2015-03-23 20:28:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2015-present, Facebook, Inc.
|
|
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This source code is licensed under the BSD-style license found in the
|
|
|
|
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. An additional grant
|
|
|
|
* of patent rights can be found in the PATENTS file in the same directory.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#import "RCTView.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#import "RCTAutoInsetsProtocol.h"
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
#import "RCTBorderDrawing.h"
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
#import "RCTConvert.h"
|
|
|
|
#import "RCTLog.h"
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#import "RCTUtils.h"
|
2015-03-26 09:58:06 +00:00
|
|
|
#import "UIView+React.h"
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-18 22:33:23 +00:00
|
|
|
@implementation UIView (RCTViewUnmounting)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)react_remountAllSubviews
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Normal views don't support unmounting, so all
|
|
|
|
// this does is forward message to our subviews,
|
|
|
|
// in case any of those do support it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (UIView *subview in self.subviews) {
|
|
|
|
[subview react_remountAllSubviews];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)react_updateClippedSubviewsWithClipRect:(CGRect)clipRect relativeToView:(UIView *)clipView
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Even though we don't support subview unmounting
|
|
|
|
// we do support clipsToBounds, so if that's enabled
|
|
|
|
// we'll update the clipping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (self.clipsToBounds && self.subviews.count > 0) {
|
|
|
|
clipRect = [clipView convertRect:clipRect toView:self];
|
|
|
|
clipRect = CGRectIntersection(clipRect, self.bounds);
|
|
|
|
clipView = self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Normal views don't support unmounting, so all
|
|
|
|
// this does is forward message to our subviews,
|
|
|
|
// in case any of those do support it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (UIView *subview in self.subviews) {
|
|
|
|
[subview react_updateClippedSubviewsWithClipRect:clipRect relativeToView:clipView];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (UIView *)react_findClipView
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
UIView *testView = self;
|
|
|
|
UIView *clipView = nil;
|
|
|
|
CGRect clipRect = self.bounds;
|
|
|
|
// We will only look for a clipping view up the view hierarchy until we hit the root view.
|
|
|
|
while (testView) {
|
|
|
|
if (testView.clipsToBounds) {
|
|
|
|
if (clipView) {
|
|
|
|
CGRect testRect = [clipView convertRect:clipRect toView:testView];
|
|
|
|
if (!CGRectContainsRect(testView.bounds, testRect)) {
|
|
|
|
clipView = testView;
|
|
|
|
clipRect = CGRectIntersection(testView.bounds, testRect);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
clipView = testView;
|
|
|
|
clipRect = [self convertRect:self.bounds toView:clipView];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if ([testView isReactRootView]) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
testView = testView.superview;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return clipView ?: self.window;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@end
|
2015-03-11 02:03:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
static NSString *RCTRecursiveAccessibilityLabel(UIView *view)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
NSMutableString *str = [NSMutableString stringWithString:@""];
|
|
|
|
for (UIView *subview in view.subviews) {
|
2015-08-24 10:14:33 +00:00
|
|
|
NSString *label = subview.accessibilityLabel;
|
2017-05-25 06:01:10 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!label) {
|
|
|
|
label = RCTRecursiveAccessibilityLabel(subview);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (label && label.length > 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (str.length > 0) {
|
|
|
|
[str appendString:@" "];
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
[str appendString:label];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return str;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@implementation RCTView
|
2015-03-11 02:03:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
UIColor *_backgroundColor;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (instancetype)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if ((self = [super initWithFrame:frame])) {
|
|
|
|
_borderWidth = -1;
|
|
|
|
_borderTopWidth = -1;
|
|
|
|
_borderRightWidth = -1;
|
|
|
|
_borderBottomWidth = -1;
|
|
|
|
_borderLeftWidth = -1;
|
2015-05-13 15:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
_borderTopLeftRadius = -1;
|
|
|
|
_borderTopRightRadius = -1;
|
|
|
|
_borderBottomLeftRadius = -1;
|
|
|
|
_borderBottomRightRadius = -1;
|
2015-12-01 15:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
_borderStyle = RCTBorderStyleSolid;
|
2016-02-17 00:50:35 +00:00
|
|
|
_hitTestEdgeInsets = UIEdgeInsetsZero;
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-08-24 10:14:33 +00:00
|
|
|
_backgroundColor = super.backgroundColor;
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-24 10:14:33 +00:00
|
|
|
RCT_NOT_IMPLEMENTED(- (instancetype)initWithCoder:unused)
|
2015-06-15 14:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-02 17:51:19 +00:00
|
|
|
- (void)setReactLayoutDirection:(UIUserInterfaceLayoutDirection)layoutDirection
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_reactLayoutDirection = layoutDirection;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-03 23:13:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if ([self respondsToSelector:@selector(setSemanticContentAttribute:)]) {
|
|
|
|
self.semanticContentAttribute =
|
|
|
|
layoutDirection == UIUserInterfaceLayoutDirectionLeftToRight ?
|
|
|
|
UISemanticContentAttributeForceLeftToRight :
|
|
|
|
UISemanticContentAttributeForceRightToLeft;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-02-02 17:51:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
- (NSString *)accessibilityLabel
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-03-01 23:33:55 +00:00
|
|
|
if (super.accessibilityLabel) {
|
|
|
|
return super.accessibilityLabel;
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return RCTRecursiveAccessibilityLabel(self);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)setPointerEvents:(RCTPointerEvents)pointerEvents
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_pointerEvents = pointerEvents;
|
|
|
|
self.userInteractionEnabled = (pointerEvents != RCTPointerEventsNone);
|
|
|
|
if (pointerEvents == RCTPointerEventsBoxNone) {
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
self.accessibilityViewIsModal = NO;
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (UIView *)hitTest:(CGPoint)point withEvent:(UIEvent *)event
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-10-30 11:11:04 +00:00
|
|
|
BOOL canReceiveTouchEvents = ([self isUserInteractionEnabled] && ![self isHidden]);
|
|
|
|
if(!canReceiveTouchEvents) {
|
|
|
|
return nil;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// `hitSubview` is the topmost subview which was hit. The hit point can
|
|
|
|
// be outside the bounds of `view` (e.g., if -clipsToBounds is NO).
|
|
|
|
UIView *hitSubview = nil;
|
|
|
|
BOOL isPointInside = [self pointInside:point withEvent:event];
|
|
|
|
BOOL needsHitSubview = !(_pointerEvents == RCTPointerEventsNone || _pointerEvents == RCTPointerEventsBoxOnly);
|
|
|
|
if (needsHitSubview && (![self clipsToBounds] || isPointInside)) {
|
2017-05-29 04:35:38 +00:00
|
|
|
// Take z-index into account when calculating the touch target.
|
|
|
|
NSArray<UIView *> *sortedSubviews = [self reactZIndexSortedSubviews];
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-30 11:11:04 +00:00
|
|
|
// The default behaviour of UIKit is that if a view does not contain a point,
|
|
|
|
// then no subviews will be returned from hit testing, even if they contain
|
|
|
|
// the hit point. By doing hit testing directly on the subviews, we bypass
|
|
|
|
// the strict containment policy (i.e., UIKit guarantees that every ancestor
|
|
|
|
// of the hit view will return YES from -pointInside:withEvent:). See:
|
|
|
|
// - https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/qa/qa2013/qa1812.html
|
2017-05-29 04:35:38 +00:00
|
|
|
for (UIView *subview in [sortedSubviews reverseObjectEnumerator]) {
|
2015-10-30 11:11:04 +00:00
|
|
|
CGPoint convertedPoint = [subview convertPoint:point fromView:self];
|
|
|
|
hitSubview = [subview hitTest:convertedPoint withEvent:event];
|
|
|
|
if (hitSubview != nil) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UIView *hitView = (isPointInside ? self : nil);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
switch (_pointerEvents) {
|
|
|
|
case RCTPointerEventsNone:
|
|
|
|
return nil;
|
|
|
|
case RCTPointerEventsUnspecified:
|
2015-10-30 11:11:04 +00:00
|
|
|
return hitSubview ?: hitView;
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
case RCTPointerEventsBoxOnly:
|
2015-10-30 11:11:04 +00:00
|
|
|
return hitView;
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
case RCTPointerEventsBoxNone:
|
2015-10-30 11:11:04 +00:00
|
|
|
return hitSubview;
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
default:
|
2017-09-25 17:23:02 +00:00
|
|
|
RCTLogError(@"Invalid pointer-events specified %lld on %@", (long long)_pointerEvents, self);
|
2015-10-30 11:11:04 +00:00
|
|
|
return hitSubview ?: hitView;
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-17 00:50:35 +00:00
|
|
|
- (BOOL)pointInside:(CGPoint)point withEvent:(UIEvent *)event
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (UIEdgeInsetsEqualToEdgeInsets(self.hitTestEdgeInsets, UIEdgeInsetsZero)) {
|
|
|
|
return [super pointInside:point withEvent:event];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
CGRect hitFrame = UIEdgeInsetsInsetRect(self.bounds, self.hitTestEdgeInsets);
|
|
|
|
return CGRectContainsPoint(hitFrame, point);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-06-02 21:17:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (UIView *)reactAccessibilityElement
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (BOOL)isAccessibilityElement
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (self.reactAccessibilityElement == self) {
|
|
|
|
return [super isAccessibilityElement];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return NO;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-02-17 00:50:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-20 15:33:16 +00:00
|
|
|
- (BOOL)accessibilityActivate
|
|
|
|
{
|
Added mechanism for directly mapping JS event handlers to blocks
Summary:
Currently, the system for mapping JS event handlers to blocks is quite clean on the JS side, but is clunky on the native side. The event property is passed as a boolean, which can then be checked by the native side, and if true, the native side is supposed to send an event via the event dispatcher.
This diff adds the facility to declare the property as a block instead. This means that the event side can simply call the block, and it will automatically send the event. Because the blocks for bubbling and direct events are named differently, we can also use this to generate the event registration data and get rid of the arrays of event names.
The name of the event is inferred from the property name, which means that the property for an event called "load" must be called `onLoad` or the mapping won't work. This can be optionally remapped to a different property name on the view itself if necessary, e.g.
RCT_REMAP_VIEW_PROPERTY(onLoad, loadEventBlock, RCTDirectEventBlock)
If you don't want to use this mechanism then for now it is still possible to declare the property as a BOOL instead and use the old mechanism (this approach is now deprecated however, and may eventually be removed altogether).
2015-09-02 12:58:10 +00:00
|
|
|
if (_onAccessibilityTap) {
|
|
|
|
_onAccessibilityTap(nil);
|
2015-05-20 15:33:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return YES;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
return NO;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-19 13:21:52 +00:00
|
|
|
- (BOOL)accessibilityPerformMagicTap
|
|
|
|
{
|
Added mechanism for directly mapping JS event handlers to blocks
Summary:
Currently, the system for mapping JS event handlers to blocks is quite clean on the JS side, but is clunky on the native side. The event property is passed as a boolean, which can then be checked by the native side, and if true, the native side is supposed to send an event via the event dispatcher.
