Merge pull request #492 from ethereum/end-of-epoch

epoch trans at end of epoch and fix finality conditions
This commit is contained in:
Danny Ryan 2019-01-28 08:28:25 -07:00 committed by GitHub
commit a249ab4519
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 272 additions and 209 deletions

View File

@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
- [Deposit contract](#deposit-contract) - [Deposit contract](#deposit-contract)
- [Initial values](#initial-values) - [Initial values](#initial-values)
- [Time parameters](#time-parameters) - [Time parameters](#time-parameters)
- [State list lengths](#state-list-lengths)
- [Reward and penalty quotients](#reward-and-penalty-quotients) - [Reward and penalty quotients](#reward-and-penalty-quotients)
- [Status flags](#status-flags) - [Status flags](#status-flags)
- [Max operations per block](#max-operations-per-block) - [Max operations per block](#max-operations-per-block)
@ -61,18 +62,22 @@
- [Helper functions](#helper-functions) - [Helper functions](#helper-functions)
- [`hash`](#hash) - [`hash`](#hash)
- [`hash_tree_root`](#hash_tree_root) - [`hash_tree_root`](#hash_tree_root)
- [`slot_to_epoch`](#slot_to_epoch)
- [`get_current_epoch`](#get_current_epoch)
- [`get_epoch_start_slot`](#get_epoch_start_slot)
- [`is_active_validator`](#is_active_validator) - [`is_active_validator`](#is_active_validator)
- [`get_active_validator_indices`](#get_active_validator_indices) - [`get_active_validator_indices`](#get_active_validator_indices)
- [`shuffle`](#shuffle) - [`shuffle`](#shuffle)
- [`split`](#split) - [`split`](#split)
- [`get_committee_count_per_slot`](#get_committee_count_per_slot) - [`get_epoch_committee_count`](#get_epoch_committee_count)
- [`get_shuffling`](#get_shuffling) - [`get_shuffling`](#get_shuffling)
- [`get_previous_epoch_committee_count_per_slot`](#get_previous_epoch_committee_count_per_slot) - [`get_previous_epoch_committee_count`](#get_previous_epoch_committee_count)
- [`get_current_epoch_committee_count_per_slot`](#get_current_epoch_committee_count_per_slot) - [`get_current_epoch_committee_count`](#get_current_epoch_committee_count)
- [`get_crosslink_committees_at_slot`](#get_crosslink_committees_at_slot) - [`get_crosslink_committees_at_slot`](#get_crosslink_committees_at_slot)
- [`get_block_root`](#get_block_root) - [`get_block_root`](#get_block_root)
- [`get_randao_mix`](#get_randao_mix) - [`get_randao_mix`](#get_randao_mix)
- [`get_active_index_root`](#get_active_index_root) - [`get_active_index_root`](#get_active_index_root)
- [`generate_seed`](#generate_seed)
- [`get_beacon_proposer_index`](#get_beacon_proposer_index) - [`get_beacon_proposer_index`](#get_beacon_proposer_index)
- [`merkle_root`](#merkle_root) - [`merkle_root`](#merkle_root)
- [`get_attestation_participants`](#get_attestation_participants) - [`get_attestation_participants`](#get_attestation_participants)
@ -84,7 +89,7 @@
- [`is_double_vote`](#is_double_vote) - [`is_double_vote`](#is_double_vote)
- [`is_surround_vote`](#is_surround_vote) - [`is_surround_vote`](#is_surround_vote)
- [`integer_squareroot`](#integer_squareroot) - [`integer_squareroot`](#integer_squareroot)
- [`entry_exit_effect_slot`](#entry_exit_effect_slot) - [`get_entry_exit_effect_epoch`](#get_entry_exit_effect_epoch)
- [`bls_verify`](#bls_verify) - [`bls_verify`](#bls_verify)
- [`bls_verify_multiple`](#bls_verify_multiple) - [`bls_verify_multiple`](#bls_verify_multiple)
- [`bls_aggregate_pubkeys`](#bls_aggregate_pubkeys) - [`bls_aggregate_pubkeys`](#bls_aggregate_pubkeys)
@ -92,10 +97,10 @@
- [Routine for processing deposits](#routine-for-processing-deposits) - [Routine for processing deposits](#routine-for-processing-deposits)
- [Routines for updating validator status](#routines-for-updating-validator-status) - [Routines for updating validator status](#routines-for-updating-validator-status)
- [Per-slot processing](#per-slot-processing) - [Per-slot processing](#per-slot-processing)
- [Misc counters](#misc-counters) - [Slot](#slot)
- [Block roots](#block-roots) - [Block roots](#block-roots)
- [Per-block processing](#per-block-processing) - [Per-block processing](#per-block-processing)
- [Slot](#slot) - [Slot](#slot-1)
- [Proposer signature](#proposer-signature) - [Proposer signature](#proposer-signature)
- [RANDAO](#randao) - [RANDAO](#randao)
- [Eth1 data](#eth1-data) - [Eth1 data](#eth1-data)
@ -167,10 +172,6 @@ Code snippets appearing in `this style` are to be interpreted as Python code. Be
| `MAX_BALANCE_CHURN_QUOTIENT` | `2**5` (= 32) | - | | `MAX_BALANCE_CHURN_QUOTIENT` | `2**5` (= 32) | - |
| `BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER` | `2**64 - 1` | - | | `BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER` | `2**64 - 1` | - |
| `MAX_CASPER_VOTES` | `2**10` (= 1,024) | votes | | `MAX_CASPER_VOTES` | `2**10` (= 1,024) | votes |
| `LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | block roots |
| `LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | randao mixes |
| `LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | index roots |
| `LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | epochs | ~36 days |
| `MAX_WITHDRAWALS_PER_EPOCH` | `2**2` (= 4) | withdrawals | | `MAX_WITHDRAWALS_PER_EPOCH` | `2**2` (= 4) | withdrawals |
* For the safety of crosslinks `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE` exceeds [the recommended minimum committee size of 111](https://vitalik.ca/files/Ithaca201807_Sharding.pdf); with sufficient active validators (at least `EPOCH_LENGTH * TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE`), the shuffling algorithm ensures committee sizes at least `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE`. (Unbiasable randomness with a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) will improve committee robustness and lower the safe minimum committee size.) * For the safety of crosslinks `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE` exceeds [the recommended minimum committee size of 111](https://vitalik.ca/files/Ithaca201807_Sharding.pdf); with sufficient active validators (at least `EPOCH_LENGTH * TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE`), the shuffling algorithm ensures committee sizes at least `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE`. (Unbiasable randomness with a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) will improve committee robustness and lower the safe minimum committee size.)
@ -189,13 +190,16 @@ Code snippets appearing in `this style` are to be interpreted as Python code. Be
| Name | Value | | Name | Value |
| - | - | | - | - |
| `GENESIS_FORK_VERSION` | `0` | | `GENESIS_FORK_VERSION` | `0` |
| `GENESIS_SLOT` | `0` | | `GENESIS_SLOT` | `2**19` |
| `GENESIS_EPOCH` | `slot_to_epoch(GENESIS_SLOT)` |
| `GENESIS_START_SHARD` | `0` | | `GENESIS_START_SHARD` | `0` |
| `FAR_FUTURE_SLOT` | `2**64 - 1` | | `FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH` | `2**64 - 1` |
| `ZERO_HASH` | `int_to_bytes32(0)` | | `ZERO_HASH` | `int_to_bytes32(0)` |
| `EMPTY_SIGNATURE` | `int_to_bytes96(0)` | | `EMPTY_SIGNATURE` | `int_to_bytes96(0)` |
| `BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX_BYTE` | `int_to_bytes1(0)` | | `BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX_BYTE` | `int_to_bytes1(0)` |
* `GENESIS_SLOT` should be at least as large in terms of time as the largest of the time parameters or state list lengths below (ie. it should be at least as large as any value measured in slots, and at least `EPOCH_LENGTH` times as large as any value measured in epochs).
### Time parameters ### Time parameters
| Name | Value | Unit | Duration | | Name | Value | Unit | Duration |
@ -203,10 +207,19 @@ Code snippets appearing in `this style` are to be interpreted as Python code. Be
| `SLOT_DURATION` | `6` | seconds | 6 seconds | | `SLOT_DURATION` | `6` | seconds | 6 seconds |
| `MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY` | `2**2` (= 4) | slots | 24 seconds | | `MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY` | `2**2` (= 4) | slots | 24 seconds |
| `EPOCH_LENGTH` | `2**6` (= 64) | slots | 6.4 minutes | | `EPOCH_LENGTH` | `2**6` (= 64) | slots | 6.4 minutes |
| `SEED_LOOKAHEAD` | `2**6` (= 64) | slots | 6.4 minutes | | `SEED_LOOKAHEAD` | `2**0` (= 1) | epochs | 6.4 minutes |
| `ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY` | `2**8` (= 256) | slots | 25.6 minutes | | `ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY` | `2**2` (= 4) | epochs | 25.6 minutes |
| `ETH1_DATA_VOTING_PERIOD` | `2**10` (= 1,024) | slots | ~1.7 hours | | `ETH1_DATA_VOTING_PERIOD` | `2**4` (= 16) | epochs | ~1.7 hours |
| `MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWAL_TIME` | `2**14` (= 16,384) | slots | ~27 hours | | `MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWAL_EPOCHS` | `2**8` (= 256) | epochs | ~27 hours |
### State list lengths
| Name | Value | Unit | Duration |
| - | - | :-: | :-: |
| `LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | slots | ~13 hours |
| `LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | epochs | ~36 days |
| `LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | epochs | ~36 days |
| `LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | epochs | ~36 days |
### Reward and penalty quotients ### Reward and penalty quotients
@ -333,8 +346,8 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
'shard_block_root': 'bytes32', 'shard_block_root': 'bytes32',
# Last crosslink's hash of root # Last crosslink's hash of root
'latest_crosslink_root': 'bytes32', 'latest_crosslink_root': 'bytes32',
# Slot of the last justified beacon block # Last justified epoch in the beacon state
'justified_slot': 'uint64', 'justified_epoch': 'uint64',
# Hash of the last justified beacon block # Hash of the last justified beacon block
'justified_block_root': 'bytes32', 'justified_block_root': 'bytes32',
} }
@ -398,8 +411,8 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
```python ```python
{ {
# Minimum slot for processing exit # Minimum epoch for processing exit
'slot': 'uint64', 'epoch': 'uint64',
# Index of the exiting validator # Index of the exiting validator
'validator_index': 'uint24', 'validator_index': 'uint24',
# Validator signature # Validator signature
@ -470,7 +483,7 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
# Validator registry # Validator registry
'validator_registry': [Validator], 'validator_registry': [Validator],
'validator_balances': ['uint64'], 'validator_balances': ['uint64'],
'validator_registry_update_slot': 'uint64', 'validator_registry_update_epoch': 'uint64',
'validator_registry_exit_count': 'uint64', 'validator_registry_exit_count': 'uint64',
# Randomness and committees # Randomness and committees
@ -478,8 +491,8 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
'latest_vdf_outputs': ['bytes32'], 'latest_vdf_outputs': ['bytes32'],
'previous_epoch_start_shard': 'uint64', 'previous_epoch_start_shard': 'uint64',
'current_epoch_start_shard': 'uint64', 'current_epoch_start_shard': 'uint64',
'previous_epoch_calculation_slot': 'uint64', 'previous_calculation_epoch': 'uint64',
'current_epoch_calculation_slot': 'uint64', 'current_calculation_epoch': 'uint64',
'previous_epoch_seed': 'bytes32', 'previous_epoch_seed': 'bytes32',
'current_epoch_seed': 'bytes32', 'current_epoch_seed': 'bytes32',
@ -487,10 +500,10 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
'custody_challenges': [CustodyChallenge], 'custody_challenges': [CustodyChallenge],
# Finality # Finality
'previous_justified_slot': 'uint64', 'previous_justified_epoch': 'uint64',
'justified_slot': 'uint64', 'justified_epoch': 'uint64',
'justification_bitfield': 'uint64', 'justification_bitfield': 'uint64',
'finalized_slot': 'uint64', 'finalized_epoch': 'uint64',
# Recent state # Recent state
'latest_crosslinks': [Crosslink], 'latest_crosslinks': [Crosslink],
@ -514,14 +527,14 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
'pubkey': 'bytes48', 'pubkey': 'bytes48',
# Withdrawal credentials # Withdrawal credentials
'withdrawal_credentials': 'bytes32', 'withdrawal_credentials': 'bytes32',
# Slot when validator activated # Epoch when validator activated
'activation_slot': 'uint64', 'activation_epoch': 'uint64',
# Slot when validator exited # Epoch when validator exited
'exit_slot': 'uint64', 'exit_epoch': 'uint64',
# Slot when validator withdrew # Epoch when validator withdrew
'withdrawal_slot': 'uint64', 'withdrawal_epoch': 'uint64',
# Slot when validator was penalized # Epoch when validator was penalized
'penalized_slot': 'uint64', 'penalized_epoch': 'uint64',
# Exit counter when validator exited # Exit counter when validator exited
'exit_count': 'uint64', 'exit_count': 'uint64',
# Status flags # Status flags
@ -537,8 +550,8 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
```python ```python
{ {
# Slot number # Epoch number
'slot': 'uint64', 'epoch': 'uint64',
# Shard block root # Shard block root
'shard_block_root': 'bytes32', 'shard_block_root': 'bytes32',
} }
@ -567,8 +580,8 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
'previous_version': 'uint64', 'previous_version': 'uint64',
# Current fork version # Current fork version
'current_version': 'uint64', 'current_version': 'uint64',
# Fork slot number # Fork epoch number
'slot': 'uint64', 'epoch': 'uint64',
} }
``` ```
@ -601,6 +614,7 @@ We define the following Python custom types for type hinting and readability:
| Name | Type | Description | | Name | Type | Description |
| - | - | - | | - | - | - |
| `SlotNumber` | unsigned 64-bit integer | the number of a slot | | `SlotNumber` | unsigned 64-bit integer | the number of a slot |
| `EpochNumber` | unsigned 64-bit integer | the number of an epoch |
| `ShardNumber` | unsigned 64-bit integer | the number of a shard | | `ShardNumber` | unsigned 64-bit integer | the number of a shard |
| `ValidatorIndex` | unsigned 24-bit integer | the index number of a validator in the registry | | `ValidatorIndex` | unsigned 24-bit integer | the index number of a validator in the registry |
| `Gwei` | unsigned 64-bit integer | an amount in Gwei | | `Gwei` | unsigned 64-bit integer | an amount in Gwei |
@ -727,8 +741,8 @@ Beacon block production is significantly different because of the proof of stake
The beacon chain fork choice rule is a hybrid that combines justification and finality with Latest Message Driven (LMD) Greediest Heaviest Observed SubTree (GHOST). At any point in time a [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` subjectively calculates the beacon chain head as follows. The beacon chain fork choice rule is a hybrid that combines justification and finality with Latest Message Driven (LMD) Greediest Heaviest Observed SubTree (GHOST). At any point in time a [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` subjectively calculates the beacon chain head as follows.
* Abstractly define `Store` as the type of storage object for the chain data and `store` be the set of attestations and blocks that the [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` has observed and verified (in particular, block ancestors must be recursively verified). Attestations not yet included in any chain are still included in `store`. * Abstractly define `Store` as the type of storage object for the chain data and `store` be the set of attestations and blocks that the [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` has observed and verified (in particular, block ancestors must be recursively verified). Attestations not yet included in any chain are still included in `store`.
* Let `finalized_head` be the finalized block with the highest slot number. (A block `B` is finalized if there is a descendant of `B` in `store` the processing of which sets `B` as finalized.) * Let `finalized_head` be the finalized block with the highest epoch. (A block `B` is finalized if there is a descendant of `B` in `store` the processing of which sets `B` as finalized.)
* Let `justified_head` be the descendant of `finalized_head` with the highest slot number that has been justified for at least `EPOCH_LENGTH` slots. (A block `B` is justified if there is a descendant of `B` in `store` the processing of which sets `B` as justified.) If no such descendant exists set `justified_head` to `finalized_head`. * Let `justified_head` be the descendant of `finalized_head` with the highest epoch that has been justified for at least 1 epoch. (A block `B` is justified if there is a descendant of `B` in `store` the processing of which sets `B` as justified.) If no such descendant exists set `justified_head` to `finalized_head`.
* Let `get_ancestor(store: Store, block: BeaconBlock, slot: SlotNumber) -> BeaconBlock` be the ancestor of `block` with slot number `slot`. The `get_ancestor` function can be defined recursively as `def get_ancestor(store: Store, block: BeaconBlock, slot: SlotNumber) -> BeaconBlock: return block if block.slot == slot else get_ancestor(store, store.get_parent(block), slot)`. * Let `get_ancestor(store: Store, block: BeaconBlock, slot: SlotNumber) -> BeaconBlock` be the ancestor of `block` with slot number `slot`. The `get_ancestor` function can be defined recursively as `def get_ancestor(store: Store, block: BeaconBlock, slot: SlotNumber) -> BeaconBlock: return block if block.slot == slot else get_ancestor(store, store.get_parent(block), slot)`.
* Let `get_latest_attestation(store: Store, validator: Validator) -> Attestation` be the attestation with the highest slot number in `store` from `validator`. If several such attestations exist, use the one the [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` observed first. * Let `get_latest_attestation(store: Store, validator: Validator) -> Attestation` be the attestation with the highest slot number in `store` from `validator`. If several such attestations exist, use the one the [validator](#dfn-validator) `v` observed first.
* Let `get_latest_attestation_target(store: Store, validator: Validator) -> BeaconBlock` be the target block in the attestation `get_latest_attestation(store, validator)`. * Let `get_latest_attestation_target(store: Store, validator: Validator) -> BeaconBlock` be the target block in the attestation `get_latest_attestation(store, validator)`.
@ -768,7 +782,7 @@ def lmd_ghost(store: Store, start_state: BeaconState, start_block: BeaconBlock)
We now define the state transition function. At a high level the state transition is made up of two parts: We now define the state transition function. At a high level the state transition is made up of two parts:
1. The per-slot transitions, which happens every slot, and only affects a parts of the `state`. 1. The per-slot transitions, which happens every slot, and only affects a parts of the `state`.
2. The per-epoch transitions, which happens at every epoch boundary (i.e. `state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH == 0`), and affects the entire `state`. 2. The per-epoch transitions, which happens in the last slot of every epoch (i.e. `(state.slot + 1) % EPOCH_LENGTH == 0`), and affects the entire `state`.
The per-slot transitions generally focus on verifying aggregate signatures and saving temporary records relating to the per-slot activity in the `BeaconState`. The per-epoch transitions focus on the [validator](#dfn-validator) registry, including adjusting balances and activating and exiting [validators](#dfn-validator), as well as processing crosslinks and managing block justification/finalization. The per-slot transitions generally focus on verifying aggregate signatures and saving temporary records relating to the per-slot activity in the `BeaconState`. The per-epoch transitions focus on the [validator](#dfn-validator) registry, including adjusting balances and activating and exiting [validators](#dfn-validator), as well as processing crosslinks and managing block justification/finalization.
@ -786,23 +800,44 @@ Note: We aim to migrate to a S[T/N]ARK-friendly hash function in a future Ethere
`def hash_tree_root(object: SSZSerializable) -> Bytes32` is a function for hashing objects into a single root utilizing a hash tree structure. `hash_tree_root` is defined in the [SimpleSerialize spec](https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/master/specs/simple-serialize.md#tree-hash). `def hash_tree_root(object: SSZSerializable) -> Bytes32` is a function for hashing objects into a single root utilizing a hash tree structure. `hash_tree_root` is defined in the [SimpleSerialize spec](https://github.com/ethereum/eth2.0-specs/blob/master/specs/simple-serialize.md#tree-hash).
#### `slot_to_epoch`
```python
def slot_to_epoch(slot: SlotNumber) -> EpochNumber:
return slot // EPOCH_LENGTH
```
#### `get_current_epoch`
```python
def get_current_epoch(state: BeaconState) -> EpochNumber:
return slot_to_epoch(state.slot)
```
#### `get_epoch_start_slot`
```python
def get_epoch_start_slot(epoch: EpochNumber) -> SlotNumber:
return epoch * EPOCH_LENGTH
```
#### `is_active_validator` #### `is_active_validator`
```python ```python
def is_active_validator(validator: Validator, slot: SlotNumber) -> bool: def is_active_validator(validator: Validator, epoch: EpochNumber) -> bool:
""" """
Checks if ``validator`` is active. Checks if ``validator`` is active.
""" """
return validator.activation_slot <= slot < validator.exit_slot return validator.activation_epoch <= epoch < validator.exit_epoch
``` ```
#### `get_active_validator_indices` #### `get_active_validator_indices`
```python ```python
def get_active_validator_indices(validators: List[Validator], slot: SlotNumber) -> List[ValidatorIndex]: def get_active_validator_indices(validators: List[Validator], epoch: EpochNumber) -> List[ValidatorIndex]:
""" """
Gets indices of active validators from ``validators``. Gets indices of active validators from ``validators``.
""" """
return [i for i, v in enumerate(validators) if is_active_validator(v, slot)] return [i for i, v in enumerate(validators) if is_active_validator(v, epoch)]
``` ```
#### `shuffle` #### `shuffle`
@ -872,17 +907,17 @@ def split(values: List[Any], split_count: int) -> List[List[Any]]:
] ]
``` ```
#### `get_committee_count_per_slot` #### `get_epoch_committee_count`
```python ```python
def get_committee_count_per_slot(active_validator_count: int) -> int: def get_epoch_committee_count(active_validator_count: int) -> int:
return max( return max(
1, 1,
min( min(
SHARD_COUNT // EPOCH_LENGTH, SHARD_COUNT // EPOCH_LENGTH,
active_validator_count // EPOCH_LENGTH // TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE, active_validator_count // EPOCH_LENGTH // TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE,
) )
) ) * EPOCH_LENGTH
``` ```
#### `get_shuffling` #### `get_shuffling`
@ -890,52 +925,49 @@ def get_committee_count_per_slot(active_validator_count: int) -> int:
```python ```python
def get_shuffling(seed: Bytes32, def get_shuffling(seed: Bytes32,
validators: List[Validator], validators: List[Validator],
slot: SlotNumber) -> List[List[ValidatorIndex]] epoch: EpochNumber) -> List[List[ValidatorIndex]]
""" """
Shuffles ``validators`` into crosslink committees seeded by ``seed`` and ``slot``. Shuffles ``validators`` into crosslink committees seeded by ``seed`` and ``epoch``.
Returns a list of ``EPOCH_LENGTH * committees_per_slot`` committees where each Returns a list of ``committees_per_epoch`` committees where each
committee is itself a list of validator indices. committee is itself a list of validator indices.
""" """
# Normalizes slot to start of epoch boundary active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(validators, epoch)
slot -= slot % EPOCH_LENGTH
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(validators, slot) committees_per_epoch = get_epoch_committee_count(len(active_validator_indices))
committees_per_slot = get_committee_count_per_slot(len(active_validator_indices))
# Shuffle # Shuffle
seed = xor(seed, int_to_bytes32(slot)) seed = xor(seed, int_to_bytes32(epoch))
shuffled_active_validator_indices = shuffle(active_validator_indices, seed) shuffled_active_validator_indices = shuffle(active_validator_indices, seed)
# Split the shuffled list into epoch_length * committees_per_slot pieces # Split the shuffled list into committees_per_epoch pieces
return split(shuffled_active_validator_indices, committees_per_slot * EPOCH_LENGTH) return split(shuffled_active_validator_indices, committees_per_epoch)
``` ```
**Invariant**: if `get_shuffling(seed, validators, slot)` returns some value `x` for some `slot <= state.slot + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY`, it should return the same value `x` for the same `seed` and `slot` and possible future modifications of `validators` forever in phase 0, and until the ~1 year deletion delay in phase 2 and in the future. **Invariant**: if `get_shuffling(seed, validators, epoch)` returns some value `x` for some `epoch <= get_current_epoch(state) + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY`, it should return the same value `x` for the same `seed` and `epoch` and possible future modifications of `validators` forever in phase 0, and until the ~1 year deletion delay in phase 2 and in the future.
**Note**: this definition and the next few definitions make heavy use of repetitive computing. Production implementations are expected to appropriately use caching/memoization to avoid redoing work. **Note**: this definition and the next few definitions make heavy use of repetitive computing. Production implementations are expected to appropriately use caching/memoization to avoid redoing work.
#### `get_previous_epoch_committee_count_per_slot` #### `get_previous_epoch_committee_count`
```python ```python
def get_previous_epoch_committee_count_per_slot(state: BeaconState) -> int: def get_previous_epoch_committee_count(state: BeaconState) -> int:
previous_active_validators = get_active_validator_indices( previous_active_validators = get_active_validator_indices(
state.validator_registry, state.validator_registry,
state.previous_epoch_calculation_slot, state.previous_calculation_epoch,
) )
return get_committee_count_per_slot(len(previous_active_validators)) return get_epoch_committee_count(len(previous_active_validators))
``` ```
#### `get_current_epoch_committee_count_per_slot` #### `get_current_epoch_committee_count`
```python ```python
def get_current_epoch_committee_count_per_slot(state: BeaconState) -> int: def get_current_epoch_committee_count(state: BeaconState) -> int:
current_active_validators = get_active_validator_indices( current_active_validators = get_active_validator_indices(
state.validator_registry, state.validator_registry,
state.current_epoch_calculation_slot, state.current_calculation_epoch,
) )
return get_committee_count_per_slot(len(current_active_validators)) return get_epoch_committee_count(len(current_active_validators))
``` ```
#### `get_crosslink_committees_at_slot` #### `get_crosslink_committees_at_slot`
@ -946,27 +978,32 @@ def get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state: BeaconState,
""" """
Returns the list of ``(committee, shard)`` tuples for the ``slot``. Returns the list of ``(committee, shard)`` tuples for the ``slot``.
