Summary:
Reported in Issue #15928
Fixing bug when permission showing dialog and user go to home and re-open minimized app.
1. Ask for permission
2. Minimize app (Press HomeButton)
3. Open app again via shortcut
[ANDROID] [BUGFIX] [PermissionsModule.java] - Fixed bug when asked for permission Cause: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException · length=0; index=0
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16507
Differential Revision: D6133708
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 9c05d1d5d16fedf718ad5113df69a4df3af62013
Summary:
Rebased version of #12842 that was reverted because of failing fb internal tests.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15919
Differential Revision: D5823956
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 4ece19a403f5ebbe4829c4c26696ea0575ab1d0e
Summary:
Trivial.
That's okay that sometimes shadowNodes and views hierarchies have lack of synchonization.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D6040022
fbshipit-source-id: 6b49a82317b620b66a87441719fddcafb1f27934
Summary:
`visible-password` represents a very basic keyboard, typically only
letters and numbers. Backed by InputType.TYPE_TEXT_VARIATION_VISIBLE_PASSWORD,
it is useful for things like password and code entry fields. It can also be more
effective than autoCorrect={false} for disabling autocompletion on some keyboards
(like Gboard).
Note `secureTextEntry` also affects `TYPE_TEXT_VARIATION_*` flags internally, so there
may be some undefined behavior when combining `secureTextEntry` with
`keyboardType="visible-password"`
Also, while here, improve the documentation on TextInput to explicitly enumerate
which keyboardType applies to Android vs. iOS (since this is the first android-specific)
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D6005353
fbshipit-source-id: 13af90c96353f714c0e106dd0fde90184a476533
Summary:
FIX#11142
This fixes#11142 and supersedes #11155 as I was unsure how to add/change commits in that PR.
Wrote up a bunch of unit tests for the ImageStore module. The added tests showed that there was indeed a problem with the flags used for the Base64OutputStream, and they also show that that has been fixed now.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/13856
Differential Revision: D6017764
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: adf667dc722ddfe31449afd8cd20a0a192eacff6
Summary:
CI is currently failing because of a lint issue, this fixes it and a bunch of other warnings that are auto-fixable.
**Test plan**
Quick manual test, cosmetic changes only.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/16229
Differential Revision: D6009748
Pulled By: TheSavior
fbshipit-source-id: cabd44fed99dd90bd0b35626492719c139c89f34
Summary:
Motivation:
(SUDDENLY) There is a thing on Android called SpanWather, and their purpose is to notify "the watcher" about span-related changes in SpannableString. The idea is: some special kind of span can have some logic to prevent or tweak interleaving with some another kind of spans. To do so, it has to implement SpanWather interface.
So, EditText uses this to control internal spannable object (!) and SUDDENLY (#><) calls internal "layout" method as a reaction to adding new spans. So, when we are cloning SpannableString, we are (re)applying same span objects to a new spannable instance, and it causes notifying other spans in the string, and they notify EditText, and the EditText does relayout and... BOOM!
So, the solution is, easy, we should use SpannableStringBuilder instead of SpannableString because it does not notify SpanWather during cloning.
See:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/master/core/java/android/text/SpannableStringBuilder.java#101
(the first argument is `false`).
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/master/core/java/android/text/SpannableStringBuilder.java#678
Compare with:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/master/core/java/android/text/SpannableStringInternal.java#43
Why? I believe because SpannableStringBuilder objects are "unfinished" by design, and documentation said: "it is the caller's responsibility to restore invariants [among spans]". As we do an exact clone of the string, that's perfectly okay to assume that all invariants were already satisfied for original string.
Reviewed By: achen1
Differential Revision: D5970940
fbshipit-source-id: 590ca0e3aede4470b809c7db527c5d55ddf5edb4