fix typo: same condition, but non-aggregate attestation here

This commit is contained in:
protolambda 2021-01-16 22:48:22 +01:00
parent f73189c30f
commit 65696ca68b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: EC89FDBB2B4C7623
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `attestation` on the s
- _[REJECT]_ The signature of `attestation` is valid.
- _[IGNORE]_ The block being voted for (`attestation.data.beacon_block_root`) has been seen
(via both gossip and non-gossip sources)
(a client MAY queue aggregates for processing once block is retrieved).
(a client MAY queue attestations for processing once block is retrieved).
- _[REJECT]_ The block being voted for (`attestation.data.beacon_block_root`) passes validation.
- _[REJECT]_ The attestation's target block is an ancestor of the block named in the LMD vote -- i.e.
`get_ancestor(store, attestation.data.beacon_block_root, compute_start_slot_at_epoch(attestation.data.target.epoch)) == attestation.data.target.root`