This diff adds the facility to declare the property as a block instead. This means that the event side can simply call the block, and it will automatically send the event. Because the blocks for bubbling and direct events are named differently, we can also use this to generate the event registration data and get rid of the arrays of event names.
The name of the event is inferred from the property name, which means that the property for an event called "load" must be called `onLoad` or the mapping won't work. This can be optionally remapped to a different property name on the view itself if necessary, e.g.
RCT_REMAP_VIEW_PROPERTY(onLoad, loadEventBlock, RCTDirectEventBlock)
If you don't want to use this mechanism then for now it is still possible to declare the property as a BOOL instead and use the old mechanism (this approach is now deprecated however, and may eventually be removed altogether).
2015-09-02 12:58:10 +00:00
|
|
|
if (_onMagicTap) {
|
|
|
|
_onMagicTap(nil);
|
2015-05-19 13:21:52 +00:00
|
|
|
return YES;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
return NO;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-15 19:05:04 +00:00
|
|
|
- (NSString *)description
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
NSString *superDescription = super.description;
|
|
|
|
NSRange semicolonRange = [superDescription rangeOfString:@";"];
|
|
|
|
NSString *replacement = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"; reactTag: %@;", self.reactTag];
|
|
|
|
return [superDescription stringByReplacingCharactersInRange:semicolonRange withString:replacement];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma mark - Statics for dealing with layoutGuides
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ (void)autoAdjustInsetsForView:(UIView<RCTAutoInsetsProtocol> *)parentView
|
|
|
|
withScrollView:(UIScrollView *)scrollView
|
|
|
|
updateOffset:(BOOL)updateOffset
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
UIEdgeInsets baseInset = parentView.contentInset;
|
|
|
|
CGFloat previousInsetTop = scrollView.contentInset.top;
|
|
|
|
CGPoint contentOffset = scrollView.contentOffset;
|
2015-03-01 23:33:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if (parentView.automaticallyAdjustContentInsets) {
|
|
|
|
UIEdgeInsets autoInset = [self contentInsetsForView:parentView];
|
|
|
|
baseInset.top += autoInset.top;
|
|
|
|
baseInset.bottom += autoInset.bottom;
|
|
|
|
baseInset.left += autoInset.left;
|
|
|
|
baseInset.right += autoInset.right;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-24 10:14:33 +00:00
|
|
|
scrollView.contentInset = baseInset;
|
|
|
|
scrollView.scrollIndicatorInsets = baseInset;
|
2015-03-01 23:33:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if (updateOffset) {
|
|
|
|
// If we're adjusting the top inset, then let's also adjust the contentOffset so that the view
|
|
|
|
// elements above the top guide do not cover the content.
|
|
|
|
// This is generally only needed when your views are initially laid out, for
|
|
|
|
// manual changes to contentOffset, you can optionally disable this step
|
|
|
|
CGFloat currentInsetTop = scrollView.contentInset.top;
|
|
|
|
if (currentInsetTop != previousInsetTop) {
|
|
|
|
contentOffset.y -= (currentInsetTop - previousInsetTop);
|
|
|
|
scrollView.contentOffset = contentOffset;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ (UIEdgeInsets)contentInsetsForView:(UIView *)view
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
while (view) {
|
2015-07-31 18:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
UIViewController *controller = view.reactViewController;
|
2015-02-20 04:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if (controller) {
|
|
|
|
return (UIEdgeInsets){
|
|
|
|
controller.topLayoutGuide.length, 0,
|
|
|
|
controller.bottomLayoutGuide.length, 0
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
view = view.superview;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return UIEdgeInsetsZero;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-18 22:33:23 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma mark - View unmounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)react_remountAllSubviews
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (_removeClippedSubviews) {
|
2017-05-29 04:35:38 +00:00
|
|
|
for (UIView *view in self.reactSubviews) {
|
2016-11-18 22:33:23 +00:00
|
|
|
if (view.superview != self) {
|
|
|
|
[self addSubview:view];
|
|
|
|
[view react_remountAllSubviews];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// If _removeClippedSubviews is false, we must already be showing all subviews
|
|
|
|
[super react_remountAllSubviews];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)react_updateClippedSubviewsWithClipRect:(CGRect)clipRect relativeToView:(UIView *)clipView
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// TODO (#5906496): for scrollviews (the primary use-case) we could
|
|
|
|
// optimize this by only doing a range check along the scroll axis,
|
|
|
|
// instead of comparing the whole frame
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!_removeClippedSubviews) {
|
|
|
|
// Use default behavior if unmounting is disabled
|
|
|
|
return [super react_updateClippedSubviewsWithClipRect:clipRect relativeToView:clipView];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (self.reactSubviews.count == 0) {
|
|
|
|
// Do nothing if we have no subviews
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (CGSizeEqualToSize(self.bounds.size, CGSizeZero)) {
|
|
|
|
// Do nothing if layout hasn't happened yet
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Convert clipping rect to local coordinates
|
|
|
|
clipRect = [clipView convertRect:clipRect toView:self];
|
|
|
|
clipRect = CGRectIntersection(clipRect, self.bounds);
|
|
|
|
clipView = self;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mount / unmount views
|
2017-05-29 04:35:38 +00:00
|
|
|
for (UIView *view in self.reactSubviews) {
|
2016-11-18 22:33:23 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!CGRectIsEmpty(CGRectIntersection(clipRect, view.frame))) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// View is at least partially visible, so remount it if unmounted
|
|
|
|
[self addSubview:view];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Then test its subviews
|
|
|
|
if (CGRectContainsRect(clipRect, view.frame)) {
|
|
|
|
// View is fully visible, so remount all subviews
|
|
|
|
[view react_remountAllSubviews];
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// View is partially visible, so update clipped subviews
|
|
|
|
[view react_updateClippedSubviewsWithClipRect:clipRect relativeToView:clipView];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else if (view.superview) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// View is completely outside the clipRect, so unmount it
|
|
|
|
[view removeFromSuperview];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)setRemoveClippedSubviews:(BOOL)removeClippedSubviews
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (!removeClippedSubviews && _removeClippedSubviews) {
|
|
|
|
[self react_remountAllSubviews];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_removeClippedSubviews = removeClippedSubviews;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)didUpdateReactSubviews
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (_removeClippedSubviews) {
|
|
|
|
[self updateClippedSubviews];
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
[super didUpdateReactSubviews];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)updateClippedSubviews
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Find a suitable view to use for clipping
|
|
|
|
UIView *clipView = [self react_findClipView];
|
|
|
|
if (clipView) {
|
|
|
|
[self react_updateClippedSubviewsWithClipRect:clipView.bounds relativeToView:clipView];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)layoutSubviews
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// TODO (#5906496): this a nasty performance drain, but necessary
|
|
|
|
// to prevent gaps appearing when the loading spinner disappears.