""" """
state_epoch_slot = state.slot - (state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH) epoch = slot_to_epoch(slot)
assert state_epoch_slot <= slot + EPOCH_LENGTH current_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
assert slot < state_epoch_slot + EPOCH_LENGTH previous_epoch = current_epoch - 1 if current_epoch > GENESIS_EPOCH else current_epoch
offset = slot % EPOCH_LENGTH next_epoch = current_epoch + 1
if slot < state_epoch_slot: assert previous_epoch <= epoch < next_epoch
committees_per_slot = get_previous_epoch_committee_count_per_slot(state)
shuffling = get_shuffling( if epoch < current_epoch:
state.previous_epoch_seed, committees_per_epoch = get_previous_epoch_committee_count(state)
state.validator_registry, seed = state.previous_epoch_seed
state.previous_epoch_calculation_slot, shuffling_epoch = state.previous_calculation_epoch
) shuffling_start_shard = state.previous_epoch_start_shard
slot_start_shard = (state.previous_epoch_start_shard + committees_per_slot * offset) % SHARD_COUNT
else: else:
committees_per_slot = get_current_epoch_committee_count_per_slot(state) committees_per_epoch = get_current_epoch_committee_count(state)
seed = state.current_epoch_seed
shuffling_epoch = state.current_calculation_epoch
shuffling_start_shard = state.current_epoch_start_shard
shuffling = get_shuffling( shuffling = get_shuffling(
state.current_epoch_seed, seed,
state.validator_registry, state.validator_registry,
state.current_epoch_calculation_slot, shuffling_epoch,
) )
slot_start_shard = (state.current_epoch_start_shard + committees_per_slot * offset) % SHARD_COUNT offset = slot % EPOCH_LENGTH
committees_per_slot = committees_per_epoch // EPOCH_LENGTH
slot_start_shard = (shuffling_start_shard + committees_per_slot * offset) % SHARD_COUNT
return [ return [
( (
@ -998,28 +1035,39 @@ def get_block_root(state: BeaconState,
```python ```python
def get_randao_mix(state: BeaconState, def get_randao_mix(state: BeaconState,
slot: SlotNumber) -> Bytes32: epoch: EpochNumber) -> Bytes32:
""" """
Returns the randao mix at a recent ``slot``. Returns the randao mix at a recent ``epoch``.
""" """
assert state.slot < slot + LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH assert get_current_epoch(state) - LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH < epoch <= get_current_epoch(state)
assert slot <= state.slot return state.latest_randao_mixes[epoch % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH]
return state.latest_randao_mixes[slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH]
``` ```
#### `get_active_index_root` #### `get_active_index_root`
```python ```python
def get_active_index_root(state: BeaconState, def get_active_index_root(state: BeaconState,
slot: SlotNumber) -> Bytes32: epoch: EpochNumber) -> Bytes32:
""" """
Returns the index root at a recent ``slot``. Returns the index root at a recent ``epoch``.
""" """
state_epoch = state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH assert get_current_epoch(state) - LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH < epoch <= get_current_epoch(state)
given_epoch = slot // EPOCH_LENGTH return state.latest_index_roots[epoch % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH]
assert state_epoch < given_epoch + LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH ```
assert given_epoch <= state_epoch
return state.latest_index_roots[given_epoch % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH] #### `generate_seed`
```python
def generate_seed(state: BeaconState,
epoch: EpochNumber) -> Bytes32:
"""
Generate a seed for the given ``epoch``.
"""
return hash(
get_randao_mix(state, epoch - SEED_LOOKAHEAD) +
get_active_index_root(state, epoch)
)
``` ```
#### `get_beacon_proposer_index` #### `get_beacon_proposer_index`
@ -1091,8 +1139,8 @@ def get_effective_balance(state: State, index: ValidatorIndex) -> Gwei:
```python ```python
def get_fork_version(fork: Fork, def get_fork_version(fork: Fork,
slot: SlotNumber) -> int: epoch: EpochNumber) -> int:
if slot < fork.slot: if epoch < fork.epoch:
return fork.previous_version return fork.previous_version
else: else:
return fork.current_version return fork.current_version
@ -1102,11 +1150,11 @@ def get_fork_version(fork: Fork,
```python ```python
def get_domain(fork: Fork, def get_domain(fork: Fork,
slot: SlotNumber, epoch: EpochNumber,
domain_type: int) -> int: domain_type: int) -> int:
return get_fork_version( return get_fork_version(
fork, fork,
slot epoch,
) * 2**32 + domain_type ) * 2**32 + domain_type
``` ```
@ -1129,7 +1177,7 @@ def verify_slashable_vote_data(state: BeaconState, vote_data: SlashableVoteData)
signature=vote_data.aggregate_signature, signature=vote_data.aggregate_signature,
domain=get_domain( domain=get_domain(
state.fork, state.fork,
vote_data.data.slot, slot_to_epoch(vote_data.data.slot),
DOMAIN_ATTESTATION, DOMAIN_ATTESTATION,
), ),
) )
@ -1145,8 +1193,8 @@ def is_double_vote(attestation_data_1: AttestationData,
Returns True if the provided ``AttestationData`` are slashable Returns True if the provided ``AttestationData`` are slashable
due to a 'double vote'. due to a 'double vote'.
""" """
target_epoch_1 = attestation_data_1.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH target_epoch_1 = slot_to_epoch(attestation_data_1.slot)
target_epoch_2 = attestation_data_2.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH target_epoch_2 = slot_to_epoch(attestation_data_2.slot)
return target_epoch_1 == target_epoch_2 return target_epoch_1 == target_epoch_2
``` ```
@ -1162,10 +1210,10 @@ def is_surround_vote(attestation_data_1: AttestationData,
Note: parameter order matters as this function only checks Note: parameter order matters as this function only checks
that ``attestation_data_1`` surrounds ``attestation_data_2``. that ``attestation_data_1`` surrounds ``attestation_data_2``.
""" """
source_epoch_1 = attestation_data_1.justified_slot // EPOCH_LENGTH source_epoch_1 = attestation_data_1.justified_epoch
source_epoch_2 = attestation_data_2.justified_slot // EPOCH_LENGTH source_epoch_2 = attestation_data_2.justified_epoch
target_epoch_1 = attestation_data_1.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH target_epoch_1 = slot_to_epoch(attestation_data_1.slot)
target_epoch_2 = attestation_data_2.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH target_epoch_2 = slot_to_epoch(attestation_data_2.slot)
return ( return (
(source_epoch_1 < source_epoch_2) and (source_epoch_1 < source_epoch_2) and
(source_epoch_2 + 1 == target_epoch_2) and (source_epoch_2 + 1 == target_epoch_2) and
@ -1189,15 +1237,15 @@ def integer_squareroot(n: int) -> int:
return x return x
``` ```
#### `entry_exit_effect_slot` #### `get_entry_exit_effect_epoch`
```python ```python
def entry_exit_effect_slot(n: int) -> int: def get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(epoch: EpochNumber) -> EpochNumber:
""" """
An entry or exit triggered in the slot given by the input takes effect at An entry or exit triggered in the ``epoch`` given by the input takes effect at
the slot given by the output. the epoch given by the output.
""" """
return (n - n % EPOCH_LENGTH) + EPOCH_LENGTH + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY return epoch + 1 + ENTRY_EXIT_DELAY
``` ```
#### `bls_verify` #### `bls_verify`
@ -1253,13 +1301,13 @@ def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
fork=Fork( fork=Fork(
previous_version=GENESIS_FORK_VERSION, previous_version=GENESIS_FORK_VERSION,
current_version=GENESIS_FORK_VERSION, current_version=GENESIS_FORK_VERSION,
slot=GENESIS_SLOT, epoch=GENESIS_EPOCH,
), ),
# Validator registry # Validator registry
validator_registry=[], validator_registry=[],
validator_balances=[], validator_balances=[],
validator_registry_update_slot=GENESIS_SLOT, validator_registry_update_epoch=GENESIS_EPOCH,
validator_registry_exit_count=0, validator_registry_exit_count=0,
# Randomness and committees # Randomness and committees
@ -1267,8 +1315,8 @@ def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
latest_vdf_outputs=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH // EPOCH_LENGTH)], latest_vdf_outputs=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH // EPOCH_LENGTH)],
previous_epoch_start_shard=GENESIS_START_SHARD, previous_epoch_start_shard=GENESIS_START_SHARD,
current_epoch_start_shard=GENESIS_START_SHARD, current_epoch_start_shard=GENESIS_START_SHARD,
previous_epoch_calculation_slot=GENESIS_SLOT, previous_calculation_epoch=GENESIS_EPOCH,
current_epoch_calculation_slot=GENESIS_SLOT, current_calculation_epoch=GENESIS_EPOCH,
previous_epoch_seed=ZERO_HASH, previous_epoch_seed=ZERO_HASH,
current_epoch_seed=ZERO_HASH, current_epoch_seed=ZERO_HASH,
@ -1276,13 +1324,13 @@ def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
custody_challenges=[], custody_challenges=[],
# Finality # Finality
previous_justified_slot=GENESIS_SLOT, previous_justified_epoch=GENESIS_EPOCH,
justified_slot=GENESIS_SLOT, justified_epoch=GENESIS_EPOCH,
justification_bitfield=0, justification_bitfield=0,
finalized_slot=GENESIS_SLOT, finalized_epoch=GENESIS_EPOCH,
# Recent state # Recent state
latest_crosslinks=[Crosslink(slot=GENESIS_SLOT, shard_block_root=ZERO_HASH) for _ in range(SHARD_COUNT)], latest_crosslinks=[Crosslink(epoch=GENESIS_EPOCH, shard_block_root=ZERO_HASH) for _ in range(SHARD_COUNT)],
latest_block_roots=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH)], latest_block_roots=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH)],
latest_index_roots=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH)], latest_index_roots=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH)],
latest_penalized_balances=[0 for _ in range(LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH)], latest_penalized_balances=[0 for _ in range(LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH)],
@ -1309,6 +1357,9 @@ def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
if get_effective_balance(state, validator_index) >= MAX_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT: if get_effective_balance(state, validator_index) >= MAX_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT:
activate_validator(state, validator_index, True) activate_validator(state, validator_index, True)
state.latest_index_roots[GENESIS_EPOCH % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH] = hash_tree_root(get_active_validator_indices(state, GENESIS_EPOCH))
state.current_epoch_seed = generate_seed(state, GENESIS_EPOCH)
return state return state
``` ```
@ -1333,7 +1384,7 @@ def validate_proof_of_possession(state: BeaconState,
signature=proof_of_possession, signature=proof_of_possession,
domain=get_domain( domain=get_domain(
state.fork, state.fork,
state.slot, get_current_epoch(state),
DOMAIN_DEPOSIT, DOMAIN_DEPOSIT,
) )
) )
@ -1366,10 +1417,10 @@ def process_deposit(state: BeaconState,
validator = Validator( validator = Validator(
pubkey=pubkey, pubkey=pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials=withdrawal_credentials, withdrawal_credentials=withdrawal_credentials,
activation_slot=FAR_FUTURE_SLOT, activation_epoch=FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH,
exit_slot=FAR_FUTURE_SLOT, exit_epoch=FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH,
withdrawal_slot=FAR_FUTURE_SLOT, withdrawal_epoch=FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH,
penalized_slot=FAR_FUTURE_SLOT, penalized_epoch=FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH,
exit_count=0, exit_count=0,
status_flags=0, status_flags=0,
latest_custody_reseed_slot=GENESIS_SLOT, latest_custody_reseed_slot=GENESIS_SLOT,
@ -1395,7 +1446,7 @@ Note: All functions in this section mutate `state`.
