Summary:
Older Android devices don't have a large stack by default and with about 16 levels of views the app will crash. Modern Android devices are fine so we can continue to use the system defaults while using a 2MB stack on older Android devices.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7416
Differential Revision: D3276805
Pulled By: astreet
fbshipit-source-id: a7b31a1be62e13f333148ca0908eb01a11aa4562
Summary:
Currently the Modal component on Android is rendered below the Status Bar, which changes it's color to grey, and in the UIExplorer example the backdrop is just formatted to look the same color. In some scenarios users may want to preserve the color of their status bar and make it look as though the modal is appearing on top. This PR allows for that.
This GIF shows current behavior and new behavior with the translucentStatusBar prop set to true.
![](http://g.recordit.co/BSX5g9obRC.gif)
I've updated the UIExplorer app to demonstrate and the docs as shown below
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4265163/14742854/500e1292-086c-11e6-9275-71808b0cbed7.png)
Thanks!
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7157
Differential Revision: D3264497
Pulled By: dmmiller
fb-gh-sync-id: 61346d99414d331d3420f44a4c5f6341b0973be6
fbshipit-source-id: 61346d99414d331d3420f44a4c5f6341b0973be6
Summary:
We previously were unmounting the react application unconditionally when the ReactRootView#onDetachedFromWindow. This is nice in that it automatically allows us to reclaim memory, but there are many scenarios where a ReactRootView can be embedded in another piece of UI that detaches its children as part of its normal function (e.g. ListView, RecyclerView, ViewPager, etc).
As such, we will now enforce that the hosting Activity/Fragment/??? explicitly calls unmountReactApplication in the same way it calls startReactApplication. For Applications extending ReactActivity/AbstractReactActivity, this will happen automatically in onDestroy.
Reviewed By: foghina
Differential Revision: D3265161
fb-gh-sync-id: 4d49b0c41256213f00874f57e784aa8741dbf394
fbshipit-source-id: 4d49b0c41256213f00874f57e784aa8741dbf394
Summary:
Add the possibility to define a progress view top offset to RefreshControl on android. As i comment in #6740, contentInset does the trick on IOS.
Looking android documentation seems that exists a possible solution:
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/support/v4/widget/SwipeRefreshLayout.html#setProgressViewOffset(boolean, int, int)
This pull request implement that but keeping it simple, only a top offset.
For example, now we could put navigation bar over the scrollview (or listview) and define a progressViewOffset on RefreshView in order to start behind the navigation. At this point we could make some kind of coordinator layout to hide/show navigation on scroll.
To maintain the default behavior, start point is equal to start point minus progress circle diameter in order to create that progress circle before the start point.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6759
Differential Revision: D3240664
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: ccf866272e871811c1c6dcc2a34f5c217967feee
fbshipit-source-id: ccf866272e871811c1c6dcc2a34f5c217967feee
Summary: Fixes a race condition where JS module functions could be called in between ##initializeWithInstance(catalystInstance);## and ##CatalystInstance#runJSBundle##, before the BatchedBridge in JS was set up. We now guarantee that all JS module methods that are called after `ReactContext#hasActiveCatalystInstance()` returns true will have the batched bridge created and ready to use.
Reviewed By: lexs
Differential Revision: D3258651
fb-gh-sync-id: 66e66533cc86d185e7c865376d6a5cdc6520d2d4
fbshipit-source-id: 66e66533cc86d185e7c865376d6a5cdc6520d2d4
Summary:
I need to do some refactoring of what happens when a ReactRootView is attached/detached from the window. In doing so, I found ReactRootView is way more complicated than it needs to be and very hard to understand. This simplifies it while maintaining functionality.
Basically:
- When you start a react application, if the root view is measured, we attach it to the instance.
- If it wasn't measured, we do nothing
- In onMeasure, if we have a ReactInstanceManager, but are not attached to it, attach to it.
None of this needs to depend on whether we're attached to the window or whether an attach is scheduled afaict.
Reviewed By: dmmiller
Differential Revision: D3260056
fb-gh-sync-id: 974c19ed75a07f83299472f75346bd6be7414128
fbshipit-source-id: 974c19ed75a07f83299472f75346bd6be7414128
Summary:
This adds support for pagingEnabled to the HorizontalScrollView.
This is an initial implementation.
Because Android doesn't provide great details about what is happening with a scroll view after you are done touching it, we have some post touch handling. This is kicked off either by touch up or a fling call.
Once we are doing that handling, we start a runnable that basically checks if we are still scrolling. If we are, we just schedule that runnable again and check a frame later. If we are done scrolling (no onScrollChanged since we last fired), we could be in one of two states, the fling is done or we are done snapping to the page boundary. If we are in the fling done case, we then check if we need to scroll to a page boundary. If so, we call smoothScrollTo and schedule ourself to check onScroll events again until done with that scroll. If we are done with both (either we only did momentum scroll or we did that and then snapped to page), we can then fire the final event and stop checking. This logic is all in handlePostTouchScrolling.
Because of the decision to only do page scrolling after momentum ends, we do allow you to scroll through with momentum a number of pages and the transition can be a little strange where it stops a sec and then slides to be page aligned. As a follow up, we can probably smooth that up by changing the value we pass to super.fling() that would adjust it to be let momentum carry it to the page boundary.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D3207608
fb-gh-sync-id: 02f62970ed9a5e3a5f9c0d959402756bc4b3699e
fbshipit-source-id: 02f62970ed9a5e3a5f9c0d959402756bc4b3699e
Summary:
This change makes all instrumentation tests to be executed in sequence in independent retriable processes.
With a new test being open sourced recently our CI stability degraded.
This PR should bring back stability because tests won't affect each other and will have shorter lifetime
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7353
Differential Revision: D3259081
fb-gh-sync-id: 48ccdb5dbd561d416526497ff474378db9ca3c60
fbshipit-source-id: 48ccdb5dbd561d416526497ff474378db9ca3c60
Summary:
We have a crash in prod t11090540, urgent fix same way as in setFontStyle
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7362
Reviewed By: foghina
Differential Revision: D3254158
Pulled By: dmmiller
fb-gh-sync-id: a497d0d4d0e4df9284e328ebb14fee74ba2f899b
fbshipit-source-id: a497d0d4d0e4df9284e328ebb14fee74ba2f899b
Summary:
transformMatrix only worked on iOS and there is an equivalent API that (mostly)
works cross platform.
decomposedMatrix could technically be passed on Android but it wasn't document and explicitly flagged as not working.
My goal is to deprecate both uses and then the only supported API is the `transform: [{ matrix: ... }]` form.
The only difference is that on Android the matrix gets decomposed.
Currently there is some special cased magic that renames transform -> transformMatrix or decomposedMatrix depending on platform.
https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/master/src/renderers/native/ReactNative/ReactNativeAttributePayload.js#L50
Therefore I'm adding an alias for both native platforms called just "transform".
Next I'll swap over the JS to always target the name "transform". The only difference is how the value is marshalled over the bridge in processTransform.
To do this, I have to clean up a few callers. Mostly that's just swapping to the new API.
For buildInterpolator this is a bit trickier but this fixes it for all our use cases (which is only the Navigator in AdsManager).
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D3239960
fb-gh-sync-id: 838edb6644c6cdd0716834f712042f226ff3136f
fbshipit-source-id: 838edb6644c6cdd0716834f712042f226ff3136f
Summary: This adds support for UIManager.setChildren on Android like D2757388 added for iOS.
Reviewed By: andreicoman11
Differential Revision: D3235369
fb-gh-sync-id: b538556ec4abdb606f9be26d1b74734046bca0cd
fbshipit-source-id: b538556ec4abdb606f9be26d1b74734046bca0cd
Summary:
textShadowOffset design is `ReactPropTypes.shape({width: ReactPropTypes.number, height: ReactPropTypes.number})`, so either width or height is optional.
Unfortunately, in Android implementation, it is my bad not handling optional case and lead to an exception.
Thanks kohver for reporting [this issue](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/4975#issuecomment-213006641)
**Test plan (required)**
*Before this fix*
1. Modify TextExample.android.js to `<Text style={{fontSize: 20, textShadowOffset: {height: 10}, textShadowRadius: 1, textShadowColor: '#00cccc'}}>` which really raise a redbox.
*After this fix*
1. Test original TextExample.android.js textShadowOffset works well.
2. Modify TextExample.android.js to `<Text style={{fontSize: 20, textShadowOffset: {height: 10}, textShadowRadius: 1, textShadowColor: '#00cccc'}}>` which works well without redbox.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7119
Differential Revision: D3240607
Pulled By: mkonicek
fb-gh-sync-id: b13221ae1586594890b0f4aa644ace7c0d5d6c58
fbshipit-source-id: b13221ae1586594890b0f4aa644ace7c0d5d6c58
Summary:
**Motivation**: Arc drawing has been broken on Android for some time. dgladkov submitted a PR, which ended up having a bug and was never merged. This PR should fix that bug as well as provide screenshots to prove it works.
**Reproducing the Bug:** dgladkov made a simple test app which helps to illustrate the bug. The repo can be found [here](https://github.com/dgladkov/RNArtArcDrawingBug). The demo app illustrates that on iOS, wedges are drawn correctly, but Android only draws full circles. [Direct Link to iOS Before](https://github.com/dgladkov/RNArtArcDrawingBug/blob/master/images/ios.png). [Direct Link to Android Before](https://github.com/dgladkov/RNArtArcDrawingBug/blob/master/images/android.png).
**Proof The Bug is Fixed:** [Here is a direct link to Android After pic.](http://i.imgur.com/9dTU2Xn.png) You can see the wedges match the iOS Before screenshot.
**What went wrong:** dgladkov's solution relied on Java's modulus, which in fact, implements modulus in a non-standard way. Modulus should a
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7049
Differential Revision: D3234404
Pulled By: spicyj
fb-gh-sync-id: 6b85eb42389da6c344ec9723c7f81f61473246b0
fbshipit-source-id: 6b85eb42389da6c344ec9723c7f81f61473246b0
Summary:
**Motivation**: Arc drawing has been broken on Android for some time. dgladkov submitted a PR, which ended up having a bug and was never merged. This PR should fix that bug as well as provide screenshots to prove it works.