|
|
|
|
// We might be able to fix this another way by triggering a call
|
|
|
|
// to updateClippedSubviews manually after loading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[super layoutSubviews];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (_removeClippedSubviews) {
|
|
|
|
[self updateClippedSubviews];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma mark - Borders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (UIColor *)backgroundColor
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
return _backgroundColor;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
- (void)setBackgroundColor:(UIColor *)backgroundColor
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if ([_backgroundColor isEqual:backgroundColor]) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-26 09:12:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
_backgroundColor = backgroundColor;
|
|
|
|
[self.layer setNeedsDisplay];
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
- (UIEdgeInsets)bordersAsInsets
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
const CGFloat borderWidth = MAX(0, _borderWidth);
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return (UIEdgeInsets) {
|
|
|
|
_borderTopWidth >= 0 ? _borderTopWidth : borderWidth,
|
|
|
|
_borderLeftWidth >= 0 ? _borderLeftWidth : borderWidth,
|
|
|
|
_borderBottomWidth >= 0 ? _borderBottomWidth : borderWidth,
|
|
|
|
_borderRightWidth >= 0 ? _borderRightWidth : borderWidth,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
- (RCTCornerRadii)cornerRadii
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-01-07 17:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
// Get corner radii
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
const CGFloat radius = MAX(0, _borderRadius);
|
2016-01-07 17:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
const CGFloat topLeftRadius = _borderTopLeftRadius >= 0 ? _borderTopLeftRadius : radius;
|
|
|
|
const CGFloat topRightRadius = _borderTopRightRadius >= 0 ? _borderTopRightRadius : radius;
|
|
|
|
const CGFloat bottomLeftRadius = _borderBottomLeftRadius >= 0 ? _borderBottomLeftRadius : radius;
|
|
|
|
const CGFloat bottomRightRadius = _borderBottomRightRadius >= 0 ? _borderBottomRightRadius : radius;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get scale factors required to prevent radii from overlapping
|
|
|
|
const CGSize size = self.bounds.size;
|
2016-01-09 00:14:20 +00:00
|
|
|
const CGFloat topScaleFactor = RCTZeroIfNaN(MIN(1, size.width / (topLeftRadius + topRightRadius)));
|
|
|
|
const CGFloat bottomScaleFactor = RCTZeroIfNaN(MIN(1, size.width / (bottomLeftRadius + bottomRightRadius)));
|
|
|
|
const CGFloat rightScaleFactor = RCTZeroIfNaN(MIN(1, size.height / (topRightRadius + bottomRightRadius)));
|
|
|
|
const CGFloat leftScaleFactor = RCTZeroIfNaN(MIN(1, size.height / (topLeftRadius + bottomLeftRadius)));
|
2016-01-07 17:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Return scaled radii
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return (RCTCornerRadii){
|
2016-01-07 17:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
topLeftRadius * MIN(topScaleFactor, leftScaleFactor),
|
|
|
|
topRightRadius * MIN(topScaleFactor, rightScaleFactor),
|
|
|
|
bottomLeftRadius * MIN(bottomScaleFactor, leftScaleFactor),
|
|
|
|
bottomRightRadius * MIN(bottomScaleFactor, rightScaleFactor),
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
- (RCTBorderColors)borderColors
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return (RCTBorderColors){
|
|
|
|
_borderTopColor ?: _borderColor,
|
|
|
|
_borderLeftColor ?: _borderColor,
|
|
|
|
_borderBottomColor ?: _borderColor,
|
2015-07-14 11:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
_borderRightColor ?: _borderColor,
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-09 00:14:20 +00:00
|
|
|
- (void)reactSetFrame:(CGRect)frame
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// If frame is zero, or below the threshold where the border radii can
|
|
|
|
// be rendered as a stretchable image, we'll need to re-render.
|
|
|
|
// TODO: detect up-front if re-rendering is necessary
|
Improved shadow performance
Summary:
public
React Native currently exposes the iOS layer shadow properties more-or-less directly, however there are a number of problems with this:
1) Performance when using these properties is poor by default. That's because iOS calculates the shadow by getting the exact pixel mask of the view, including any tranlucent content, and all of its subviews, which is very CPU and GPU-intensive.
2) The iOS shadow properties do not match the syntax or semantics of the CSS box-shadow standard, and are unlikely to be possible to implement on Android.
3) We don't expose the `layer.shadowPath` property, which is crucial to getting good performance out of layer shadows.
This diff solves problem number 1) by implementing a default `shadowPath` that matches the view border for views with an opaque background. This improves the performance of shadows by optimizing for the common usage case. I've also reinstated background color propagation for views which have shadow props - this should help ensure that this best-case scenario occurs more often.
For views with an explicit transparent background, the shadow will continue to work as it did before ( `shadowPath` will be left unset, and the shadow will be derived exactly from the pixels of the view and its subviews). This is the worst-case path for performance, however, so you should avoid it unless absolutely necessary. **Support for this may be disabled by default in future, or dropped altogether.**
For translucent images, it is suggested that you bake the shadow into the image itself, or use another mechanism to pre-generate the shadow. For text shadows, you should use the textShadow properties, which work cross-platform and have much better performance.
Problem number 2) will be solved in a future diff, possibly by renaming the iOS shadowXXX properties to boxShadowXXX, and changing the syntax and semantics to match the CSS standards.
Problem number 3) is now mostly moot, since we generate the shadowPath automatically. In future, we may provide an iOS-specific prop to set the path explicitly if there's a demand for more precise control of the shadow.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D2827581
fb-gh-sync-id: 853aa018e1d61d5f88304c6fc1b78f9d7e739804
2016-01-14 22:03:31 +00:00
|
|
|
CGSize oldSize = self.bounds.size;
|
2016-01-09 00:14:20 +00:00
|
|
|
[super reactSetFrame:frame];
|
Improved shadow performance
Summary:
public
React Native currently exposes the iOS layer shadow properties more-or-less directly, however there are a number of problems with this:
1) Performance when using these properties is poor by default. That's because iOS calculates the shadow by getting the exact pixel mask of the view, including any tranlucent content, and all of its subviews, which is very CPU and GPU-intensive.
2) The iOS shadow properties do not match the syntax or semantics of the CSS box-shadow standard, and are unlikely to be possible to implement on Android.
3) We don't expose the `layer.shadowPath` property, which is crucial to getting good performance out of layer shadows.
This diff solves problem number 1) by implementing a default `shadowPath` that matches the view border for views with an opaque background. This improves the performance of shadows by optimizing for the common usage case. I've also reinstated background color propagation for views which have shadow props - this should help ensure that this best-case scenario occurs more often.
For views with an explicit transparent background, the shadow will continue to work as it did before ( `shadowPath` will be left unset, and the shadow will be derived exactly from the pixels of the view and its subviews). This is the worst-case path for performance, however, so you should avoid it unless absolutely necessary. **Support for this may be disabled by default in future, or dropped altogether.**
For translucent images, it is suggested that you bake the shadow into the image itself, or use another mechanism to pre-generate the shadow. For text shadows, you should use the textShadow properties, which work cross-platform and have much better performance.
Problem number 2) will be solved in a future diff, possibly by renaming the iOS shadowXXX properties to boxShadowXXX, and changing the syntax and semantics to match the CSS standards.
Problem number 3) is now mostly moot, since we generate the shadowPath automatically. In future, we may provide an iOS-specific prop to set the path explicitly if there's a demand for more precise control of the shadow.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D2827581
fb-gh-sync-id: 853aa018e1d61d5f88304c6fc1b78f9d7e739804
2016-01-14 22:03:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!CGSizeEqualToSize(self.bounds.size, oldSize)) {
|
|
|
|
[self.layer setNeedsDisplay];
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-01-09 00:14:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
- (void)displayLayer:(CALayer *)layer
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-01-07 17:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
if (CGSizeEqualToSize(layer.bounds.size, CGSizeZero)) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Improved shadow performance
Summary:
public
React Native currently exposes the iOS layer shadow properties more-or-less directly, however there are a number of problems with this:
1) Performance when using these properties is poor by default. That's because iOS calculates the shadow by getting the exact pixel mask of the view, including any tranlucent content, and all of its subviews, which is very CPU and GPU-intensive.
2) The iOS shadow properties do not match the syntax or semantics of the CSS box-shadow standard, and are unlikely to be possible to implement on Android.
3) We don't expose the `layer.shadowPath` property, which is crucial to getting good performance out of layer shadows.
This diff solves problem number 1) by implementing a default `shadowPath` that matches the view border for views with an opaque background. This improves the performance of shadows by optimizing for the common usage case. I've also reinstated background color propagation for views which have shadow props - this should help ensure that this best-case scenario occurs more often.
For views with an explicit transparent background, the shadow will continue to work as it did before ( `shadowPath` will be left unset, and the shadow will be derived exactly from the pixels of the view and its subviews). This is the worst-case path for performance, however, so you should avoid it unless absolutely necessary. **Support for this may be disabled by default in future, or dropped altogether.**
For translucent images, it is suggested that you bake the shadow into the image itself, or use another mechanism to pre-generate the shadow. For text shadows, you should use the textShadow properties, which work cross-platform and have much better performance.
Problem number 2) will be solved in a future diff, possibly by renaming the iOS shadowXXX properties to boxShadowXXX, and changing the syntax and semantics to match the CSS standards.
