status-im
/
eth2.0-specs
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/eth2.0-specs.git
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #1156 from ethereum/container-cleanup 

Cleanup containers
This commit is contained in:
Danny Ryan 2019-06-17 13:30:20 -06:00 committed by GitHub
parent fd04f4129a 75b469281e
commit c70643e49d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
26 changed files with 486 additions and 535 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
configs/constant_presets/mainnet.yaml
View File

@ -80,11 +80,11 @@ MIN_EPOCHS_TO_INACTIVITY_PENALTY: 4
# State list lengths
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
# 2**13 (= 8,192) epochs ~36 days
LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH: 8192
RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH: 8192
# 2**13 (= 8,192) epochs ~36 days
LATEST_ACTIVE_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH: 8192
ACTIVE_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH: 8192
# 2**13 (= 8,192) epochs ~36 days
LATEST_SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH: 8192
SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH: 8192
# Reward and penalty quotients

6
configs/constant_presets/minimal.yaml
View File

@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS: 4096
# State list lengths
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
# [customized] smaller state
LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH: 64
RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH: 64
# [customized] smaller state
LATEST_ACTIVE_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH: 64
ACTIVE_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH: 64
# [customized] smaller state
LATEST_SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH: 64
SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH: 64
# Reward and penalty quotients

9
scripts/build_spec.py
View File

@ -130,9 +130,10 @@ def objects_to_spec(functions: Dict[str, str],
"""
Given all the objects that constitute a spec, combine them into a single pyfile.
"""
new_type_definitions = \
'\n'.join(['''%s = NewType('%s', %s)''' % (key, key, value) for key, value in new_types.items()])
new_type_definitions += '\n' + '\n'.join(['Bytes%s = BytesN[%s]' % (n, n) for n in byte_types])
new_type_definitions = '\n'.join(['Bytes%s = BytesN[%s]' % (n, n) for n in byte_types])
new_type_definitions += '\n' + '\n'.join(['Hash = Bytes32', 'BLSPubkey = Bytes48', 'BLSSignature = Bytes96'])
new_type_definitions += \
'\n' + '\n'.join(['''%s = NewType('%s', %s)''' % (key, key, value) for key, value in new_types.items()])
functions_spec = '\n\n'.join(functions.values())
constants_spec = '\n'.join(map(lambda x: '%s = %s' % (x, constants[x]), constants))
ssz_objects_instantiation_spec = '\n\n'.join(ssz_objects.values())
@ -177,7 +178,7 @@ def dependency_order_ssz_objects(objects: Dict[str, str]) -> None:
items = list(objects.items())
for key, value in items:
dependencies = re.findall(r'(: [A-Z][\w[]*)', value)
dependencies = map(lambda x: re.sub(r'\W|Vector|List|Container|uint\d+|Bytes\d+|bytes', '', x), dependencies)
dependencies = map(lambda x: re.sub(r'\W|Vector|List|Container|Hash|BLSPubkey|BLSSignature|uint\d+|Bytes\d+|bytes', '', x), dependencies)
for dep in dependencies:
if dep in NEW_TYPES or len(dep) == 0:
continue

734
specs/core/0_beacon-chain.md
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

10
specs/core/0_fork-choice.md
View File

@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ All terminology, constants, functions, and protocol mechanics defined in the [Ph
Processing the beacon chain is similar to processing the Ethereum 1.0 chain. Clients download and process blocks and maintain a view of what is the current "canonical chain", terminating at the current "head". For a beacon block, `block`, to be processed by a node, the following conditions must be met:
* The parent block with root `block.parent_root` has been processed and accepted.
* An Ethereum 1.0 block pointed to by the `state.latest_eth1_data.block_hash` has been processed and accepted.
* An Ethereum 1.0 block pointed to by the `state.eth1_data.block_hash` has been processed and accepted.
* The node's Unix time is greater than or equal to `state.genesis_time + block.slot * SECONDS_PER_SLOT`.
*Note*: Leap seconds mean that slots will occasionally last `SECONDS_PER_SLOT + 1` or `SECONDS_PER_SLOT - 1` seconds, possibly several times a year.
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ def get_ancestor(store: Store, block: BeaconBlock, slot: Slot) -> BeaconBlock:
```
* Let `get_latest_attestation(store: Store, index: ValidatorIndex) -> Attestation` be the attestation with the highest slot number in `store` from the validator with the given `index`. If several such attestations exist, use the one the validator `v` observed first.
* Let `get_latest_attestation_target(store: Store, index: ValidatorIndex) -> BeaconBlock` be the target block in the attestation `get_latest_attestation(store, index)`.
* Let `get_attestation_target(store: Store, index: ValidatorIndex) -> BeaconBlock` be the target block in the attestation `get_latest_attestation(store, index)`.
* Let `get_children(store: Store, block: BeaconBlock) -> List[BeaconBlock]` return the child blocks of the given `block`.
* Let `justified_head_state` be the resulting `BeaconState` object from processing the chain up to the `justified_head`.
* The `head` is `lmd_ghost(store, justified_head_state, justified_head)` where the function `lmd_ghost` is defined below. Note that the implementation below is suboptimal; there are implementations that compute the head in time logarithmic in slot count.
@ -79,16 +79,16 @@ def lmd_ghost(store: Store, start_state: BeaconState, start_block: BeaconBlock)
"""
Execute the LMD-GHOST algorithm to find the head ``BeaconBlock``.
"""
validators = start_state.validator_registry
validators = start_state.validators
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(validators, slot_to_epoch(start_state.slot))
attestation_targets = [(i, get_latest_attestation_target(store, i)) for i in active_validator_indices]
attestation_targets = [(i, get_attestation_target(store, i)) for i in active_validator_indices]
# Use the rounded-balance-with-hysteresis supplied by the protocol for fork
# choice voting. This reduces the number of recomputations that need to be
# made for optimized implementations that precompute and save data
def get_vote_count(block: BeaconBlock) -> int:
return sum(
start_state.validator_registry[validator_index].effective_balance
start_state.validators[validator_index].effective_balance
for validator_index, target in attestation_targets
if get_ancestor(store, target, block.slot) == block
)

20
specs/core/1_custody-game.md
View File

@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ def process_custody_key_reveal(state: BeaconState,
Note that this function mutates ``state``.
"""
revealer = state.validator_registry[reveal.revealer_index]
revealer = state.validators[reveal.revealer_index]
epoch_to_sign = get_randao_epoch_for_custody_period(revealer.next_custody_reveal_period, reveal.revealed_index)
assert revealer.next_custody_reveal_period < get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, reveal.revealed_index)
@ -389,8 +389,8 @@ def process_early_derived_secret_reveal(state: BeaconState,
Note that this function mutates ``state``.
"""
revealed_validator = state.validator_registry[reveal.revealed_index]
masker = state.validator_registry[reveal.masker_index]
revealed_validator = state.validators[reveal.revealed_index]
masker = state.validators[reveal.masker_index]
derived_secret_location = reveal.epoch % EARLY_DERIVED_SECRET_PENALTY_MAX_FUTURE_EPOCHS
assert reveal.epoch >= get_current_epoch(state) + RANDAO_PENALTY_EPOCHS
@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ def process_early_derived_secret_reveal(state: BeaconState,
assert reveal.revealed_index not in state.exposed_derived_secrets[derived_secret_location]
# Verify signature correctness
masker = state.validator_registry[reveal.masker_index]
masker = state.validators[reveal.masker_index]
pubkeys = [revealed_validator.pubkey, masker.pubkey]
message_hashes = [
hash_tree_root(reveal.epoch),
@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ def process_chunk_challenge(state: BeaconState,
validate_indexed_attestation(state, convert_to_indexed(state, challenge.attestation))
# Verify it is not too late to challenge
assert slot_to_epoch(challenge.attestation.data.slot) >= get_current_epoch(state) - MAX_CHUNK_CHALLENGE_DELAY
responder = state.validator_registry[challenge.responder_index]
responder = state.validators[challenge.responder_index]
assert responder.exit_epoch >= get_current_epoch(state) - MAX_CHUNK_CHALLENGE_DELAY
# Verify the responder participated in the attestation
attesters = get_attesting_indices(state, challenge.attestation.data, challenge.attestation.aggregation_bitfield)
@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ def process_bit_challenge(state: BeaconState,
challenge: CustodyBitChallenge) -> None:
# Verify challenge signature
challenger = state.validator_registry[challenge.challenger_index]
challenger = state.validators[challenge.challenger_index]
assert bls_verify(
pubkey=challenger.pubkey,
message_hash=signing_root(challenge),
@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ def process_bit_challenge(state: BeaconState,
attestation = challenge.attestation
validate_indexed_attestation(state, convert_to_indexed(state, attestation))
# Verify the attestation is eligible for challenging
responder = state.validator_registry[challenge.responder_index]
responder = state.validators[challenge.responder_index]
assert (slot_to_epoch(attestation.data.slot) + responder.max_reveal_lateness <=
get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, challenge.responder_index))
@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ def process_bit_challenge_response(state: BeaconState,
# Verify chunk index
assert response.chunk_index < challenge.chunk_count
# Verify responder has not been slashed
responder = state.validator_registry[challenge.responder_index]
responder = state.validators[challenge.responder_index]
assert not responder.slashed
# Verify the chunk matches the crosslink data root
assert verify_merkle_branch(
@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ Run `process_reveal_deadlines(state)` immediately after `process_registry_update
process_reveal_deadlines(state)
# end insert @process_reveal_deadlines
def process_reveal_deadlines(state: BeaconState) -> None:
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validators):
deadline = validator.next_custody_reveal_period + (CUSTODY_RESPONSE_DEADLINE // EPOCHS_PER_CUSTODY_PERIOD)
if get_validators_custody_reveal_period(state, index) > deadline:
slash_validator(state, index)
@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ def after_process_final_updates(state: BeaconState) -> None:
validator_indices_in_records = set(
[record.challenger_index for record in records] + [record.responder_index for record in records]
)
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validators):
if index not in validator_indices_in_records:
if validator.exit_epoch != FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH and validator.withdrawable_epoch == FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH:
validator.withdrawable_epoch = validator.exit_epoch + MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWABILITY_DELAY

12
specs/core/1_shard-data-chains.md
View File

@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ def get_persistent_committee(state: BeaconState,
later_start_epoch = epoch - (epoch % PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD) - PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
committee_count = max(
len(get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, earlier_start_epoch)) //
len(get_active_validator_indices(state.validators, earlier_start_epoch)) //
(SHARD_COUNT * TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE),
len(get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, later_start_epoch)) //
len(get_active_validator_indices(state.validators, later_start_epoch)) //
(SHARD_COUNT * TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE),
) + 1
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ def get_shard_proposer_index(state: BeaconState,
# Search for an active proposer
for index in persistent_committee:
if is_active_validator(state.validator_registry[index], get_current_epoch(state)):
if is_active_validator(state.validators[index], get_current_epoch(state)):
return index
# No block can be proposed if no validator is active
@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ def verify_shard_attestation_signature(state: BeaconState,
pubkeys = []
for i, index in enumerate(persistent_committee):
if get_bitfield_bit(attestation.aggregation_bitfield, i) == 0b1:
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
validator = state.validators[index]
assert is_active_validator(validator, get_current_epoch(state))
pubkeys.append(validator.pubkey)
assert bls_verify(
@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ def is_valid_shard_block(beacon_blocks: List[BeaconBlock],
proposer_index = get_shard_proposer_index(beacon_state, candidate.shard, candidate.slot)
assert proposer_index is not None
assert bls_verify(
pubkey=beacon_state.validator_registry[proposer_index].pubkey,
pubkey=beacon_state.validators[proposer_index].pubkey,
message_hash=signing_root(block),
signature=candidate.signature,
domain=get_domain(beacon_state, slot_to_epoch(candidate.slot), DOMAIN_SHARD_PROPOSER),
@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ def is_valid_beacon_attestation(shard: Shard,
assert candidate.data.previous_attestation.epoch < slot_to_epoch(candidate.data.slot)
# Check crosslink data root
start_epoch = beacon_state.latest_crosslinks[shard].epoch
start_epoch = beacon_state.crosslinks[shard].epoch
end_epoch = min(slot_to_epoch(candidate.data.slot) - CROSSLINK_LOOKBACK, start_epoch + MAX_EPOCHS_PER_CROSSLINK)
blocks = []
for slot in range(start_epoch * SLOTS_PER_EPOCH, end_epoch * SLOTS_PER_EPOCH):

8
specs/light_client/sync_protocol.md
View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ We define an "expansion" of an object as an object where a field in an object th
We define two expansions:
* `ExtendedBeaconState`, which is identical to a `BeaconState` except `latest_active_index_roots: List[Bytes32]` is replaced by `latest_active_indices: List[List[ValidatorIndex]]`, where `BeaconState.latest_active_index_roots[i] = hash_tree_root(ExtendedBeaconState.latest_active_indices[i])`.
* `ExtendedBeaconState`, which is identical to a `BeaconState` except `active_index_roots: List[Bytes32]` is replaced by `active_indices: List[List[ValidatorIndex]]`, where `BeaconState.active_index_roots[i] = hash_tree_root(ExtendedBeaconState.active_indices[i])`.
* `ExtendedBeaconBlock`, which is identical to a `BeaconBlock` except `state_root` is replaced with the corresponding `state: ExtendedBeaconState`.
### `get_active_validator_indices`
@ -40,10 +40,10 @@ Note that there is now a new way to compute `get_active_validator_indices`:
```python
def get_active_validator_indices(state: ExtendedBeaconState, epoch: Epoch) -> List[ValidatorIndex]:
return state.latest_active_indices[epoch % LATEST_ACTIVE_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH]
return state.active_indices[epoch % ACTIVE_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH]
```
Note that it takes `state` instead of `state.validator_registry` as an argument. This does not affect its use in `get_shuffled_committee`, because `get_shuffled_committee` has access to the full `state` as one of its arguments.
Note that it takes `state` instead of `state.validators` as an argument. This does not affect its use in `get_shuffled_committee`, because `get_shuffled_committee` has access to the full `state` as one of its arguments.
### `MerklePartial`
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ def get_period_data(block: ExtendedBeaconBlock, shard_id: Shard, later: bool) ->
return PeriodData(
validator_count,
generate_seed(block.state, period_start),
[block.state.validator_registry[i] for i in indices],
[block.state.validators[i] for i in indices],
)
```

8
specs/networking/rpc-interface.md
View File

@ -95,8 +95,8 @@ Since some clients are waiting for `libp2p` implementations in their respective
(
network_id: uint8
chain_id: uint64
latest_finalized_root: bytes32
latest_finalized_epoch: uint64
finalized_root: bytes32
finalized_epoch: uint64
best_root: bytes32
best_slot: uint64
)
@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Clients exchange `hello` messages upon connection, forming a two-phase handshake
Clients SHOULD immediately disconnect from one another following the handshake above under the following conditions:
1. If `network_id` belongs to a different chain, since the client definitionally cannot sync with this client.
2. If the `latest_finalized_root` shared by the peer is not in the client's chain at the expected epoch. For example, if Peer 1 in the diagram below has `(root, epoch)` of `(A, 5)` and Peer 2 has `(B, 3)`, Peer 1 would disconnect because it knows that `B` is not the root in their chain at epoch 3:
2. If the `finalized_root` shared by the peer is not in the client's chain at the expected epoch. For example, if Peer 1 in the diagram below has `(root, epoch)` of `(A, 5)` and Peer 2 has `(B, 3)`, Peer 1 would disconnect because it knows that `B` is not the root in their chain at epoch 3:
```
Root A
@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ Root B ^
+---+
```
Once the handshake completes, the client with the higher `latest_finalized_epoch` or `best_slot` (if the clients have equal `latest_finalized_epoch`s) SHOULD request beacon block roots from its counterparty via `beacon_block_roots` (i.e. RPC method `10`).
Once the handshake completes, the client with the higher `finalized_epoch` or `best_slot` (if the clients have equal `finalized_epoch`s) SHOULD request beacon block roots from its counterparty via `beacon_block_roots` (i.e. RPC method `10`).
### Goodbye

4
specs/test_formats/operations/README.md
View File

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ post: BeaconState -- state after applying the operation. No
## Condition
A handler of the `operations` test-runner should process these cases,
A handler of the `operations` test-runner should process these cases,
calling the corresponding processing implementation.
Operations:
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Operations:
| `transfer` | `Transfer` | `transfer` | `process_transfer(state, transfer)` |
| `voluntary_exit` | `VoluntaryExit` | `voluntary_exit` | `process_voluntary_exit(state, voluntary_exit)` |
Note that `block_header` is not strictly an operation (and is a full `Block`), but processed in the same manner, and hence included here.
Note that `block_header` is not strictly an operation (and is a full `Block`), but processed in the same manner, and hence included here.
The resulting state should match the expected `post` state, or if the `post` state is left blank,
the handler should reject the input operation as invalid.

16
specs/validator/0_beacon-chain-validator.md
View File

@ -101,15 +101,15 @@ To submit a deposit:
* Let `signature` be the result of `bls_sign` of the `signing_root(deposit_data)` with `domain=bls_domain(DOMAIN_DEPOSIT)`. (Deposits are valid regardless of fork version, `bls_domain` will default to zeroes there).
* Send a transaction on the Ethereum 1.0 chain to `DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS` executing `def deposit(pubkey: bytes[48], withdrawal_credentials: bytes[32], signature: bytes[96])` along with a deposit of `amount` Gwei.
*Note*: Deposits made for the same `pubkey` are treated as for the same validator. A singular `Validator` will be added to `state.validator_registry` with each additional deposit amount added to the validator's balance. A validator can only be activated when total deposits for the validator pubkey meet or exceed `MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE`.
*Note*: Deposits made for the same `pubkey` are treated as for the same validator. A singular `Validator` will be added to `state.validators` with each additional deposit amount added to the validator's balance. A validator can only be activated when total deposits for the validator pubkey meet or exceed `MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE`.
### Process deposit
Deposits cannot be processed into the beacon chain until the Eth 1.0 block in which they were deposited or any of its descendants is added to the beacon chain `state.eth1_data`. This takes _a minimum_ of `ETH1_FOLLOW_DISTANCE` Eth 1.0 blocks (~4 hours) plus `ETH1_DATA_VOTING_PERIOD` epochs (~1.7 hours). Once the requisite Eth 1.0 data is added, the deposit will normally be added to a beacon chain block and processed into the `state.validator_registry` within an epoch or two. The validator is then in a queue to be activated.
Deposits cannot be processed into the beacon chain until the Eth 1.0 block in which they were deposited or any of its descendants is added to the beacon chain `state.eth1_data`. This takes _a minimum_ of `ETH1_FOLLOW_DISTANCE` Eth 1.0 blocks (~4 hours) plus `ETH1_DATA_VOTING_PERIOD` epochs (~1.7 hours). Once the requisite Eth 1.0 data is added, the deposit will normally be added to a beacon chain block and processed into the `state.validators` within an epoch or two. The validator is then in a queue to be activated.
### Validator index
Once a validator has been processed and added to the beacon state's `validator_registry`, the validator's `validator_index` is defined by the index into the registry at which the [`ValidatorRecord`](../core/0_beacon-chain.md#validator) contains the `pubkey` specified in the validator's deposit. A validator's `validator_index` is guaranteed to not change from the time of initial deposit until the validator exits and fully withdraws. This `validator_index` is used throughout the specification to dictate validator roles and responsibilities at any point and should be stored locally.
Once a validator has been processed and added to the beacon state's `validators`, the validator's `validator_index` is defined by the index into the registry at which the [`ValidatorRecord`](../core/0_beacon-chain.md#validator) contains the `pubkey` specified in the validator's deposit. A validator's `validator_index` is guaranteed to not change from the time of initial deposit until the validator exits and fully withdraws. This `validator_index` is used throughout the specification to dictate validator roles and responsibilities at any point and should be stored locally.
### Activation
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ In normal operation, the validator is quickly activated at which point the valid
The function [`is_active_validator`](../core/0_beacon-chain.md#is_active_validator) can be used to check if a validator is active during a given epoch. Usage is as follows:
```python
validator = state.validator_registry[validator_index]
validator = state.validators[validator_index]
is_active = is_active_validator(validator, get_current_epoch(state))
```
@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ epoch_signature = bls_sign(
##### Eth1 Data
`block.eth1_data` is a mechanism used by block proposers vote on a recent Ethereum 1.0 block hash and an associated deposit root found in the Ethereum 1.0 deposit contract. When consensus is formed, `state.latest_eth1_data` is updated, and validator deposits up to this root can be processed. The deposit root can be calculated by calling the `get_deposit_root()` function of the deposit contract using the post-state of the block hash.
`block.eth1_data` is a mechanism used by block proposers vote on a recent Ethereum 1.0 block hash and an associated deposit root found in the Ethereum 1.0 deposit contract. When consensus is formed, `state.eth1_data` is updated, and validator deposits up to this root can be processed. The deposit root can be calculated by calling the `get_deposit_root()` function of the deposit contract using the post-state of the block hash.
* Let `D` be the list of `Eth1DataVote` objects `vote` in `state.eth1_data_votes` where:
* `vote.eth1_data.block_hash` is the hash of an Eth 1.0 block that is (i) part of the canonical chain, (ii) >= `ETH1_FOLLOW_DISTANCE` blocks behind the head, and (iii) newer than `state.latest_eth1_data.block_hash`.
* `vote.eth1_data.block_hash` is the hash of an Eth 1.0 block that is (i) part of the canonical chain, (ii) >= `ETH1_FOLLOW_DISTANCE` blocks behind the head, and (iii) newer than `state.eth1_data.block_hash`.
* `vote.eth1_data.deposit_count` is the deposit count of the Eth 1.0 deposit contract at the block defined by `vote.eth1_data.block_hash`.
* `vote.eth1_data.deposit_root` is the deposit root of the Eth 1.0 deposit contract at the block defined by `vote.eth1_data.block_hash`.
* If `D` is empty:
@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ Up to `MAX_ATTESTATIONS` aggregate attestations can be included in the `block`.
##### Deposits
If there are any unprocessed deposits for the existing `state.latest_eth1_data` (i.e. `state.latest_eth1_data.deposit_count > state.deposit_index`), then pending deposits _must_ be added to the block. The expected number of deposits is exactly `min(MAX_DEPOSITS, latest_eth1_data.deposit_count - state.deposit_index)`. These [`deposits`](../core/0_beacon-chain.md#deposit) are constructed from the `Deposit` logs from the [Eth 1.0 deposit contract](../core/0_deposit-contract) and must be processed in sequential order. The deposits included in the `block` must satisfy the verification conditions found in [deposits processing](../core/0_beacon-chain.md#deposits).
If there are any unprocessed deposits for the existing `state.eth1_data` (i.e. `state.eth1_data.deposit_count > state.eth1_deposit_index`), then pending deposits _must_ be added to the block. The expected number of deposits is exactly `min(MAX_DEPOSITS, eth1_data.deposit_count - state.eth1_deposit_index)`. These [`deposits`](../core/0_beacon-chain.md#deposit) are constructed from the `Deposit` logs from the [Eth 1.0 deposit contract](../core/0_deposit-contract) and must be processed in sequential order. The deposits included in the `block` must satisfy the verification conditions found in [deposits processing](../core/0_beacon-chain.md#deposits).
The `proof` for each deposit must be constructed against the deposit root contained in `state.latest_eth1_data` rather than the deposit root at the time the deposit was initially logged from the 1.0 chain. This entails storing a full deposit merkle tree locally and computing updated proofs against the `latest_eth1_data.deposit_root` as needed. See [`minimal_merkle.py`](https://github.com/ethereum/research/blob/master/spec_pythonizer/utils/merkle_minimal.py) for a sample implementation.
The `proof` for each deposit must be constructed against the deposit root contained in `state.eth1_data` rather than the deposit root at the time the deposit was initially logged from the 1.0 chain. This entails storing a full deposit merkle tree locally and computing updated proofs against the `eth1_data.deposit_root` as needed. See [`minimal_merkle.py`](https://github.com/ethereum/research/blob/master/spec_pythonizer/utils/merkle_minimal.py) for a sample implementation.
##### Voluntary exits

2
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/helpers/block.py
View File

@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ def build_empty_block(spec, state, slot=None, signed=False):
slot = state.slot
empty_block = spec.BeaconBlock()
empty_block.slot = slot
empty_block.body.eth1_data.deposit_count = state.deposit_index
empty_block.body.eth1_data.deposit_count = state.eth1_deposit_index
previous_block_header = deepcopy(state.latest_block_header)
if previous_block_header.state_root == spec.ZERO_HASH:
previous_block_header.state_root = state.hash_tree_root()

6
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/helpers/deposits.py
View File

@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ def prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount, withdrawal_c
"""
Prepare the state for the deposit, and create a deposit for the given validator, depositing the given amount.
"""
pre_validator_count = len(state.validator_registry)
pre_validator_count = len(state.validators)
# fill previous deposits with zero-hash
deposit_data_leaves = [spec.ZERO_HASH] * pre_validator_count
@ -80,6 +80,6 @@ def prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount, withdrawal_c
signed,
)
state.latest_eth1_data.deposit_root = root
state.latest_eth1_data.deposit_count = len(deposit_data_leaves)
state.eth1_data.deposit_root = root
state.eth1_data.deposit_count = len(deposit_data_leaves)
return deposit

12
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/helpers/genesis.py
View File

@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ def create_genesis_state(spec, num_validators):
state = spec.BeaconState(
genesis_time=0,
deposit_index=num_validators,
latest_eth1_data=spec.Eth1Data(
eth1_deposit_index=num_validators,
eth1_data=spec.Eth1Data(
deposit_root=deposit_root,
deposit_count=num_validators,
block_hash=spec.ZERO_HASH,
@ -32,16 +32,16 @@ def create_genesis_state(spec, num_validators):
# We "hack" in the initial validators,
# as it is much faster than creating and processing genesis deposits for every single test case.
state.balances = [spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE] * num_validators
state.validator_registry = [build_mock_validator(spec, i, state.balances[i]) for i in range(num_validators)]
state.validators = [build_mock_validator(spec, i, state.balances[i]) for i in range(num_validators)]
# Process genesis activations
for validator in state.validator_registry:
for validator in state.validators:
if validator.effective_balance >= spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE:
validator.activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.GENESIS_EPOCH
validator.activation_epoch = spec.GENESIS_EPOCH
genesis_active_index_root = hash_tree_root(spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, spec.GENESIS_EPOCH))
for index in range(spec.LATEST_ACTIVE_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH):
state.latest_active_index_roots[index] = genesis_active_index_root
for index in range(spec.ACTIVE_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH):
state.active_index_roots[index] = genesis_active_index_root
return state

2
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/helpers/proposer_slashings.py
View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ from eth2spec.test.helpers.keys import pubkey_to_privkey
def get_valid_proposer_slashing(spec, state, signed_1=False, signed_2=False):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[-1]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
slot = state.slot
header_1 = spec.BeaconBlockHeader(

2
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/helpers/state.py
View File

@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ def get_state_root(spec, state, slot) -> bytes:
Return the state root at a recent ``slot``.
"""
assert slot < state.slot <= slot + spec.SLOTS_PER_HISTORICAL_ROOT
return state.latest_state_roots[slot % spec.SLOTS_PER_HISTORICAL_ROOT]
return state.state_roots[slot % spec.SLOTS_PER_HISTORICAL_ROOT]

2
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/helpers/transfers.py
View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ def get_valid_transfer(spec, state, slot=None, sender_index=None, amount=None, f
sign_transfer(spec, state, transfer, transfer_privkey)
# ensure withdrawal_credentials reproducible
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].withdrawal_credentials = (
state.validators[transfer.sender].withdrawal_credentials = (
spec.int_to_bytes(spec.BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX, length=1) + spec.hash(transfer.pubkey)[1:]
)

4
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase_0/block_processing/test_process_attester_slashing.py
View File

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ def run_attester_slashing_processing(spec, state, attester_slashing, valid=True)
# Process slashing
spec.process_attester_slashing(state, attester_slashing)
slashed_validator = state.validator_registry[slashed_index]
slashed_validator = state.validators[slashed_index]
# Check slashing
assert slashed_validator.slashed
@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ def test_participants_already_slashed(spec, state):
attestation_1 = attester_slashing.attestation_1
validator_indices = attestation_1.custody_bit_0_indices + attestation_1.custody_bit_1_indices
for index in validator_indices:
state.validator_registry[index].slashed = True
state.validators[index].slashed = True
yield from run_attester_slashing_processing(spec, state, attester_slashing, False)

2
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase_0/block_processing/test_process_block_header.py
View File

@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ def test_proposer_slashed(spec, state):
proposer_index = spec.get_beacon_proposer_index(stub_state)
# set proposer to slashed
state.validator_registry[proposer_index].slashed = True
state.validators[proposer_index].slashed = True
block = build_empty_block_for_next_slot(spec, state, signed=True)

28
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase_0/block_processing/test_process_deposit.py
View File

@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ def run_deposit_processing(spec, state, deposit, validator_index, valid=True, ef
- post-state ('post').
If ``valid == False``, run expecting ``AssertionError``
"""
pre_validator_count = len(state.validator_registry)
pre_validator_count = len(state.validators)
pre_balance = 0
if validator_index < pre_validator_count:
pre_balance = get_balance(state, validator_index)
@ -34,29 +34,29 @@ def run_deposit_processing(spec, state, deposit, validator_index, valid=True, ef
yield 'post', state
if not effective:
assert len(state.validator_registry) == pre_validator_count
assert len(state.validators) == pre_validator_count
assert len(state.balances) == pre_validator_count
if validator_index < pre_validator_count:
assert get_balance(state, validator_index) == pre_balance
else:
if validator_index < pre_validator_count:
# top-up
assert len(state.validator_registry) == pre_validator_count
assert len(state.validators) == pre_validator_count
assert len(state.balances) == pre_validator_count
else:
# new validator
assert len(state.validator_registry) == pre_validator_count + 1
assert len(state.validators) == pre_validator_count + 1
assert len(state.balances) == pre_validator_count + 1
assert get_balance(state, validator_index) == pre_balance + deposit.data.amount
assert state.deposit_index == state.latest_eth1_data.deposit_count
assert state.eth1_deposit_index == state.eth1_data.deposit_count
@with_all_phases
@spec_state_test
def test_new_deposit(spec, state):
# fresh deposit = next validator index = validator appended to registry
validator_index = len(state.validator_registry)
validator_index = len(state.validators)
amount = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
deposit = prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount, signed=True)
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ def test_new_deposit(spec, state):
@spec_state_test
def test_invalid_sig_new_deposit(spec, state):
# fresh deposit = next validator index = validator appended to registry
validator_index = len(state.validator_registry)
validator_index = len(state.validators)
amount = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
deposit = prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount)
yield from run_deposit_processing(spec, state, deposit, validator_index, valid=True, effective=False)
@ -117,12 +117,12 @@ def test_invalid_withdrawal_credentials_top_up(spec, state):
@with_all_phases
@spec_state_test
def test_wrong_index(spec, state):
validator_index = len(state.validator_registry)
validator_index = len(state.validators)
amount = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
deposit = prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount)
# mess up deposit_index
deposit.index = state.deposit_index + 1
# mess up eth1_deposit_index
deposit.index = state.eth1_deposit_index + 1
sign_deposit_data(spec, state, deposit.data, privkeys[validator_index])
@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ def test_wrong_index(spec, state):
@with_all_phases
@spec_state_test
def test_wrong_deposit_for_deposit_count(spec, state):
deposit_data_leaves = [spec.ZERO_HASH] * len(state.validator_registry)
deposit_data_leaves = [spec.ZERO_HASH] * len(state.validators)
# build root for deposit_1
index_1 = len(deposit_data_leaves)
@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ def test_wrong_deposit_for_deposit_count(spec, state):
)
# state has root for deposit_2 but is at deposit_count for deposit_1
state.latest_eth1_data.deposit_root = root_2
state.latest_eth1_data.deposit_count = deposit_count_1
state.eth1_data.deposit_root = root_2
state.eth1_data.deposit_count = deposit_count_1
yield from run_deposit_processing(spec, state, deposit_2, index_2, valid=False)
@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ def test_wrong_deposit_for_deposit_count(spec, state):
@with_all_phases
@spec_state_test
def test_bad_merkle_proof(spec, state):
validator_index = len(state.validator_registry)
validator_index = len(state.validators)
amount = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
deposit = prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount)

10
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase_0/block_processing/test_process_proposer_slashing.py
View File

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ def run_proposer_slashing_processing(spec, state, proposer_slashing, valid=True)
yield 'post', state
# check if slashed
slashed_validator = state.validator_registry[proposer_slashing.proposer_index]
slashed_validator = state.validators[proposer_slashing.proposer_index]
assert slashed_validator.slashed
assert slashed_validator.exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert slashed_validator.withdrawable_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ def test_invalid_sig_1_and_2(spec, state):
def test_invalid_proposer_index(spec, state):
proposer_slashing = get_valid_proposer_slashing(spec, state, signed_1=True, signed_2=True)
# Index just too high (by 1)
proposer_slashing.proposer_index = len(state.validator_registry)
proposer_slashing.proposer_index = len(state.validators)
yield from run_proposer_slashing_processing(spec, state, proposer_slashing, False)
@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ def test_proposer_is_not_activated(spec, state):
proposer_slashing = get_valid_proposer_slashing(spec, state, signed_1=True, signed_2=True)
# set proposer to be not active yet
state.validator_registry[proposer_slashing.proposer_index].activation_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state) + 1
state.validators[proposer_slashing.proposer_index].activation_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state) + 1
yield from run_proposer_slashing_processing(spec, state, proposer_slashing, False)
@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ def test_proposer_is_slashed(spec, state):
proposer_slashing = get_valid_proposer_slashing(spec, state, signed_1=True, signed_2=True)
# set proposer to slashed
state.validator_registry[proposer_slashing.proposer_index].slashed = True
state.validators[proposer_slashing.proposer_index].slashed = True
yield from run_proposer_slashing_processing(spec, state, proposer_slashing, False)
@ -137,6 +137,6 @@ def test_proposer_is_withdrawn(spec, state):
# set proposer withdrawable_epoch in past
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
proposer_index = proposer_slashing.proposer_index
state.validator_registry[proposer_index].withdrawable_epoch = current_epoch - 1
state.validators[proposer_index].withdrawable_epoch = current_epoch - 1
yield from run_proposer_slashing_processing(spec, state, proposer_slashing, False)

20
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase_0/block_processing/test_process_transfer.py
View File

