Fix #223
`next_start_shard` does not need to be part of `state` (it's already available via `(state.shard_committees_at_slots[-1][-1].shard + 1) % SHARD_COUNT`)
This commit is contained in:
parent
67e4fa9d6f
commit
73e77b75e1
|
@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ And perform the following updates to the `state`:
|
|||
|
||||
* Set `state.validator_registry_latest_change_slot = s + EPOCH_LENGTH`.
|
||||
* Set `state.shard_committees_at_slots[:EPOCH_LENGTH] = state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:]`.
|
||||
* Let `state.next_start_shard = (state.shard_committees_at_slots[-1][-1].shard + 1) % SHARD_COUNT`.
|
||||
* Let `next_start_shard = (state.shard_committees_at_slots[-1][-1].shard + 1) % SHARD_COUNT`.
|
||||
* Set `state.shard_committees_at_slots[EPOCH_LENGTH:] = get_new_shuffling(state.next_seed, state.validator_registry, next_start_shard)`.
|
||||
* Set `state.next_seed = state.randao_mix`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue