Fix list indentation

This commit is contained in:
Taneli Hukkinen 2021-03-17 02:15:08 +02:00
parent 54279f9e3b
commit b23b16c7b7
2 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -1298,10 +1298,10 @@ Requests are segregated by protocol ID to:
6. Parallelise RFCs (or Eth2 EIPs).
By decoupling requests from one another, each RFC that affects the request protocol can be deployed/tested/debated independently
without relying on a synchronization point to version the general top-level protocol.
1. This has the benefit that clients can explicitly choose which RFCs to deploy
without buying into all other RFCs that may be included in that top-level version.
2. Affording this level of granularity with a top-level protocol would imply creating as many variants
(e.g. /protocol/43-{a,b,c,d,...}) as the cartesian product of RFCs inflight, O(n^2).
1. This has the benefit that clients can explicitly choose which RFCs to deploy
without buying into all other RFCs that may be included in that top-level version.
2. Affording this level of granularity with a top-level protocol would imply creating as many variants
(e.g. /protocol/43-{a,b,c,d,...}) as the cartesian product of RFCs inflight, O(n^2).
7. Allow us to simplify the payload of requests.
Request-ids and method-ids no longer need to be sent.
The encoding/request type and version can all be handled by the framework.

View File

@ -141,12 +141,12 @@ Clients should allow users to input a Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint at startup, a
### Weak Subjectivity Sync Procedure
1. Input a Weak Subjectivity Checkpoint as a CLI parameter in `block_root:epoch_number` format,
where `block_root` (an "0x" prefixed 32-byte hex string) and `epoch_number` (an integer) represent a valid `Checkpoint`.
Example of the format:
where `block_root` (an "0x" prefixed 32-byte hex string) and `epoch_number` (an integer) represent a valid `Checkpoint`.
Example of the format:
```
0x8584188b86a9296932785cc2827b925f9deebacce6d72ad8d53171fa046b43d9:9544
```
```
0x8584188b86a9296932785cc2827b925f9deebacce6d72ad8d53171fa046b43d9:9544
```
2. Check the weak subjectivity requirements:
- *IF* `epoch_number > store.finalized_checkpoint.epoch`,