def activate_validator(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex, genesis: bool) -> None: def activate_validator(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex, genesis: bool) -> None:
validator = state.validator_registry[index] validator = state.validator_registry[index]
validator.activation_slot = GENESIS_SLOT if genesis else entry_exit_effect_slot(state.slot) validator.activation_epoch = GENESIS_EPOCH if genesis else get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(get_current_epoch(state))
``` ```
```python ```python
@ -1409,10 +1460,10 @@ def exit_validator(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex) -> None:
validator = state.validator_registry[index] validator = state.validator_registry[index]
# The following updates only occur if not previous exited # The following updates only occur if not previous exited
if validator.exit_slot <= entry_exit_effect_slot(state.slot): if validator.exit_epoch <= get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(get_current_epoch(state)):
return return
validator.exit_slot = entry_exit_effect_slot(state.slot) validator.exit_epoch = get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(get_current_epoch(state))
state.validator_registry_exit_count += 1 state.validator_registry_exit_count += 1
validator.exit_count = state.validator_registry_exit_count validator.exit_count = state.validator_registry_exit_count
@ -1422,13 +1473,13 @@ def exit_validator(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex) -> None:
def penalize_validator(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex) -> None: def penalize_validator(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex) -> None:
exit_validator(state, index) exit_validator(state, index)
validator = state.validator_registry[index] validator = state.validator_registry[index]
state.latest_penalized_balances[(state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH] += get_effective_balance(state, index) state.latest_penalized_balances[get_current_epoch(state) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH] += get_effective_balance(state, index)
whistleblower_index = get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot) whistleblower_index = get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)
whistleblower_reward = get_effective_balance(state, index) // WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT whistleblower_reward = get_effective_balance(state, index) // WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
state.validator_balances[whistleblower_index] += whistleblower_reward state.validator_balances[whistleblower_index] += whistleblower_reward
state.validator_balances[index] -= whistleblower_reward state.validator_balances[index] -= whistleblower_reward
validator.penalized_slot = state.slot validator.penalized_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
``` ```
```python ```python
@ -1441,10 +1492,9 @@ def prepare_validator_for_withdrawal(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex)
Below are the processing steps that happen at every slot. Below are the processing steps that happen at every slot.
### Misc counters ### Slot
* Set `state.slot += 1`. * Set `state.slot += 1`.
* Set `state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = state.latest_randao_mixes[(state.slot - 1) % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH]`
### Block roots ### Block roots
@ -1464,13 +1514,13 @@ Below are the processing steps that happen at every `block`.
* Let `block_without_signature_root` be the `hash_tree_root` of `block` where `block.signature` is set to `EMPTY_SIGNATURE`. * Let `block_without_signature_root` be the `hash_tree_root` of `block` where `block.signature` is set to `EMPTY_SIGNATURE`.
* Let `proposal_root = hash_tree_root(ProposalSignedData(state.slot, BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER, block_without_signature_root))`. * Let `proposal_root = hash_tree_root(ProposalSignedData(state.slot, BEACON_CHAIN_SHARD_NUMBER, block_without_signature_root))`.
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)].pubkey, message=proposal_root, signature=block.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork, state.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`. * Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)].pubkey, message=proposal_root, signature=block.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork, get_current_epoch(state), DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`.
### RANDAO ### RANDAO
* Let `proposer = state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)]`. * Let `proposer = state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)]`.
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message=int_to_bytes32(state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH), signature=block.randao_reveal, domain=get_domain(state.fork, state.slot, DOMAIN_RANDAO))`. * Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message=int_to_bytes32(get_current_epoch(state)), signature=block.randao_reveal, domain=get_domain(state.fork, get_current_epoch(state), DOMAIN_RANDAO))`.
* Set `state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = xor(state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH], hash(block.randao_reveal))`. * Set `state.latest_randao_mixes[get_current_epoch(state) % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = xor(get_randao_mix(state, get_current_epoch(state)), hash(block.randao_reveal))`.
### Eth1 data ### Eth1 data
@ -1489,9 +1539,9 @@ For each `proposer_slashing` in `block.body.proposer_slashings`:
* Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.slot == proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.slot`. * Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.slot == proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.slot`.
* Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.shard == proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.shard`. * Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.shard == proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.shard`.
* Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.block_root != proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.block_root`. * Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.block_root != proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.block_root`.
* Verify that `proposer.penalized_slot > state.slot`. * Verify that `proposer.penalized_epoch > get_current_epoch(state)`.
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message=hash_tree_root(proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1), signature=proposer_slashing.proposal_signature_1, domain=get_domain(state.fork, proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`. * Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message=hash_tree_root(proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1), signature=proposer_slashing.proposal_signature_1, domain=get_domain(state.fork, slot_to_epoch(proposer_slashing.proposal_data_1.slot), DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`.
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message=hash_tree_root(proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2), signature=proposer_slashing.proposal_signature_2, domain=get_domain(state.fork, proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.slot, DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`. * Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message=hash_tree_root(proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2), signature=proposer_slashing.proposal_signature_2, domain=get_domain(state.fork, slot_to_epoch(proposer_slashing.proposal_data_2.slot), DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`.
* Run `penalize_validator(state, proposer_slashing.proposer_index)`. * Run `penalize_validator(state, proposer_slashing.proposer_index)`.
#### Casper slashings #### Casper slashings
@ -1509,7 +1559,7 @@ For each `casper_slashing` in `block.body.casper_slashings`:
* Verify that `is_double_vote(slashable_vote_data_1.data, slashable_vote_data_2.data)` or `is_surround_vote(slashable_vote_data_1.data, slashable_vote_data_2.data)`. * Verify that `is_double_vote(slashable_vote_data_1.data, slashable_vote_data_2.data)` or `is_surround_vote(slashable_vote_data_1.data, slashable_vote_data_2.data)`.
* Verify that `verify_slashable_vote_data(state, slashable_vote_data_1)`. * Verify that `verify_slashable_vote_data(state, slashable_vote_data_1)`.
* Verify that `verify_slashable_vote_data(state, slashable_vote_data_2)`. * Verify that `verify_slashable_vote_data(state, slashable_vote_data_2)`.
* For each [validator](#dfn-validator) index `i` in `intersection` run `penalize_validator(state, i)` if `state.validator_registry[i].penalized_slot > state.slot`. * For each [validator](#dfn-validator) index `i` in `intersection` run `penalize_validator(state, i)` if `state.validator_registry[i].penalized_epoch > get_current_epoch(state)`.
#### Attestations #### Attestations
@ -1519,13 +1569,13 @@ For each `attestation` in `block.body.attestations`:
* Verify that `attestation.data.slot + MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY <= state.slot`. * Verify that `attestation.data.slot + MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY <= state.slot`.
* Verify that `attestation.data.slot + EPOCH_LENGTH >= state.slot`. * Verify that `attestation.data.slot + EPOCH_LENGTH >= state.slot`.
* Verify that `attestation.data.justified_slot` is equal to `state.justified_slot if attestation.data.slot >= state.slot - (state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH) else state.previous_justified_slot`. * Verify that `attestation.data.justified_epoch` is equal to `state.justified_epoch if attestation.data.slot >= get_epoch_start_slot(get_current_epoch(state)) else state.previous_justified_epoch`.
* Verify that `attestation.data.justified_block_root` is equal to `get_block_root(state, attestation.data.justified_slot)`. * Verify that `attestation.data.justified_block_root` is equal to `get_block_root(state, get_epoch_start_slot(attestation.data.justified_epoch))`.
* Verify that either `attestation.data.latest_crosslink_root` or `attestation.data.shard_block_root` equals `state.latest_crosslinks[shard].shard_block_root`. * Verify that either `attestation.data.latest_crosslink_root` or `attestation.data.shard_block_root` equals `state.latest_crosslinks[shard].shard_block_root`.
* `aggregate_signature` verification: * `aggregate_signature` verification:
* Let `participants = get_attestation_participants(state, attestation.data, attestation.aggregation_bitfield)`. * Let `participants = get_attestation_participants(state, attestation.data, attestation.aggregation_bitfield)`.
* Let `group_public_key = bls_aggregate_pubkeys([state.validator_registry[v].pubkey for v in participants])`. * Let `group_public_key = bls_aggregate_pubkeys([state.validator_registry[v].pubkey for v in participants])`.
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=group_public_key, message=hash_tree_root(AttestationDataAndCustodyBit(attestation.data, False)), signature=attestation.aggregate_signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork, attestation.data.slot, DOMAIN_ATTESTATION))`. * Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=group_public_key, message=hash_tree_root(AttestationDataAndCustodyBit(attestation.data, False)), signature=attestation.aggregate_signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork, slot_to_epoch(attestation.data.slot), DOMAIN_ATTESTATION))`.
* [TO BE REMOVED IN PHASE 1] Verify that `attestation.data.shard_block_root == ZERO_HASH`. * [TO BE REMOVED IN PHASE 1] Verify that `attestation.data.shard_block_root == ZERO_HASH`.
* Append `PendingAttestation(data=attestation.data, aggregation_bitfield=attestation.aggregation_bitfield, custody_bitfield=attestation.custody_bitfield, slot_included=state.slot)` to `state.latest_attestations`. * Append `PendingAttestation(data=attestation.data, aggregation_bitfield=attestation.aggregation_bitfield, custody_bitfield=attestation.custody_bitfield, slot_included=state.slot)` to `state.latest_attestations`.
@ -1571,10 +1621,10 @@ Verify that `len(block.body.exits) <= MAX_EXITS`.
For each `exit` in `block.body.exits`: For each `exit` in `block.body.exits`:
* Let `validator = state.validator_registry[exit.validator_index]`. * Let `validator = state.validator_registry[exit.validator_index]`.
* Verify that `validator.exit_slot > entry_exit_effect_slot(state.slot)`. * Verify that `validator.exit_epoch > get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(get_current_epoch(state))`.
* Verify that `state.slot >= exit.slot`. * Verify that `get_current_epoch(state) >= exit.epoch`.
* Let `exit_message = hash_tree_root(Exit(slot=exit.slot, validator_index=exit.validator_index, signature=EMPTY_SIGNATURE))`. * Let `exit_message = hash_tree_root(Exit(epoch=exit.epoch, validator_index=exit.validator_index, signature=EMPTY_SIGNATURE))`.
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=validator.pubkey, message=exit_message, signature=exit.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork, exit.slot, DOMAIN_EXIT))`. * Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=validator.pubkey, message=exit_message, signature=exit.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork, exit.epoch, DOMAIN_EXIT))`.
* Run `initiate_validator_exit(state, exit.validator_index)`. * Run `initiate_validator_exit(state, exit.validator_index)`.
#### Custody #### Custody
@ -1583,34 +1633,35 @@ For each `exit` in `block.body.exits`:
## Per-epoch processing ## Per-epoch processing
The steps below happen when `state.slot % EPOCH_LENGTH == 0`. The steps below happen when `(state.slot + 1) % EPOCH_LENGTH == 0`.
### Helpers ### Helpers
All [validators](#dfn-validator): * Let `current_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)`.
* Let `previous_epoch = current_epoch - 1 if current_epoch > GENESIS_EPOCH else current_epoch`.
* Let `active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, state.slot)`. * Let `next_epoch = current_epoch + 1`.
* Let `total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices])`.
[Validators](#dfn-Validator) attesting during the current epoch: [Validators](#dfn-Validator) attesting during the current epoch:
* Let `current_epoch_attestations = [a for a in state.latest_attestations if state.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH <= a.data.slot < state.slot]`. (Note: this is the set of attestations of slots in the epoch `state.slot-EPOCH_LENGTH...state.slot-1`, _not_ attestations that got included in the chain during the epoch `state.slot-EPOCH_LENGTH...state.slot-1`.) * Let `current_total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, current_epoch)])`.
* Let `current_epoch_attestations = [a for a in state.latest_attestations if current_epoch == slot_to_epoch(a.data.slot)]`. (Note: this is the set of attestations of slots in the epoch `current_epoch`, _not_ attestations that got included in the chain during the epoch `current_epoch`.)
* Validators justifying the epoch boundary block at the start of the current epoch: * Validators justifying the epoch boundary block at the start of the current epoch:
* Let `current_epoch_boundary_attestations = [a for a in current_epoch_attestations if a.data.epoch_boundary_root == get_block_root(state, state.slot-EPOCH_LENGTH) and a.data.justified_slot == state.justified_slot]`. * Let `current_epoch_boundary_attestations = [a for a in current_epoch_attestations if a.data.epoch_boundary_root == get_block_root(state, get_epoch_start_slot(current_epoch)) and a.data.justified_epoch == state.justified_epoch]`.
* Let `current_epoch_boundary_attester_indices` be the union of the [validator](#dfn-validator) index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in current_epoch_boundary_attestations]`. * Let `current_epoch_boundary_attester_indices` be the union of the [validator](#dfn-validator) index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in current_epoch_boundary_attestations]`.
* Let `current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in current_epoch_boundary_attester_indices])`. * Let `current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in current_epoch_boundary_attester_indices])`.
[Validators](#dfn-Validator) attesting during the previous epoch: [Validators](#dfn-Validator) attesting during the previous epoch:
* Let `previous_total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, previous_epoch)])`.
* Validators that made an attestation during the previous epoch: * Validators that made an attestation during the previous epoch:
* Let `previous_epoch_attestations = [a for a in state.latest_attestations if state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH <= a.data.slot < state.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH]`. * Let `previous_epoch_attestations = [a for a in state.latest_attestations if previous_epoch == slot_to_epoch(a.data.slot)]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_attester_indices` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_attestations]`. * Let `previous_epoch_attester_indices` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_attestations]`.
* Validators targeting the previous justified slot: * Validators targeting the previous justified slot:
* Let `previous_epoch_justified_attestations = [a for a in current_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.data.justified_slot == state.previous_justified_slot]`. * Let `previous_epoch_justified_attestations = [a for a in current_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.data.justified_epoch == state.previous_justified_epoch]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_justified_attestations]`. * Let `previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_justified_attestations]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_justified_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices])`. * Let `previous_epoch_justified_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices])`.
* Validators justifying the epoch boundary block at the start of the previous epoch: * Validators justifying the epoch boundary block at the start of the previous epoch:
* Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attestations = [a for a in previous_epoch_justified_attestations if a.data.epoch_boundary_root == get_block_root(state, state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH)]`. * Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attestations = [a for a in previous_epoch_justified_attestations if a.data.epoch_boundary_root == get_block_root(state, get_epoch_start_slot(previous_epoch))]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_boundary_attestations]`. * Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_boundary_attestations]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices])`. * Let `previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices])`.
* Validators attesting to the expected beacon chain head during the previous epoch: * Validators attesting to the expected beacon chain head during the previous epoch:
@ -1618,9 +1669,9 @@ All [validators](#dfn-validator):
* Let `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_head_attestations]`. * Let `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices` be the union of the validator index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in previous_epoch_head_attestations]`.
* Let `previous_epoch_head_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_head_attester_indices])`. * Let `previous_epoch_head_attesting_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in previous_epoch_head_attester_indices])`.
**Note**: `previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance` balance might be marginally different than `current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance` during the previous epoch transition. Due to the tight bound on validator churn each epoch and small per-epoch rewards/penalties, the potential balance difference is very low and only marginally affects consensus safety. **Note**: `previous_total_balance` and `previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance` balance might be marginally different than the actual balances during previous epoch transition. Due to the tight bound on validator churn each epoch and small per-epoch rewards/penalties, the potential balance difference is very low and only marginally affects consensus safety.
For every `slot in range(state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH, state.slot)`, let `crosslink_committees_at_slot = get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state, slot)`. For every `(crosslink_committee, shard)` in `crosslink_committees_at_slot`, compute: For every `slot in range(get_epoch_start_slot(previous_epoch), get_epoch_start_slot(next_epoch))`, let `crosslink_committees_at_slot = get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state, slot)`. For every `(crosslink_committee, shard)` in `crosslink_committees_at_slot`, compute:
* Let `shard_block_root` be `state.latest_crosslinks[shard].shard_block_root` * Let `shard_block_root` be `state.latest_crosslinks[shard].shard_block_root`
* Let `attesting_validator_indices(crosslink_committee, shard_block_root)` be the union of the [validator](#dfn-validator) index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in current_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.data.shard == shard and a.data.shard_block_root == shard_block_root]`. * Let `attesting_validator_indices(crosslink_committee, shard_block_root)` be the union of the [validator](#dfn-validator) index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.aggregation_bitfield) for a in current_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.data.shard == shard and a.data.shard_block_root == shard_block_root]`.
@ -1636,35 +1687,43 @@ Define the following helpers to process attestation inclusion rewards and inclus
### Eth1 data ### Eth1 data
If `state.slot % ETH1_DATA_VOTING_PERIOD == 0`: If `next_epoch % ETH1_DATA_VOTING_PERIOD == 0`:
* Set `state.latest_eth1_data = eth1_data_vote.data` if `eth1_data_vote.vote_count * 2 > ETH1_DATA_VOTING_PERIOD` for some `eth1_data_vote` in `state.eth1_data_votes`. * If `eth1_data_vote.vote_count * 2 > ETH1_DATA_VOTING_PERIOD * EPOCH_LENGTH` for some `eth1_data_vote` in `state.eth1_data_votes` (ie. more than half the votes in this voting period were for that value), set `state.latest_eth1_data = eth1_data_vote.data`.
* Set `state.eth1_data_votes = []`. * Set `state.eth1_data_votes = []`.
### Justification ### Justification
* Set `state.previous_justified_slot = state.justified_slot`. First, update the justification bitfield:
* Set `state.justification_bitfield = (state.justification_bitfield * 2) % 2**64`.
* Set `state.justification_bitfield |= 2` and `state.justified_slot = state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH` if `3 * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >= 2 * total_balance`.
* Set `state.justification_bitfield |= 1` and `state.justified_slot = state.slot - 1 * EPOCH_LENGTH` if `3 * current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >= 2 * total_balance`.
Set `state.finalized_slot = state.previous_justified_slot` if any of the following are true: * Let `new_justified_epoch = state.justified_epoch`.
* Set `state.justification_bitfield = state.justification_bitfield << 1`.
* Set `state.justification_bitfield |= 2` and `new_justified_epoch = previous_epoch` if `3 * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >= 2 * previous_total_balance`.
* Set `state.justification_bitfield |= 1` and `new_justified_epoch = current_epoch` if `3 * current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance >= 2 * current_total_balance`.
* `state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 4 == 3` Next, update last finalized epoch if possible:
* `state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 3 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 8 == 7`
* `state.previous_justified_slot == state.slot - 4 * EPOCH_LENGTH and state.justification_bitfield % 16 in (15, 14)` * Set `state.finalized_epoch = state.previous_justified_epoch` if `(state.justification_bitfield >> 1) % 8 == 0b111 and state.previous_justified_epoch == previous_epoch - 2`.
* Set `state.finalized_epoch = state.previous_justified_epoch` if `(state.justification_bitfield >> 1) % 4 == 0b11 and state.previous_justified_epoch == previous_epoch - 1`.
* Set `state.finalized_epoch = state.justified_epoch` if `(state.justification_bitfield >> 0) % 8 == 0b111 and state.justified_epoch == previous_epoch - 1`.
* Set `state.finalized_epoch = state.justified_epoch` if `(state.justification_bitfield >> 0) % 4 == 0b11 and state.justified_epoch == previous_epoch`.
Finally, update the following:
* Set `state.previous_justified_epoch = state.justified_epoch`.
* Set `state.justified_epoch = new_justified_epoch`.
### Crosslinks ### Crosslinks
For every `slot in range(state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH, state.slot)`, let `crosslink_committees_at_slot = get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state, slot)`. For every `(crosslink_committee, shard)` in `crosslink_committees_at_slot`, compute: For every `slot in range(get_epoch_start_slot(previous_epoch), get_epoch_start_slot(next_epoch))`, let `crosslink_committees_at_slot = get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state, slot)`. For every `(crosslink_committee, shard)` in `crosslink_committees_at_slot`, compute:
* Set `state.latest_crosslinks[shard] = Crosslink(slot=state.slot, shard_block_root=winning_root(crosslink_committee))` if `3 * total_attesting_balance(crosslink_committee) >= 2 * total_balance(crosslink_committee)`. * Set `state.latest_crosslinks[shard] = Crosslink(epoch=current_epoch, shard_block_root=winning_root(crosslink_committee))` if `3 * total_attesting_balance(crosslink_committee) >= 2 * total_balance(crosslink_committee)`.
### Rewards and penalties ### Rewards and penalties
First, we define some additional helpers: First, we define some additional helpers:
* Let `base_reward_quotient = integer_squareroot(total_balance) // BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT`. * Let `base_reward_quotient = integer_squareroot(previous_total_balance) // BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT`.
* Let `base_reward(state, index) = get_effective_balance(state, index) // base_reward_quotient // 5` for any validator with the given `index`. * Let `base_reward(state, index) = get_effective_balance(state, index) // base_reward_quotient // 5` for any validator with the given `index`.
* Let `inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality) = base_reward(state, index) + get_effective_balance(state, index) * epochs_since_finality // INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT // 2` for any validator with the given `index`. * Let `inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality) = base_reward(state, index) + get_effective_balance(state, index) * epochs_since_finality // INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT // 2` for any validator with the given `index`.
@ -1672,18 +1731,18 @@ First, we define some additional helpers:
Note: When applying penalties in the following balance recalculations implementers should make sure the `uint64` does not underflow. Note: When applying penalties in the following balance recalculations implementers should make sure the `uint64` does not underflow.
* Let `epochs_since_finality = (state.slot - state.finalized_slot) // EPOCH_LENGTH`. * Let `epochs_since_finality = next_epoch - state.finalized_epoch`.
Case 1: `epochs_since_finality <= 4`: Case 1: `epochs_since_finality <= 4`:
* Expected FFG source: * Expected FFG source:
* Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices` gains `base_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_justified_attesting_balance // total_balance`. * Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices` gains `base_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_justified_attesting_balance // previous_total_balance`.
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `v` not in `previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index)`. * Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `v` not in `previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index)`.
* Expected FFG target: * Expected FFG target:
* Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices` gains `base_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance // total_balance`. * Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices` gains `base_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance // previous_total_balance`.
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index)`. * Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index)`.
* Expected beacon chain head: * Expected beacon chain head:
* Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices` gains `base_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_head_attesting_balance // total_balance)`. * Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices` gains `base_reward(state, index) * previous_epoch_head_attesting_balance // previous_total_balance)`.
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index)`. * Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index)`.
* Inclusion distance: * Inclusion distance:
* Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_attester_indices` gains `base_reward(state, index) * MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY // inclusion_distance(state, index)` * Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_attester_indices` gains `base_reward(state, index) * MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY // inclusion_distance(state, index)`
@ -1693,7 +1752,7 @@ Case 2: `epochs_since_finality > 4`:
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices`, loses `inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality)`. * Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_justified_attester_indices`, loses `inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality)`.
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices`, loses `inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality)`. * Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices`, loses `inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality)`.
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices`, loses `base_reward(state, index)`. * Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices`, loses `base_reward(state, index)`.
* Any [active_validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` with `validator.penalized_slot <= state.slot`, loses `2 * inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality) + base_reward(state, index)`. * Any [active_validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` with `validator.penalized_epoch <= current_epoch`, loses `2 * inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality) + base_reward(state, index)`.
* Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index) - base_reward(state, index) * MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY // inclusion_distance(state, index)` * Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index) - base_reward(state, index) * MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY // inclusion_distance(state, index)`
#### Attestation inclusion #### Attestation inclusion
@ -1702,8 +1761,10 @@ For each `index` in `previous_epoch_attester_indices`, we determine the proposer
#### Crosslinks #### Crosslinks
For every `slot in range(state.slot - 2 * EPOCH_LENGTH, state.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH)`, let `crosslink_committees_at_slot = get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state, slot)`. For every `(crosslink_committee, shard)` in `crosslink_committees_at_slot`, compute: For every `slot in range(get_epoch_start_slot(previous_epoch), get_epoch_start_slot(current_epoch))`:
* Let `crosslink_committees_at_slot = get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(state, slot)`.
* For every `(crosslink_committee, shard)` in `crosslink_committees_at_slot`:
* If `index in attesting_validators(crosslink_committee)`, `state.validator_balances[index] += base_reward(state, index) * total_attesting_balance(crosslink_committee) // total_balance(crosslink_committee))`. * If `index in attesting_validators(crosslink_committee)`, `state.validator_balances[index] += base_reward(state, index) * total_attesting_balance(crosslink_committee) // total_balance(crosslink_committee))`.
* If `index not in attesting_validators(crosslink_committee)`, `state.validator_balances[index] -= base_reward(state, index)`. * If `index not in attesting_validators(crosslink_committee)`, `state.validator_balances[index] -= base_reward(state, index)`.
