Summary:
The `ScrollView` component tells the native side the subview indices of the views to make sticky. The problem is that, once layout-only views are collapsed, the indices are no longer reflective of the original views to make stick to the top.
Summary:
Android WebView now supports the prop "injectedJavaScript", too.
It's time to rename "injectedJavascriptIOS" to "injectedJavaScript" for API
consistency between IOS and Android.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
Summary:
@public
The API and implementation of `shouldInjectAJAXHandler` is very opinionated, and it does not solve many of the use cases that we'd like to address.
Since `shouldInjectAJAXHandler` is basically juts injecting JS to the web page, we should let developer inject whatever JS that address different issues that they want to fix.
Test Plan:
Test this snippet at <Playground />
```
<WebView
url="http://www.facebook.com"
injectedJavascriptIOS="document.body.style.border='solid 10px red'"
/>
```
Summary:
Hi,
I've updated the NavigatorIOS component to allow setting the translucent property.
usage is:
```
<NavigatorIOS
translucent={false}
/>
```
This is my first contrib to react-native, so apologies if I've missed something.
Cheers,
Owen
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1273
Github Author: Owen Kelly <owen@novede.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Started from here - https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/1120. Most functionality for annotations were missing so I started implementing and somehow got caught up until the entire thing was done.
![screen shot 2015-05-12 at 10 07 43 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/688326/7588677/8479a7a4-f8f9-11e4-99a4-1dc3c7691810.png)
2 new events:
- callout presses (left / right)
- annotation presses
6 new properties for annotations:
- hasLeftCallout
- hasRightCallout
- onLeftCalloutPress
- onRightCalloutPress
- animateDrop
- id
1 new property for MapView
- onAnnotationPress
---
Now the important thing is, that I implemented all of this the way "I would do it". I am not sure this is the 'reacty' way so please let me know my mistakes 😄
The problem is that there is no real way to identify annotations which makes it difficult to distinguish which one got clicked. The idea is to pass a `id` and whether it has callouts the entire way with the annotation. I had to
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1247
Github Author: David Mohl <me@dave.cx>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Remove layout-only views. Works by checking properties against a list of known properties that only affect layout. The `RCTShadowView` hierarchy still has a 1:1 correlation with the JS nodes.
This works by adjusting the tags and indices in `manageChildren`. For example, if JS told us to insert tag 1 at index 0 and tag 1 is layout-only with children whose tags are 2 and 3, we adjust it so we insert tags 2 and 3 at indices 0 and 1. This keeps changes out of `RCTView` and `RCTScrollView`. In order to simplify this logic, view moves are now processed as view removals followed by additions. A move from index 0 to 1 is recorded as a removal of view at indices 0 and 1 and an insertion of tags 1 and 2 at indices 0 and 1. Of course, the remaining indices have to be offset to take account for this.
The `collapsible` attribute is a bit of a hack to force `RCTScrollView` to always have one child. This was easier than rethinking out the logic there, but we could change this later.
@public
Test Plan: There are tests in `RCTUIManagerTests.m` that test the tag- and index-manipulation logic works. There are various scenarios including add-only, remove-only, and move. In addition, two scenario tests verify that the optimization works by checking the number of views and shadow views after various situations happen.
Summary:
Added the ``scalesPageToFit`` prop to ``WebView``. This allows ``UIWebView`` to handle user zoom and scale.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1631
Github Author: alvaromb <amedina@apsl.net>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
The activity indicator was treated as a zero-width element without an explicit width. Fill it in so the style dimensions match what is displayed on the screen.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1156
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan:
Render an ActivityIndicator with a background, and see that the background shows up as a square behind the spinner instead of not showing up at all (since it was 0px wide previously).
Summary:
As discussed in our internal group, think this is a fairly easy error to run into so I added some explanation.
@frantic / @vjeux open to better wording here, but I tried to explain how setting the height directly is discouraged and it's probably better to pipe `flex: 1` all the way down.
