note v5.1 in discv5 p2p spec
This commit is contained in:
parent
df23a95a26
commit
8cda237884
|
@ -54,8 +54,6 @@ It consists of four main sections:
|
|||
- [ENR structure](#enr-structure)
|
||||
- [Attestation subnet bitfield](#attestation-subnet-bitfield)
|
||||
- [`eth2` field](#eth2-field)
|
||||
- [General capabilities](#general-capabilities)
|
||||
- [Topic advertisement](#topic-advertisement)
|
||||
- [Design decision rationale](#design-decision-rationale)
|
||||
- [Transport](#transport-1)
|
||||
- [Why are we defining specific transports?](#why-are-we-defining-specific-transports)
|
||||
|
@ -846,13 +844,11 @@ The response MUST consist of a single `response_chunk`.
|
|||
|
||||
## The discovery domain: discv5
|
||||
|
||||
Discovery Version 5 ([discv5](https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/discv5/discv5.md)) is used for peer discovery.
|
||||
Discovery Version 5 ([discv5](https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/discv5/discv5.md)) (Protocol version v5.1) is used for peer discovery.
|
||||
|
||||
`discv5` is a standalone protocol, running on UDP on a dedicated port, meant for peer discovery only.
|
||||
`discv5` supports self-certified, flexible peer records (ENRs) and topic-based advertisement, both of which are (or will be) requirements in this context.
|
||||
|
||||
:warning: Under construction. :warning:
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration into libp2p stacks
|
||||
|
||||
`discv5` SHOULD be integrated into the client’s libp2p stack by implementing an adaptor
|
||||
|
@ -935,19 +931,6 @@ Clients MAY connect to peers with the same `fork_digest` but a different `next_f
|
|||
Unless `ENRForkID` is manually updated to matching prior to the earlier `next_fork_epoch` of the two clients,
|
||||
these connecting clients will be unable to successfully interact starting at the earlier `next_fork_epoch`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### General capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
ENRs MUST include a structure enumerating the capabilities offered by the peer in an efficient manner.
|
||||
The concrete solution is currently undefined.
|
||||
Proposals include using namespaced bloom filters mapping capabilities to specific protocol IDs supported under that capability.
|
||||
|
||||
### Topic advertisement
|
||||
|
||||
discv5's topic advertisement feature is not expected to be ready for mainnet launch of Phase 0.
|
||||
|
||||
Once this feature is built out and stable, we expect to use topic advertisement as a rendezvous facility for peers on shards.
|
||||
Until then, the ENR [attestation subnet bitfield](#attestation-subnet-bitfield) will be used for discovery of peers on particular subnets.
|
||||
|
||||
# Design decision rationale
|
||||
|
||||
## Transport
|
||||
|
@ -1408,7 +1391,7 @@ discv5 supports self-certified, flexible peer records (ENRs) and topic-based adv
|
|||
On the other hand, libp2p Kademlia DHT is a fully-fledged DHT protocol/implementations
|
||||
with content routing and storage capabilities, both of which are irrelevant in this context.
|
||||
|
||||
We assume that Eth 1.0 nodes will evolve to support discv5.
|
||||
Eth 1.0 nodes will evolve to support discv5.
|
||||
By sharing the discovery network between Eth 1.0 and 2.0,
|
||||
we benefit from the additive effect on network size that enhances resilience and resistance against certain attacks,
|
||||
to which smaller networks are more vulnerable.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue