status-im
/
eth2.0-specs
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/eth2.0-specs.git
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

clean up

This commit is contained in:
Danny Ryan 2019-02-21 16:58:58 -07:00
parent f28af3f72b
commit 8169229f5a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 2765A792E42CE07A
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
specs/validator/0_beacon-chain-validator.md
View File

@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ There are three possibilities for the shuffling at the next epoch:
Either (2) or (3) occurs if (1) fails. The choice between (2) and (3) is deterministic based upon `epochs_since_last_registry_update`. Either (2) or (3) occurs if (1) fails. The choice between (2) and (3) is deterministic based upon `epochs_since_last_registry_update`.
`get_crosslink_committees_at_slot` is designed to be able to query slots in the next epoch. When querying slots in the next epoch there are two options -- with and without a `registry_change` -- which is the optional third parameter of the function. The `get_committee_assignment` helper can be used to get the potential crosslink committee assignments in the next epoch for a given `validator_index` and `registry_change`. When querying for assignments in the next epoch there are two options -- with and without a `registry_change` -- which is the optional fourth parameter of the `get_committee_assignment`.
`get_committee_assignment` should be called at the start of each epoch to get the assignment for the next epoch (`current_epoch + 1`). A validator should always plan for assignments from both values of `registry_change` unless the validator can concretely eliminate one of the options. Planning for future assignments involves noting at which future slot one might have to attest and propose and also which shard one should begin syncing (in phase 1+). `get_committee_assignment` should be called at the start of each epoch to get the assignment for the next epoch (`current_epoch + 1`). A validator should always plan for assignments from both values of `registry_change` unless the validator can concretely eliminate one of the options. Planning for future assignments involves noting at which future slot one might have to attest and propose and also which shard one should begin syncing (in phase 1+).