Add transition test case of non-empty pre-state `historical_roots`
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6d214df2d
commit
4fe36dec58
|
@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ def is_partially_withdrawable_validator(validator: Validator, balance: Gwei) ->
|
|||
|
||||
### Epoch processing
|
||||
|
||||
*Note*: The function `process_historical_summaries_update` replaces `process_historical_roots_update` in Bellatrix.
|
||||
*Note*: The function `process_historical_summaries_update` replaces `process_historical_roots_update` in Capella.
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def process_epoch(state: BeaconState) -> None:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -418,3 +418,37 @@ def test_transition_with_no_attestations_until_after_fork(state, fork_epoch, spe
|
|||
|
||||
yield "blocks", blocks
|
||||
yield "post", state
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@with_fork_metas([ForkMeta(pre_fork_name=pre, post_fork_name=post, fork_epoch=2) for pre, post in ALL_PRE_POST_FORKS])
|
||||
def test_non_empty_historical_roots(state, fork_epoch, spec, post_spec, pre_tag, post_tag):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test with non-empty pre-state `state.historical_roots`.
|
||||
|
||||
Since Capella froze `historical_roots`, Capealla spec doesn't invoke `process_historical_roots_update` anymore.
|
||||
Therefore, we need to fill in `historical_roots` with non-empty value.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# fill in historical_roots with non-empty values
|
||||
pre_historical_roots = [b'\x56' * 32 for _ in range(spec.SLOTS_PER_HISTORICAL_ROOT)]
|
||||
state.historical_roots = pre_historical_roots
|
||||
|
||||
transition_until_fork(spec, state, fork_epoch)
|
||||
# check pre state
|
||||
assert spec.get_current_epoch(state) < fork_epoch
|
||||
assert len(state.historical_roots) > 0
|
||||
|
||||
yield "pre", state
|
||||
|
||||
# irregular state transition to handle fork:
|
||||
blocks = []
|
||||
state, block = do_fork(state, spec, post_spec, fork_epoch)
|
||||
blocks.append(post_tag(block))
|
||||
|
||||
# continue regular state transition with new spec into next epoch
|
||||
transition_to_next_epoch_and_append_blocks(post_spec, state, post_tag, blocks, only_last_block=True)
|
||||
|
||||
yield "blocks", blocks
|
||||
yield "post", state
|
||||
|
||||
assert len(state.historical_roots) > 0
|
||||
assert state.historical_roots == pre_historical_roots
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ Clients should assume forks happen sequentially in the following manner:
|
|||
0. `phase0`
|
||||
1. `altair`
|
||||
2. `bellatrix`
|
||||
3. `capella`
|
||||
4. `deneb`
|
||||
|
||||
For example, if a test case has `post_fork` of `altair`, the test consumer should assume the test begins in `phase0` and use that specification to process the initial state and any blocks up until the fork epoch. After the fork happens, the test consumer should use the specification according to the `altair` fork to process the remaining data.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue