Merge pull request #520 from ethereum/next-epoch-shuffling
helpers and notes for shuffling lookahead
This commit is contained in:
commit
e400c28372
|
@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
|
|||
- [`get_shuffling`](#get_shuffling)
|
||||
- [`get_previous_epoch_committee_count`](#get_previous_epoch_committee_count)
|
||||
- [`get_current_epoch_committee_count`](#get_current_epoch_committee_count)
|
||||
- [`get_next_epoch_committee_count`](#get_next_epoch_committee_count)
|
||||
- [`get_crosslink_committees_at_slot`](#get_crosslink_committees_at_slot)
|
||||
- [`get_block_root`](#get_block_root)
|
||||
- [`get_randao_mix`](#get_randao_mix)
|
||||
|
@ -72,6 +73,7 @@
|
|||
- [`get_beacon_proposer_index`](#get_beacon_proposer_index)
|
||||
- [`merkle_root`](#merkle_root)
|
||||
- [`get_attestation_participants`](#get_attestation_participants)
|
||||
- [`is_power_of_two`](#is_power_of_two)
|
||||
- [`int_to_bytes1`, `int_to_bytes2`, ...](#int_to_bytes1-int_to_bytes2-)
|
||||
- [`get_effective_balance`](#get_effective_balance)
|
||||
- [`get_fork_version`](#get_fork_version)
|
||||
|
@ -815,31 +817,61 @@ def get_current_epoch_committee_count(state: BeaconState) -> int:
|
|||
return get_epoch_committee_count(len(current_active_validators))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `get_next_epoch_committee_count`
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def get_next_epoch_committee_count(state: BeaconState) -> int:
|
||||
next_active_validators = get_active_validator_indices(
|
||||
state.validator_registry,
|
||||
get_current_epoch(state) + 1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return get_epoch_committee_count(len(next_active_validators))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `get_crosslink_committees_at_slot`
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state: BeaconState,
|
||||
slot: SlotNumber) -> List[Tuple[List[ValidatorIndex], ShardNumber]]:
|
||||
slot: SlotNumber,
|
||||
registry_change=False: bool) -> List[Tuple[List[ValidatorIndex], ShardNumber]]:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Return the list of ``(committee, shard)`` tuples for the ``slot``.
|
||||
|
||||
Note: There are two possible shufflings for crosslink committees for a
|
||||
``slot`` in the next epoch -- with and without a `registry_change`
|
||||
"""
|
||||
epoch = slot_to_epoch(slot)
|
||||
current_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
|
||||
previous_epoch = current_epoch - 1 if current_epoch > GENESIS_EPOCH else current_epoch
|
||||
next_epoch = current_epoch + 1
|
||||
|
||||
assert previous_epoch <= epoch < next_epoch
|
||||
assert previous_epoch <= epoch <= next_epoch
|
||||
|
||||
if epoch < current_epoch:
|
||||
if epoch == previous_epoch:
|
||||
committees_per_epoch = get_previous_epoch_committee_count(state)
|
||||
seed = state.previous_epoch_seed
|
||||
shuffling_epoch = state.previous_calculation_epoch
|
||||
shuffling_start_shard = state.previous_epoch_start_shard
|
||||
else:
|
||||
elif epoch == current_epoch:
|
||||
committees_per_epoch = get_current_epoch_committee_count(state)
|
||||
seed = state.current_epoch_seed
|
||||
shuffling_epoch = state.current_calculation_epoch
|
||||
shuffling_start_shard = state.current_epoch_start_shard
|
||||
elif epoch == next_epoch:
|
||||
current_committees_per_epoch = get_current_epoch_committee_count(state)
|
||||
committees_per_epoch = get_next_epoch_committee_count(state)
|
||||
shuffling_epoch = next_epoch
|
||||
|
||||
epochs_since_last_registry_update = current_epoch - state.validator_registry_update_epoch
|
||||
if registry_change:
|
||||
seed = generate_seed(state, next_epoch)
|
||||
shuffling_start_shard = (state.current_epoch_start_shard + current_committees_per_epoch) % SHARD_COUNT
|
||||
elif epochs_since_last_registry_update > 1 and is_power_of_two(epochs_since_last_registry_update):
|
||||
seed = generate_seed(state, next_epoch)
|
||||
shuffling_start_shard = state.current_epoch_start_shard
|
||||
else:
|
||||
seed = state.current_epoch_seed
|
||||
shuffling_start_shard = state.current_epoch_start_shard
|
||||
|
||||
shuffling = get_shuffling(
|
||||
seed,
|
||||
|
@ -896,7 +928,7 @@ def get_active_index_root(state: BeaconState,
|
|||
"""
|
||||
Return the index root at a recent ``epoch``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
assert get_current_epoch(state) - LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH < epoch <= get_current_epoch(state)
|
||||
assert get_current_epoch(state) - LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY < epoch <= get_current_epoch(state) + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY
|
||||
return state.latest_index_roots[epoch % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -966,6 +998,19 @@ def get_attestation_participants(state: BeaconState,
|
|||
return participants
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `is_power_of_two`
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
def is_power_of_two(value: int) -> bool:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Check if ``value`` is a power of two integer.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if value == 0:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return 2**int(math.log2(value)) == value
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `int_to_bytes1`, `int_to_bytes2`, ...
|
||||
|
||||
`int_to_bytes1(x): return x.to_bytes(1, 'big')`, `int_to_bytes2(x): return x.to_bytes(2, 'big')`, and so on for all integers, particularly 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 32, 48, 96.
|
||||
|
@ -1507,7 +1552,9 @@ def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
|
|||
if get_effective_balance(state, validator_index) >= MAX_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT:
|
||||
activate_validator(state, validator_index, is_genesis=True)
|
||||
|
||||
state.latest_index_roots[GENESIS_EPOCH % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH] = hash_tree_root(get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, GENESIS_EPOCH))
|
||||
genesis_active_index_root = hash_tree_root(get_active_validator_indices(state, GENESIS_EPOCH))
|
||||
for index in range(LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH):
|
||||
state.latest_index_roots[index] = genesis_active_index_root
|
||||
state.current_epoch_seed = generate_seed(state, GENESIS_EPOCH)
|
||||
|
||||
return state
|
||||
|
@ -1933,7 +1980,6 @@ First, update the following:
|
|||
* Set `state.previous_calculation_epoch = state.current_calculation_epoch`.
|
||||
* Set `state.previous_epoch_start_shard = state.current_epoch_start_shard`.
|
||||
* Set `state.previous_epoch_seed = state.current_epoch_seed`.
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_index_roots[next_epoch % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH] = hash_tree_root(get_active_validator_indices(state, next_epoch))`.
|
||||
|
||||
If the following are satisfied:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1996,7 +2042,7 @@ and perform the following updates:
|
|||
If a validator registry update does _not_ happen do the following:
|
||||
|
||||
* Let `epochs_since_last_registry_update = current_epoch - state.validator_registry_update_epoch`.
|
||||
* If `epochs_since_last_registry_update` is an exact power of 2:
|
||||
* If `epochs_since_last_registry_update > 1` and `is_power_of_two(epochs_since_last_registry_update)`:
|
||||
* Set `state.current_calculation_epoch = next_epoch`.
|
||||
* Set `state.current_epoch_seed = generate_seed(state, state.current_calculation_epoch)`
|
||||
* _Note_ that `state.current_epoch_start_shard` is left unchanged.
|
||||
|
@ -2048,6 +2094,7 @@ def process_penalties_and_exits(state: BeaconState) -> None:
|
|||
|
||||
#### Final updates
|
||||
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_index_roots[(next_epoch + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY) % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH] = hash_tree_root(get_active_validator_indices(state, next_epoch + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY))`.
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_penalized_balances[(next_epoch) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH] = state.latest_penalized_balances[current_epoch % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH]`.
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_randao_mixes[next_epoch % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = get_randao_mix(state, current_epoch)`.
|
||||
* Remove any `attestation` in `state.latest_attestations` such that `slot_to_epoch(attestation.data.slot) < current_epoch`.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ __NOTICE__: This document is a work-in-progress for researchers and implementers
|
|||
- [Aggregation bitfield](#aggregation-bitfield)
|
||||
- [Custody bitfield](#custody-bitfield)
|
||||
- [Aggregate signature](#aggregate-signature)
|
||||
- [Responsibility lookahead](#responsibility-lookahead)
|
||||
- [How to avoid slashing](#how-to-avoid-slashing)
|
||||
- [Proposer slashing](#proposer-slashing)
|
||||
- [Attester slashing](#attester-slashing)
|
||||
|
@ -329,6 +330,39 @@ signed_attestation_data = bls_sign(
|
|||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Responsibility lookahead
|
||||
|
||||
The beacon chain shufflings are designed to provide a minimum of 1 epoch lookahead on the validator's upcoming responsibilities of proposing and attesting dictated by the shuffling and slot.
|
||||
|
||||
There are three possibilities for the shuffling at the next epoch:
|
||||
1. The shuffling changes due to a "validator registry change".
|
||||
2. The shuffling changes due to `epochs_since_last_registry_update` being an exact power of 2 greater than 1.
|
||||
3. The shuffling remains the same (i.e. the validator is in the same shard committee).
|
||||
|
||||
Either (2) or (3) occurs if (1) fails. The choice between (2) and (3) is deterministic based upon `epochs_since_last_registry_update`.
|
||||
|
||||
`get_crosslink_committees_at_slot` is designed to be able to query slots in the next epoch. When querying slots in the next epoch there are two options -- with and without a `registry_change` -- which is the optional third parameter of the function. The following helper can be used to get the potential crosslink committees in the next epoch for a given `validator_index`. This function returns a list of 2 shard committee tuples.
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def get_next_epoch_crosslink_committees(state: BeaconState,
|
||||
validator_index: ValidatorIndex) -> List[Tuple[ValidatorIndex], ShardNumber]:
|
||||
current_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
|
||||
next_epoch = current_epoch + 1
|
||||
next_epoch_start_slot = get_epoch_start_slot(next_epoch)
|
||||
potential_committees = []
|
||||
for validator_registry in [False, True]:
|
||||
for slot in range(next_epoch_start_slot, next_epoch_start_slot + EPOCH_LENGTH):
|
||||
shard_committees = get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state, slot, validator_registry)
|
||||
selected_committees = [committee for committee in shard_committees if validator_index in committee[0]]
|
||||
if len(selected_committees) > 0:
|
||||
potential_assignments.append(selected_committees)
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
return potential_assignments
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`get_next_epoch_crosslink_committees` should be called at the beginning of each epoch to plan for the next epoch. A validator should always plan for both values of `registry_change` as a possibility unless the validator can concretely eliminate one of the options. Planning for a future shuffling involves noting at which slot one might have to attest and propose and also which shard one should begin syncing (in phase 1+).
|
||||
|
||||
## How to avoid slashing
|
||||
|
||||
"Slashing" is the burning of some amount of validator funds and immediate ejection from the active validator set. In Phase 0, there are two ways in which funds can be slashed -- [proposer slashing](#proposer-slashing) and [attester slashing](#attester-slashing). Although being slashed has serious repercussions, it is simple enough to avoid being slashed all together by remaining _consistent_ with respect to the messages a validator has previously signed.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue