Merge branch 'master' into vbuterin-patch-1

This commit is contained in:
Danny Ryan 2018-11-20 17:41:18 +09:00
commit addd345b36
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 2765A792E42CE07A
1 changed files with 73 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@ -39,20 +39,21 @@ The primary source of load on the beacon chain are "attestations". Attestations
| `DEPOSIT_CONTRACT_ADDRESS` | **TBD** | - |
| `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE` | 2**8 (= 256) | validators |
| `GENESIS_TIME` | **TBD** | seconds |
| `SLOT_DURATION` | 2**4 (= 16) | seconds |
| `CYCLE_LENGTH` | 2**6 (= 64) | slots | ~17 minutes |
| `RANDAO_SLOTS_PER_LAYER` | 2**12 (= 4096) | slots | ~18 hours |
| `SQRT_E_DROP_TIME` | 2**10 (= 1,024) | cycles | ~12 days |
| `MIN_WITHDRAWAL_PERIOD` | 2**12 (= 4096) | slots | ~18 hours |
| `WITHDRAWALS_PER_CYCLE` | 8 | - | 4.3m ETH in ~6 months |
| `COLLECTIVE_PENALTY_CALCULATION_PERIOD` | 2**19 (= 524,288) | slots | ~3 months |
| `DELETION_PERIOD` | 2**21 (= 2,097,152) | slots | ~1.06 years |
| `SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD` | 2**16 (= 65,536) | slots | ~12 days |
| `BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT` | 2**9 (= 512) | — |
| `SLOT_DURATION` | 6 | seconds |
| `CYCLE_LENGTH` | 2**6 (= 64) | slots | ~6 minutes |
| `MIN_VALIDATOR_SET_CHANGE_INTERVAL` | 2**8 (= 256) | slots | ~25 minutes |
| `SHARD_PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_CHANGE_PERIOD` | 2**17 (= 131,072) | slots | ~9 days |
| `MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY` | 2**2 (= 4) | slots | ~24 seconds |
| `RANDAO_SLOTS_PER_LAYER` | 2**12 (= 4096) | slots | ~7 hours |
| `SQRT_E_DROP_TIME` | 2**11 (= 1,024) | cycles | ~9 days |
| `WITHDRAWALS_PER_CYCLE` | 2**2 (=4) | validators | 5.2m ETH in ~6 months |
| `MIN_WITHDRAWAL_PERIOD` | 2**13 (= 8192) | slots | ~14 hours |
| `DELETION_PERIOD` | 2**22 (= 4,194,304) | slots | ~290 days |
| `COLLECTIVE_PENALTY_CALCULATION_PERIOD` | 2**20 (= 1,048,576) | slots | ~2.4 months |
| `BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT` | 2**11 (= 2,048) | — |
| `MAX_VALIDATOR_CHURN_QUOTIENT` | 2**5 (= 32) | — |
| `POW_HASH_VOTING_PERIOD` | 2**10 (=1024) | - |
| `POW_CONTRACT_MERKLE_TREE_DEPTH` | 2**5 (=32) | - |
| `MAX_SPECIALS_PER_BLOCK` | 2**4 (= 16) | - |
| `LOGOUT_MESSAGE` | `"LOGOUT"` | — |
| `INITIAL_FORK_VERSION` | 0 | — |
@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ The primary source of load on the beacon chain are "attestations". Attestations
* See a recommended min committee size of 111 here https://vitalik.ca/files/Ithaca201807_Sharding.pdf); our algorithm will generally ensure the committee size is at least half the target.
* The `SQRT_E_DROP_TIME` constant is the amount of time it takes for the quadratic leak to cut deposits of non-participating validators by ~39.4%.
* The `BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT` constant is the per-cycle interest rate assuming all validators are participating, assuming total deposits of 1 ETH. It corresponds to ~3.88% annual interest assuming 10 million participating ETH.
* The `BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT` constant dictates the per-cycle interest rate assuming all validators are participating, assuming total deposits of 1 ETH. It corresponds to ~2.57% annual interest assuming 10 million participating ETH.