Problem number 3) is now mostly moot, since we generate the shadowPath automatically. In future, we may provide an iOS-specific prop to set the path explicitly if there's a demand for more precise control of the shadow.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D2827581
fb-gh-sync-id: 853aa018e1d61d5f88304c6fc1b78f9d7e739804
2016-01-14 22:03:31 +00:00
|
|
|
RCTUpdateShadowPathForView(self);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
const RCTCornerRadii cornerRadii = [self cornerRadii];
|
|
|
|
const UIEdgeInsets borderInsets = [self bordersAsInsets];
|
|
|
|
const RCTBorderColors borderColors = [self borderColors];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOOL useIOSBorderRendering =
|
|
|
|
!RCTRunningInTestEnvironment() &&
|
|
|
|
RCTCornerRadiiAreEqual(cornerRadii) &&
|
|
|
|
RCTBorderInsetsAreEqual(borderInsets) &&
|
2015-06-23 13:43:55 +00:00
|
|
|
RCTBorderColorsAreEqual(borderColors) &&
|
2015-12-01 15:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
_borderStyle == RCTBorderStyleSolid &&
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-23 13:43:55 +00:00
|
|
|
// iOS draws borders in front of the content whereas CSS draws them behind
|
|
|
|
// the content. For this reason, only use iOS border drawing when clipping
|
|
|
|
// or when the border is hidden.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-23 10:43:31 +00:00
|
|
|
(borderInsets.top == 0 || (borderColors.top && CGColorGetAlpha(borderColors.top) == 0) || self.clipsToBounds);
|
2015-06-23 13:43:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// iOS clips to the outside of the border, but CSS clips to the inside. To
|
|
|
|
// solve this, we'll need to add a container view inside the main view to
|
|
|
|
// correctly clip the subviews.
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (useIOSBorderRendering) {
|
|
|
|
layer.cornerRadius = cornerRadii.topLeft;
|
|
|
|
layer.borderColor = borderColors.left;
|
|
|
|
layer.borderWidth = borderInsets.left;
|
|
|
|
layer.backgroundColor = _backgroundColor.CGColor;
|
|
|
|
layer.contents = nil;
|
|
|
|
layer.needsDisplayOnBoundsChange = NO;
|
|
|
|
layer.mask = nil;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-22 16:30:00 +00:00
|
|
|
UIImage *image = RCTGetBorderImage(_borderStyle,
|
|
|
|
layer.bounds.size,
|
|
|
|
cornerRadii,
|
2015-12-01 15:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
borderInsets,
|
|
|
|
borderColors,
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
_backgroundColor.CGColor,
|
|
|
|
self.clipsToBounds);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-22 16:30:00 +00:00
|
|
|
layer.backgroundColor = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (image == nil) {
|
|
|
|
layer.contents = nil;
|
|
|
|
layer.needsDisplayOnBoundsChange = NO;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-30 13:20:28 +00:00
|
|
|
CGRect contentsCenter = ({
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
CGSize size = image.size;
|
|
|
|
UIEdgeInsets insets = image.capInsets;
|
|
|
|
CGRectMake(
|
|
|
|
insets.left / size.width,
|
|
|
|
insets.top / size.height,
|
|
|
|
1.0 / size.width,
|
|
|
|
1.0 / size.height
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
});
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
if (RCTRunningInTestEnvironment()) {
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
const CGSize size = self.bounds.size;
|
|
|
|
UIGraphicsBeginImageContextWithOptions(size, NO, image.scale);
|
|
|
|
[image drawInRect:(CGRect){CGPointZero, size}];
|
|
|
|
image = UIGraphicsGetImageFromCurrentImageContext();
|
|
|
|
UIGraphicsEndImageContext();
|
2015-07-30 13:20:28 +00:00
|
|
|
contentsCenter = CGRectMake(0, 0, 1, 1);
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
layer.contents = (id)image.CGImage;
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
layer.contentsScale = image.scale;
|
|
|
|
layer.needsDisplayOnBoundsChange = YES;
|
2015-12-22 16:30:00 +00:00
|
|
|
layer.magnificationFilter = kCAFilterNearest;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const BOOL isResizable = !UIEdgeInsetsEqualToEdgeInsets(image.capInsets, UIEdgeInsetsZero);
|
|
|
|
if (isResizable) {
|
|
|
|
layer.contentsCenter = contentsCenter;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
layer.contentsCenter = CGRectMake(0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 1.0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-26 09:12:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[self updateClippingForLayer:layer];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Improved shadow performance
Summary:
public
React Native currently exposes the iOS layer shadow properties more-or-less directly, however there are a number of problems with this:
1) Performance when using these properties is poor by default. That's because iOS calculates the shadow by getting the exact pixel mask of the view, including any tranlucent content, and all of its subviews, which is very CPU and GPU-intensive.
2) The iOS shadow properties do not match the syntax or semantics of the CSS box-shadow standard, and are unlikely to be possible to implement on Android.
3) We don't expose the `layer.shadowPath` property, which is crucial to getting good performance out of layer shadows.
This diff solves problem number 1) by implementing a default `shadowPath` that matches the view border for views with an opaque background. This improves the performance of shadows by optimizing for the common usage case. I've also reinstated background color propagation for views which have shadow props - this should help ensure that this best-case scenario occurs more often.
For views with an explicit transparent background, the shadow will continue to work as it did before ( `shadowPath` will be left unset, and the shadow will be derived exactly from the pixels of the view and its subviews). This is the worst-case path for performance, however, so you should avoid it unless absolutely necessary. **Support for this may be disabled by default in future, or dropped altogether.**
For translucent images, it is suggested that you bake the shadow into the image itself, or use another mechanism to pre-generate the shadow. For text shadows, you should use the textShadow properties, which work cross-platform and have much better performance.
Problem number 2) will be solved in a future diff, possibly by renaming the iOS shadowXXX properties to boxShadowXXX, and changing the syntax and semantics to match the CSS standards.