@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ def run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer, valid=True):
def test_success_non_activated(spec, state):
transfer = get_valid_transfer(spec, state, signed=True)
# un-activate so validator can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[transfer.sender].activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer)
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ def test_success_withdrawable(spec, state):
transfer = get_valid_transfer(spec, state, signed=True)
# withdrawable_epoch in past so can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].withdrawable_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state) - 1
state.validators[transfer.sender].withdrawable_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state) - 1
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer)
@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ def test_success_active_above_max_effective_fee(spec, state):
def test_invalid_signature(spec, state):
transfer = get_valid_transfer(spec, state)
# un-activate so validator can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[transfer.sender].activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer, False)
@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ def test_active_but_transfer_past_effective_balance(spec, state):
def test_incorrect_slot(spec, state):
transfer = get_valid_transfer(spec, state, slot=state.slot + 1, signed=True)
# un-activate so validator can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer, False)
@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ def test_insufficient_balance_for_fee(spec, state):
transfer = get_valid_transfer(spec, state, sender_index=sender_index, amount=0, fee=1, signed=True)
# un-activate so validator can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer, False)
@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ def test_insufficient_balance(spec, state):
transfer = get_valid_transfer(spec, state, sender_index=sender_index, amount=1, fee=0, signed=True)
# un-activate so validator can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer, False)
@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ def test_no_dust_sender(spec, state):
)
# un-activate so validator can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer, False)
@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ def test_no_dust_recipient(spec, state):
state.balances[transfer.recipient] = 0
# un-activate so validator can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer, False)
@ -176,9 +176,9 @@ def test_no_dust_recipient(spec, state):
@spec_state_test
def test_invalid_pubkey(spec, state):
transfer = get_valid_transfer(spec, state, signed=True)
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].withdrawal_credentials = spec.ZERO_HASH
state.validators[transfer.sender].withdrawal_credentials = spec.ZERO_HASH
# un-activate so validator can transfer
state.validator_registry[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[transfer.sender].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
yield from run_transfer_processing(spec, state, transfer, False)

34
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase_0/block_processing/test_process_voluntary_exit.py
View File

@ -21,14 +21,14 @@ def run_voluntary_exit_processing(spec, state, voluntary_exit, valid=True):
yield 'post', None
return
pre_exit_epoch = state.validator_registry[validator_index].exit_epoch
pre_exit_epoch = state.validators[validator_index].exit_epoch
spec.process_voluntary_exit(state, voluntary_exit)
yield 'post', state
assert pre_exit_epoch == spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validator_registry[validator_index].exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validators[validator_index].exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
@with_all_phases
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ def test_success(spec, state):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[0]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
voluntary_exit = build_voluntary_exit(spec, state, current_epoch, validator_index, privkey, signed=True)
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ def test_invalid_signature(spec, state):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[0]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
voluntary_exit = build_voluntary_exit(spec, state, current_epoch, validator_index, privkey)
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ def test_success_exit_queue(spec, state):
# Prepare a bunch of exits, based on the current state
exit_queue = []
for index in initial_indices:
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[index].pubkey]
exit_queue.append(build_voluntary_exit(
spec,
state,
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ def test_success_exit_queue(spec, state):
# exit an additional validator
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[-1]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
voluntary_exit = build_voluntary_exit(
spec,
state,
@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ def test_success_exit_queue(spec, state):
yield from run_voluntary_exit_processing(spec, state, voluntary_exit)
assert (
state.validator_registry[validator_index].exit_epoch ==
state.validator_registry[initial_indices[0]].exit_epoch + 1
state.validators[validator_index].exit_epoch ==
state.validators[initial_indices[0]].exit_epoch + 1
)
@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ def test_validator_exit_in_future(spec, state):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[0]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
voluntary_exit = build_voluntary_exit(
spec,
@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ def test_validator_invalid_validator_index(spec, state):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[0]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
voluntary_exit = build_voluntary_exit(
spec,
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ def test_validator_invalid_validator_index(spec, state):
privkey,
signed=False,
)
voluntary_exit.validator_index = len(state.validator_registry)
voluntary_exit.validator_index = len(state.validators)
sign_voluntary_exit(spec, state, voluntary_exit, privkey)
yield from run_voluntary_exit_processing(spec, state, voluntary_exit, False)
@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ def test_validator_invalid_validator_index(spec, state):
def test_validator_not_active(spec, state):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[0]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
state.validator_registry[validator_index].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[validator_index].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
# build and test voluntary exit
voluntary_exit = build_voluntary_exit(
@ -192,10 +192,10 @@ def test_validator_already_exited(spec, state):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[0]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
# but validator already has exited
state.validator_registry[validator_index].exit_epoch = current_epoch + 2
state.validators[validator_index].exit_epoch = current_epoch + 2
voluntary_exit = build_voluntary_exit(
spec,
@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ def test_validator_already_exited(spec, state):
def test_validator_not_active_long_enough(spec, state):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[0]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey]
privkey = pubkey_to_privkey[state.validators[validator_index].pubkey]
voluntary_exit = build_voluntary_exit(
spec,
@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ def test_validator_not_active_long_enough(spec, state):
)
assert (
current_epoch - state.validator_registry[validator_index].activation_epoch <
current_epoch - state.validators[validator_index].activation_epoch <
spec.PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
)

26
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase_0/epoch_processing/test_process_registry_updates.py
View File

@ -35,23 +35,23 @@ def run_process_registry_updates(spec, state, valid=True):
@spec_state_test
def test_activation(spec, state):
index = 0
assert spec.is_active_validator(state.validator_registry[index], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
assert spec.is_active_validator(state.validators[index], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
# Mock a new deposit
state.validator_registry[index].activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validator_registry[index].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validator_registry[index].effective_balance = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
assert not spec.is_active_validator(state.validator_registry[index], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
state.validators[index].activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[index].activation_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
state.validators[index].effective_balance = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
assert not spec.is_active_validator(state.validators[index], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
for _ in range(spec.ACTIVATION_EXIT_DELAY + 1):
next_epoch(spec, state)
yield from run_process_registry_updates(spec, state)
assert state.validator_registry[index].activation_eligibility_epoch != spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validator_registry[index].activation_epoch != spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validators[index].activation_eligibility_epoch != spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validators[index].activation_epoch != spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert spec.is_active_validator(
state.validator_registry[index],
state.validators[index],
spec.get_current_epoch(state),
)
@ -60,19 +60,19 @@ def test_activation(spec, state):
@spec_state_test
def test_ejection(spec, state):
index = 0
assert spec.is_active_validator(state.validator_registry[index], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
assert state.validator_registry[index].exit_epoch == spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert spec.is_active_validator(state.validators[index], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
assert state.validators[index].exit_epoch == spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
# Mock an ejection
state.validator_registry[index].effective_balance = spec.EJECTION_BALANCE
state.validators[index].effective_balance = spec.EJECTION_BALANCE
for _ in range(spec.ACTIVATION_EXIT_DELAY + 1):
next_epoch(spec, state)
yield from run_process_registry_updates(spec, state)
assert state.validator_registry[index].exit_epoch != spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validators[index].exit_epoch != spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert not spec.is_active_validator(
state.validator_registry[index],
state.validators[index],
spec.get_current_epoch(state),
)

