Fail if:
* we don't have any gateways configured
* we have gateways configured but with non-existing bridge configuration
* we have gateways configured without any configuration
GetChannelId will support names generated from query groups when a team is not set,
but not when a team is set since it falls through to getChannelIdTeam which has a different inner loop. i
This pull makes the two implementations do the same thing.
* initial work on native keybase bridging
* Hopefully make a functional keybase bridge
* add keybase to bridgemap
* send to right channel, try to figure out received msgs
* add account and userid
* i am a Dam Fool
* Fix formatting for messages, handle /me
* update vendors, ran golint and goimports
* move handlers to handlers.go, clean up unused config options
* add sample config, fix inconsistent remote nick handling
* Update readme with keybase links
* Resolve fixmie errors
* Error -> Errorf
* fix linting errors in go.mod and go.sum
* explicitly join channels, ignore messages from non-specified channels
* check that team names match before bridging message
This adds support for the discord category option that can be used
to group channels in. This means we can have multiple channels with
the same name.
We add the option to specify a category in the channel option of a
discord account under [[gateway]]
Besides channel="channel" or channel="ID:channelID", now also
channel="category/channel" can be specified.
This change remains backwards compatible with people that haven't
specified the category and incorporates the fix in #861
* Support webhook message deletions (discord)
Messages sent via webhook can now be deleted. It seems it can do this
without any special permissions.
This copies discordgo.WebhookExecute and makes it support the returning
of discordgo.Message.
A pull request has been sent upstream, so we should use that if
@bwmariin accepts the pull request:
https://github.com/bwmarrin/discordgo/pull/663
Changes in behaviour (webhook mode only):
- Previously messages *edited* on other platforms would just be
retransmitted as a brand new message to Discord.
- Message *edits* will now be ignored.
- Debug: message edits will now print out a "permission error".
In the future it may be good to send an "message edited" react to those
webhook messages, so at least people know that the message was edited on
other platforms. (Even though it can't actually show the new message.)
Alternatively, message edits could just send a brand new message with a
link back to the old one. This is a little ugly but it would ensure that
Discord users are able to see the edited message. These "message edit
notifications" would be sent from the bot user (not from a webhook), so
we could edit the "edit notification" if subsequent edits to the
original message are made.
Wim
Qais Patankar
Benjamin
Gonçalo Ribeiro
Michal Suchánek
David Buckley
MOZGIII
cori hudson