88d8f80957
Fix two bugs: 1) The participant reward (previously known as "inclusion reward") should not be proportional to `effective_balance` because a sync committee member is already chosen with probability proportional to the effective balance. Credit to @vbuterin. 2) The participant reward (previously known as "inclusion reward") was too large by a factor of `len(participant_indices)`, not taking into account the `for` loop. Fixing these two bugs actually makes the code significantly simpler and cleaner :) @barnabemonnot: Could you check the logic? :) If confirmed happy to update the tests. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| altair | ||
| custody_game | ||
| das | ||
| merge | ||
| phase0 | ||
| sharding | ||