I didn't regenerate the website since the script assumes some permissions (push permission to master repo) and has some missing npm dependencies (and after fixing that, still had some obscure error :P )
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1633
Github Author: Peter Cottle <pcottle@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This is a proposal to add `getScrollResponder` to all ScrollView-like components, including ListView. This allows multiple higher-order scroll views to be composed while allowing the owner of the top-level scroll view to call `scrollableView.getScrollResponder().scrollTo(...)` regardless of whether `scrollableView` is a ScrollView, ListView, InvertedScrollView, etc.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/766
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This is a proposal to add `getScrollResponder` to all ScrollView-like components, including ListView. This allows multiple higher-order scroll views to be composed while allowing the owner of the top-level scroll view to call `scrollableView.getScrollResponder().scrollTo(...)` regardless of whether `scrollableView` is a ScrollView, ListView, InvertedScrollView, etc.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/766
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
@public
This PR adds quite a bit of functionality to the Touchable components, allowing the ms delays of each of the handlers (`onPressIn, onPressOut, onPress, onLongPress`) to be configured.
It adds the following props to `TouchableWithoutFeedback, TouchableOpacity, and TouchableHighlight`:
```javascript
/**
* Delay in ms, from the release of the touch, before onPress is called.
*/
delayOnPress: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from the start of the touch, before onPressIn is called.
*/
delayOnPressIn: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from the release of the touch, before onPressOut is called.
*/
delayOnPressOut: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Delay in ms, from onPressIn, before onLongPress is called.
*/
delayOnLongPress: React.PropTypes.number,
```
`TouchableHighlight` also gets an additional set of props:
```javascript
/**
* Delay in ms, from the start of the touch, before the highlight is shown.
*/
delayHighlightShow: React.PropTypes.number,
/**
* Del
...
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1255
Github Author: jmstout <git@jmstout.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
ActivityIndicator was forwarding all of its props except `style` to the inner native view. This meant that onLayout would report a zero-sized frame that was relative to the wrapper view instead of the parent of the ActivityIndicator.
This diff adds `onLayout` to the wrapper view instead of the native view.
In general, all components that forward props need to be audited in this manner.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1292
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: `<ActivityIndicator onLayout={...} />` reports the size of the spinner plus a position relative to its parent view.
Summary:
`TextInput` does not automatically forward all props using the spread operator so we need to explicitly forward the `onLayout` prop.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1296
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan:
Mount a TextInput component with an `onLayout` prop and see that the callback handler is invoked with the TextInput's frame.
Summary:
Pretty sure this shouldn't be @provides
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/837
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Simply add an `onLayout` callback to a native view component, and the callback
will be invoked with the current layout information when the view is mounted and
whenever the layout changes.
The only limitation is that scroll position and other stuff the layout system
isn't aware of is not taken into account. This is because onLayout events
wouldn't be triggered for these changes and if they are desired they should be
tracked separately (e.g. with `onScroll`) and combined.
Also fixes some bugs with LayoutAnimation callbacks.
@public
Test Plan:
- Run new LayoutEventsExample in UIExplorer and see it work correctly.
- New integration test passes internally (IntegrationTest project seems busted).
- New jest test case passes.
{F22318433}
```
2015-05-06 15:45:05.848 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "Running application "UIExplorerApp" with appParams: {"rootTag":1,"initialProps":{}}. __DEV__ === true, development-level warning are ON, performance optimizations are OFF"
2015-05-06 15:45:05.881 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received text layout event
", {"target":27,"layout":{"y":123,"x":12.5,"width":140.5,"height":18}}
2015-05-06 15:45:05.882 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received image layout event
", {"target":23,"layout":{"y":12.5,"x":122,"width":50,"height":50}}
2015-05-06 15:45:05.883 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received view layout event
", {"target":22,"layout":{"y":70.5,"x":20,"width":294,"height":204}}
2015-05-06 15:45:05.897 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received text layout event
", {"target":27,"layout":{"y":206.5,"x":12.5,"width":140.5,"height":18}}
2015-05-06 15:45:05.897 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received view layout event
", {"target":22,"layout":{"y":70.5,"x":20,"width":294,"height":287.5}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.847 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "layout animation done."
