Merge pull request #1627 from ethereum/hysteris-fix
adjust hysteresis to avoid initial over-deposit incentive
This commit is contained in:
commit
5e1fb79a8e
|
@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ SHUFFLE_ROUND_COUNT: 90
|
|||
MIN_GENESIS_ACTIVE_VALIDATOR_COUNT: 16384
|
||||
# Jan 3, 2020
|
||||
MIN_GENESIS_TIME: 1578009600
|
||||
# 4
|
||||
HYSTERESIS_QUOTIENT: 4
|
||||
# 1 (minus 0.25)
|
||||
HYSTERESIS_DOWNWARD_MULTIPLIER: 1
|
||||
# 5 (plus 1.25)
|
||||
HYSTERESIS_UPWARD_MULTIPLIER: 5
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Fork Choice
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ SHUFFLE_ROUND_COUNT: 10
|
|||
MIN_GENESIS_ACTIVE_VALIDATOR_COUNT: 64
|
||||
# Jan 3, 2020
|
||||
MIN_GENESIS_TIME: 1578009600
|
||||
# 4
|
||||
HYSTERESIS_QUOTIENT: 4
|
||||
# 1 (minus 0.25)
|
||||
HYSTERESIS_DOWNWARD_MULTIPLIER: 1
|
||||
# 5 (plus 1.25)
|
||||
HYSTERESIS_UPWARD_MULTIPLIER: 5
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Fork Choice
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ The following values are (non-configurable) constants used throughout the specif
|
|||
| `SHUFFLE_ROUND_COUNT` | `90` |
|
||||
| `MIN_GENESIS_ACTIVE_VALIDATOR_COUNT` | `2**14` (= 16,384) |
|
||||
| `MIN_GENESIS_TIME` | `1578009600` (Jan 3, 2020) |
|
||||
| `HYSTERESIS_QUOTIENT` | `4` |
|
||||
| `HYSTERESIS_DOWNWARD_MULTIPLIER` | `1` |
|
||||
| `HYSTERESIS_UPWARD_MULTIPLIER` | `5` |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- For the safety of committees, `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE` exceeds [the recommended minimum committee size of 111](http://web.archive.org/web/20190504131341/https://vitalik.ca/files/Ithaca201807_Sharding.pdf); with sufficient active validators (at least `SLOTS_PER_EPOCH * TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE`), the shuffling algorithm ensures committee sizes of at least `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE`. (Unbiasable randomness with a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) will improve committee robustness and lower the safe minimum committee size.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1402,8 +1406,13 @@ def process_final_updates(state: BeaconState) -> None:
|
|||
# Update effective balances with hysteresis
|
||||
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validators):
|
||||
balance = state.balances[index]
|
||||
HALF_INCREMENT = EFFECTIVE_BALANCE_INCREMENT // 2
|
||||
if balance < validator.effective_balance or validator.effective_balance + 3 * HALF_INCREMENT < balance:
|
||||
HYSTERESIS_INCREMENT = EFFECTIVE_BALANCE_INCREMENT // HYSTERESIS_QUOTIENT
|
||||
DOWNWARD_THRESHOLD = HYSTERESIS_INCREMENT * HYSTERESIS_DOWNWARD_MULTIPLIER
|
||||
UPWARD_THRESHOLD = HYSTERESIS_INCREMENT * HYSTERESIS_UPWARD_MULTIPLIER
|
||||
if (
|
||||
balance + DOWNWARD_THRESHOLD < validator.effective_balance
|
||||
or validator.effective_balance + UPWARD_THRESHOLD < balance
|
||||
):
|
||||
validator.effective_balance = min(balance - balance % EFFECTIVE_BALANCE_INCREMENT, MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE)
|
||||
# Reset slashings
|
||||
state.slashings[next_epoch % EPOCHS_PER_SLASHINGS_VECTOR] = Gwei(0)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -51,19 +51,25 @@ def test_effective_balance_hysteresis(spec, state):
|
|||
max = spec.MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
|
||||
min = spec.EJECTION_BALANCE
|
||||
inc = spec.EFFECTIVE_BALANCE_INCREMENT
|
||||
half_inc = inc // 2
|
||||
div = spec.HYSTERESIS_QUOTIENT
|
||||
hys_inc = inc // div
|
||||
down = spec.HYSTERESIS_DOWNWARD_MULTIPLIER
|
||||
up = spec.HYSTERESIS_UPWARD_MULTIPLIER
|
||||
cases = [
|
||||
(max, max, max, "as-is"),
|
||||
(max, max - 1, max - inc, "round down, step lower"),
|
||||
(max, max - 1, max, "round up"),
|
||||
(max, max + 1, max, "round down"),
|
||||
(max, max - down * hys_inc, max, "lower balance, but not low enough"),
|
||||
(max, max - down * hys_inc - 1, max - inc, "lower balance, step down"),
|
||||
(max, max + (up * hys_inc) + 1, max, "already at max, as is"),
|
||||
(max, max - inc, max - inc, "exactly 1 step lower"),
|
||||
(max, max - inc - 1, max - (2 * inc), "just 1 over 1 step lower"),
|
||||
(max, max - inc - 1, max - (2 * inc), "past 1 step lower, double step"),
|
||||
(max, max - inc + 1, max - inc, "close to 1 step lower"),
|
||||
(min, min + (half_inc * 3), min, "bigger balance, but not high enough"),
|
||||
(min, min + (half_inc * 3) + 1, min + inc, "bigger balance, high enough, but small step"),
|
||||
(min, min + (half_inc * 4) - 1, min + inc, "bigger balance, high enough, close to double step"),
|
||||
(min, min + (half_inc * 4), min + (2 * inc), "exact two step balance increment"),
|
||||
(min, min + (half_inc * 4) + 1, min + (2 * inc), "over two steps, round down"),
|
||||
(min, min + (hys_inc * up), min, "bigger balance, but not high enough"),
|
||||
(min, min + (hys_inc * up) + 1, min + inc, "bigger balance, high enough, but small step"),
|
||||
(min, min + (hys_inc * div * 2) - 1, min + inc, "bigger balance, high enough, close to double step"),
|
||||
(min, min + (hys_inc * div * 2), min + (2 * inc), "exact two step balance increment"),
|
||||
(min, min + (hys_inc * div * 2) + 1, min + (2 * inc), "over two steps, round down"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
current_epoch = spec.get_current_epoch(state)
|
||||
for i, (pre_eff, bal, _, _) in enumerate(cases):
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue