Apply naming suggestion from @djrtwo
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f4adfde9d
commit
fbb13f0cf0
|
@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ def test_success_exit_and_bls_change(spec, state):
|
|||
|
||||
@with_phases([CAPELLA])
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_invalid_double_bls_changes_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
def test_invalid_duplicate_bls_changes_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
index = 0
|
||||
signed_address_change = get_signed_address_change(spec, state, validator_index=index)
|
||||
yield 'pre', state
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ def test_proposer_slashing(spec, state):
|
|||
|
||||
@with_all_phases
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_invalid_double_same_proposer_slashings_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
def test_invalid_duplicate_proposer_slashings_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
proposer_slashing = get_valid_proposer_slashing(spec, state, signed_1=True, signed_2=True)
|
||||
slashed_index = proposer_slashing.signed_header_1.message.proposer_index
|
||||
assert not state.validators[slashed_index].slashed
|
||||
|
@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ def test_invalid_double_same_proposer_slashings_same_block(spec, state):
|
|||
|
||||
@with_all_phases
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_invalid_double_similar_proposer_slashings_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
def test_invalid_similar_proposer_slashings_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
slashed_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, spec.get_current_epoch(state))[-1]
|
||||
|
||||
# Same validator, but different slashable offences in the same block
|
||||
|
@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ def test_attester_slashing(spec, state):
|
|||
|
||||
@with_all_phases
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_invalid_double_same_attester_slashing_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
def test_invalid_duplicate_attester_slashing_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
if spec.MAX_ATTESTER_SLASHINGS < 2:
|
||||
return dump_skipping_message("Skip test if config cannot handle multiple AttesterSlashings per block")
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ def test_deposit_in_block(spec, state):
|
|||
|
||||
@with_all_phases
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_invalid_double_same_deposit_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
def test_invalid_duplicate_deposit_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
validator_index = len(state.validators)
|
||||
amount = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
|
||||
deposit = prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount, signed=True)
|
||||
|
@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ def test_attestation(spec, state):
|
|||
|
||||
@with_all_phases
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_double_same_attestation_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
def test_duplicate_attestation_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
next_epoch(spec, state)
|
||||
|
||||
yield 'pre', state
|
||||
|
@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ def test_voluntary_exit(spec, state):
|
|||
|
||||
@with_all_phases
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_invalid_double_validator_exit_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
def test_invalid_duplicate_validator_exit_same_block(spec, state):
|
||||
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, spec.get_current_epoch(state))[-1]
|
||||
|
||||
# move state forward SHARD_COMMITTEE_PERIOD epochs to allow for exit
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue