Merge pull request #3628 from mehdi-aouadi/eip-7549-onchain-aggregation
EIP-7549 Clarify network vs on chain aggregation
This commit is contained in:
commit
68dceb7cda
|
@ -26,7 +26,24 @@
|
|||
|
||||
##### Attestations
|
||||
|
||||
Attestations received from aggregators with disjoint `committee_bits` sets and equal `AttestationData` SHOULD be consolidated into a single `Attestation` object.
|
||||
The network attestation aggregates contain only the assigned committee attestations.
|
||||
Attestation aggregates received by the block proposer from the committee aggregators with disjoint `committee_bits` sets and equal `AttestationData` SHOULD be consolidated into a single `Attestation` object.
|
||||
The proposer should run the following function to construct an on chain final aggregate form a list of network aggregates with equal `AttestationData`:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def compute_on_chain_aggregate(network_aggregates: List[Attestation]) -> Attestation:
|
||||
aggregates = sorted(network_aggregates, key=lambda a: get_committee_indices(a.committee_bits)[0])
|
||||
|
||||
data = aggregates[0].data
|
||||
aggregation_bits = [a.aggregation_bits[0] for a in aggregates]
|
||||
signature = bls.Aggregate([a.signature for a in aggregates])
|
||||
|
||||
committee_indices = [get_committee_indices(a.committee_bits)[0] for a in aggregates]
|
||||
committee_flags = [(index in committee_indices) for index in range(0, MAX_COMMITTEES_PER_SLOT)]
|
||||
committee_bits = Bitvector[MAX_COMMITTEES_PER_SLOT](committee_flags)
|
||||
|
||||
return Attestation(aggregation_bits, data, committee_bits, signature)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Attesting
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue