Summary:
Now setting explicit backgroundColor style is required for Views with background shadow,
otherwise the shadow will be generated based on content of the view (which is expected behaviour).
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6582587
fbshipit-source-id: 0514cb3c57bad17d2af40810b0e0f7ddc96a2c31
Summary:
We are removing `reactSetInheritedBackgroundColor` feature because it overcomplicates RN rendering layer and provides very small benefits.
This is the last place where we are using `reactSetInheritedBackgroundColor`.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6581599
fbshipit-source-id: 129997332a03daf927acdd174e5853bfd388332f
Summary:
This was leftovers from old implementation of zIndex feature.
Janic janicduplessis refactored this and moved all logic to UIView layer, so we don't need this prop anymore in shadow realm.
More info: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14011
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6574414
fbshipit-source-id: 2cae19350765689784d7884ed875878d39b4e3f1
Summary:
This is a long story. Awhile ago awesome Nick Lockwood (Hey Nick!) introduced a special optimization for ReactNative rendering layer called "inherited background color".
He described this idea in D2811031:
>>>
Blending semitransparent pixels against their background is fairly a fairly expensive operation on mobile GPUs. To reduce blending, React Native has a system called "background color propagation", where the background color of parent views is automatically inherited by child views unless explicitly overridden. This means that translucent pixels can be blended directly against a known background color, avoiding the need to do this dynamically on the GPU.
In practice, this is only useful for views that do their own drawing, which is basically just <Image/> and <Text/> components, and for image components it only really matters when the image has an alpha component.
The automatic background propagation is a bit of a hack, and often does the wrong thing - for example if a view overflows its bounds, or if it overlaps a sibling, the background color will often be incorrect and need to be manually disabled. Because the only place that it provides a significant performance benefit is for text, this diff disables the behavior for everything except <Text/> nodes. It might still be useful for <Image/> nodes too, but looking through the examples in UIExplorer, the number of places where it does the wrong thing for images outnumbers the cases where it provides significant reduction in blending.
However. I think it is time to remove it. Why? There are several reasons:
* It drastically complicates rendering layer. DRASTICALLY. In many many unrelated places (try search for "backgroundColor"!);
* This mechanism is totally non-conceptual to RN and it prevents us to implement some new possible render optimization that we plan to do;
* This adopted only by two components now: Text and ART;
* This is not a significant performance drain anymore; from iOS 6 even UILabel has clear background color by default.
* I doubt that it even works now because `drawRect:` in Text component does not call super method.
So, this diff just turns this feature off for Text. If all performance metrics are neutral, I will delete this mechanism.
Peace.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D6564199
fbshipit-source-id: 70524fdd955ca32bbf86d2d1ff5e73316b791219
Summary:
Fixes the Flow failure due to an undefined Ast type.
Before:
```
$ npm run flow -- check
> react-native@1000.0.0 flow /Users/hramos/git/react-native
> flow "check"
Error: local-cli/__tests__/fs-mock-test.js:27
27: beforeEach(() => {
^^^^^^^^^^ beforeEach. Could not resolve name
Error: local-cli/__tests__/fs-mock-test.js:53
53: expect(content).toEqual('beep');
^^^^^^ expect. Could not resolve name
Error: local-cli/__tests__/fs-mock-test.js:88
88: expect(content).toEqual('hello, world!');
^^^^^^ expect. Could not resolve name
Error: local-cli/__tests__/fs-mock-test.js:100
100: expect(content).toEqual('hello, world!');
^^^^^^ expect. Could not resolve name
Error: node_modules/metro/src/Bundler/util.js.flow:46
46: ): Ast {
^^^ Ast. Could not resolve name
Error: node_modules/metro/src/ModuleGraph/worker/collect-dependencies.js.flow:283
283: const xp = (module.exports = (ast: Ast) =>
^^^ Ast. Could not resolve name
Error: node_modules/metro/src/assetTransformer.js.flow:29
29: ): Promise<{ast: Ast}> {
^^^ Ast. Could not resolve name
```
After
```
$ npm run flow -- check
> react-native@1000.0.0 flow /Users/hramos/git/react-native
> flow "check"
Error: local-cli/__tests__/fs-mock-test.js:27
27: beforeEach(() => {
^^^^^^^^^^ beforeEach. Could not resolve name
Error: local-cli/__tests__/fs-mock-test.js:53
53: expect(content).toEqual('beep');
^^^^^^ expect. Could not resolve name
Error: local-cli/__tests__/fs-mock-test.js:88
88: expect(content).toEqual('hello, world!');
^^^^^^ expect. Could not resolve name
Error: local-cli/__tests__/fs-mock-test.js:100
100: expect(content).toEqual('hello, world!');
^^^^^^ expect. Could not resolve name
```
[ GENERAL ] [ BUGFIX] [ .flowconfig ] - Have Flow ignore Metro node_nodules
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17187
Differential Revision: D6572303
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: aa256b9725970fcc2a6da6578c83e7c0875e3cfd
Summary: JSON.stringify will convert a function to null, but folly::dynamic in the native code can't represent a JS function. Props do sometimes have functions, but don't permit them everywhere.
Reviewed By: johnislarry
Differential Revision: D6541878
fbshipit-source-id: b2a9d3ba7899dfb98a6a2ada3aa91a26549fdd94
Summary: Following common ObjC pattern, we have to store delegates as weak pointers.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D6558886
fbshipit-source-id: 11a710a7e9e17d7c6a78ae46b53b043f44ccf8e5
Summary:
We are removing `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`.
Why?
* It is a performance drain. Supporting this requires dispatching main-thread block on every single transaction complete;
* It has "too broad" non-conceptual semantic which encouraged using this as a "band-aid solution" for poorly designed components;
* It is conceptually incompatible with new approaches that we are trying to implement to optimize the render layer;
* It was deprecated for very long time.
This diff removes `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction` from RCTScrollView component. As I mentioned, because of the semantic of `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction` is extremely broad, it's hard to capture what exact case it should handle. Based on comments and existing logic, it seems it tight to `contentSize` property and the size of RCTScrollContentView.
Reviewed By: rsnara
Differential Revision: D6538419
fbshipit-source-id: ccc6f5fea327471f10f1738d3da5214c0d362953
Summary:
Because it is not simply flushing, it (in the future) is more complex process. And the names should represent logical meaning of the process, not particular implementation details.
It also nice to have unified terminology across our reactive UI frameworks.
See the next diffs.
Reviewed By: rsnara
Differential Revision: D6436770
fbshipit-source-id: 0a0b686e8ace89e30f6787a37c0a7965c5af757b
Valentin Shergin
Miguel Jimenez Esun
Spencer Ahrens
Michael Schneider
Peter van der Zee
Ben Nham
Taras Tsugrii
Alex Dvornikov
Sam Goldman
Héctor Ramos
Max Sherman
Yujie Liu
Marc Horowitz
Ayush Sood
Alexey Lang
Jean Lauliac
Paco Estevez Garcia
Eli White
Andrew Imm
Rahul Ramachandran
Rafael Oleza
Greg McGary
Nat Mote
Shin-Kai Chen
Ramanpreet Nara
Oleg Lokhvitsky
David Vacca