@ -1717,7 +1778,7 @@ def process_ejections(state: BeaconState) -> None:
Iterate through the validator registry Iterate through the validator registry
and eject active validators with balance below ``EJECTION_BALANCE``. and eject active validators with balance below ``EJECTION_BALANCE``.
""" """
for index in get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, state.slot): for index in get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, current_epoch(state)):
if state.validator_balances[index] < EJECTION_BALANCE: if state.validator_balances[index] < EJECTION_BALANCE:
exit_validator(state, index) exit_validator(state, index)
``` ```
@ -1726,15 +1787,15 @@ def process_ejections(state: BeaconState) -> None:
First, update the following: First, update the following:
* Set `state.previous_epoch_calculation_slot = state.current_epoch_calculation_slot` * Set `state.previous_calculation_epoch = state.current_calculation_epoch`.
* Set `state.previous_epoch_start_shard = state.current_epoch_start_shard` * Set `state.previous_epoch_start_shard = state.current_epoch_start_shard`.
* Set `state.previous_epoch_seed = state.current_epoch_seed` * Set `state.previous_epoch_seed = state.current_epoch_seed`.
* Set `state.latest_index_roots[epoch % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH] = hash_tree_root(get_active_validator_indices(state, state.slot))` * Set `state.latest_index_roots[next_epoch % LATEST_INDEX_ROOTS_LENGTH] = hash_tree_root(get_active_validator_indices(state, next_epoch))`.
If the following are satisfied: If the following are satisfied:
* `state.finalized_slot > state.validator_registry_update_slot` * `state.finalized_epoch > state.validator_registry_update_epoch`
* `state.latest_crosslinks[shard].slot > state.validator_registry_update_slot` for every shard number `shard` in `[(state.current_epoch_start_shard + i) % SHARD_COUNT for i in range(get_current_epoch_committee_count_per_slot(state) * EPOCH_LENGTH)]` (that is, for every shard in the current committees) * `state.latest_crosslinks[shard].epoch > state.validator_registry_update_epoch` for every shard number `shard` in `[(state.current_epoch_start_shard + i) % SHARD_COUNT for i in range(get_current_epoch_committee_count(state))]` (that is, for every shard in the current committees)
update the validator registry and associated fields by running update the validator registry and associated fields by running
@ -1744,8 +1805,9 @@ def update_validator_registry(state: BeaconState) -> None:
Update validator registry. Update validator registry.
Note that this function mutates ``state``. Note that this function mutates ``state``.
""" """
current_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
# The active validators # The active validators
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, state.slot) active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, current_epoch)
# The total effective balance of active validators # The total effective balance of active validators
total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices]) total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices])
@ -1758,7 +1820,7 @@ def update_validator_registry(state: BeaconState) -> None:
# Activate validators within the allowable balance churn # Activate validators within the allowable balance churn
balance_churn = 0 balance_churn = 0
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry): for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
if validator.activation_slot > entry_exit_effect_slot(state.slot) and state.validator_balances[index] >= MAX_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT: if validator.activation_epoch > get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(current_epoch) and state.validator_balances[index] >= MAX_DEPOSIT_AMOUNT:
# Check the balance churn would be within the allowance # Check the balance churn would be within the allowance
balance_churn += get_effective_balance(state, index) balance_churn += get_effective_balance(state, index)
if balance_churn > max_balance_churn: if balance_churn > max_balance_churn:
@ -1770,7 +1832,7 @@ def update_validator_registry(state: BeaconState) -> None:
# Exit validators within the allowable balance churn # Exit validators within the allowable balance churn
balance_churn = 0 balance_churn = 0
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry): for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
if validator.exit_slot > entry_exit_effect_slot(state.slot) and validator.status_flags & INITIATED_EXIT: if validator.exit_epoch > get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(current_epoch) and validator.status_flags & INITIATED_EXIT:
# Check the balance churn would be within the allowance # Check the balance churn would be within the allowance
balance_churn += get_effective_balance(state, index) balance_churn += get_effective_balance(state, index)
if balance_churn > max_balance_churn: if balance_churn > max_balance_churn:
@ -1779,21 +1841,21 @@ def update_validator_registry(state: BeaconState) -> None:
# Exit validator # Exit validator
exit_validator(state, index) exit_validator(state, index)
state.validator_registry_update_slot = state.slot state.validator_registry_update_epoch = current_epoch
``` ```
and perform the following updates: and perform the following updates:
* Set `state.current_epoch_calculation_slot = state.slot` * Set `state.current_calculation_epoch = next_epoch`
* Set `state.current_epoch_start_shard = (state.current_epoch_start_shard + get_current_epoch_committee_count_per_slot(state) * EPOCH_LENGTH) % SHARD_COUNT` * Set `state.current_epoch_start_shard = (state.current_epoch_start_shard + get_current_epoch_committee_count(state)) % SHARD_COUNT`
* Set `state.current_epoch_seed = hash(get_randao_mix(state, state.current_epoch_calculation_slot - SEED_LOOKAHEAD) + get_active_index_root(state, state.current_epoch_calculation_slot))` * Set `state.current_epoch_seed = generate_seed(state, state.current_calculation_epoch)`
If a validator registry update does _not_ happen do the following: If a validator registry update does _not_ happen do the following:
* Let `epochs_since_last_registry_change = (state.slot - state.validator_registry_update_slot) // EPOCH_LENGTH`. * Let `epochs_since_last_registry_change = current_epoch - state.validator_registry_update_epoch`.
* If `epochs_since_last_registry_change` is an exact power of 2: * If `epochs_since_last_registry_change` is an exact power of 2:
* Set `state.current_epoch_calculation_slot = state.slot`. * Set `state.current_calculation_epoch = next_epoch`.
* Set `state.current_epoch_seed = hash(get_randao_mix(state, state.current_epoch_calculation_slot - SEED_LOOKAHEAD) + get_active_index_root(state, state.current_epoch_calculation_slot))`. * Set `state.current_epoch_seed = generate_seed(state, state.current_calculation_epoch)`
* _Note_ that `state.current_epoch_start_shard` is left unchanged. * _Note_ that `state.current_epoch_start_shard` is left unchanged.
**Invariant**: the active index root that is hashed into the shuffling seed actually is the `hash_tree_root` of the validator set that is used for that epoch. **Invariant**: the active index root that is hashed into the shuffling seed actually is the `hash_tree_root` of the validator set that is used for that epoch.
@ -1802,14 +1864,15 @@ Regardless of whether or not a validator set change happens, run the following:
```python ```python
def process_penalties_and_exits(state: BeaconState) -> None: def process_penalties_and_exits(state: BeaconState) -> None:
current_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
# The active validators # The active validators
active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, state.slot) active_validator_indices = get_active_validator_indices(state.validator_registry, current_epoch)
# The total effective balance of active validators # The total effective balance of active validators
total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices]) total_balance = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices])
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry): for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
if (state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH) == (validator.penalized_slot // EPOCH_LENGTH) + LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH // 2: if current_epoch == validator.penalized_epoch + LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH // 2:
e = (state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH e = current_epoch % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH
total_at_start = state.latest_penalized_balances[(e + 1) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH] total_at_start = state.latest_penalized_balances[(e + 1) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH]
total_at_end = state.latest_penalized_balances[e] total_at_end = state.latest_penalized_balances[e]
total_penalties = total_at_end - total_at_start total_penalties = total_at_end - total_at_start
@ -1818,11 +1881,11 @@ def process_penalties_and_exits(state: BeaconState) -> None:
def eligible(index): def eligible(index):
validator = state.validator_registry[index] validator = state.validator_registry[index]
if validator.penalized_slot <= state.slot: if validator.penalized_epoch <= current_epoch:
penalized_withdrawal_time = LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH * EPOCH_LENGTH // 2 penalized_withdrawal_epochs = LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH // 2
return state.slot >= validator.penalized_slot + penalized_withdrawal_time return current_epoch >= validator.penalized_epoch + penalized_withdrawal_epochs
else: else:
return state.slot >= validator.exit_slot + MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWAL_TIME return current_epoch >= validator.exit_epoch + MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWAL_EPOCHS
all_indices = list(range(len(state.validator_registry))) all_indices = list(range(len(state.validator_registry)))
eligible_indices = filter(eligible, all_indices) eligible_indices = filter(eligible, all_indices)
@ -1837,9 +1900,9 @@ def process_penalties_and_exits(state: BeaconState) -> None:
### Final updates ### Final updates
* Let `epoch = state.slot // EPOCH_LENGTH`. * Set `state.latest_penalized_balances[(next_epoch) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH] = state.latest_penalized_balances[current_epoch % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH]`.
* Set `state.latest_penalized_balances[(epoch+1) % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH] = state.latest_penalized_balances[epoch % LATEST_PENALIZED_EXIT_LENGTH]`. * Set `state.latest_randao_mixes[next_epoch % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = get_randao_mix(state, current_epoch)`.
* Remove any `attestation` in `state.latest_attestations` such that `attestation.data.slot < state.slot - EPOCH_LENGTH`. * Remove any `attestation` in `state.latest_attestations` such that `slot_to_epoch(attestation.data.slot) < current_epoch`.
## State root processing ## State root processing