status-im
/
eth2.0-specs
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/eth2.0-specs.git
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

simplify total_attesting_balance

This commit is contained in:
terence tsao 2018-12-20 06:37:03 -08:00 committed by GitHub
parent e780be349e
commit 96633781fb
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
specs/core/0_beacon-chain.md
View File

@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@ For every `shard_committee` in `state.shard_committees_at_slots`:
* Let `attesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, shard_block_root)` be the union of the [validator](#dfn-validator) index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in this_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.shard == shard_committee.shard and a.shard_block_root == shard_block_root]`. * Let `attesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, shard_block_root)` be the union of the [validator](#dfn-validator) index sets given by `[get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield) for a in this_epoch_attestations + previous_epoch_attestations if a.shard == shard_committee.shard and a.shard_block_root == shard_block_root]`.
* Let `winning_root(shard_committee)` be equal to the value of `shard_block_root` such that `sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in attesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, shard_block_root)])` is maximized (ties broken by favoring lower `shard_block_root` values). * Let `winning_root(shard_committee)` be equal to the value of `shard_block_root` such that `sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in attesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, shard_block_root)])` is maximized (ties broken by favoring lower `shard_block_root` values).
* Let `attesting_validators(shard_committee)` be equal to `attesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, winning_root(shard_committee))` for convenience. * Let `attesting_validators(shard_committee)` be equal to `attesting_validator_indices(shard_committee, winning_root(shard_committee))` for convenience.
* Let `total_attesting_balance(shard_committee)` be the sum of the balances-at-stake of `attesting_validators(shard_committee)`. * Let `total_attesting_balance(shard_committee) = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in attesting_validators(shard_committee)])`.
* Let `total_balance(shard_committee) = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in shard_committee.committee])`. * Let `total_balance(shard_committee) = sum([get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in shard_committee.committee])`.
* Let `inclusion_slot(state, index) = a.slot_included` for the attestation `a` where `index` is in `get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield)`. * Let `inclusion_slot(state, index) = a.slot_included` for the attestation `a` where `index` is in `get_attestation_participants(state, a.data, a.participation_bitfield)`.
* Let `inclusion_distance(state, index) = a.slot_included - a.data.slot` where `a` is the above attestation. * Let `inclusion_distance(state, index) = a.slot_included - a.data.slot` where `a` is the above attestation.