kevaundray 6efab19ad0
chore: Refactor cell recovery code (#3781)
* multi:

- Remove shift_polynomial_coeff
- Remove recover_shifted_data
- Remove recover_original_data
- Move `zero_poly_eval_brp ` under sanity check comment as its only used for sanity checking

* chore: remove sanity check -- this was doing a wasteful `compute_root_of_unity` operation

* chore: add previous sanity check as a unit test

* chore: copy values python was taking a reference, so it passes in our regular codepaths but not in isolated test

* chore: add coset_fft test

* Update specs/_features/eip7594/polynomial-commitments-sampling.md

Co-authored-by: Justin Traglia <95511699+jtraglia@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update specs/_features/eip7594/polynomial-commitments-sampling.md

Co-authored-by: Justin Traglia <95511699+jtraglia@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: linter

* chore: asn (switch to bls_modular_inverse)

* chore: (ben) rename func to test_construct_vanishing_polynomial

* chore: (ben) rename `extended_evaluations_coeffs` to `extended_evaluation_times_zero_coeffs`

* chore: compute `roots_of_unity_extended` in recover_data method

* chore: add more comments explaining whats happening in recover_data

* chore: compute_zero_poly_coeff in recover_data

* chore: make lint

* chore: add doc comment to coset_fft_field

* chore: (ben) add code to generate the vanishing polynomial when all cells are missing

* chore: remove handling of edge case when constructing a vanishing polynomial

* chore: rename H(x) to Q_3(x)

* chore: remove trailing whitespace

* chore: add whitespace between comments

* chore: (asn) add assert that num missing cells is not 0

* chore: (justin) address comments

* chore: merge resolution

* chore: fixup remaining IDs -> indices

* chore: use indice nomenclature in tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Justin Traglia <95511699+jtraglia@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-06-11 20:26:19 +03:00
2024-05-21 22:54:25 +02:00
2024-05-21 22:54:25 +02:00
2024-05-21 22:54:25 +02:00
2024-06-05 00:42:37 +08:00
2024-05-28 16:24:11 +08:00
2024-05-28 16:24:11 +08:00
2019-03-12 11:59:08 +00:00
2022-11-28 20:01:50 +08:00
2024-05-28 16:24:11 +08:00
2024-05-21 22:54:25 +02:00
2024-05-21 22:54:25 +02:00
2024-05-28 16:24:11 +08:00

Ethereum Proof-of-Stake Consensus Specifications

Join the chat at https://discord.gg/qGpsxSA

To learn more about proof-of-stake and sharding, see the PoS documentation, sharding documentation and the research compendium.

This repository hosts the current Ethereum proof-of-stake specifications. Discussions about design rationale and proposed changes can be brought up and discussed as issues. Solidified, agreed-upon changes to the spec can be made through pull requests.

Specs

GitHub release PyPI version

Core specifications for Ethereum proof-of-stake clients can be found in specs. These are divided into features. Features are researched and developed in parallel, and then consolidated into sequential upgrades when ready.

Stable Specifications

Seq. Code Name Fork Epoch Specs
0 Phase0 0
1 Altair 74240
2 Bellatrix
("The Merge")
144896
3 Capella 194048
4 Deneb 269568

In-development Specifications

Code Name or Topic Specs Notes
Electra
Sharding (outdated)
Custody Game (outdated) Dependent on sharding
Data Availability Sampling (outdated)

Accompanying documents can be found in specs and include:

Additional specifications for client implementers

Additional specifications and standards outside of requisite client functionality can be found in the following repos:

Design goals

The following are the broad design goals for the Ethereum proof-of-stake consensus specifications:

  • to minimize complexity, even at the cost of some losses in efficiency
  • to remain live through major network partitions and when very large portions of nodes go offline
  • to select all components such that they are either quantum secure or can be easily swapped out for quantum secure counterparts when available
  • to utilize crypto and design techniques that allow for a large participation of validators in total and per unit time
  • to allow for a typical consumer laptop with O(C) resources to process/validate O(1) shards (including any system level validation such as the beacon chain)

Useful external resources

For spec contributors

Documentation on the different components used during spec writing can be found here:

Online viewer of the latest release (latest master branch)

Ethereum Consensus Specs

Consensus spec tests

Conformance tests built from the executable python spec are available in the Ethereum Proof-of-Stake Consensus Spec Tests repo. Compressed tarballs are available in releases.

Description
Ethereum 2.0 Specifications
Readme CC0-1.0
Languages
Python 98%
Makefile 2%