Fix test cases for minimal and mainnet configs
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a6699290f
commit
c5d9aa2502
|
@ -12,8 +12,10 @@ from eth2spec.test.helpers.sync_committee import (
|
|||
)
|
||||
from eth2spec.test.context import (
|
||||
PHASE0, PHASE1,
|
||||
MAINNET, MINIMAL,
|
||||
expect_assertion_error,
|
||||
with_all_phases_except,
|
||||
with_configs,
|
||||
spec_state_test,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -72,12 +74,18 @@ def compute_sync_committee_participant_reward(spec, state, participant_index, ac
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
@with_all_phases_except([PHASE0, PHASE1])
|
||||
@with_configs([MINIMAL], reason="to create nonduplicate committee")
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_sync_committee_rewards(spec, state):
|
||||
def test_sync_committee_rewards_nonduplicate_committee(spec, state):
|
||||
committee = spec.get_sync_committee_indices(state, spec.get_current_epoch(state))
|
||||
committee_size = len(committee)
|
||||
active_validator_count = len(spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, spec.get_current_epoch(state)))
|
||||
|
||||
# Preconditions of this test case
|
||||
# Note that the committee members MAY still be duplicate even with enough active validator count probabilistically.
|
||||
assert active_validator_count >= spec.SYNC_COMMITTEE_SIZE
|
||||
assert committee_size == len(set(committee))
|
||||
|
||||
yield 'pre', state
|
||||
|
||||
pre_balances = state.balances.copy()
|
||||
|
@ -114,6 +122,67 @@ def test_sync_committee_rewards(spec, state):
|
|||
assert state.balances[index] == pre_balances[index] + expected_reward
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@with_all_phases_except([PHASE0, PHASE1])
|
||||
@with_configs([MAINNET], reason="to create duplicate committee")
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_sync_committee_rewards_duplicate_committee(spec, state):
|
||||
committee = spec.get_sync_committee_indices(state, spec.get_current_epoch(state))
|
||||
committee_size = len(committee)
|
||||
active_validator_count = len(spec.get_active_validator_indices(state, spec.get_current_epoch(state)))
|
||||
|
||||
# Preconditions of this test case
|
||||
# With mainnet config, where active validators are less than SYNC_COMMITTEE_SIZE,
|
||||
# the committee members SHOULD be duplicate.
|
||||
assert active_validator_count < spec.SYNC_COMMITTEE_SIZE
|
||||
assert committee_size > len(set(committee))
|
||||
|
||||
yield 'pre', state
|
||||
|
||||
pre_balances = state.balances.copy()
|
||||
|
||||
block = build_empty_block_for_next_slot(spec, state)
|
||||
block.body.sync_committee_bits = [True] * committee_size
|
||||
block.body.sync_committee_signature = compute_aggregate_sync_committee_signature(
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
state,
|
||||
block.slot - 1,
|
||||
committee,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
signed_block = state_transition_and_sign_block(spec, state, block)
|
||||
|
||||
yield 'blocks', [signed_block]
|
||||
yield 'post', state
|
||||
|
||||
duplicate_count = {}
|
||||
for i, x in enumerate(committee):
|
||||
if i != committee.index(x):
|
||||
if x not in duplicate_count:
|
||||
duplicate_count[x] = 1
|
||||
duplicate_count[x] += 1
|
||||
|
||||
for index in range(len(state.validators)):
|
||||
expected_reward = 0
|
||||
|
||||
if index == block.proposer_index:
|
||||
expected_reward += sum([spec.get_proposer_reward(state, index) for index in committee])
|
||||
|
||||
if index in committee:
|
||||
reward = compute_sync_committee_participant_reward(
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
state,
|
||||
index,
|
||||
active_validator_count,
|
||||
committee_size,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if index not in duplicate_count:
|
||||
expected_reward += reward
|
||||
else:
|
||||
expected_reward += reward * duplicate_count[index]
|
||||
|
||||
assert state.balances[index] == pre_balances[index] + expected_reward
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@with_all_phases_except([PHASE0, PHASE1])
|
||||
@spec_state_test
|
||||
def test_invalid_signature_past_block(spec, state):
|
||||
|
@ -163,24 +232,26 @@ def test_invalid_signature_previous_committee(spec, state):
|
|||
# To get a distinct committee so we can generate an "old" signature, we need to advance
|
||||
# 2 EPOCHS_PER_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PERIOD periods.
|
||||
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
|
||||
previous_committee = state.next_sync_committee
|
||||
|
||||
epoch_in_future_sync_commitee_period = current_epoch + 2 * spec.EPOCHS_PER_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
|
||||
slot_in_future_sync_committee_period = epoch_in_future_sync_commitee_period * spec.SLOTS_PER_EPOCH
|
||||
transition_to(spec, state, slot_in_future_sync_committee_period)
|
||||
|
||||
# Create incorrect_committee for generating invalid signature.
|
||||
pubkeys = [validator.pubkey for validator in state.validators]
|
||||
committee = [pubkeys.index(pubkey) for pubkey in previous_committee.pubkeys]
|
||||
correct_committee = [pubkeys.index(pubkey) for pubkey in state.current_sync_committee.pubkeys]
|
||||
incorrect_committee = [(correct_committee[0] + 1) % len(pubkeys)] + correct_committee[1:]
|
||||
assert correct_committee != incorrect_committee
|
||||
|
||||
yield 'pre', state
|
||||
|
||||
block = build_empty_block_for_next_slot(spec, state)
|
||||
block.body.sync_committee_bits = [True] * len(committee)
|
||||
block.body.sync_committee_bits = [True] * len(incorrect_committee)
|
||||
block.body.sync_committee_signature = compute_aggregate_sync_committee_signature(
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
state,
|
||||
block.slot - 1,
|
||||
committee,
|
||||
incorrect_committee,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
yield 'blocks', [block]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue