Jacek Sieka bab5e402df
Ignore subset aggregates (#2847)
* Ignore subset aggregates

When aggregates are propagated through the network, it is often the case
that a better aggregate has already been seen - in particular, this
happens when an aggregator has not been able to include itself in the
mesh and therefore publishes an aggregate with only its own
attestations.

This new ignore rule allows dropping all aggregates that are
(non-strict) subsets of aggregates that have already been seen on the
network. In particular, it does not mandate dropping aggregates where a
union of previous aggregates would cause it to become a subset).

The logic for allowing this is based on the premise that any aggregate
that has already been seen by a peer will also have been seen by its
neighbours - a subset aggregate (strict or not) brings no new value to
the aggregation algorithm, except in the extreme edge case where you
could combine several such sparse aggregates into a single, more dense
"combined" aggregate and thus use less block space.

Further, as a small benefit, computing the `hash_tree_root` of the full
aggregate is generally not done -however, `hash_tree_root(data)` is
already done for other purposes as this is used as index in the beacon
API.

* add subset ignore rule to sync contributions as well

* typo
2022-05-17 07:05:22 -06:00
2021-12-27 18:30:12 +08:00
2021-12-27 18:30:12 +08:00
2022-05-17 07:05:22 -06:00
2021-05-28 18:13:22 -07:00
2021-12-27 18:30:12 +08:00
2019-03-12 11:59:08 +00:00
2020-06-18 14:36:14 +08:00
2022-01-11 20:34:06 -08:00
2021-08-30 16:29:41 -06:00
2022-05-14 19:47:46 +02:00

Ethereum Proof-of-Stake Consensus Specifications

Join the chat at https://discord.gg/qGpsxSA Join the chat at https://gitter.im/ethereum/sharding

To learn more about proof-of-stake and sharding, see the PoS FAQ, sharding FAQ and the research compendium.

This repository hosts the current Ethereum proof-of-stake specifications. Discussions about design rationale and proposed changes can be brought up and discussed as issues. Solidified, agreed-upon changes to the spec can be made through pull requests.

Specs

GitHub release PyPI version

Core specifications for Ethereum proof-of-stake clients can be found in specs. These are divided into features. Features are researched and developed in parallel, and then consolidated into sequential upgrades when ready.

The current features are:

Phase 0

Altair

Bellatrix (also known as The Merge)

The Bellatrix protocol upgrade is still actively in development. The exact specification has not been formally accepted as final and details are still subject to change.

Sharding

Sharding follows Bellatrix, and is divided into three parts:

Accompanying documents can be found in specs and include:

Additional specifications for client implementers

Additional specifications and standards outside of requisite client functionality can be found in the following repos:

Design goals

The following are the broad design goals for the Ethereum proof-of-stake consensus specifications:

  • to minimize complexity, even at the cost of some losses in efficiency
  • to remain live through major network partitions and when very large portions of nodes go offline
  • to select all components such that they are either quantum secure or can be easily swapped out for quantum secure counterparts when available
  • to utilize crypto and design techniques that allow for a large participation of validators in total and per unit time
  • to allow for a typical consumer laptop with O(C) resources to process/validate O(1) shards (including any system level validation such as the beacon chain)

Useful external resources

For spec contributors

Documentation on the different components used during spec writing can be found here:

Consensus spec tests

Conformance tests built from the executable python spec are available in the Ethereum Proof-of-Stake Consensus Spec Tests repo. Compressed tarballs are available in releases.

Description
Ethereum 2.0 Specifications
Readme CC0-1.0
Languages
Python 98%
Makefile 2%