Problem number 3) is now mostly moot, since we generate the shadowPath automatically. In future, we may provide an iOS-specific prop to set the path explicitly if there's a demand for more precise control of the shadow.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D2827581
fb-gh-sync-id: 853aa018e1d61d5f88304c6fc1b78f9d7e739804
2016-01-14 22:03:31 +00:00
|
|
|
static BOOL RCTLayerHasShadow(CALayer *layer)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return layer.shadowOpacity * CGColorGetAlpha(layer.shadowColor) > 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (void)reactSetInheritedBackgroundColor:(UIColor *)inheritedBackgroundColor
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Inherit background color if a shadow has been set, as an optimization
|
|
|
|
if (RCTLayerHasShadow(self.layer)) {
|
|
|
|
self.backgroundColor = inheritedBackgroundColor;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void RCTUpdateShadowPathForView(RCTView *view)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (RCTLayerHasShadow(view.layer)) {
|
|
|
|
if (CGColorGetAlpha(view.backgroundColor.CGColor) > 0.999) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If view has a solid background color, calculate shadow path from border
|
|
|
|
const RCTCornerRadii cornerRadii = [view cornerRadii];
|
|
|
|
const RCTCornerInsets cornerInsets = RCTGetCornerInsets(cornerRadii, UIEdgeInsetsZero);
|
|
|
|
CGPathRef shadowPath = RCTPathCreateWithRoundedRect(view.bounds, cornerInsets, NULL);
|
|
|
|
view.layer.shadowPath = shadowPath;
|
|
|
|
CGPathRelease(shadowPath);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Can't accurately calculate box shadow, so fall back to pixel-based shadow
|
|
|
|
view.layer.shadowPath = nil;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-25 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
RCTLogAdvice(@"View #%@ of type %@ has a shadow set but cannot calculate "
|
|
|
|
"shadow efficiently. Consider setting a background color to "
|
|
|
|
"fix this, or apply the shadow to a more specific component.",
|
|
|
|
view.reactTag, [view class]);
|
Improved shadow performance
Summary:
public
React Native currently exposes the iOS layer shadow properties more-or-less directly, however there are a number of problems with this:
1) Performance when using these properties is poor by default. That's because iOS calculates the shadow by getting the exact pixel mask of the view, including any tranlucent content, and all of its subviews, which is very CPU and GPU-intensive.
2) The iOS shadow properties do not match the syntax or semantics of the CSS box-shadow standard, and are unlikely to be possible to implement on Android.
3) We don't expose the `layer.shadowPath` property, which is crucial to getting good performance out of layer shadows.
This diff solves problem number 1) by implementing a default `shadowPath` that matches the view border for views with an opaque background. This improves the performance of shadows by optimizing for the common usage case. I've also reinstated background color propagation for views which have shadow props - this should help ensure that this best-case scenario occurs more often.
For views with an explicit transparent background, the shadow will continue to work as it did before ( `shadowPath` will be left unset, and the shadow will be derived exactly from the pixels of the view and its subviews). This is the worst-case path for performance, however, so you should avoid it unless absolutely necessary. **Support for this may be disabled by default in future, or dropped altogether.**
For translucent images, it is suggested that you bake the shadow into the image itself, or use another mechanism to pre-generate the shadow. For text shadows, you should use the textShadow properties, which work cross-platform and have much better performance.
Problem number 2) will be solved in a future diff, possibly by renaming the iOS shadowXXX properties to boxShadowXXX, and changing the syntax and semantics to match the CSS standards.
Problem number 3) is now mostly moot, since we generate the shadowPath automatically. In future, we may provide an iOS-specific prop to set the path explicitly if there's a demand for more precise control of the shadow.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D2827581
fb-gh-sync-id: 853aa018e1d61d5f88304c6fc1b78f9d7e739804
2016-01-14 22:03:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-26 09:12:28 +00:00
|
|
|
- (void)updateClippingForLayer:(CALayer *)layer
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CALayer *mask = nil;
|
|
|
|
CGFloat cornerRadius = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (self.clipsToBounds) {
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
const RCTCornerRadii cornerRadii = [self cornerRadii];
|
|
|
|
if (RCTCornerRadiiAreEqual(cornerRadii)) {
|
2015-05-26 09:12:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 15:52:46 +00:00
|
|
|
cornerRadius = cornerRadii.topLeft;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAShapeLayer *shapeLayer = [CAShapeLayer layer];
|
|
|
|
CGPathRef path = RCTPathCreateWithRoundedRect(self.bounds, RCTGetCornerInsets(cornerRadii, UIEdgeInsetsZero), NULL);
|
|
|
|
shapeLayer.path = path;
|
|
|
|
CGPathRelease(path);
|
|
|
|
mask = shapeLayer;
|
2015-05-26 09:12:28 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
layer.cornerRadius = cornerRadius;
|
|
|
|
layer.mask = mask;
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma mark Border Color
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-14 11:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
#define setBorderColor(side) \
|
|
|
|
- (void)setBorder##side##Color:(CGColorRef)color \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
if (CGColorEqualToColor(_border##side##Color, color)) { \
|
|
|
|
return; \
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
CGColorRelease(_border##side##Color); \
|
|
|
|
_border##side##Color = CGColorRetain(color); \
|
|
|
|
[self.layer setNeedsDisplay]; \
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
setBorderColor()
|
|
|
|
setBorderColor(Top)
|
|
|
|
setBorderColor(Right)
|
|
|
|
setBorderColor(Bottom)
|
|
|
|
setBorderColor(Left)
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma mark - Border Width
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-14 11:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
#define setBorderWidth(side) \
|
|
|
|
- (void)setBorder##side##Width:(CGFloat)width \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
if (_border##side##Width == width) { \
|
|
|
|
return; \
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
_border##side##Width = width; \
|
|
|
|
[self.layer setNeedsDisplay]; \
|
2015-03-26 08:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
setBorderWidth()
|
|
|
|
setBorderWidth(Top)
|
|
|
|
setBorderWidth(Right)
|
|
|
|
setBorderWidth(Bottom)
|
|
|
|
setBorderWidth(Left)
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-01 15:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma mark - Border Radius
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-14 11:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
#define setBorderRadius(side) \
|
|
|
|
- (void)setBorder##side##Radius:(CGFloat)radius \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
if (_border##side##Radius == radius) { \
|
|
|
|
return; \
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
_border##side##Radius = radius; \
|
|
|
|
[self.layer setNeedsDisplay]; \
|
2015-05-13 15:22:21 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setBorderRadius()
|
|
|
|
setBorderRadius(TopLeft)
|
|
|
|
setBorderRadius(TopRight)
|
|
|
|
setBorderRadius(BottomLeft)
|
|
|
|
setBorderRadius(BottomRight)
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-01 15:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma mark - Border Style
|
|
|
|
|
Improved shadow performance
Summary:
public
React Native currently exposes the iOS layer shadow properties more-or-less directly, however there are a number of problems with this:
1) Performance when using these properties is poor by default. That's because iOS calculates the shadow by getting the exact pixel mask of the view, including any tranlucent content, and all of its subviews, which is very CPU and GPU-intensive.