* At most `1/MAX_VALIDATOR_CHURN_QUOTIENT` of the validators can change during each validator set change.
**Validator status codes**
@ -76,11 +77,12 @@ The primary source of load on the beacon chain are "attestations". Attestations
**Special record types**
| Name | Value |
| - | :-: |
| `LOGOUT` | `0` |
| `CASPER_SLASHING` | `1` |
| `RANDAO_CHANGE` | `2` |
| Name | Value | Maximum count |
| - | :-: | :-: |
| `LOGOUT` | `0` | `16` |
| `CASPER_SLASHING` | `1` | `16` |
| `PROPOSER_SLASHING` | `2` | `16` |
| `DEPOSIT_PROOF` | `3` | `16` |
**Validator set delta flags**
@ -116,7 +118,9 @@ A `BeaconBlock` has the following fields:
# Attestations
'attestations': [AttestationRecord],
# Specials (e.g. logouts, penalties)
'specials': [SpecialRecord]
'specials': [SpecialRecord],
# Proposer signature
'proposer_signature': ['uint256'],
}
```
@ -147,6 +151,21 @@ An `AttestationRecord` has the following fields:
}
```
A `ProposalSignedData` has the following fields:
```python
{
# Fork version
'fork_version': 'uint64',
# Slot number
'slot': 'uint64',
# Shard ID (or `2**64 - 1` for beacon chain)
'shard_id': 'uint64',
# Block hash
'block_hash': 'hash32',
}
```
An `AttestationSignedData` has the following fields:
```python
@ -489,6 +508,15 @@ def get_block_hash(state: BeaconState,
`get_block_hash(_, _, s)` should always return the block hash in the beacon chain at slot `s`, and `get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(_, s)` should not change unless the validator set changes.
The following is a function that determines the proposer of a beacon block:
```python
def get_beacon_proposer(state:BeaconState, slot: int) -> ValidatorRecord:
first_committee = get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(state, slot)[0]
index = first_committee[slot % len(first_committee)]
return state.validators[index]
```
We define another set of helpers to be used throughout: `bytes1(x): return x.to_bytes(1, 'big')`, `bytes2(x): return x.to_bytes(2, 'big')`, and so on for all integers, particularly 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 32.
We define a function to "add a link" to the validator hash chain, used when a validator is added or removed:
@ -580,7 +608,8 @@ A valid block with slot `0` (the "genesis block") has the following values. Othe
'ancestor_hashes': [bytes32(0) for i in range(32)],
'state_root': STARTUP_STATE_ROOT,
'attestations': [],
'specials': []
'specials': [],
'proposer_signature': [0, 0]
}
```
@ -803,11 +832,11 @@ def update_ancestor_hashes(parent_ancestor_hashes: List[Hash32],
return new_ancestor_hashes
```
A beacon block can have 0 or more `AttestationRecord` objects
### Verify attestations
For each one of these attestations:
For each `AttestationRecord` object:
* Verify that `slot <= parent.slot` and `slot >= max(parent.slot - CYCLE_LENGTH + 1, 0)`.
* Verify that `slot <= block.slot - MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY` and `slot >= max(parent.slot - CYCLE_LENGTH + 1, 0)`.
* Verify that `justified_slot` is equal to or earlier than `last_justified_slot`.
* Verify that `justified_block_hash` is the hash of the block in the current chain at the slot -- `justified_slot`.
* Verify that either `last_crosslink_hash` or `shard_block_hash` equals `state.crosslinks[shard].shard_block_hash`.
@ -820,12 +849,16 @@ For each one of these attestations:
Extend the list of `AttestationRecord` objects in the `state` with those included in the block, ordering the new additions in the same order as they came in the block.
Let `curblock_proposer_index` be the validator index of the `block.slot % len(get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(state, block.slot)[0].committee)`'th attester in `get_shards_and_committees_for_slot(state, block.slot)[0]`, and `parent_proposer_index` be the validator index of the parent block, calculated similarly. Verify that an attestation from the `parent_proposer_index`'th validator is part of the first (ie. item 0 in the array) `AttestationRecord` object; this attester can be considered to be the proposer of the parent block. In general, when a beacon block is produced, it is broadcasted at the network layer along with the attestation from its proposer.
### Verify proposer signature
Additionally, verify and update the RANDAO reveal. This is done as follows:
Let `proposal_hash = hash(ProposalSignedData(fork_version, block.slot, 2**64 - 1, block_hash_without_sig))` where `block_hash_without_sig` is the hash of the block except setting `proposer_signature` to `[0, 0]`.
Verify that `BLSVerify(pubkey=get_beacon_proposer(state, block.slot).pubkey, data=proposal_hash, sig=block.proposer_signature)` passes.
### Verify and process RANDAO reveal
* Let `repeat_hash(x, n) = x if n == 0 else repeat_hash(hash(x), n-1)`.
* Let `V = state.validators[curblock_proposer_index]`.
* Let `V = get_beacon_proposer(state, block.slot).
* Verify that `repeat_hash(block.randao_reveal, (block.slot - V.randao_last_change) // RANDAO_SLOTS_PER_LAYER + 1) == V.randao_commitment`
* Set `state.randao_mix = xor(state.randao_mix, block.randao_reveal)`, `V.randao_commitment = block.randao_reveal`, `V.randao_last_change = block.slot`
@ -833,7 +866,7 @@ Finally, if `block.candidate_pow_hash_chain_tip = state.candidate_pow_hash_chain
### Process penalties, logouts and other special objects
Verify that there are at most `MAX_SPECIALS_PER_BLOCK` objects in `block.specials`.
Verify that the quantity of each type of object in `block.specials` is less than or equal to its maximum (see table at the top). Verify that objects are sorted in order of `kind` (ie. `block.specials[i+1].kind >= block.specials[i].kind` for all `0 <= i < len(block.specials-1)`).
For each `SpecialRecord` `obj` in `block.specials`, verify that its `kind` is one of the below values, and that `obj.data` deserializes according to the format for the given `kind`, then process it. The word "verify" when used below means that if the given verification check fails, the block containing that `SpecialRecord` is invalid.
@ -874,6 +907,19 @@ Perform the following checks:
For each validator index `v` in `intersection`, if `state.validators[v].status` does not equal `PENALIZED`, then run `exit_validator(v, state, penalize=True, current_slot=block.slot)`
#### PROPOSER_SLASHING
```python
{
'proposer_index': 'uint24',
'proposal1_data': ProposalSignedData,
'proposal1_signature': '[uint256]',
'proposal2_data': ProposalSignedData,
'proposal1_signature': '[uint256]',
}
```
For each `proposal_signature`, verify that `BLSVerify(pubkey=validators[proposer_index].pubkey, msg=hash(proposal_data), sig=proposal_signature)` passes. Verify that `proposal1_data.slot == proposal2_data.slot` but `proposal1 != proposal2`. If `state.validators[proposer_index].status` does not equal `PENALIZED`, then run `exit_validator(proposer_index, state, penalize=True, current_slot=block.slot)`
#### DEPOSIT_PROOF
```python
@ -929,7 +975,7 @@ Note: When applying penalties in the following balance recalculations implemente
* Let `total_balance` be the total balance of active validators.
* Let `total_balance_in_eth = total_balance // GWEI_PER_ETH`.
* Let `reward_quotient = BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT * int_sqrt(total_balance_in_eth)`. (The per-slot maximum interest rate is `1/reward_quotient`.)
* Let `reward_quotient = BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT * int_sqrt(total_balance_in_eth)`. (The per-slot maximum interest rate is `2/reward_quotient`.)
* Let `quadratic_penalty_quotient = SQRT_E_DROP_TIME**2`. (The portion lost by offline validators after `D` cycles is about `D*D/2/quadratic_penalty_quotient`.)
* Let `time_since_finality = slot - last_finalized_slot`.