2015-05-06 15:45:09.847 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received image layout event
", {"target":23,"layout":{"y":12.5,"x":82,"width":50,"height":50}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.848 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received view layout event
", {"target":22,"layout":{"y":110.5,"x":60,"width":214,"height":287.5}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.862 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received text layout event
", {"target":27,"layout":{"y":206.5,"x":12.5,"width":120,"height":68}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.863 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received image layout event
", {"target":23,"layout":{"y":12.5,"x":55,"width":50,"height":50}}
2015-05-06 15:45:09.863 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "received view layout event
", {"target":22,"layout":{"y":128,"x":60,"width":160,"height":337.5}}
```
Summary:
NavigatorIOS supports four new properties:
- **rightButtonImageSource:** The source of an image to display in the top right. This must be a static image since UINavigationController only supports UIImages. Adding support for UIImageViews (or arbitrary views) is more complicated because custom views do not fade on touch and do not have hit slop the same way that UIImage buttons do. Usage: `rightButtonImageSource: ix('ImageName')`
- **backButtonImageSource:** Use a custom image for the back button. This does not replace the back caret (`<`) but instead replaces the text next to it.
- **leftButtonTitle**: Text for the left nav button, which supersedes the previous nav item's back button when specified. The main use case for this is your initial screen/UIVC which has nothing to go back to (since it is the first VC on the stack) but need to display a left button. This does hide the back button if there would have been one otherwise.
- **leftButtonImageSource:** Image source for the left button, super
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/263
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Simple one character change - add a missing space
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/1112
Github Author: Brent Vatne <brent.vatne@madriska.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
As per #941 - fixes bug with `TouchabeOpacity` always reseting child opacity to `1.0` after press.
A note about the code: we could probably use a general `getNativeProp(propName, callback)` function rather than `getOpacity` but just used that as it was simpler for this specific PR, perhaps that refactor could be left to another - or maybe there is a way to do this already that I missed.
Before:
![bug](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/90494/7287207/52d6a686-e907-11e4-8e16-04b2ddd0582c.gif)
After:
![after](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/90494/7287689/5aca4776-e90c-11e4-8c40-aa6bd3e822d8.gif)
Example code:
```javascript
'use strict';
var React = require('react-native');
var {
AppRegistry,
StyleSheet,
Text,
View,
TouchableOpacity,
} = React;
var TestIt = React.createClass({
render() {
return (
<View style={styles.container}>
<TouchableOpacity activeOpacity={0.3}>
<View style={styles.searchButton}>
<Text>
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/977
Github Author: Brent Vatne <brent.vatne@madriska.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Fixes#534:
![screen shot 2015-03-31 at 7 52 10 pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/153704/6934038/742ddd34-d7e3-11e4-8f55-3eb7d9d3f1cd.png)
```jsx
<SegmentedControlIOS
tintColor="#ff0000"
values={['One', 'Two', 'Three', 'Four']}
selectedtIndex={0}
momentary={false}
enabled={true}
onValueChange={ (value) => console.log(value) } />
```
This only supports string-based segments, not images. Also doesn't support full customization (no separator images etc); I figure this is a good MVP to lock-down a basic API
I also included a snapshot test case, but the images keep coming out funky. When I look at the sim, I see that the text labels show up for the selected segment, but the snapshot keeps coming out with no text on those segments. I tried forcing a delay, but same result. Is that explainable?
Obviously happy to change anything about the API, code-style nitpicks, etc
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/564
Github Author: Clay Allsopp <clay.allsopp@gmail.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
NavigatorIOS with custom nav bar custom colors, working example included in
UIExplorer.
Based on pull request #318 to complete pending work based on comments.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/695
Github Author: Eduardo <edo.lomeli@gmail.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
There are still many other props that can be added to further customize the SliderIOS component, but I had a specific need for these two so I just went ahead and added them.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/799
Github Author: Brent Vatne <brent.vatne@madriska.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Enables overwriting of underlying colors for WebViews. Especially useful if you want to give your WebView a transparent background.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/767
Github Author: Lochlan Wansbrough <lochie@live.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Currently, the documentation shows both `password` and `secureTextEntry` as props for TextInput. However, the `password` prop is only passed to the Android component, so it does not work as expected for iOS developers. This PR prefers `password` over `secureTextEntry` but won't break anybody's code.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/622
Github Author: Will Piers <wpiers@rallydev.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Added constraint of child type to touchablewithoutfeedback to match touchablehighlight (this would have failed silently previously), also added the cloneWithProps as by note of @vjeux
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/517
Github Author: Daniele Zannotti <d.zannotti@me.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
I'd love to add annotations letting people know that this function and a few others take `SyntheticEvent`s but that may be inconsistent with the rest of the docs. For now, this particular annotation should be removed
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/592
Github Author: Will Piers <wpiers@rallydev.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
@vjeux Making the renderError and renderLoading props optional for WebView by setting the default to be what's shown for the WebView example in UIExplorer. issue #349
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/512
Github Author: Don Yu <donyu8@gmail.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Implementing the consensus approach from the comments on
this PR:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/486
We use a boolean flag in the Obj-C code to determine whether
to animate or not, and then provide two public JS functions
that call the Obj-C with or without the flag.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/509
Github Author: Charlie Cheever <ccheever@gmail.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
The `bounces` property lets you disable rubber-banding. It was already exposed on the native side so this diff is just documenting it in JS.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/264
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Allows setting of HTML directly on webview to support #506. This is a starting point, and feedback/improvement is requested.
1. if `startInLoadingState` is true, the HTML content will never show since the load event never fires
2. Neither html nor url are set as required props any more
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/542
Github Author: Colin Ramsay <colinramsay@gmail.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
This diff completes adding support for the following UITextField properties:
- returnKeyType: what the return key on the keyboard says
- enablesReturnKeyAutomatically: the return key is disabled iff there is no text entered. This too could be implemented in React but it feels better in UIKit right now because it is handled synchronously.
- secureTextEntry: obscure passwords
- keyboardType: added all the keyboard types, they are useful in different scenarios
There were varying degrees of support for these properties so it looks like this diff continues some unfinished work. I also updated the keyboardType enum to use native constants instead of strings like the other properties here.
Added examples to the UIExplorer.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/265
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
Found a typo in the TouchableOpacity and TouchableHighlight documentation
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/292
Github Author: Ryan Warren <ryan@war.re>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
I think this line is a legacy code from `NativeModulesDeprecated`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/340
Github Author: Edward Kim <onward.edkim@gmail.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.
Summary:
If you give a TouchableHighlight component some styling (e.g. a background color) with the `underlayStyle` prop, the style is wiped away after touching the component. This diff restores the `underlayStyle`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/129
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan:
Create a TouchableHighlight that receives `underlayStyle={{style:
'blue'}}`. It initially has a blue background. Touch it and let go. See the blue background now comes back as expected.
Summary:
Summary:
Makes sure that it looks good in the website
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/160
Github Author: Christopher Chedeau <vjeux@fb.com>
Test Plan:
Run the website
CC:
Task ID: #
Summary:
Summary:
Instead of having a separate TouchablePropTypes, put those in TouchableWithoutFeedback and have the other ones use ...TouchableWithoutFeedback.propTypes. This makes it work with the docs parsing.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/159
Github Author: Christopher Chedeau <vjeux@fb.com>
Test Plan:
Run the website, make sure all the touchable components have the right prop types
CC:
Task ID: #
Summary:
The following props are now supported on TouchableHighlight/Opacity components:
- onPress (was there before)
- onPressIn
- onPressOut
- onLongPress
There is a `TouchableFeedbackPropType` that is shared amongst the Touchable family for consistency.
Added UIExplorer example to demonstrate and test.
Fixes#101.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/102
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Imported from GitHub, without a `Test Plan:` line.