**Reproducing the Bug:** dgladkov made a simple test app which helps to illustrate the bug. The repo can be found [here](https://github.com/dgladkov/RNArtArcDrawingBug). The demo app illustrates that on iOS, wedges are drawn correctly, but Android only draws full circles. [Direct Link to iOS Before](https://github.com/dgladkov/RNArtArcDrawingBug/blob/master/images/ios.png). [Direct Link to Android Before](https://github.com/dgladkov/RNArtArcDrawingBug/blob/master/images/android.png).
**Proof The Bug is Fixed:** [Here is a direct link to Android After pic.](http://i.imgur.com/9dTU2Xn.png) You can see the wedges match the iOS Before screenshot.
**What went wrong:** dgladkov's solution relied on Java's modulus, which in fact, implements modulus in a non-standard way. Modulus should a
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7049
Differential Revision: D3234404
Pulled By: spicyj
fb-gh-sync-id: 4974b818dc49d9d16f2483c49b462c459a8bb479
fbshipit-source-id: 4974b818dc49d9d16f2483c49b462c459a8bb479
Summary: When the ModalHostView is added as a child of whatever view holds it, if accessibility is turned on, Android will walk up to the root and then walk all children of the child and verify that they are indeed children of the root. Since ModalHostView actually adds its children to a new ReactDialogViewGroup which has the Dialog as a parent, there is a disagreement about the tree deep in the bowels of View when it performs that walk. The trick is to stop from adding the children of the ModalHostView when walking for accessibility. The accessibility of those children views are properly handled by the hosting Dialog.
Reviewed By: andreicoman11
Differential Revision: D3230033
fb-gh-sync-id: 1e5ac334c996b1d5f50c75ded60805d8b871477a
fbshipit-source-id: 1e5ac334c996b1d5f50c75ded60805d8b871477a
Summary:
This only works for the new cxx bridge (hopefully open sourcing soon!).
This diff allows Java native modules to expose synchronous hooks to JS via the ReactSyncHook annotation. The methods will appear in JS on the native module object (e.g. you would do `require('UIManager').mySyncHook('foo');`) which allows us to enforce that required native modules are installed at build time. In order to support remote debugging, both the args and return type must be JSON serializable (so that we can go back across to the device to resolve synchronous hooks).
Follow ups will be integration tests, adding support for return types besides void, and adding support for remote debugging.
Reviewed By: mhorowitz
Differential Revision: D3218794
fb-gh-sync-id: 7e3366a8254276f5a55eb806287419287ca9182b
fbshipit-source-id: 7e3366a8254276f5a55eb806287419287ca9182b
Summary:Using TouchableNativeFeedback has been a problem for me because the ripples it makes don't follow the child view's border radii so the ripples stick out of the child view's rounded corners. This PR should fix this problem with a minor caveat: this only works for TouchableNativeFeedback.Ripple and not TouchableNativeFeedback.SelectableBackground. I searched how I could apply corner radius to selectableItemBackground and it doesn't seem to be possible (the prevalent advice is to create the ripple manually which is equivalent to using TNF.Ripple in our case), though I could be wrong.
I added [an example to UIExplorer (TouchableExample)](http://i.imgur.com/CHY9xjW.png). This is my first PR to this repo so let me know if something's wrong. Cheers!
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6515
Differential Revision: D3126513
Pulled By: AaaChiuuu
fb-gh-sync-id: 4a00e7177ee4ffd8dffeca143f4f43f08c99b5a1
fbshipit-source-id: 4a00e7177ee4ffd8dffeca143f4f43f08c99b5a1
Summary:Fixes #5408 as per ide and vjeux suggestions here https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/529#issuecomment-107328799
Could've been probably done in a single `if` clause, but this is more explicit and leaves potential place for future implementation (if we ever decide to do so)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7197
Differential Revision: D3217740
Pulled By: vjeux
fb-gh-sync-id: aa08a5c42e43c1abe17b72a424ee96146f2667f6
fbshipit-source-id: aa08a5c42e43c1abe17b72a424ee96146f2667f6
Summary:This change adds native animated support for Animated.interpolate
Animated.interpolate allows for defining nodes that outputs an interpolated value of their input node based on the interpolation node configuration. For now native animated implementation only supports a linear interpolation for a given input and output ranges (ranges can consists of multiple segments). Native interpolation node is compatible with the JS implementation with the exception that not all attributes that can be used in JS are supported. Before we migrate interpolation node from JS->native we verify that only supported props are used.
**Test Plan**
Run JS tests: `npm test Libraries/Animated/src/__tests__/AnimatedNative-test.js`
Run java tests: `buck test ReactAndroid/src/test/java/com/facebook/react/animated`
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7141
Differential Revision: D3216546
fb-gh-sync-id: 29876e33956615c6370ca4d332abe048f8dba5b8
fbshipit-source-id: 29876e33956615c6370ca4d332abe048f8dba5b8