sharding p2p code review fixes

Co-authored-by: Danny Ryan <dannyjryan@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Diederik Loerakker 2021-08-10 13:48:26 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent fc3e651817
commit d005fee67d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 14 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ on the horizontal subnet or creating samples for it. Alias `blob = signed_blob.m
- _[REJECT]_ The shard blob is for the correct subnet --
i.e. `compute_subnet_for_shard_blob(state, blob.slot, blob.shard) == subnet_id`
- _[IGNORE]_ The blob is the first blob with valid signature received for the `(blob.proposer_index, blob.slot, blob.shard)` combination.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob is not too large, the data MUST NOT be larger than the SSZ list-limit, and a client MAY be more strict.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob is not too large -- the data MUST NOT be larger than the SSZ list-limit, and a client MAY apply stricter bounds.
- _[REJECT]_ The `blob.body.data` MUST NOT contain any point `p >= MODULUS`. Although it is a `uint256`, not the full 256 bit range is valid.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob builder exists and has sufficient balance to back the fee payment.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob signature is valid for the aggregate of proposer and builder, `signed_blob.signature`,
- _[REJECT]_ The blob builder defined by `blob.builder_index` exists and has sufficient balance to back the fee payment.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob signature, `signed_blob.signature`, is valid for the aggregate of proposer and builder --
i.e. `bls.FastAggregateVerify([builder_pubkey, proposer_pubkey], blob_signing_root, signed_blob.signature)`.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob is proposed by the expected `proposer_index` for the blob's `slot` and `shard`,
in the context of the current shuffling (defined by `blob.body.beacon_block_root`/`slot`).
@ -104,17 +104,17 @@ on the horizontal subnet or creating samples for it. Alias `blob = signed_blob.m
There are three additional global topics for Sharding.
- `shard_blob_header`: co-signed headers, to be included on-chain, and signaling builders to publish full data.
- `shard_blob_header`: co-signed headers to be included on-chain and to serve as a signal to the builder to publish full data.
- `shard_blob_tx`: builder-signed headers, also known as "data transaction".
- `shard_proposer_slashing`: slashings of duplicate shard proposals
- `shard_proposer_slashing`: slashings of duplicate shard proposals.
##### `shard_blob_header`
Shard header data, in the form of a `SignedShardBlobHeader` is published to the global `shard_blob_header` subnet.
Shard blob headers select shard blob bids by builders,
Shard blob headers select shard blob bids by builders
and should be timely to ensure builders can publish the full shard blob before subsequent attestations.
The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `signed_blob_header` on the network. Alias `header = signed_blob_header.message`
The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `signed_blob_header` on the network. Alias `header = signed_blob_header.message`.
- _[IGNORE]_ The `header` is not from a future slot (with a `MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY` allowance) --
i.e. validate that `header.slot <= current_slot`
@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `signed_blob_header` o
- _[REJECT]_ The `header.shard` MUST have a committee at the `header.slot` --
i.e. validate that `compute_committee_index_from_shard(state, header.slot, header.shard)` doesn't raise an error
- _[IGNORE]_ The header is the first header with valid signature received for the `(header.proposer_index, header.slot, header.shard)` combination.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob builder exists and has sufficient balance to back the fee payment.
- _[REJECT]_ The header signature is valid for the aggregate of proposer and builder, `signed_blob_header.signature`,
- _[REJECT]_ The blob builder defined by `blob.builder_index` exists and has sufficient balance to back the fee payment.
- _[REJECT]_ The header signature, `signed_blob_header.signature`, is valid for the aggregate of proposer and builder --
i.e. `bls.FastAggregateVerify([builder_pubkey, proposer_pubkey], blob_signing_root, signed_blob_header.signature)`.
- _[REJECT]_ The header is proposed by the expected `proposer_index` for the blob's `header.slot` and `header.shard`
in the context of the current shuffling (defined by `header.body_summary.beacon_block_root`/`slot`).
@ -137,12 +137,12 @@ The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `signed_blob_header` o
##### `shard_blob_tx`
Shard data-transactions, in the form of a `SignedShardBlobHeader` is published to the global `shard_blob_tx` subnet.
Shard data-transactions in the form of a `SignedShardBlobHeader` are published to the global `shard_blob_tx` subnet.
These shard blob headers are signed solely by the blob-builder.
The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `signed_blob_header` on the network. Alias `header = signed_blob_header.message`
The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `signed_blob_header` on the network. Alias `header = signed_blob_header.message`.
- _[IGNORE]_ The `header` is not from a future slot (with a `MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY` allowance) --
- _[IGNORE]_ The header is not from a future slot (with a `MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY` allowance) --
i.e. validate that `header.slot <= current_slot`
(a client MAY queue future headers for processing at the appropriate slot).
- _[IGNORE]_ The header is new enough to still be processed --
@ -152,10 +152,10 @@ The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `signed_blob_header` o
- _[REJECT]_ The `header.shard` MUST have a committee at the `header.slot` --
i.e. validate that `compute_committee_index_from_shard(state, header.slot, header.shard)` doesn't raise an error
- _[IGNORE]_ The header is the first header with valid signature received for the `(header.builder_index, header.slot, header.shard)` combination.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob builder exists and has sufficient balance to back the fee payment.
- _[REJECT]_ The blob builder, define by `header.builder_index`, exists and has sufficient balance to back the fee payment.
- _[IGNORE]_ The header fee SHOULD be higher than previously seen headers for `(header.slot, header.shard)`, from any builder.
Propagating nodes MAY increase fee increments in case of spam.
- _[REJECT]_ The header signature is valid for ONLY the builder, `signed_blob_header.signature`,
- _[REJECT]_ The header signature, `signed_blob_header.signature`, is valid for ONLY the builder --
i.e. `bls.Verify(builder_pubkey, blob_signing_root, signed_blob_header.signature)`. The signature is not an aggregate with the proposer.
- _[REJECT]_ The header is designated for proposal by the expected `proposer_index` for the blob's `header.slot` and `header.shard`
in the context of the current shuffling (defined by `header.body_summary.beacon_block_root`/`slot`).