4
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase_1/block_processing/test_process_early_derived_secret_reveal.py
View File

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def run_early_derived_secret_reveal_processing(spec, state, randao_key_reveal, v
spec.process_early_derived_secret_reveal(state, randao_key_reveal)
slashed_validator = state.validator_registry[randao_key_reveal.revealed_index]
slashed_validator = state.validators[randao_key_reveal.revealed_index]
if randao_key_reveal.epoch >= spec.get_current_epoch(state) + spec.CUSTODY_PERIOD_TO_RANDAO_PADDING:
assert slashed_validator.slashed
@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ def test_double_reveal(spec, state):
@spec_state_test
def test_revealer_is_slashed(spec, state):
randao_key_reveal = get_valid_early_derived_secret_reveal(spec, state, spec.get_current_epoch(state))
state.validator_registry[randao_key_reveal.revealed_index].slashed = True
state.validators[randao_key_reveal.revealed_index].slashed = True
yield from run_early_derived_secret_reveal_processing(spec, state, randao_key_reveal, False)

34
test_libs/pyspec/eth2spec/test/sanity/test_blocks.py
View File

@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ def test_empty_epoch_transition(spec, state):
# assert state.slot == block.slot
# assert state.finalized_epoch < spec.get_current_epoch(state) - 4
# for index in range(len(state.validator_registry)):
# for index in range(len(state.validators)):
# assert get_balance(state, index) < get_balance(pre_state, index)
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ def test_proposer_slashing(spec, state):
proposer_slashing = get_valid_proposer_slashing(spec, state, signed_1=True, signed_2=True)
validator_index = proposer_slashing.proposer_index
assert not state.validator_registry[validator_index].slashed
assert not state.validators[validator_index].slashed
yield 'pre', state
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ def test_proposer_slashing(spec, state):
yield 'post', state
# check if slashed
slashed_validator = state.validator_registry[validator_index]
slashed_validator = state.validators[validator_index]
assert slashed_validator.slashed
assert slashed_validator.exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert slashed_validator.withdrawable_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ def test_attester_slashing(spec, state):
validator_index = (attester_slashing.attestation_1.custody_bit_0_indices +
attester_slashing.attestation_1.custody_bit_1_indices)[0]
assert not state.validator_registry[validator_index].slashed
assert not state.validators[validator_index].slashed
yield 'pre', state
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ def test_attester_slashing(spec, state):
spec.state_transition(state, block)
yield 'post', state
slashed_validator = state.validator_registry[validator_index]
slashed_validator = state.validators[validator_index]
assert slashed_validator.slashed
assert slashed_validator.exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert slashed_validator.withdrawable_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
@ -172,10 +172,10 @@ def test_attester_slashing(spec, state):
@with_all_phases
@spec_state_test
def test_deposit_in_block(spec, state):
initial_registry_len = len(state.validator_registry)
initial_registry_len = len(state.validators)
initial_balances_len = len(state.balances)
validator_index = len(state.validator_registry)
validator_index = len(state.validators)
amount = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
deposit = prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount, signed=True)
@ -190,10 +190,10 @@ def test_deposit_in_block(spec, state):
spec.state_transition(state, block)
yield 'post', state
assert len(state.validator_registry) == initial_registry_len + 1
assert len(state.validators) == initial_registry_len + 1
assert len(state.balances) == initial_balances_len + 1
assert get_balance(state, validator_index) == spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
assert state.validator_registry[validator_index].pubkey == pubkeys[validator_index]
assert state.validators[validator_index].pubkey == pubkeys[validator_index]
@with_all_phases
@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ def test_deposit_top_up(spec, state):
amount = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE // 4
deposit = prepare_state_and_deposit(spec, state, validator_index, amount)
initial_registry_len = len(state.validator_registry)
initial_registry_len = len(state.validators)
initial_balances_len = len(state.balances)
validator_pre_balance = get_balance(state, validator_index)
@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ def test_deposit_top_up(spec, state):
spec.state_transition(state, block)
yield 'post', state
assert len(state.validator_registry) == initial_registry_len
assert len(state.validators) == initial_registry_len
assert len(state.balances) == initial_balances_len
assert get_balance(state, validator_index) == validator_pre_balance + amount
@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ def test_voluntary_exit(spec, state):
sign_block(spec, state, initiate_exit_block)
spec.state_transition(state, initiate_exit_block)
assert state.validator_registry[validator_index].exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validators[validator_index].exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
# Process within epoch transition
exit_block = build_empty_block_for_next_slot(spec, state)
@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ def test_voluntary_exit(spec, state):
yield 'blocks', [initiate_exit_block, exit_block], List[spec.BeaconBlock]
yield 'post', state
assert state.validator_registry[validator_index].exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validators[validator_index].exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
# @with_all_phases
@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ def test_voluntary_exit(spec, state):
# pre_transfer_recipient_balance = get_balance(state, recipient_index)
# un-activate so validator can transfer
# state.validator_registry[sender_index].activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
# state.validators[sender_index].activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
# yield 'pre', state
@ -343,10 +343,10 @@ def test_balance_driven_status_transitions(spec, state):
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
validator_index = spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, current_epoch)[-1]
assert state.validator_registry[validator_index].exit_epoch == spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validators[validator_index].exit_epoch == spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
# set validator balance to below ejection threshold
state.validator_registry[validator_index].effective_balance = spec.EJECTION_BALANCE
state.validators[validator_index].effective_balance = spec.EJECTION_BALANCE
yield 'pre', state
@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ def test_balance_driven_status_transitions(spec, state):
yield 'blocks', [block], List[spec.BeaconBlock]
yield 'post', state
assert state.validator_registry[validator_index].exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
assert state.validators[validator_index].exit_epoch < spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
@with_all_phases