2) The iOS shadow properties do not match the syntax or semantics of the CSS box-shadow standard, and are unlikely to be possible to implement on Android.
3) We don't expose the `layer.shadowPath` property, which is crucial to getting good performance out of layer shadows.
This diff solves problem number 1) by implementing a default `shadowPath` that matches the view border for views with an opaque background. This improves the performance of shadows by optimizing for the common usage case. I've also reinstated background color propagation for views which have shadow props - this should help ensure that this best-case scenario occurs more often.
For views with an explicit transparent background, the shadow will continue to work as it did before ( `shadowPath` will be left unset, and the shadow will be derived exactly from the pixels of the view and its subviews). This is the worst-case path for performance, however, so you should avoid it unless absolutely necessary. **Support for this may be disabled by default in future, or dropped altogether.**
For translucent images, it is suggested that you bake the shadow into the image itself, or use another mechanism to pre-generate the shadow. For text shadows, you should use the textShadow properties, which work cross-platform and have much better performance.
Problem number 2) will be solved in a future diff, possibly by renaming the iOS shadowXXX properties to boxShadowXXX, and changing the syntax and semantics to match the CSS standards.
Problem number 3) is now mostly moot, since we generate the shadowPath automatically. In future, we may provide an iOS-specific prop to set the path explicitly if there's a demand for more precise control of the shadow.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D2827581
fb-gh-sync-id: 853aa018e1d61d5f88304c6fc1b78f9d7e739804
2016-01-14 22:03:31 +00:00
|
|
|
#define setBorderStyle(side) \
|
2015-12-01 15:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
- (void)setBorder##side##Style:(RCTBorderStyle)style \
|
Improved shadow performance
Summary:
public
React Native currently exposes the iOS layer shadow properties more-or-less directly, however there are a number of problems with this:
1) Performance when using these properties is poor by default. That's because iOS calculates the shadow by getting the exact pixel mask of the view, including any tranlucent content, and all of its subviews, which is very CPU and GPU-intensive.
2) The iOS shadow properties do not match the syntax or semantics of the CSS box-shadow standard, and are unlikely to be possible to implement on Android.
3) We don't expose the `layer.shadowPath` property, which is crucial to getting good performance out of layer shadows.
This diff solves problem number 1) by implementing a default `shadowPath` that matches the view border for views with an opaque background. This improves the performance of shadows by optimizing for the common usage case. I've also reinstated background color propagation for views which have shadow props - this should help ensure that this best-case scenario occurs more often.
For views with an explicit transparent background, the shadow will continue to work as it did before ( `shadowPath` will be left unset, and the shadow will be derived exactly from the pixels of the view and its subviews). This is the worst-case path for performance, however, so you should avoid it unless absolutely necessary. **Support for this may be disabled by default in future, or dropped altogether.**
For translucent images, it is suggested that you bake the shadow into the image itself, or use another mechanism to pre-generate the shadow. For text shadows, you should use the textShadow properties, which work cross-platform and have much better performance.
Problem number 2) will be solved in a future diff, possibly by renaming the iOS shadowXXX properties to boxShadowXXX, and changing the syntax and semantics to match the CSS standards.
Problem number 3) is now mostly moot, since we generate the shadowPath automatically. In future, we may provide an iOS-specific prop to set the path explicitly if there's a demand for more precise control of the shadow.
Reviewed By: weicool
Differential Revision: D2827581
fb-gh-sync-id: 853aa018e1d61d5f88304c6fc1b78f9d7e739804
2016-01-14 22:03:31 +00:00
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
if (_border##side##Style == style) { \
|
|
|
|
return; \
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
_border##side##Style = style; \
|
|
|
|
[self.layer setNeedsDisplay]; \
|
2015-12-01 15:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setBorderStyle()
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-14 11:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
- (void)dealloc
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CGColorRelease(_borderColor);
|
|
|
|
CGColorRelease(_borderTopColor);
|
|
|
|
CGColorRelease(_borderRightColor);
|
|
|
|
CGColorRelease(_borderBottomColor);
|
|
|
|
CGColorRelease(_borderLeftColor);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 10:50:07 +00:00
|
|
|
@end
|