status-im
/
eth2.0-specs
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/eth2.0-specs.git
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

int128 -> int64

This commit is contained in:
vbuterin 2018-11-16 12:20:59 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 57c2deefbb
commit eb24f9482d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
specs/core/0_beacon-chain.md
View File

@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ For each `SpecialRecord` `obj` in `state.pending_specials`:
* **[covers `LOGOUT`]**: If `obj.kind == LOGOUT`, interpret `data[0]` as a `uint24` and `data[1]` as a `hash32`, where `validator_index = data[0]` and `signature = data[1]`. If `BLSVerify(pubkey=validators[validator_index].pubkey, msg=hash(LOGOUT_MESSAGE + bytes8(fork_version)), sig=signature)`, where `fork_version = pre_fork_version if slot < fork_slot_number else post_fork_version`, and `validators[validator_index].status == ACTIVE`, run `exit_validator(validator_index, state, penalize=False, current_slot=block.slot)`
* **[covers `NO_DBL_VOTE`, `NO_SURROUND`, `NO_DBL_PROPOSE` slashing conditions]:** If `obj.kind == CASPER_SLASHING`, interpret `data[0]` as a list of concatenated `uint32` values where each value represents an index into `validators`, `data[1]` as the data being signed and `data[2]` as an aggregate signature. Interpret `data[3:6]` similarly. Verify that both signatures are valid, that the two signatures are signing distinct data, and that they are either signing the same slot number, or that one surrounds the other (ie. `source1 < source2 < target2 < target1`). Let `indices` be the list of indices in both signatures; verify that its length is at least 1. For each validator index `v` in `indices`, if its `status` does not equal `PENALIZED`, then run `exit_validator(v, state, penalize=True, current_slot=block.slot)`
* **[covers `RANDAO_CHANGE`]**: If `obj.kind == RANDAO_CHANGE`, interpret `data[0]` as a `uint24`, `data[1]` as a `hash32`, and `data[2]` as a `uint64`, where `proposer_index = data[0]`, `randao_commitment = data[1]`, and `randao_last_change = data[2]`. Set `validators[proposer_index].randao_commitment = randao_commitment`, and set `validators[proposer_index].randao_last_change = randao_last_change`.
* **[covers `DEPOSIT_PROOF`]**: If `obj.kind == DEPOSIT_PROOF`, interpret `data[0]` as a Merkle branch from a deposit object to the `known_pow_receipt_root` (hashes in order lower to higher, concatenated), `data[1]` as being the `int128` index in the tree, and `data[2]` as being the deposit object itself, having the format `concat(data, as_bytes32(msg.value), as_bytes32(timestamp)` where `data` itself is a `DepositParams`. Verify the Merkle branch. Verify that `msg.value == DEPOSIT_SIZE` and `block.slot - (timestamp - state.genesis_time) // SLOT_DURATION < DELETION_PERIOD`. Run `add_validator(validators, data.pubkey, data.proof_of_possession, data.withdrawal_shard, data.withdrawal_address, data.randao_commitment, PENDING_ACTIVATION, block.slot)`.
* **[covers `DEPOSIT_PROOF`]**: If `obj.kind == DEPOSIT_PROOF`, interpret `data[0]` as a Merkle branch from a deposit object to the `known_pow_receipt_root` (hashes in order lower to higher, concatenated), `data[1]` as being the `int64` index in the tree, and `data[2]` as being the deposit object itself, having the format `concat(data, as_bytes32(msg.value), as_bytes32(timestamp)` where `data` itself is a `DepositParams`. Verify the Merkle branch. Verify that `msg.value == DEPOSIT_SIZE` and `block.slot - (timestamp - state.genesis_time) // SLOT_DURATION < DELETION_PERIOD`. Run `add_validator(validators, data.pubkey, data.proof_of_possession, data.withdrawal_shard, data.withdrawal_address, data.randao_commitment, PENDING_ACTIVATION, block.slot)`.
#### Finally...