Rename `LATEST_BLOCK_ROOT_COUNT` -> `LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH`

This commit is contained in:
Hsiao-Wei Wang 2018-12-13 13:55:34 +08:00
parent 9eeb863ec6
commit d5a5e1815c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 95B070122902DEA4
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
| `BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER` | `2**64 - 1` | - | | `BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER` | `2**64 - 1` | - |
| `BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX_BYTE` | `0x00` | - | | `BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX_BYTE` | `0x00` | - |
| `MAX_CASPER_VOTES` | `2**10` (= 1,024) | votes | | `MAX_CASPER_VOTES` | `2**10` (= 1,024) | votes |
| `LATEST_BLOCK_ROOT_COUNT` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | block roots | | `LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | block roots |
* For the safety of crosslinks a minimum committee size of 111 is [recommended](https://vitalik.ca/files/Ithaca201807_Sharding.pdf). (Unbiasable randomness with a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) will improve committee robustness and lower the safe minimum committee size.) The shuffling algorithm generally ensures (assuming sufficient validators) committee sizes at least `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE // 2`. * For the safety of crosslinks a minimum committee size of 111 is [recommended](https://vitalik.ca/files/Ithaca201807_Sharding.pdf). (Unbiasable randomness with a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) will improve committee robustness and lower the safe minimum committee size.) The shuffling algorithm generally ensures (assuming sufficient validators) committee sizes at least `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE // 2`.
@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ def on_startup(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
# Recent state # Recent state
latest_crosslinks=[CrosslinkRecord(slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER, shard_block_root=ZERO_HASH) for _ in range(SHARD_COUNT)], latest_crosslinks=[CrosslinkRecord(slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER, shard_block_root=ZERO_HASH) for _ in range(SHARD_COUNT)],
latest_block_roots=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_BLOCK_ROOT_COUNT)], latest_block_roots=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH)],
latest_penalized_exit_balances=[], latest_penalized_exit_balances=[],
latest_attestations=[], latest_attestations=[],
batched_block_roots=[] batched_block_roots=[]
@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ Below are the processing steps that happen at every slot.
* Let `previous_block_root` be the `tree_hash_root` of the previous beacon block processed in the chain. * Let `previous_block_root` be the `tree_hash_root` of the previous beacon block processed in the chain.
* Set `state.latest_block_roots = state.latest_block_roots[1:] + [previous_block_root]`. * Set `state.latest_block_roots = state.latest_block_roots[1:] + [previous_block_root]`.
* If `state.slot % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOT_COUNT == 0` append `merkle_root(state.latest_block_roots)` to `state.batched_block_roots`. * If `state.slot % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH == 0` append `merkle_root(state.latest_block_roots)` to `state.batched_block_roots`.
## Per-block processing ## Per-block processing