4bbc8918b334a35 Remove ecmult_context. (Russell O'Connor)
f20dcbbad1b88b5635ce096257c40849b1d02f32 Correct typo. (Russell O'Connor)
16a3cc07e8450bc3b68b19240f1c729e677a01c9 Generate ecmult_static_pre_g.h (Russell O'Connor)
8de2d86a06f014b650cd81d89a370d2326c4ed71 Bump memory limits in advance of making the ecmult context static. (Russell O'Connor)

Pull request description:

  Replace ecmult_context with a static array.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK 20abd52c2e107e79391a19d2d2f8845e83858dea code inspection and tested some parameters
  sipa:
    utACK 20abd52c2e107e79391a19d2d2f8845e83858dea (reviewed diff with earlier reviewed commit 8e9f75a5888a8ec549fe9026053051c3db7a1282)

Tree-SHA512: 9980edf36e81430ea1774e6d5eef81946c26684f6e13eab2b61a8a6c9f23ed074ea8f33e80023bdf4275749275221879eacc8f222d2027e4286725127139f069
2021-08-25 20:57:47 +02:00
Russell O'Connor
20abd52c2e Add tests for pre_g tables.
We check that the static table entries are all correct.
2021-08-20 11:11:26 -04:00
Russell O'Connor
6815761cf5 Remove ecmult_context.
These tables stored in this context are now statically available from the generated ecmult_static_pre_g.h file.
2021-08-20 11:11:26 -04:00
Russell O'Connor
f20dcbbad1 Correct typo. 2021-08-20 11:11:26 -04:00
Russell O'Connor
16a3cc07e8 Generate ecmult_static_pre_g.h
This header contains a static array that replaces the ecmult_context pre_g and pre_g_128 tables.
The gen_ecmult_static_pre_g program generates this header file.
2021-08-20 11:11:26 -04:00
Russell O'Connor
8de2d86a06 Bump memory limits in advance of making the ecmult context static. 2021-08-20 11:11:26 -04:00
Jonas Nick
d7ec49a689
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#969: ci: Fixes after Debian release
5d5c74a057f3951677691113747952f4cbdde86b tests: Rewrite code to circument potential bug in clang (Tim Ruffing)
3d2f492ceb76eea93d3a9f85f80baec7b5842160 ci: Install libasan6 (instead of 5) after Debian upgrade (Tim Ruffing)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  jonasnick:
    ACK 5d5c74a057f3951677691113747952f4cbdde86b

Tree-SHA512: 540ede482214bf9feaa607de52a69f6d34169dd98fb14bd3d003f4c8f722c1eebed56eb9d933e742f36d8886c25bfa9fa0ebbed5b0c3b161f04dc26180f5d214
2021-08-20 14:17:16 +00:00
Tim Ruffing
5d5c74a057 tests: Rewrite code to circument potential bug in clang
clang 7 to 11 (and maybe earlier versions) warn about recid being
potentially unitiliazed in "CHECK(recid >= 0 [...]", which was mitigated
in commit 3d2cf6c5bd35b0d72716b47bdd7e3892388aafc4 by initializing recid
to make clang happy but VG_UNDEF'ing the variable after initializiation
in order to ensure valgrind's memcheck analysis will still be sound and
complain if recid is not actually written to when creating a signature.

However, it turns out that at least for binaries produced by clang 11
(but not clang 7), valgrind complains about a branch on unitialized data
in the recid variable in that line before *and* after the aforementioned
commit. While the complaint after the commit could be spurious (clang
knows that recid is initialized, so it's fine to access it even though
the access is stupid), the complaint before the commit indicates a real
problem: it might be the case that clang is performing a wrong
optimization that leads to a situation where recid is really not
guaranteed to be initialized when it's accessed. As a result, clang
warns about this and generates code that just accesses the variable.

I'm not going to bother with this further because this is fixed in
clang 12 and the problem is just in our test code, not in the tested
code.

This commit rewrites the code in a way that groups the signing together
with the CHECK such that it's very easy to figure out for clang that
recid will be initialized properly. This seems to circument the issue.
2021-08-19 13:41:40 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
3d2f492ceb ci: Install libasan6 (instead of 5) after Debian upgrade 2021-08-19 12:11:11 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
be8d9c262f
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#965: gen_context: Don't use any ASM
aeece4459977b69962bcd1e1ee8845c18c74ff8f gen_context: Don't use any ASM (Tim Ruffing)

Pull request description:

  See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22441 , we need to wait for the testing results there.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    utACK aeece4459977b69962bcd1e1ee8845c18c74ff8f
  jonasnick:
    ACK aeece4459977b69962bcd1e1ee8845c18c74ff8f

Tree-SHA512: 52ff90f3dedda90124140de1c2c1c065a2f9374930d6b988d35c37f5eeae97f7d557b7ab0cf99d22add5a76ff8a3e06226572e43949e12d1048cb323d1b3d92b
2021-07-14 18:57:40 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
aeece44599 gen_context: Don't use any ASM 2021-07-14 11:15:36 +02:00
Jonas Nick
7688a4f13a
Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#963: "Schnorrsig API overhaul" fixups
90e83449b2c2e4046af755e35fdeee579a468f31 ci: Add C++ test (Tim Ruffing)
f698caaff6a263390d7ded5be4751dbc1c862b1e Use unsigned char consistently for byte arrays (Tim Ruffing)
b5b8e7b7190aed619a1fa83bf1794fddef90346d Don't declare constants twice (Tim Ruffing)
769528f30714a1e5503a7abefad25fd89f0ef237 Don't use string literals for char arrays without NUL termination (Tim Ruffing)
2cc3cfa58382582fc26eb91e3243153e1d06ce77 Fix -Wmissing-braces warning in clang (Tim Ruffing)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  jonasnick:
    ACK 90e83449b2c2e4046af755e35fdeee579a468f31

Tree-SHA512: c26ba3db7514399c502f6c5c6f6ce6703459d83d831765042e331b051aeee282641197c3ae881c614f51ca714a818c5528410d288aadbd3e92361c1e9c129afe
2021-07-05 20:59:43 +00:00
Tim Ruffing
90e83449b2 ci: Add C++ test 2021-07-05 13:57:40 +02:00
Elichai Turkel
adec5a1638 Add missing null check for ctx and input keys in the public API 2021-07-04 12:47:46 +03:00
Elichai Turkel
f4edfc7581 Improve consistency for NULL arguments in the public interface 2021-07-04 12:47:45 +03:00
Tim Ruffing
f698caaff6 Use unsigned char consistently for byte arrays
C++ does not allow initialization with string literals but we do it in other
places and -fpermissive will convince g++ to compile.
2021-07-04 11:37:06 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
b5b8e7b719 Don't declare constants twice
This is forbidden in C++.
2021-07-04 11:35:52 +02:00
Tim Ruffing
769528f307 Don't use string literals for char arrays without NUL termination
unsigned char foo[4] = "abcd" is not valid C++ because the string
literal "abcd" does not fit into foo due to the terminating NUL
character. This is valid in C, it will just omit the NUL character.

Fixes #962.
2021-07-04 10:40:30 +02:00